The Biden administration was on display this week refusing to comment on the recent filing by Special Counsel John Durham, that reveals how Hillary Clinton used the Obama-Biden administration to spy on candidate and then President Donald Trump. Gee, I wonder why?
During a presser on Monday, White House Deputy mouthpiece Karine Jean-Pierre was asked by a reporter if President Biden believes it is appropriate to “infiltrate” [hack] computer servers of a political opponent to create a false narrative against him. They call it an infiltration because the tech firm that was hired to do the dirty work of Clinton used credentials they had from past legitimate work on those servers. It’s still hacking, but the Special Counsel wants to make that distinction.
Jean-Pierre did not answer that question, but passed the buck instead.
The question came after Durham discovered that Hillary Clinton hired political operatives who hired technology experts to manufacture a fabricated connection between Donald Trump and Russia. This was initially to get her private email server off the front pages of the news, but it was much more involved than that.
John Ratcliffe, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) has said that based on the intelligence documents that he handed over to the Durham investigation, he believes we will see more indictments as the investigation goes on.
On Monday, the former DNI explained during an appearance on Fox News how he met with Durham in 2020 to give him the intelligence documents he had concerning the origins of the Russia collusion hoax.
Interesting exchange here.
Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer wonders if the Durham filing's mention of "infiltrate" means there was "hacking" of computers, only for John Ratcliffe to admit that this was actually "lawful access into government servers" by the tech company involved. pic.twitter.com/LKwEiEjTJc
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) February 14, 2022
Ratcliffe told Fox News that he had given Durham a CIA document that proves Hillary Clinton approved of the Russia hoax operation in 2016 in an effort to get the focus off of her illegal private email server and her Benghazi scandal where she and President Obama left Americans behind to die. Does this mean that the perpetual grump, John Brennan, the former CIA chief, knew all along that the whole thing was a hoax?
I believe everyone involved working to help Hillary knew it was a hoax. I think the DNC got some internal polling done, and they realized that Hillary was in serious trouble with the election. I think with that devastating news, Hillary set out to trash Trump to help her campaign. Hillary had no appealing message for the American people. She didn’t have a real economic policy, and Trump did, so instead of saying “Vote for me because I’m going to do X, Y, and Z for you!” she said, “Don’t vote for that guy, because he’s a Russian puppet.”
Ratcliffe’s comments came after Durham found Clinton hired operatives to infiltrate Trump Tower servers to fake a connection between Trump and Russia. Among other things, they planted phony data in server logs at the Trump Tower to make it appear that the Trump Organization was communicating secretly with Alfa Bank, a Russian bank with ties to the Kremlin.
“So what John Durham pleading talks about is that Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, Michael Sussmann, took this information from the tech executives and pitched it to the FBI as evidence of Trump-Russia connections that simply weren’t true,” stated the former Director of National Intelligence. “And that the lawyer, Michael Sussmann, and the tech executive knew not to be true.”
Ratcliffe added that Clinton and her cop-conspirators are guilty of participating in a criminal conspiracy and they could face indictments in the near future. I think the whole operation was the first coup attempt in our nation’s history and a lot of people need to be held accountable in order for the American people to even begin to grow faith in their government again.