Eric Bolling Walks Off Explosive Interview When Other Guest Accuses Him off Faking Concern For Black Communities [VIDEO]

Eric Bolling Walks Off Explosive Interview When Other Guest Accuses Him off Faking Concern For Black Communities [VIDEO]

This story is the height of racism. When people use racism as a weapon when there is no racism to be found, they’re being racist. When people throw out accusations of racism without sufficient evidence, they’re a piece of garbage.

Media political and financial commentator Eric Bolling shut down an interview he was doing on the BBC on Wednesday when another guest who was on with him simultaneously said he was faking his concern for black communities.

Bolling suddenly left an interview by walking off camera with BBC’s “Newsnight” after the other guest, political commentator, and racial agitator Aisha Mills said that his concern for black communities wasn’t real.

The two of them were discussing Georgia’s new voting law as well as Major League Baseball’s (MLB) decision to pull the All-Star Game from Atlanta and moving it to Denver, Colorado, as a punishment to Atlanta over the new law.

Bolling pointed out that the MLB’s decision to pull the game from Atlanta hurt minorities, including minority-owned businesses. Bolling was responding to how the Democrats made the issue racial from the minute Governor Kemp signed the bill into law.

Atlanta is 51% black, therefore many businesses in the Atlanta surrounding area have to be black-owned. The potential for $100 million of revenues from the game was taken away from Atlanta businesses. The point Bolling was trying to make was that the MLB was pressured by Stacey Abrams and others to move the gave upon a threat that they would get MLB players to boycott games if they didn’t. Imagine that every game. Bolling pointed out that the MLB’s decision, which they claimed in a statement was based on the new voting law hurting black voters, actually hurt black people by killing the $100 million in revenues and gave it all to a city that is about 91% white.

Bolling is a financial guy. It’s one of the things he does for a living. He is qualified to talk about this subject.

Mills started out referring to what Bolling said as rubbish.

“Well, first of all let me just go back and address the rubbish that was just said, you know, this attack on liberals and boycotts, as if, um, somehow one holding corporations accountable, uh, is a problem…” Mills said.

WATCH:

Here is the problem with the asinine logic of what she said. First off, it wasn’t Major League Baseball that added voter integrity laws to Georgia law. They are about baseball. The same goes for Delta Wokelines, Woka Cola, and other businesses that cowered in the face of race-baiters like Mills, Stacey Abrams, Al Sharpton, LeBron James, and others. Those corporations didn’t act irresponsibly at all, so there was nothing they had to be held accountable over. That part was all made up by lying leftists like Aisha Mills.

So are we to believe that established corporations are now supposed to just get up and move out of a jurisdiction that the Woke Supremacy deems a problem for whatever is the issue of the month and they just happen to be unfortunate enough to be nearby? That would be a hell of an economic boom for U-Haul. But then again, U-Haul may have to up and haul ass out of Pheonix, Arizona if some Woke Supremacist race hustler wets their pants during a temper tantrum over something that has nothing to do with renting a moving truck.

Aisha Mills and her ilk are dividing our country based on racial sophistry.

During the exchange, Mills said, “I think it’s really rich for any Republican — especially a white man — to run around and claim they care about the economic condition of black communities and black businesses when that’s all a lie.”

“Especially a white man?” How racist is that? Eric said nothing out of line, not even coming close. But this is how it is today. Black race-baiters feel that they can say anything they want regardless of it being racist to make their point. They all have the same self-righteousness about them as if the world owes them something. It’s called Black Woke Privilege and it’s just as dangerous to the civil society as the gibberish rhetoric of white nationalists.

Bolling shot back, “That is not fair! You don’t know me. You don’t know who I am.”

Mills threw a “how dare you” at him while turning herself into a racial victim, claiming Bolling was only showing empathy for black people to create a wedge.

“I am … a black person in America,” Mills said. “Everything that these voting laws stand for … is all about racial discrimination. How dare you try to act like you are somehow a proponent of black people and businesses just to make a point and try to create a wedge? It’s ignorant, and it’s disrespectful.”

Did you catch her bizarre leap in logic? Mills was saying that being a white person, Bolling would not normally show empathy for black people or black-owned businesses and that he only mentioned how a majority-black city got screwed out of $100 million in revenues by MLB’s decision just to stir up racial problems in the country and create a wedge between racial groups.

That’s nuts. Who thinks like that? A sick person, a racist nut job who wears race on their sleeve, that’s who.

At that point, Bolling had enough and shot back, “That’s disgusting. I’m done. Put me off. That’s disgusting. I am nowhere near anything you are painting me to be, and the problem with American politics is exactly that. Because I’m white, you think I’m racist? That’s BS! I’m done.”

As Bolling moved to leave the interview, “Newsnight” host Emily Maitlis asked if he would remain for a question.

Bolling sat back down saying, “I don’t know why I’m staying here.” He followed up saying, “I need an apology.”

Mills fired back, “I’m not going to apologize for being offended.”

Can you believe this crazy woman? SHE was the one who was offended! She fabricated what she claimed to be offended about.

Folks, this is why I am believing more and more every day that this country is divided so badly it will never come together again. I don’t believe the country is divided by race. I believe we are divided by ideology and it is the Left’s decision to be this divided. They are the ones who use cancel culture, racial sophistry, and reverse racism disguised as righteous indignation. When you have people who are capable of making up disgusting things about other people out of whole cloth, knowing they can do it with impunity, and they share absolutely no values with anyone outside of their political ideology, how can you go on as a society? You cannot. Decent people of all walks of life, all races, colors, and creeds do not live this way, they do not think this way. And the decent people among us have absolutely nothing in common with the Woke Supremacy of the leftists.

After adding insult to injury Bolling finalized his intentions saying, “I’m done” and he walked off not to return.

Clarence Thomas Says The Days of Blocking Free Speech on Social Media May Be Numbered

Clarence Thomas Says The Days of Blocking Free Speech on Social Media May Be Numbered

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas lifted eyebrows over a statement he made that appears to warn social media companies that their power to censor speech they don’t like might be diminished sometime soon.

Thomas gave his thoughts in comments he made in a 12-page concurrent opinion on a Supreme Court ruling that considered whether former President Donald Trump had acted unconstitutionally when he blocked several people from following his now-banned Twitter account. In fact, because the account was banned, the lawsuit was ruled moot.

Thomas deliberated that the argument made by the plaintiffs was undermined because Trump’s social media accounts were later suspended by numerous social media platforms. This was when the tech tyrants went Woke and started censoring people who were not Woke.

The Justice then wondered whether the social media companies found themselves in violation of free speech rights when they censored the use of their platforms.

“Today’s digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors. Also unprecedented, however, is control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties,” Thomas wrote in his opinion. “We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.”

It has begun. Finally, a learned Constitutional mind is getting involved in the unfair practices of Big Tech. He had better hire a food taster because the Woke Supremacy wants to conquer the country and the number one way all socialist supremacies throughout history have accomplished this was to silence the opposition. In this case, they will want to silence Justice Thomas.

Justice Thomas considered if social media tech companies should continue to receive an exemption from liability in the now-famous Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Publishers do not get such an exemption from liability. What this means is that a publisher has to watch what is posted on their website because they could be sued if they say something inaccurate or if they libel someone in their content. This is why I cannot write an article and post it on the New York times website. They are a publisher and they decide what goes on their site, not the writer.

On the flip side, a platform means that the tech giants in social media are merely providing a place on the Internet for people to post their own comments. They don’t have to worry about being sued if somebody posts foul language or someone spreads misinformation intentionally or otherwise. It’s not them posting it, they’re merely giving a medium for anyone to post.

Section 230 among other things allows platforms to moderate their content, and it is supposed to be in the spirit of what would upset the general public. For example, if someone posts F-bombs for the sake of shock value, that would be considered offensive speech that would upset the average person in a community.

The problem arises when social media companies start censoring speech that is not inflammatory, isn’t looking for shock value, but simply disagrees politically with the radical corporate officers of the company like say, anything Donald Trump said over the last four years. Section 230 wasn’t intended to give tech tyrants full control over free speech on their platforms, which is exactly what they have taken.

“As Twitter made clear, the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms. The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions.”

“This petition, unfortunately, affords us no opportunity to confront them,” Thomas concluded.

In Marsh v. Alabama the court ruled that a private town could not use a state trespassing statute to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town’s sidewalk, even though the town was a privately owned company town.

“Whether a corporation or a municipality owns or possesses a town, the public in either case has an identical interest in the functioning of the community in such manner that the channels of communication remain free. P. 326 U. S. 507.”

And then…

“People living in company-owned towns are free citizens of their State and country, just as residents of municipalities, and there is no more reason for depriving them of the liberties guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments than there is for curtailing these freedoms with respect to any other citizen. P. 326 U. S. 508.”

What this means is that a privately owned town is a de facto government and the rules of the First Amendment apply. I see no reason at all why they shouldn’t also apply to privately owned social media companies because social media has become the de facto town square in our society. I own and operate a social media site. We adhere to the spirit of Section 230. We have a Terms of Use notice that users adhere to, but we do not block free speech simply because we disagree with it. If the government removes Section 230 from the Communications Decency Act it will help the tech tyrants because they have the money to hire enough lawyers to keep the courts tied up for a decade while smaller companies that protect Free Speech like Parler, Gab, and mine don’t have those billions of dollars for tons of lawyers, so removing 230 would just kill the competition for the Big Tech sites. What the government should do punish companies that violate the spirit of Section 230 by censoring free speech they don’t like politically and stripping them of their platform status and deem them a publisher because that’s what publishers do.

Rand Paul Rips Democrats for Pushing Racist Idea That Black People Are Too Stupid To Get Voter ID  [VIDEO]

Rand Paul Rips Democrats for Pushing Racist Idea That Black People Are Too Stupid To Get Voter ID [VIDEO]

On Fox News’s “The Ingraham Angle” on Friday night, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) blasted the Coca-Cola company for caving and jumping on the #MeTooAfraid movement after the Georgia legislature passed a bill to ensure election integrity in the wake of the 2020 Presidential election theft that every fact-checker reading this knows is true.

The senator from Kentucky pointed out that there are self-evident differences in what the Democrats are saying about the legislation and what is actually written in the legislation. In short, they’re lying, and that includes the president of the United States, Joe Biden.

“There is a distinction between in-person and by mail,” Paul said.

“All of these proposals are to trying to make it easy to vote but hard to cheat,” Paul said to host Laura Ingraham. “I’ve been involved with this. I’ve communicated with people in all 50 state legislatures, I’ve called them on the phone. I’ve talked to the conservative ALEC [American Legislative Exchange Council] group about this, and we’ve now passed it in Kentucky and we actually had more early voting days added, so it’s easier to vote, but you vote in person.

“There is nothing Jim Crow about this. In fact, what is very insulting and really just gets to me is they are implying that people of certain races are not able to comply with rules, show up, or have a driver’s license or figure this out.”

WATCH:

Paul added that people who implicitly believe that certain groups of voters (black people) would be disenfranchised by stipulations like obtaining a photo ID are “very racist in their thinking.” In fact, it never made sense to people with three-digit IQs when the Democrats first came out with the idea that voter ID was racist. Black people use ID every day to do common things in this country. Democrats are evil but they’re not that bright, and I think they were incapable of coming up with another argument to make, so they used their #1 weapon: play the race card.

“They think there are certain groups of our people who are incapable of following basic rules,” Rand continued. “I don’t think it’s true. I think the trend lines for all the different races voting have been good in our country for 20 or 30 years and all these election bills do is try to make it easier to vote but harder to cheat.”

Voter ID also secures the integrity of the vote for black people and people of color, just like everyone else. It’s across-the-board protection and isn’t that exactly what we want? Those nasty evil Republicans can’t steal their vote if there’s voter ID. That’s the argument that makes it so ridiculous on the face of it when Democrats call voter ID racist. It’s because voter ID really tamps down their ability to cheat in elections and Democrats absolutely 100% want to cheat.

Senator Paul likened what’s going on here to the extortion racket saying, “Jesse Jackson would do it years ago.” He continued, “He would protest in front of a big corporation that wasn’t doing anything wrong until they gave money to his organization, and then the protest would leave the organization.

“That’s what they are doing, they think they can bully.”

That’s what Cancel Culture is. It’s a bunch of losers who get a thrill out of being able to destroy someone’s life. They don’t care if there’s a reason to do it or if the reason they are using is legitimate or not. They feel power stomping on an innocent person and it makes them look like they truly are a legitimate member of the Woke Supremacy.

“Now Coca-Cola are telling people to apologize for being White, apologize for being arrogant, apologize for all of these things supposedly that white people are doing, and that’s a very racist sort of philosophy,” he said. “It’s this Woke sort of Critical Race Theory, but it’s now infected a publicly-traded company, and when they start saying things like that, they are actually going against what their mandate is. Their mandate is to maximize profit, but now they are turning off 40% of the country who don’t really want to be woke up and told that we’re horrible people.”

Critical Race Theory teaches that a certain group of people are inherently (read genetically) racist; they were born that way. Folks, that is the very definition of racism.

Another Asian Couple Attacked Out of the Blue By a Street Thug [VIDEO]

Another Asian Couple Attacked Out of the Blue By a Street Thug [VIDEO]

A 15-year-old boy was arrested in Tacoma, Washington after he apparently attacked an Asian couple. I say apparently instead of allegedly because the attack was caught on film and the video was widely distributed on social media.

Tacoma Police said that the unnamed teen has been charged with second-degree assault, according to CNN.

Someone wearing a red shirt can be seen in the video approaching a man and a woman on a Washington street. Red shirt guy, who has been identified as the teen who was arrested, is seen swinging at the man and the woman when he starts crying out. During a second video clip, the outlet reported the Asian man “is being cursed at and seems to be pushed or struck,” and then said that it’s unclear if the second clip was of the same attacker or someone else from a group, probably because there are two people wearing red in the video. To me, it looks like the same guy.

Police said that the attack took place in November 2020 and that the victims didn’t know the identity of the attacker.

Do you remember when the Knockout Game that was all the rage in black neighborhoods across America? It’s not racist to say that because that’s the only place it was done back then. That’s where black thugs would go up to an innocent person, usually a white person, and sucker punch them in the head from behind in hopes to knock them out with one punch.

WATCH:

At the time, when these incidents were reported, the Fake News industry never said anything about “hate crimes” or that they were racially motivated, yet they clearly would have said so if it were the other way around. I believe blacks attacking Asian Americans is the new Knockout Game, but this time it’s even worse because there are white Woke Supremacists who buy into the racist Critical Race Theory (CRT) garbage that Asians are the enemy attacking Asian people on the streets. Why? Because Asians have come out against CTR because a big part of it is getting rid of meritocracy in America and Asians wholeheartedly support meritocracy, which is a belief that if you work hard to get ahead, you should be able to get ahead regardless of your race. CRT wants special front-of-the-line treatment whether the hard work has been done or not.

At first, the Fake News media tried to blame Donald Trump because he kept referring to COVID-19 as the China Virus because it originated in Wuhan China. But that argument fell flat in the minds of people who have three-digit IQs.

WATCH:

We reported almost three weeks ago when a white man attacked a 79-year-old Asian woman without provocation. Unfortunately for the soy boy who attacked her, the 70-year-old firecracker never got the memo that she was supposed to be a victim and not fight back.

Remember this?

Tacoma Police Public Information Officer Wendy Haddow told the outlet that they hadn’t been able to connect the video to the victims until family members recognized them in the video footage that had been shown on social media and on the news.

On Wednesday, an Asian man who identified himself as one of the two victims told KIRO-TV he forgives the attacker. Of course, he’s going to say that because now that he has been outed as the victim, he would likely become the focus of many more attacks.

“I want him to be better,” he said in Korean. “I want him to know this was bad.”

The victim who remains unnamed said that he can’t figure out why he was targeted by the attacker and said the only thing he can think of is because he’s Asian. He had no run-in with the thug who attacked him, so what other reason could there be?

I am now waiting for President Joe Biden and other Democrats to blame racism or Donald Trump or even systemic racism for a black teen attacking an Asian couple.

The unnamed victim said he just couldn’t understand why he was targeted to be attacked, but said that he could only imagine because he is Asian.

“I have to think so,” he said. “I’m Asian. I’m older, and I’m not that big.”

The man said that the attack took place when he was walking near his apartment when the couple saw four teenagers approaching them.

“I thought they were messing around with each other and accidentally bumped into me,” he said. “So I asked, ‘You OK? You OK? … A fist came flying in, hit me … and I started bleeding.”

According to NBC News, the man suffered a broken rib from the attack.

The ‘Big Lie’ of the Left is Labeling Election Fraud Allegations as the Big Lie

The ‘Big Lie’ of the Left is Labeling Election Fraud Allegations as the Big Lie

The gaslighting that has taken place since the November 3 election is stunning and evil at the same time.

Numerous bullschtein stories presented as news over the last month and a half have referred to President Donald Trump’s claims of massive, widespread, organized election fraud as “The Big Lie,” which is itself the Big Lie.  Unfortunately, it’s not just leftists and Democrats who are gaslighting Trump supporters over election fraud. The RINOs of the Republican Establishment have even started repeating the false narrative, Liz Cheney, the third highest-ranking GOP member of the House is the leader in spreading the real Big Lie from the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

According to The Hill Cheney said:

“It’s incumbent upon everybody who takes an oath of office and swears to protect and defend the Constitution that we recognize what happened on Jan. 6, that we commit ourselves that it must never happen again, that we recognize the damage that was done by the president, President Trump, saying that somehow the election was stolen, making those claims for months and summoning the mob and provoking them then in the attack on the Capitol. And also, and very importantly, in refusing, despite multiple requests from people to ask him to stop what was happening to ask him to stop the violence to protect the Capitol to protect the counting of electoral votes — he didn’t do so.”

The frightening irony of what’s going on to people who understand it is that the unprecedented amount of election and voter fraud that took place during and after the 2020 presidential election is the exact same thing Nazi Germany did during World War II.

From Wikipedia:

A big lie (German: große Lüge; often the big lie) is a propaganda technique used for political purpose, defined as “a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the facts, especially when used as a propaganda device by a politician or official body”. The German expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, to describe the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”. Hitler believed the technique was used by Jews to blame Germany’s loss in World War I on German general Erich Ludendorff, who was a prominent nationalist political leader in the Weimar Republic. Historian Jeffrey Herf says the idea of the original big lie was instrumental in turning sentiment against Jews and bringing about the Holocaust.

The American people have been subjected to the lies from Democrats and the Woke Supremacy including the Fake News media and the censoring tech tyrants of social media, accepting the election results as gospel, not just ignoring any allegations or questions of election fraud, but punishing those who ask any questions, censoring any and all speech about what took place during and after the election, canceling anyone who dares point out the many irregularities, material evidence, and circumstantial evidence and labeling it as a conspiracy theory, misinformation, and now the Big Lie.  Censoring free speech is one of the most unamerican things you can do.

Just the other day I saw a headline pop up in my Twitter feed, “Big Lie? Big Whoop: Many Republicans on Capitol Hill see little reason to bat down Trump’s election lies”  That, and dozens of other like-minded headlines coming from the Left is straight out of the Nazi propaganda playbook by telling a lie so outrageous, so big and repeating it often enough that eventually, people start to believe it’s truthful.

I honestly believe that the Democrats and their sycophants utilize psychological professionals to teach them how average people think and how to be able to gaslight them and the truth of what happened during the election, and I believe they have mastered it and gone beyond simple gaslighting because what they are doing now is worse than simple gaslighting by publishing articles like these that are full of lies so that other leftists can use them and not only throw them in the face of conservatives who know better but also point to the large number of articles saying the exact same thing as if that’s evidence that there was no voter fraud.  They are doing this in an effort to make the rest of the country and the world believe that the conservative Trump supporters are the ones who are lying when they point to hard evidence and testimony from whistleblowers from multiple state legislature hearings about the massive amounts of election fraud they witnessed personally.

And so far it’s not really making much of a dent in the 74 million people who voted for Trump because the evidence is just too great to make us not believe our own lying eyes.  What am I talking about?  When you see the key battleground states during Election Day evening announce almost simultaneously that they were going to stop counting until the morning, something that has never been done before, you start to think that’s odd, why did they do that?  Then, during the night when the people in the vote-counting centers were supposed to have stopped counting ballots until the morning suddenly show huge spikes of votes for Joe Biden show up on the tally boards across the TV screen, just enough to overtake Donald Trump’s lead, in multiple states, by the way, you start to feel shocked that you witnessed it yourself.  At first, you think to yourself that’s not what you just saw.  It’s can’t be.  They said they were stopping the vote count and then votes for Biden skyrocketed during the middle of the night.  They wouldn’t lie, would they?  Of course, they would.  Vote counting centers are at the local level and the local levels are all controlled by Democrats.

We even saw video footage of election fraud taking place in Georgia and we were shown voting machine audits that just did not match up.  We saw in one Michigan county where over 70 precincts were out of balance.  That means in 70 precincts there were more people who voted than people registered to vote.

At first, the lies of the Left and the gaslighting by the Fake News media weren’t effective so the tech tyrants running social media began a full-blown censorship operation where they punished anyone who wanted to talk about what they know took place.

Censorship isn’t anything new to social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, Google, and YouTube.  On Facebook, we would get a strike if we mentioned the non-whistleblower whistleblower’s name during the Ukraine phone call impeachment farce.  We literally had our page taken down temporarily, and there was nothing illegal about mentioning his name or even a violation of Facebook’s rules.

YouTube will delete your videos if they mention any real evidence of election fraud.  They recently deleted a video I uploaded about the use of a drug that doctors are saying cures coronavirus in most cases after one does in under 48 hours saying the video was “misinformation,” even though the video had medical doctors discussing the drug.

We have Dominion and other vote-counting machine companies suing people like MyPillow’s CEO Mike Lindell for speaking out about data evidence of election fraud.

The Left’s Big Lie about election fraud has gotten so bad that many conservative outlets are afraid to engage in the discussion for fear of being deplatformed like the social media site Parler was when Amazon kicked them off of their web services platform.

YouTube channels like the great Right Side Broadcasting are stuck in a situation where they have to conform to the tech tyrant’s demands.  I won’t call them rules or terms of service, because those things are usually enforced on all users, yet we see conservative channels get punished for free speech while liberal channels get away with far worse.

The Left’s Big Lie claiming election fraud is the Big Lie is one of the worst frauds they ever perpetrated on the American people.  At this point, the only way to defeat the bald-faced lies of the Big Lie is to never give up spreading the truth.  We need to create our own social media platforms, but more importantly platforms that don’t have to rely on leftist companies for their survival.  In the meantime, we should continue to let the Left know that we know they are the ones spreading a big lie and that the truth is on our side.

FCC Commissioner Blasts Democrats For Trying To Get Cable Providers to Drop Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN

FCC Commissioner Blasts Democrats For Trying To Get Cable Providers to Drop Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr blasted California Democrat Representatives Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney for writing  letters to television cable providers such as Amazon, Apple, AT&T, and Comcast, and suggesting they drop conservative news outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, OANN, and others for “disseminating disinformation.”  It’s one thing to disagree with an ideology of certain hosts of certain networks while it is quite another to act as a totalitarian tyrant in trying to silence a First Amendment-protected entity such as a news outlet.  Who the hell do these two think they are?  These two members of Congress should be censured at least but should ultimately be expelled from Congress for their actions.  What they did is a seriously dangerous act of trying to kill multiple clauses of the Constitution’s First Amendment protections against a tyrannical government run by people like Eshoo and McNerney.

Carr condemned the letters that proposed to the chief executives of the media companies seven questions regarding policies on how they determine whether or not to carry particular channels as an “effort to censor newsrooms.”

“By writing letters to the cable providers and other regulated entities that carry these news media outlets, the Democrats are sending a message that is as clear as it is troubling—these regulated entities will pay a price if the targeted newsrooms do not conform to Democrats’ preferred political narratives,” Carr wrote in a statement on the FCC website. “This is a chilling transgression of the free speech rights that every media outlet in this country enjoys.”

What’s more, we just reported on a story on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson making the serious and sober point that it is new outlets that Democrats favor, mainly CNN and MSNBC and pretty much every other mainstream news outlet that are the ones who spread misinformation every day of the year, which result in causing harm to many people.

Eshoo, 78, who represents California’s 18th Congressional District including Santa Cruz, and McNerney, 69, who represents the 9th Congressional District centered around Stockton, cited “experts” as declaring the “right-wing media ecosystem” – specifying Newsmax, One America News Network (OANN) and Fox News as “much more susceptible…to disinformation, lies, and half-truths.” Of course, these “experts” are themselves biased to the Left, otherwise, they would never have made such ridiculous claims especially when we have the likes of CNN and MSNBC.

It wasn’t Fox News, OANN, or Newsmax that lied repeatedly for over two-and-a-half years about a Russian collusion delusion hoax, and then never apologized for it after Special Counsel Mueller’s office revealed there was absolutely no evidence of collusion.

Democrats are sick people who project what they do onto their opponents.  These two members of Congress, and anyone else who jumps on their bandwagon, should face serious sanctions for tarnishing an institution that already has lower ratings than Jeff Zucker’s network.

The two Democratic  members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who are behaving like the Colectivos in Venezuela, demanded, among that the CEOs tell them “what moral or ethical principles (including those related to journalistic integrity, violence, medical information, and public health) do you apply in deciding which channels to carry or when to take adverse actions against a channel?”

Carr denounced the two Democrats as viciously attacking First Amendment protections against Free Speech and Freedom of the Press.

“Debate on matters of public interest should be robust, uninhibited, and wide open. More speech is better than less,” Carr wrote. “Yet the concerted effort by Democrats to drive political dissent from the public square represents a marked departure from these First Amendment norms. A newsroom’s decision about what stories to cover and how to frame them should be beyond the reach of any government official, not targeted by them.”

It’s only a matter of time before the Supremacy gets to the Thief-in-Chief Biden or his Woke sidekick to have Carr replaced with someone who doesn’t care about the First Amendment.

What’s going on here is that the Democrats and the Left have already tried the robust debate route and they lost because their ideas suck.  Most of their policies cause more problems and more harm to people than helping anyone but themselves and growing government even bigger than it already is.  Now they are at the point where they no longer want to have a robust debate, they just want to shut down debate and shut down opposing views that point out how asinine their ideas really are.   That’s what happens with all Woke Supremacies that emerge once an ideology crosses that thin line into tyrannical territory that is hell-bent on crushing freedoms in society.  That’s where the Democratic Party is today.

Tucker Carlson Points Out Fake News Media Are the Masters At Spreading Misinformation

Tucker Carlson Points Out Fake News Media Are the Masters At Spreading Misinformation

On Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Tuesday, the host, Tucker Carlson, made an interesting observation about disinformation and misinformation.

“‘Disinformation is the real threat,’ says the guy who thinks his union has the contract on bringing you the news. It’s ridiculous,” Tucker started off.

“However, before you judge these people, take a moment and feel some compassion. Imagine if you had spent 30 years making a good living as a car mechanic, and all of a sudden GM invents an engine that anyone can fix at home with a screwdriver. You’d be upset. That’s how CNN feels about the internet. It’s exposing their scam, so naturally, they’re a little irrational about it.

“The thing about disinformation, they’re telling us, is not that it’s simply harmful to you personally. It’s not like eating a pint of Ben & Jerry’s or sneaking a smoke while the kids are at school. Disinformation isn’t a sin, it’s a crime. Disinformation is an offense against this country, an attack on America and, more critically, on something called our ‘norms.'”

Tucker is onto something.  I’ve been thinking for some time now that the whole disinformation-misinformation thing is the cudgel that the tech tyrants on social media and the cable Fake News networks use to dismiss any information that doesn’t fit in with their narrative.  And even if they hear speech that does fit into their narrative but just a tiny part of it does not the entire statement is considered misinformation.  That designation is being used as a weapon to silence conservatives, but worse, to silence the truth.  The Left tells us that misinformation hurts people, and impairs their ability to make good decisions.  And they’re right, it does.  And the labels of misinformation handed out like water from a fountain is actually misinformation in itself nine out of ten times.

Tucker made a statement that sums it up on why the media spreads so much misinformation:

“No, it takes a sophisticated operator to take the central problem of American life, the agonizing death of our middle class, and cover it up with a smokescreen of manufactured race hatred. You’d really need to be, as CNN would put it, a “disinformation network” to pull that off. “

But it’s not just misinformation about race. They do it for everything where they have an agenda, which is everything.

I believe it is the Left that pushes misinformation and they’ve been doing it for a very long time.  Think about it.  Until it was exposed nationally during the second Trump Senate impeachment trial farce that Donald Trump never referred to neo-Nazis and white nationalists at Charlottesville as “very fine people” how many people across the world thought that he did, simply because the media edited out the part of Trump’s speech where he condemned the hate groups?  Had the news media done their job, that lie would never have permeated our society.  CNN spread misinformation about Trump’s Charlottesville speech and yet even if I showed them the video of Trump condemning the hate groups, they would today label the video as misinformation.

WATCH:

Tucker brought up the belief that police are hunting black people so that they can shoot them.  The evidence?  Democrat politicians and cable news anchors have lied about it.  Carlson mentioned a research paper called “How Informed are Americans about Race and Policing?”  It was published by the Skeptic Research Center.

The researchers looked into the number of unarmed black Americans who were killed by police in 2019.  The results are astounding with 44 percent of Americans who claim to be liberal believing that at least 1,000 and probably more unarmed black Americans were shot and killed by police in 2019 when the real number was 27.  Don’t me wrong, 27 people shot and killed is a tragedy regardless of the circumstances, but that’s a heck of a wide gap between what the real number is and what the perception is among American liberals.  So, why is that?  Probably because liberal politicians and Fake News outlets keep preaching that there’s some kind of genocide going on in America among law enforcement against black people.

About 25 percent of people asked in the study believed a large majority of people shot and killed by police in 2019 were black when the actual number falls closer to 25 percent.

These are not small miscalculations.  Many Americans are totally misinformed about these issues and they have real-world consequences.  Remember the white mall Macy’s department store manager who was suddenly attacked by a black guy and beaten while his friend captured it on his cell phone?  That happened because the thug believed that white people are systemically racist and that’s because he was completely misinformed by a lying news media with an agenda.

Government public policies are created and/or changed based on many things that are not true but are believed to be true, so this is a serious problem.

With the way things are now if you even deny the narrative that large numbers of black Americans are being murdered by cops each and every year the Woke Supremacy will make you out to be actually participating in the murders.  And it’s so simple to debunk a story like that because all you need do is ask where are all the supposed victims of racial violence against blacks by cops.

To make the argument, Tucker talked about the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin.  MSNBC claimed that the police who shot him tried to execute Blake and he was unarmed. The Woke Supremacy media continually reported that Kenosha police shot Blake and that he was unarmed.  They threw his race into the story every time as well, “an unarmed black man.”  That’s all you heard was police shot Jacob Blake an unarmed black man.  The notion that cops shot an unarmed black man, while the George Floyd riots were still raging, was probably enough to start the riots in Kenosha.  All because Fake News like MSNBC and CNN and others kept reporting that police shot an unarmed black man.

But Jacob Blake was not unarmed.  How do we know this?  Because Jacob Blake himself said so.  He had a knife, and police on the scene knew he did.  Why didn’t MSNBC or CNN do their jobs and investigate to find out if Blake was unarmed or not?  That’s a pretty important piece of information you would think.  But no one on cable news did think. They never think when they push misleading information.

For over two and a half years the cable Fake News networks like CNN and MSNBC continually reported every day that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election.  There was absolutely no evidence whatsoever that proved the allegations but that never stopped them from spreading that misinformation daily.   In fact, after the Mueller witch hunt investigation ended with Special Counsel Robert Muller admitting that there was no evidence of Russian collusion we have yet to hear a single cable news network anchor, reporter, or pundit apologize to the American people for lying to them every single day for close to three years with misinformation.

For example, here is CNN’s Very Jake Tapper allowing the mentally ill lunatic Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) drone on and on with what we now know was lie after lie.

WATCH:

Throughout 2020 the cable news freaks and leftist print news spread misinformation about COVID-19 while deeming any new information about treatments that they didn’t personally approve of as misinformation.  For example, President Trump talked about doctors who were getting great results with COVID-19 patients using a regimen that included Hydroxychloroquine, the drug that’s been on the market for a gazillion years that was used to fight Malaria, and that was the beginning of the entire Fake News industry refusing to allow any positive information about the drug to be heard or seen.

The Left did not want to hear any good news about combatting the virus because they were using the virus as a weapon against the president.  They blamed Trump for every COVID-19 death.  They said Trump didn’t act fast enough to contain the virus, and that was misinformation because within hours of the first American case of the virus Trump created a travel ban on China, where the virus originated.  The Trump administration then went into action.  President Trump handled the COVID-19 pandemic better than any past president has ever handled anything like it before, and yet the leftist news media spread misinformation the entire year just to make Trump look bad.

You can take an interest in just about any news cycle, look at how the Fake News reported on it, then go back sometime in the near future and see how much misinformation they spread.  It’s almost guaranteed the press slanted the story either against Trump, against conservatives, or against America.  And these people have a Constitutional protection inside the First Amendment that they abuse on a minute-by-minute basis.

The news media worked closely with the social media tech tyrants who censored anyone that didn’t fall into the Left’s chosen narratives including blocking a live video streamed summit held by medical doctors and other medical professionals, you know, the science people, from around the world talking about how well Hydroxychloroquine was saving their patients.

It’s alternate universe time when the very people who are spreading dangerous misinformation hold all the power to be able to get away with censoring and labeling others as the spreaders of misinformation. The media are the original masters at spreading misinformation.

Democrat Sponsors Bill Creating Public Gun Registry Listing Owners, Their Guns, and More, Biggest 2A Infringement Yet

Democrat Sponsors Bill Creating Public Gun Registry Listing Owners, Their Guns, and More, Biggest 2A Infringement Yet

In the House of Representatives, a Democrat introduced a bill that’s purpose is to create a mandatory and publicly available gun registry that contains gun owners’ names, how many guns they own, and even where they keep them.  It’s a 100% federal infringement on the Second Amendment, and it’s how one of the most infamous political parties got their start in taking over society and beginning a brutal and bloody regime.

On top of that, the bill, H.R. 127, would ban several types of commonly used ammunition from .50 caliber or greater, it requires gun owners to buy firearm insurance costing about $800 a year, and force law-abiding citizens who want to purchase a gun to complete a psychological evaluation and a government training course before they can make the purchase.

Personally, I think every Democrat in office should have to complete a psychological evaluation and be forced to read the US Constitution and be able to pass a test before they are given the power to create such a god-awful bill as this.

According to the Founders who wrote, debated, and ratified the Second Amendment the federal government cannot even start a conversation about Second Amendment rights.

If gun owners fail to comply with these new draconian violations of the Second Amendment they would face severe penalties of 10 years in prison and have to pay fines from $50,000 to $150,000.

The corrupt reprobate who sponsored this disastrous bill, which will cause many Americans to die, is Representative Shiela Jackson Lee (D-TX).  The bill is one of the biggest infringements on American citizens’ right to protect themselves and it’s already generating intense blowback by gun rights groups.  This is what happens when you allow the mainstream media and tech tyrants to assist in the stealing of elections.

“All gun control bills share the same basic goal: a world in which fewer people own firearms,” the National Rifle Association (NRA) wrote about the legislation. “Some bills simply ban certain types of firearms or ammunition outright. Others place obstacles in the path of owning firearms or ammunition to make them more difficult and expensive to obtain, thereby shrinking the market for them … H.R. 127 combines both failed approaches.”

“It bans common types of ammunition and original equipment magazines for most self-defense firearms. And, it makes all firearms more difficult to obtain and possess through a punitive licensing and registration scheme,” the group continued.

The Weimar Republic convinced its citizens that a gun registry would make people safer because the police would know exactly who had the guns.  So, the people were convinced and they allowed it.  Once the Nazi party was elected to power one of the first things they did was to grab hold of that gun registry and use it to seek out all gun owners and force them to turn in their guns.  Once the undesirables i.e. Jews and criminal types were relieved of any way to defend themselves, the Nazis relaxed their gun restrictions just a tad, enough for the desirables to be able own firearms for protection.  Many historians believe that had the Nazis not had that Weimar gun registry they never would have been able to create the stranglehold they held over their people and many of the atrocities that took place by the socialist regime would have happened.  So now our Democratic Party is starting out down the same path that will end in the same way.

Retired police groups have also come out against the bill as an attempt to remove Second Amendment rights to the point where it infringes on a citizen’s ability to protect themself and that of their loved ones.  Under this bill, retired police officers are not exempt from being listed in the public registry.

“This is very dangerous, especially for retirees,” Kevin Hassett, president of the New York’s Retired Police Association, told the Washington Times. “Things have gone so downhill with this level of hostility towards cops and we are out there with the label that we are no longer cops. Retired cops don’t have partners or backup. We are out there on our own.”

Gerald G. Neill Jr., president of the Association of Retired Police Officers indicated strong concerns that a registry would lead to the targeting of former cops who are already a target by the same leftists who support the bill.

“There is danger in having this as part of the public record,” he said.

Democrats don’t think so, and they are so much smarter than us.  Just ask them and they’ll tell you.

This bill still has a while before it becomes law.  There are no co-sponsors as of yet, and it’s not scheduled for a committee hearing.  Hopefully, it’s nothing more than Shiela Jackson Lee seeking a superiority the Woke Supremamcists get from practicing one-upmanship and virtue signaling.  The biggest problem with this legislation is it shows how far the Democrats are willing to go to harm the very people they claim to represent.

“H.R. 127 is so outrageous, persecutory, and unworkable that its main function is simply to display the hostility of its author and supporters toward firearms, those who own them, and those who want to own them,” the NRA said.

UC Riverside Staff Attack Rush Limbaugh the Day After His Passing With Hate-Filled Rhetoric

UC Riverside Staff Attack Rush Limbaugh the Day After His Passing With Hate-Filled Rhetoric

Well, that didn’t take long.  It took only one day for the vitriolic hatred of the academic Woke Supremacy to trash Rush Limbaugh who passed away on Wednesday from advanced lung cancer.

Faculty at the University of California celebrated the death of the conservative radio legend just hours after he died on Wednesday, labeling him a “one-man hate industry” in an email that went out where they designated themselves “Rush Limbaugh experts” to offer themselves up for media interviews.

At least two Professors from the University of California, Riverside were happy that Limbaugh lost his life at the age of 70, stating that “America is objectively a better place without Rush in it.”  I would submit that the world would be a much better place without hate-mongers like these professors in it, but maybe that’s just me.

“For decades, Rush Limbaugh made millions trafficking in racism, sexism, and xenophobia,” Iranian-American scholar of religious studies, writer, and television host Reza Aslan said in the email, which incidentally was distributed through the university’s PR department.  The email went on saying “Rush Limbaugh experts available to media.”  I can tell you right now that this man knows nothing about Rush Limbaugh beyond the lies and defamation the Left has thrown at him for over 30 years.

“He was a one-man hate industry. And while the hatred and fear he sowed throughout his destructive career will continue long after his death, America is objectively a better place without Rush in it,” Aslan said.

This is where conservatives break from leftists like this former CNN guy.  For example, most conservatives disliked Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. They despised what she and the other leftists on the US Supreme Court did to our country, but I don’t remember any conservative college professors or any prominent conservatives at all attack the Justice right after her passing.

The same people who call Rush hateful are the ones spewing hate at the time when his family and friends are still mourning his passing.  It’s called having a sense of decorum and knowing how and when to act civilly because it’s better for society.  Leftists like these professors who could not wait until the body was cold started their hate-filled rants about a man who did far more for charity to help people in need than any of the nitwit college professors.

If Rush was racist then how could he have employed and worked closely with James Golden, otherwise known as Bo Snerdly, an African American man, as his call screener, producer, and radio engineer for three decades?  If Rush was a racist then why did he have Justice Clarence Thomas, a black man, preside over his wedding ceremony?  If Limbaugh was any of the things the haters accused him of would he have ever had Sir Elton John perform at his wedding to Kathryn? Racists and bigots would never do any of that no matter what.

Aslan the demagogue took to social media to make vicious remarks a year ago when the radio talk show legend announced his lung cancer diagnosis, calling him evil and saying he was a “curse upon this nation”

It takes a lot of a feeling of supremacy to go on social media and make statements like that at that point in time.  Reza Aslan is apparently a Woke Supremacist who can not help himself with impulse control. 

Think about it.  He attacked Limbaugh as his loved ones were just starting the grieving process after Rush’s passing and they want to be thought of as decent and moral people.  It’s disgusting behavior.

A year ago Aslan went on Twitter and cloaked a hate-filled message behind a message about not celebrating Limbaugh’s diagnosis.

I think a real curse upon this nation is when college professors teach students to hate their country, to hate anyone, those who spew venom against the greatest country ever created that has done more to help people from around the world than any other.

After Breitbart published an article about Aslan referring to the radio host as a “curse upon this nation” Aslan again couldn’t help himself and took to social media to double down on the insult, saying “Actually ‘curse upon this nation’ is just about the nicest thing I can think of to say about Rush Limbaugh dead or alive.”

Dylan Rodriguez, an Aslan colleague who has research interests in the fields of Ethnic Studies, Critical Race Studies, Black Studies, Carceral Studies, and Radical Social Movements said that Rush will be remembered as “an unapologetic purveyor of right-wing conspiracy narratives, racist mythologies, Islamophobic hate, and smug claims of white ‘American’ victimhood.”

“In life, there were few public figures who contributed more to the normalization of everyday white supremacist, antiblack, homophobic and transphobic, misogynist worldviews than Rush Limbaugh,” Rodriguez scrawled.

“It was entirely fitting that Donald Trump awarded him the Presidential Medal of freedom, given Limbaugh’s primary, decades-long role in establishing the white nationalist populism that swept Trump into the White House.”

To even consider that Rush Limbaugh supported any form of white nationalism is defamation of character.  There isn’t a single piece of evidence that would win that argument in a court of law, so pinheads like these professors and other Woke Supremacists have to attempt to skew the court of public opinion instead.  Rush wanted everyone, regardless of their station in life, he everyone to succeed.  He said it all the time and he meant it.

What the Left hated him for was when he would simply read the newspaper online and comment about what he read.  Rush exposed the Left as the hate-filled tyrants that they really are and he did it in a fashion that regular folks, people who didn’t live and die by politics, could understand.  He took very complicated issues and made them very easy to understand and the Left could not find his equal.  In fact, the conservatives could not find his equal either.

Unlike these professors and other haters on the Left, Limbaugh would give examples of things liberals did that were harming the very people they claimed to want to help.  He had a bombastic style at times, which is no different from many radio talk show hosts, but what leftists fail to acknowledge is that they practically own all forms of communication and media in this society, and sometimes the only way to get your point out there was to make fun of the Left for the kookiness that is their ideology.

0