The National Rifle Association (NRA), the organization that fights for the American people’s right to be able to protect themselves from bad people who want to do them harm, has now filed for bankruptcy and the Second Amendment organization will reincorporate in Texas, the gun rights group announced on Friday.
The NRA, which is based in New York, said it is leaving “what it believes is a corrupt political and regulatory environment in New York” and will reconstitute itself as a Texas nonprofit. The group said its plan “involves utilizing the protection of the bankruptcy court.”
“The move will enable long-term, sustainable growth and ensure the NRA’s continued success as the nation’s leading advocate for constitutional freedom – free from the toxic political environment of New York,” the NRA said in a statement.
The NRA also claims it is in its “strongest financial condition in years” and said there will be no immediate changes to its operations. Over 400,000 NRA members live in Texas and the group is holding its annual meeting in Houston in 2021.
“This strategic plan represents a pathway to opportunity, growth, and progress,” NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre said in a statement. Obviously an important part of this plan is ‘dumping New York.’ The NRA is pursuing reincorporating in a state that values the contributions of the NRA, celebrates our law-abiding members, and will join us as a partner in upholding constitutional freedom. This is a transformational moment in the history of the NRA.”
The news follows a lawsuit from Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James back in August that accuses the NRA of violating state law that governs nonprofit organizations.
The real reason why the New York attorney general went after the National Rifle Association has nothing to do with violating nonprofit laws. The reason they went after them is because the NRA is one of the top organizations that get the vote out for Republicans. The NRA uses a lot of its donation money to put up campaign ads that show which politicians protect Second Amendment rights and which politicians want to take away your Second Amendment rights to protect yourself and your loved one. Anyone who tells you any different is lying to you.
The suit brought on by the New York AG also accuses the group, including Wayne Lapierre and three other top officials, of diverting millions of dollars from its charitable mission.
In a statement given on Friday, James called the NRA morally and financially bankrupt. I think the Attorney General is morally bankrupt in that she only went after this organization for political reasons. When you think about it, Democrats in Democrat-run states made sure that small businesses suffered during the COVID crisis. They shut down small businesses because small business owners are the backbone of financial support in donations to the Republican Party. At the same time they shut down small businesses their rich friends in high places made out like bandits. Jeff Bezos who owns Amazon is an elite leftist friend of the Democrats, and he said that his company earned an additional $70 Billion because of COVID.
“The NRA’s claimed financial status has finally met its moral status: bankrupt. While we review this filing, we will not allow the NRA to use this or any other tactic to evade accountability and my office’s oversight,” she said.
This is the same attorney general who sued the NYPD for using too much force during the protests and riots in New York. City. The New York cops, thanks to the asinine Mayor Bill de Blasio, spent the better part of a year not being allowed to retaliate against thugs and hoodlums who would throw water on them. Can you imagine being a beat cop and you have some jackass throw a bucket of water on you and you don’t know when it’s coming at you if it is scalding hot water if it had bleach mixed in with it or some other chemical that could blind you or harm you or burn your skin? James is a toys-in-the-attic, bat guano crazy woman who is just another radical progressive funded by Jennifer Soros, daughter-in-law of George Soros to change American law to favor chaos and punish the cops.
The NRA went away you know damn right well that our Second Amendment rights would be eroded in no time.
Remember when Kamala Harris promoted a bail fund that helped released people arrested for rioting, and some of them were convicted criminals, with at least one we know had a violent history? And she’s going to be the vice president in six days. Well, that bail fund is refusing to show the records of the people it helped release from jail so that they could get back on the streets to terrorize more businesses and innocent people during the Black Lives Matter riots in Minnesota.
Back in June, as Democrat cities across the country were being swarmed with violence, unrest, looting, murder, arson, and a bunch of other crimes in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police, only two months prior to Harris being selected by Joe Biden to be his running mate, she tweeted out a link to the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF), an organization founded in 2016 by a University of Minnesota student named Simon Cecil. The group claims to “pay criminal bail and immigration bonds for those who cannot otherwise afford to.”
The MFF got a reported cash dump in the tens of millions of dollars thanks to Harris’ support. Think of all the criminals who can be put right back into your neighborhood thanks to the future vice president. In 2018 the group had a tax return of about $100,000.
MFF caught some heat over the summer after it was reported that it helped free someone with multiple rape convictions and allegedly a lot of violent criminals.
The Washington Post did a random act of journalism by reviewing the data and discovered that MFF bailed out of jail a person who was accused of shooting at police officers during the riots in Minnesota.
KMSP, a local Fox affiliate learned that of those who received bail money from the MMF was a twice-convicted sex offender and a woman who was accused of killing a friend of hers.
And you can’t get a full accounting of the people who were bailed out of jail by the fund that Kamala Harris supported and helped get millions. They don’t want to give up the list, which means they more-than-likely know that what they do is unconscionable. They are helping violent felons to get out of jail and go back into neighborhoods to prey on innocent people and innocent businesses again. For whatever reason, they are doing it, whatever the ideology that forces them to do something so evil, they know that civil society does not approve. That’s why they will not give up the list.
An MFF says that the record of people they helped reach bail “are available via the Hennepin and Ramsey County jail rosters.” Even so, it’s nearly impossible to see them.
A reporter for KMSP, Tom Lunden, said that the documentation “is difficult to find and it is not available online.”
“You must go through items in the file, which you can only do at a live terminal,” he said. Have you ever had to sit down at a public library and use a terminal system? I’d rather shave my head with a cheese grater while chewing on tinfoil.
Lynden said they used a court document, a “Request to Return Bail to a Third Party” to help confirm a lot of the bail cases that are tied to MFF.
“In the rundown of court filings, it is usually listed as an ‘Other,’ along with many other items, so you have to go into each file to find it,” Lyden said.
“If there is such a document,” he added. “In some cases, the defendant may get to keep the money, and in other cases, I’ve been told it wasn’t necessary. So, the request form is one indicator, but not the only one.”
At this point, it’s next to impossible to get real numbers or real information. It’s like the old adage, the process is the punishment.
On Thursday, Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN), who has been a loud critic of President Donald Donald Trump, introduced two bills to do away with the Electoral College and prevent presidents from pardoning themselves or their family members.
“Presidents should not pardon themselves, their families, their administration or campaign staff,” Cohen said in a statement. “This constitutional amendment would expressly prohibit this and any future president, from abusing the pardon power.”
The numbskull congressman doesn’t understand that the president has plenary powers of the pardon and any use of it is not an abuse of power. It’s like listening to children.
A third term of President Jimmy Carter is more likely than for either of the Amendments to pass because Amendments require a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress and then they go out to the states and must be ratified by three-fourths of them. Yes, I know that presidents can only have two terms. As I said, a third term of Jimmy Carter has a better chance.
Cohen is the loudmouth who once predicted that Donald Trump Jr. and the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner would both be indicted by Robert Mueller, the special counsel appointed by his good buddy Rod Rosenstein to investigate the fake phony fraud Russian collusion delusion nonsense. Of course, he wouldn’t provide any evidence. None of the Democrats who said the Trump family was guilty of anything ever did. Hell, Adam Schiff (D-CA) the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee for over two years said daily that he had evidence that Russian collusion happened with the Trump campaign, and he never provided a single piece of his professed evidence.
Last summer President Trump said that he has the right to pardon himself, but that he doesn’t have to do that, because he’s done nothing wrong and has committed no crimes. The only thing a president cannot pardon themself over is an impeachment. I believe the president should rethink that logic because things have changed radically since then. The Democrats made up impeachment articles against him and there’s nothing now to stop them from making up a crime against Trump to go after him once he’s out of office.
“As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” the president wrote in a tweet.
Many Democrats are bringing back the idiotic idea of getting rid of the Electoral College. They started complaining about it after George W Bush lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College. Only five presidents have done that: John Quincy Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, Benjamin Harrison, George W Bush, and Donald J Trump. Hillary Clinton’s first bill she presented as a US Senator was the eliminate the Electoral College. Back then, most of the Democrats in Washington still had some common sense and the bill was never taken seriously. Hillary certainly screeched a lot about it after she won the popular vote against Donald Trump (304-227), but he won the Electoral College.
“In two presidential elections since 2000, including the most recent one in which Hillary Clinton won 2.8 million more votes than her opponent, the winner of the popular vote did not win the election because of the distorting effect of the outdated Electoral College,” Cohen blathered in his statement about the bill he introduced. “Americans expect and deserve the winner of the popular vote to win office.”
Cohen appears to suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome at Level 7, which is the highest known level of the disease.
“More than a century ago, we amended our Constitution to provide for the direct election of US Senators,” he added. “It is past time to directly elect our President and Vice President.”
This clown doesn’t understand that the 17th Amendment which changed how Senators are elected was one of the single most damaging Amendments to our country ever passed. Prior to the 17th Amendment, senators were elected by state legislatures. This meant that if a US Senator was voting in ways that were not supportive of his state, the legislature could remove him from office. The 17th Amendment changed that and senators are now elected by the popular vote of the American voters. The problem with this is that the change in how senators are elected made it so that senators are no longer loyal to their state, but now are loyal to Washington, DC. It was the creation of the Swamp.
What Cohen is doing is showboating for his constituents and his Democrat colleagues, but more importantly he is showboating his extreme ignorance of the law and our history.
The New York State Bar Association has announced that it has opened an investigation into whether or not it should remove Rudy Giuliani from their organization, a remarkable move to examine President Donald Trump’s attorney’s role in the Capitol Hill riot last week. The former 911 New York City mayor had no role in it whatsoever, but the progressives just continue to poke people in the eye.
This petty, mean, and evil inquiry won’t cause Giuliani to be disbarred, but it would still be a precedent-setting condemnation of a lawyer who once served as the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, probably the most powerful law enforcement roles in the country. Giuliani is also the mayor who consoled New Yorkers and kept spirits high in the aftermath of the 911 attacks on the Twin Towers.
This Bar Association has over 70,000 members as listed on its website and is the largest voluntary bar association in the United States.
Susan DeSantis, a spokeswoman for the organization, said that while a lawyer who is disbarred is automatically stripped of membership, this is the very first time the organization opened an inquiry of a current member since the 1970s when the organization adopted its bylaws.
The organization said their inquiry will examine whether or not Giuliani took actions during and after the presidential election that violated their bylaws. They said the association received hundreds of complaints over the last couple of months about Giuliani deriving from so-called “baseless efforts” to cast doubt on the presidential election to overturn its results.
The fact of the matter is Rudy Giuliani is Donald Trump’s personal attorney. Everyone knows that. He was asked by the president to do an investigation, a legal investigation in the key battleground states to weed out evidence of election fraud. Mr. Giuliani organized the Trump campaign’s legal team to get the battleground state legislatures to hold hearings. The legal team found whistleblowers and data experts who signed over one thousand affidavits, upon penalty of perjury, and who testified at the legislature hearings by exposing massive amounts of election fraud in each of the battleground states of Arizona, Georiga, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
The mainstream media, which has forever favored the Democrats, did not cover the hearings, and they certainly didn’t cover the massive amount of election fraud that was discovered. Yet they continue to report that there was no evidence of election fraud.
Giuliani spoke to the Trump supporters who were at the rally last week before they marched to the Capitol, and he urged them to fight on. The bar association cited Mr. Giuliani’s encouragement to the crowds by saying, “Let’s have trial by combat.”
What Giuliani really said was “If we’re wrong, we will be made fools of. But if we’re right, a lot of them will go to jail.” Giuliani added, “Let’s have trial by combat.”
If the members of the Bar Association are going to be so petty that they say they truly believe that Giuliani was telling the Trump supporters at the rally to go physically fight people then they are as politically motivated as the people who wrote the letters to the organization asking them to attack the former NYC mayor. Giuliani was clearly talking about legal combat in a courtroom and not some street brawl outside the Capitol building. How does one have a trial by beating on people? The whole notion is ridiculous.
The organization spokeswoman added that Giuliani will have the opportunity to “explain and defend his words and actions.”
With the Cancel Culture that is being shoved down America’s throat right now by the progressive left the last person you would think the New York State Bar Association would go after is Rudy Giuliani, but here we are.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said there will be no second impeachment trial against President Donald Trump if the crazy Democrats follow through with their threat to impeach the president. But don’t mistake McConnell’s words for solidarity with the president.
McConnell sent out a memo where he said that the soonest that the Senate would be able to consider the matter would happen the day before the president leaves office.
The Washington Post, where democracy goes to die, got a copy of the memo, and reported that the Senate “will not reconvene for substantive business until January 19, which means the earliest possible date that impeachment trial proceedings can begin in the Senate is the day before President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated.”
“Although the Senate will hold two pro forma sessions next week, on Jan. 12 and Jan. 15, it is barred from conducting any kind of business during those days — including “beginning to act on received articles of impeachment from the House” — without agreement from all 100 senators. With a cadre of Trump-allied senators in the Republican conference, that unanimous consent is highly unlikely.”
The Washington Examiner noted that it looks like McConnell is handing over the next impeachment battle for a trial in the Senate to Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who will take over as Senate Majority Leader after the inauguration since the Republicans lost control of the Senate earlier this week after the Democrats pulled the same tactics to steal the two Senate runoff elections in Georgia.
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) hailed McConnell’s move on Friday, tweeting, “Completely agree with @senatemajldr‘s analysis that the Senate cannot process the impeachment being contemplated by the House before January 20. I firmly believe impeachment would further destroy our ability to heal and start over.”
Democrats expressed outrage over McConnell’s timeline, with the sleazy Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), who spearheaded the first impeachment of Trump, complaining to MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, “If Mitch McConnell wants to move with expedition, he knows how to do it. And if he doesn’t, then he will bear the responsibility for whatever dangerous acts this president commits.”
This from a man who impeached an innocent president with zero evidence of wrongdoing and for something that Joe Biden as vice president actually did.
If the second impeachment trial does occur, “there is also a question of who exactly would preside over a trial of a former president,” The Post said.
The newspaper reported that according to McConnell’s memo, “Senate impeachment rules require Chief Justice John Roberts preside over a trial of a sitting president, but whether he would have to once Trump is no longer president is ‘unclear.'”
Folks, the only reason they want to impeach Trump again is so that this time they can remove him from office with a Senate trial as that would disqualify him from ever running for president again.
To even attempt to hold a Senate trial on a president who has already left office smacks of desperation on the part of the Democrats. It’s not clear if they can even do that. Can a new Congress take an impeachment from the last Congress to trial even though there’s no president to remove from office? The supreme penalty for an impeachment trial is removal from office.
Getting rid of Trump was just the beginning. Now the Democrats and the Left are going to go after anyone who supported the president. If you’re on Twitter and you Followed the president, you may be purged.
The Democrats are already talking about making lists the way the Nazis did when they took over. AOC has already said that she wants to cancel anyone who worked for Trump. She wants to create lists of them.
On Thursday, the day after the mayhem at the Capitol building, Kamala Harris, who is about to be sworn in as the new vice president, gave a speech about the incident. Did Harris talk about the need for peace and for civility? Not at all. She used the opportunity to play the race card. She actually asked America to think of what would have happened if those Trump supporters who stormed the Capital building were black, how many more would have been shot, and treated horribly by police.
We haven’t even reached the penalties phase with the Democrats who are now in total control of the government. The next six months will be a “get evenism” experience throughout. They will come up with very inventive ways to punish anyone who supported Donald Trump. Their tyranny will change America forever. Get ready, folks. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
On Sunday, the Washington Post committed another act of Fake News when they released an audio of a Saturday phone call between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where the two men can be heard discussing the 2020 election results.
Originally, the Post released just snippets of the hour-long phone call where Trump can be heard talking about the election results with Raffensperger and his attorney Ryan Germany.
Listening in on the call was Trump campaign attorney Cleta Mitchell and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
The president spoke to details of numerous examples of dead people voting, double voting, and other ballot irregularities, all of which helped Joe Biden. Though, the Democrats always did do well with the dead demographic.
The secretary of state and his lawyer counter Trump’s accusations mostly by giving simple responses saying that the problems Donald Trump raised have been investigated. That’s their way of saying we don’t want to discuss it.
Trump then insists that he won Georgia’s presidential election on November 3 and argues that widespread election fraud took away his victory.
Where the Post lied was when they claimed that while talking to Raffensperger Trump “repeatedly urged him to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state.”
That is an outright bald-faced lie.
The transcript of the phone call shows Trump demanding an honest accounting of the ballots, which he says would give him far more than 11,000 votes.
In laying out the irregularities like ballot fraud, Trump said:
But we’ve had hundreds of thousands of ballots that we’re able to actually — we’ll get you a pretty accurate number. You don’t need much of a number because the number that in theory I lost by, the margin would be 11,779. But you also have a substantial numbers of people, thousands and thousands, who went to the voting place on November 3, were told they couldn’t vote, were told they couldn’t vote because a ballot had been put on their name. And you know that’s very, very, very, very sad. We had, I believe it’s about 4,502 voters who voted but who weren’t on the voter registration list, so it’s 4,502 who voted, but they weren’t on the voter registration roll, which they had to be. You had 18,325 vacant address voters. The address was vacant, and they’re not allowed to be counted. That’s 18,325. Smaller number — you had 904 who only voted where they had just a P.O. — a post office box number — and they had a post office box number, and that’s not allowed.
President Trump mentioned the Fulton County video tape that shows massive fraud, the one that everyone in the country by now saw:
We had at least 18,000 — that’s on tape, we had them counted very painstakingly — 18,000 voters having to do with [person’s name]. She’s a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler [person’s name]. That was the [Fulton County] tape that’s been shown all over the world that makes everybody look bad, you, me and everybody else. Where they got — number one they said very clearly and it’s been reported that they said there was a major water main break. Everybody fled the area. And then they came back, [name] and her daughter and a few people. There were no Republican poll watchers. Actually, there were no Democrat poll watchers, I guess they were them. But there were no Democrats, either, and there was no law enforcement. Late in the morning, early in the morning, they went to the table with the black robe and the black shield, and they pulled out the votes. Those votes were put there a number of hours before — the table was put there — I think it was, Brad, you would know, it was probably eight hours or seven hours before, and then it was stuffed with votes. They weren’t in an official voter box; they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases, but they weren’t in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it, and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it, but slow motion, and it was magnified many times over, and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.
Trump referred to even more examples of fraud:
You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia, but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that’s 2,326. And you had dropboxes, which is very bad. You had dropboxes that were picked up. We have photographs, and we have affidavits from many people. I don’t know if you saw the hearings, but you have dropboxes where the box was picked up but not delivered for three days. So all sorts of things could have happened to that box, including, you know, putting in the votes that you wanted. So there were many infractions, and the bottom line is, many, many times the 11,779 margin that they said we lost by — we had vast, I mean the state is in turmoil over this.
And then the president talked about that demographic the Democrats have always done well with, the dead vote:
The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters. The bottom line is, when you add it all up and then you start adding, you know, 300,000 fake ballots. Then the other thing they said is in Fulton County and other areas. And this may or may not be true .?.?. this just came up this morning, that they are burning their ballots, that they are shredding, shredding ballots and removing equipment. . . . And they supposedly shredded I think they said 300 pounds of, 3,000 pounds of ballots. And that just came to us as a report today. And it is a very sad situation. But Brad, if you took the minimum numbers where many, many times above the 11,779, and many of those numbers are certified, or they will be certified, but they are certified. And those are numbers that are there, that exist. And that beat the margin of loss, they beat it, I mean, by a lot, and people should be happy to have an accurate count instead of an election where there’s turmoil.
Raffensperger Claims Only 2 Dead People Voted:
Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is the data you have is wrong. We talked to the congressmen, and they were surprised.
But they — I guess there was a person named Mr. Braynard who came to these meetings and presented data, and he said that there was dead people, I believe it was upward of 5,000.
The actual number were two. Two. Two people that were dead that voted. So that’s wrong.
Raffensperger gives the Democrat lie about the video:
You’re talking about the State Farm video. And I think it’s extremely unfortunate that Rudy Giuliani or his people, they sliced and diced that video and took it out of context. The next day, we brought in WSB-TV, and we let them show, see the full run of tape, and what you’ll see, the events that transpired are nowhere near what was projected by, you know —
Trump refutes Raffensperger’s claims:
But where were the poll watchers, Brad? There were no poll watchers there. There were no Democrats or Republicans. There was no security there. It was late in the evening, late in the, early in the morning, and there was nobody else in the room. Where were the poll watchers, and why did they say a water main broke, which they did and which was reported in the newspapers? They said they left. They ran out because of a water main break, and there was no water main. There was nothing. There was no break. There was no water main break. But we’re, if you take out everything, where were the Republican poll watchers, even where were the Democrat poll watchers, because there were none. And then you say, well, they left their station, you know, if you look at the tape, and this was, this was reviewed by professional police and detectives and other people, when they left in a rush, everybody left in a rush because of the water main, but everybody left in a rush. These people left their station. When they came back, they didn’t go to their station. They went to the apron, wrapped around the table, under which were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box. And then they took those. They went back to a different station. So if they would have come back, they would have walked to their station, and they would have continued to work. But they couldn’t do even that because that’s illegal, because they had no Republican poll watchers. And remember, her reputation is — she’s known all over the Internet, Brad. She’s known all over. I’m telling you, “Where’s [name] ” was one of the hot items .?.?. [name] They knew her. “Where’s [name]?” So Brad, there can be no justification for that. And I, you know, I give everybody the benefit of the doubt. But that was — and Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put ’em in three times.
Raffensperger tries to BS the president:
Mr. President, they did not put that. We did an audit of that, and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times.
Trump pushes back because he wants to know:
Where was everybody else at that late time in the morning? Where was everybody? Where were the Republicans? Where were the security guards? Were the people that were there just a little while before when everyone ran out of the room. How come we had no security in the room. Why did they run to the bottom of the table? Why do they run there and just open the skirt and rip out the votes. I mean, Brad. And they were sitting there, I think for five hours or something like that, the votes.
Raffensperger tried to blow the question off:
Mr. President, we’ll send you the link from WSB.
Trump points out that there was no signature verification:
No, no you don’t [Brad]. No, no you don’t. You don’t have. Not even close. You’re off by hundreds of thousands of votes. And just on the small numbers, you’re off on these numbers, and these numbers can’t be just — well, why wont? — Okay. So you sent us into Cobb County for signature verification, right? You sent us into Cobb County, which we didn’t want to go into. And you said it would be open to the public. So we had our experts there, they weren’t allowed into the room. But we didn’t want Cobb County. We wanted Fulton County. And you wouldn’t give it to us. Now, why aren’t we doing signature — and why can’t it be open to the public? And why can’t we have professionals do it instead of rank amateurs who will never find anything and don’t want to find anything? They don’t want to find, you know they don’t want to find anything. Someday you’ll tell me the reason why, because I don’t understand your reasoning, but someday you’ll tell me the reason why. But why don’t you want to find?
Trump points out the incredulity of 100% of military ballots went for Biden, which is an impossibility:
And what about that batch of military ballots that came in. And even though I won the military by a lot, it was 100 percent Trump. I mean 100 percent Biden. Do you know about that? A large group of ballots came in, I think it was to Fulton County, and they just happened to be 100 percent for Trump — for Biden — even though Trump won the military by a lot, you know, a tremendous amount. But these ballots were 100 percent for Biden. And do you know about that? A very substantial number came in, all for Biden. Does anybody know about it? . . . Okay, Cleta, I’m not asking you, Cleta, honestly. I’m asking Brad. Do you know about the military ballots that we have confirmed now. Do you know about the military ballots that came in that were 100 percent, I mean 100 percent, for Biden. Do you know about that?
Raffensperger’s lawyer responds to the president:
I don’t know about that. I do know that we have, when military ballots come in, it’s not just military, it’s also military and overseas citizens. The military part of that does generally go Republican. The overseas citizen part of it generally goes very Democrat. This was a mix of ’em.
Trump doesn’t back down:
No, but this was. That’s okay. But I got like 78 percent of the military. These ballots were all for .?.?. They didn’t tell me overseas. Could be overseas, too, but I get votes overseas, too, Ryan, in all fairness. No they came in, a large batch came in, and it was, quote, 100 percent for Biden. And that is criminal. You know, that’s criminal. Okay. That’s another criminal, that’s another of the many criminal events, many criminal events here. I don’t know, look, Brad. I got to get .?.?. I have to find 12,000 votes, and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state. That’s before we go to the next step, which is in the process of right now. You know, and I watched you this morning, and you said, well, there was no criminality. But I mean all of this stuff is very dangerous stuff. When you talk about no criminality, I think it’s very dangerous for you to say that.
Folks, this is where the leftist kooks claim Trump ordered Raffensperger to cheat for him.
Trump: Fellas, I need 11,000 votes:
So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break. You know, we have that in spades already. Or we can keep it going, but that’s not fair to the voters of Georgia because they’re going to see what happened, and they’re going to see what happened. I mean, I’ll, I’ll take on anybody you want with regard to [name] and her lovely daughter, a very lovely young lady, I’m sure. But, but [name] .?.?. I will take on anybody you want. And the minimum, there were 18,000 ballots, but they used them three times. So that’s, you know, a lot of votes. And they were all to Biden, by the way, that’s the other thing we didn’t say. You know, [name] , the one thing I forgot to say, which was the most important. You know that every single ballot she did went to Biden. You know that, right? Do you know that, by the way, Brad? Every single ballot that she did through the machines at early, early in the morning went to Biden. Did you know that, Ryan?
On December 30, attorney Lin Wood filed an emergency petition with the US Supreme Court where he is seeking to block the Georgia Senate runoff elections next week, a mere few days after his lawsuit was rejected by a federal judge.
Wood, an attorney doing work on behalf of President Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign, filed his petition on Wednesday asking for a judge’s order to halt the January 5, 2021 runoff elections for US Senate in Georgia, “until such time as the respondents agree to comply with the Georgia Legislature’s prescribed election procedures.”
Of course, nobody expects the Court to rule in his favor even though what he is asking for is legit and 100 percent Constitutional.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, along with Vice-Chair of the Georgia State Election Board Rebecca N. Sullivan, and members of the Georgia State Election Board David J. Worley, Matthew Mashburn, and Anh Le are listed as respondents.
Wood’s petition also asks that a judge order the preservation of election-related materials, and order election officials to provide one voting machine used in the November 3 presidential election from each Georgia county for forensic examination. I don’t know why, because the cretins in the Democratic Party have probably already erased all the evidence.
This order was filed only days after Wood filed a different lawsuit in the US District Court in Atlanta earlier this month, arguing that the secretary of state’s office violated the law in the way it handled absentee and mail-in ballots during the November 3 election. Wood argued that the state’s process to verify signatures on ballots was flawed, among other allegations. This was made possible by an illegal consent decree that Raffensperger went into with the Democrats, including the lunatic Stacey Abrams who still lives in a fantasy world where she thinks she is the true governor of Georgia.
The injunctive relief Wood sought was denied by US District Judge Timothy Batten Sr. on December 28, saying that the allegations in the lawsuit are speculative, while asserting that Wood lacked standing.
The concept of “standing” is not in the Constitution, and it is always used by judges who are too cowardly to hear a case. The whole idea is that if you are not harmed by what you’re arguing over then you lack standing. Lin Wood is a resident of Georgia and he voted for Donald Trump. If the Democrats created, they most certainly nullified his vote, and therefore he has standing.
The petition declares that the district court made an error when it “summarily” dismissed Wood’s lawsuit that was “supported by numerous fact and expert witness declarations and affidavits.” The courts are as corrupt as the Democrats.
Wood’s suit to the district court is “part of a larger effort to expose and reverse an unprecedented conspiracy to steal the 2020 General Election, as well as January 5, 2021, senatorial runoff election in the State of Georgia,” it states. Some conspiracies are real, and folks, it looks like this one is.
Wood and others “seek to expose the massive coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election, that will inevitably repeat itself” in the senate runoffs, the petition claims.
Raffensperger, in a statement on December 28, said that his office “time and time again” has been able to fend off lawsuits related to the November 3 election. Can you believe a Republican secretary of state is fighting election fraud accusations that harmed a sitting president from his own party? Did you ever think you would see the day?
“We have successfully fought off lawsuits from the right and the left looking to undermine rule of law in Georgia,” Raffensperger wrote. “The numerous baseless and frivolous lawsuits … are just the latest in a long history of lawsuits to nowhere in Georgia.”
I honestly believe this man is a mental patient. The lawsuits are not “baseless and frivolous,” because he, as the Secretary of State of Georgia, broke the law when he violated the Constitution by entering into that consent decree with the Democrats that ultimately changed election law. The Secretary of State does not have the authority to change election laws. The office can only enforce the laws that were written by the state legislature. Article I, Section 4 of the US Constitution gives the power to create and change election laws to the state legislatures and not to the Executive branch of the Judicial branch. This is black letter law.
ARTICLE I, SECTION 4: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. [Emphasis added]
If the Democrats win both of these seats it would hand control of the US Senate over to the Democrats, and it would most certainly lead to the end of our republic. I’m not being hyperbolic here. The Democrats have already told us the things they will do if they get control of the Senate, things like they will get rid of the filibuster rule, which will allow the Democrats to shove any legislation down America’s throat. They said they will make Puerto Rico and Washington, DC states giving them four more senators so that the Democrats will always have a majority. They said they will pack the US Supreme Court and federal courts so that leftist activist judges will rule against the Constitution daily. Folks, those three things alone would end our republic.
The best thing you can do right now to save our country from ruin is to support the two Republican candidates in the Georgia Senate runoff elections any way you can.
President Donald Trump’s supporters across the nation are ramping up efforts to contest the November 3 election results ahead of Wednesday’s official certification by Congress. Some Pennsylvania lawmakers are appealing to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Georgia Republicans who just received a last-minute court hearing.
The frantic efforts are taking place just as Republicans are also trying to win two US Senate runoff elections in Georgia that will determine control of the Senate, while the president’s lawyers place their bets on an appeal they sent to the US Supreme Court on top of urging legislatures in as many as six states to object to the certifications. This is all 100 percent Constitutional.
Republican congressional leaders are saying that up to as many as two dozen, possibly more, representatives in the House and at least one senator, Josh Hawley of Missouri, will object to the chosen electors for Joe Biden in several contested battleground states, which bring on a debate that will last at least a two-hours on Wednesday. A little birdie told me that right now Mitch McConnell is hammering Senator Hawley to get him to stand down and not object on January 6.
McConnell is an odd duck. He knows that the Republicans in the House and Senate did very well in the 2020 elections as the down ballot to the president, because they rode on Trump’s coattails. However, McConnell has abandoned the president in his quest to overturn the election with massive voter fraud in the key battleground states. He hasn’t lifted a finger to help a president of his own party when his involvement could have given weight to the election fraud that robbed over 74 million Trump voters across the country.
Adding to the pressure, on Thursday, two dozen Republican state lawmakers in Pennsylvania, spearheaded by state Senator Doug Mastriano, sent letters to McConnell and House minority leader Republican Kevin McCarthy, asking that Pennsylvania’s election results not be accepted by Congress until further investigation of irregularities is completed.
“Actions taken by the PA State Supreme Court and Secretary [of State Kathy] Boockvar in the 2020 general election were so fraught with inconsistencies, improprieties and irregularities that the results for the Office of President of the United States cannot be determined in our state,” the lawmakers wrote. “This election is an embarrassment to our nation.”
And it was an embarrassment, yet the Democrats are not capable of being embarrassed. Wouldn’t you think Joe Biden would be shouting from the rooftops if the Democratic Party really wasn’t involved in massive election fraud in the 2020 election?
“We the undersigned ask that you dispute the certification until an investigation is completed,” they added to the letter that was signed by 8 state senators or senators-elect and 19 state House members, 27 lawmakers in all.
Momentum was building among Trump supporters in Georgia after the GOP-controlled state Senate Judiciary Committee approved an audit of voting machines in Fulton County, and they held a hearing where one expert claimed he could get into voting machines that weren’t supposed to be able to connect to the Internet. The Democrats must have lied when they said the machines could not access the Internet early on in the aftermath of the election. The expert said he was able to do this now, during the two Senate runoff elections!
The Superior Court in Fulton County scheduled a hearing for Monday, accepting an emergency petition from a group of Georgian voters called Voter GA demanding a “forensic inspection” of November mail-in ballots.
“We have just received notice that we will be granted a hearing Monday, January 4 at 11 am on our Emergency Petition to visually inspect and forensically examine all Fulton County mail-in ballots,” petitioner Garland Favorito told The Epoch Times. “That includes those processed at State Farm Arena and those that auditors detected as potentially fraudulent.”
The Trump legal team filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court to challenge the results in Wisconsin while at the same time they were urging Republican legislatures in up to six states to object to the certifications on Wednesday: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
“President Trump continues to fight for the American people and election integrity,” Trump legal team lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said in a statement this week when they filed a lawsuit arguing against Wisconsin’s results to the US Supreme Court. “We have to restore integrity to our process through every legal and constitutionally viable mechanism. America has seen the extent of corruption in this election and is demanding swift resolution.
“We hope that state legislatures in Wisconsin and the five other states will not wait on a court order but exercise their plenary constitutional authority and we continue to appeal to them as well as seek judicial remedy.”
President Donald Trump’s legal team filed an appeal to the US Supreme Court to reverse cases by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that changed mail-in ballot laws.
According to the US Constitution’s Article I, Section 4, the State Legislature has the power to create or change election laws. Neither the Executive branch nor the Judicial branch has that power, and yet both of the branches went rogue in Pennsylvania and changed election laws, and both branches did it to help Democrats.
The legal case is asking the US Supreme Court to reverse three cases decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that “illegally changed” mail-in ballot laws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election.” They rigged it for Democrats. The lawyers argued that the Supreme Court’s decisions are in violation of Article II of the Constitution and the 2000 Bush v. Gore ruling. The argument being the state’s Supreme Court violated the US Constitution’s Article II, Section 1 that says that the State Legislature chooses the Electors who will vote for president based on the election laws created by the Legislature. By changing election laws they violated the State Legislature’s prescribed method of selecting Electors. Also, in Bush v Gore the US Supreme Court ruled that the way ballots were handled in Florida violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by counting votes in one county one way and differently in another county. That also happened in Pennsylvania counties during and after the 2020 election.
The lawsuit is asking for “all appropriate remedies,” which includes the vacating of Electors that were committed to Joe Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania Legislature to call up their own electors. If the US Supreme Court has a problem with this then they have a problem with our Constitution.
When on December 14, 2020, the Electoral College voted, the Republican Party in Pennsylvania had its own Electors cast votes for Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, in a bid to preserve legal challenges in the state.
“The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the US Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider the votes of the electoral college,” according to a statement, authored by former New York City Mayor and Trump legal team attorney Rudy Giuliani.
“This represents the Campaign’s first independent US Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.”
Word has gone out that the Texas case against four of the key battleground states was rejected because Chief Justice John Roberts was afraid of riots that most certainly would occur if the High Court had done their duty and served the American people by following the Constitution. But Roberts is a weak man who would rather allow 75 million American voters to be disenfranchised by cowering away from Biden supporters who would act like animals on our streets than to do the right thing.
On top of that, the lawsuit will seek to reverse several decisions that “eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud.”
In the lawsuit it reads that these laws barred election officials from being able to check whether or not mail-in ballot signatures were legitimate during Election Day canvassing, they removed the right of certain campaigns to challenge ballots when they were canvassed for signatures that were forged, along with other issues. The laws blocked campaign poll watchers/observers from being able to stand close enough so that they could see the ballots they were appointed to observe, and in counties like Philadelphia they removed the statutory requirement that voters had to correctly sign, address, and date mailed ballots.
“Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature,” Trump lawyer John Eastman wrote, adding that “more than enough” ballots are involved to affect the election outcome.
If the Supreme Court denies to even hear this case it should be pitchforks and torches by 75 million angry American voters, because the one thing Americans do not like is when someone gets away with cheating.
The Trump lawyer also asked the Supreme Court to require Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, who clearly broke the law when she herself changed election laws, to respond to the filing by noon on December 23rd.
Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) filed a lawsuit against officials in Pennsylvania’s Executive branch charging that the state unconstitutionally changed its mail-in ballot laws. This is a black letter law filing because the letter of the law says that only State Legislatures can change election laws, and members of the Pennsylvania Executive branch are certainly not from the Legislative branch of government.