CNN Exec Caught On Video Admitting Network Used Propaganda To Defeat Trump in 2020 [VIDEO]

CNN Exec Caught On Video Admitting Network Used Propaganda To Defeat Trump in 2020 [VIDEO]

Project Veritas has done it again. They remind me of the old 60 Minutes undercover interviews back before the show was compromised by liberalism, now gone Woke.

The undercover video journalists released a bombshell on Tuesday to their email subscribers. It reveals CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester admitting that the CNN news network engaged in intentional propaganda tactics to get President Donald Trump out of office. Chester admitted they ran with propaganda to help Biden’s campaign during the 2020 election, and to harm then-President Trump. He also admitted that CNN has a pre-determined agenda when reporting on COVID-19 and Climate Change.

We knew this all along, but now we have solid proof.

How much do you want to bet that one of CNN’s high-ranking muckety mucks or some other flunky tries to make the claim that Chester is a low-level employee who was just screwing around and possibly trying to show off his inside knowledge for the journalist? He was the CNN Technical Director, not a low-level employee. Don’t let them gaslight you on this.

CNN’s technical director went on and bragged about what the network did.

“Look what we did, we got Trump out. I am 100% going to say it, and I 100% believe that if it wasn’t for CNN, I don’t know that Trump would have got voted out…I came to CNN because I wanted to be a part of that.”

He revealed that CNN brings in so-called “experts” just to lend some kind of credibility, and everyone involved knows they’re full of bullschtein.

“[Trump’s] hand was shaking or whatever, I think,” Chester said. “We brought in so many medical people to tell a story that was all speculation — that he was neurologically damaged, and he was losing it. He’s unfit to you know, whatever. We were creating a story there that we didn’t know anything about. That’s what — I think that’s propaganda.”

WATCH:

CNN’s motto is “CNN, the most trusted name in news.” Yeah, and I’m Mary, Queen of Scots. It should be changed to “CNN, the most propagandist network in news.”

How sick do these people have to be to resort to this kind of ugliness and then to brag about it openly, as if the network did a good thing? This CNN technical director has admitted that CNN, a supposed news outlet, intentionally duped millions of Americans and possibly caused them to vote against Trump based on their propaganda lies. CNN should be held accountable. There should be an investigation and they should have their license suspended until the investigation is concluded. Who knows how much damage they will do with their propaganda lies?

Chester continued unwittingly exposing CNN of its depravity.

“We would always show shots of him [Joe Biden] jogging and that [he’s] healthy, you know, and him in aviator shades. Like you paint him as a young geriatric.”

This unsuspecting weasel even gave away the playbook for how CNN was going to shift from COVID lies to pushing Climate Change.

“I think there’s a COVID fatigue. So, like whenever a new story comes up, they’re [CNN’s] going to latch onto it. They’ve already announced in our office that once the public is — will be open to it — we’re going to start focusing mainly on climate.”

He admits that CNN is nothing more than a propaganda outlet.

“It’s going to be our [CNN’s] focus,” he added. “Like our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that’s what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be for Climate Change awareness.”

At that point the Veritas journalist asked, “What does that look like?”

Chest replied, “I don’t know. I’m not sure. I have a feeling that it’s going to be like, constantly showing videos of decline in ice, and weather warming up, and like the effects, it’s having on the economy–”

The journalist follows up. “Who decides that?”

“Head of the network,” Chest says.

To get the name down, the journalist asked, “Who is that? Is that Zucker?” Jeff Zucker is the president of CNN.

Chester confirms, “Zucker, yeah. I imagine that he’s got his council and they’ve all like, discussed, like where they think–”

What comes next in the conversation is very disturbing.

The journalist moves on, saying, So, that’s like the next–”

Chest replies, “Pandemic-like story that we’ll beat to death, but that one’s got longevity. You know what I mean? Like there’s a definitive ending to the pandemic. It’ll taper off to a point that it’s not a problem anymore. Climate Change can take years, so they’ll [CNN will] probably be able to milk that quite a bit.”

“So, Climate Change overload,” the journalist queries.

“Be prepared, it’s coming,” Chester predicts. “Climate Change is going to be the next COVID thing for CNN.”

For evidence of future fear-mongering, the journalist asks Chester, “You think it’s going to be just like — a lot of like, fear for the climate?”

And Chester responded, “Yeah. Fear sells.”

At one point Chester talked about how during the campaign his father said to him, “You know you’re voting in Kamala Harris because he’s [Joe Biden] gonna die during his presidency. And I’m like, ‘He’s not gonna F-Bombing die'”

Chester went on to tell the undercover journalist “But I’m okay with that. I’m okay with that.” He would be okay with the president of the United States, supposedly one of his guys, dying.

For a reaction, the journalist said, “She’d probably be better.”

Chester followed that up with, “She probably could be a bitch in like a board meeting and you’d hate her as a boss, but she’s F-Bombing real and better than we’ve got, regardless [Joe Biden].”

Un-freaking-real.

Durham Subpoenaed Liberal Think Tank As Part Of Probe Into Steele Dossier: Report

Durham Subpoenaed Liberal Think Tank As Part Of Probe Into Steele Dossier: Report

Special prosecutor John Durham subpoenaed liberal think tank, the Brookings Institute over a former employee, Igor Danchenko and his connections to the bogus Steele Dossier paid for by the Hillary campaign and the DNC.

Danchenko was the alleged primary source for the Steele dossier, but he has disputed much of what went into the dossier and attributable to him. Some he said was embellished and some he said he knew nothing about.

It is said that the Brookings Institute cooperated fully in the Durham investigation. The institute was and is not the target in the investigation.

Danchenko had worked there as an analyst before moving on and he even landed a job at Steele-owned Orbis Business Intelligence.

He testified that he passed rumors on to Steele, who then represented the rumors as truth. Danchenko says that other parts of the dossier listing him as the source did not come from him.

The inspector general report found 17 inaccuracies in the FBI’s applications for FISA warrants against Carter Page, including a forged email from the CIA for which Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to without so much as a slap on the wrist. I still don’t expect results from the Durham investigation.

The investigation has drug on forever and many key witnesses have never been called to the best of my knowledge.

From The Daily Caller

Investigations led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the Justice Department inspector general and several congressional committees all undermined the dossier’s central thesis of a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

The IG report also debunked several specific claims of collusion that are found in the Steele dossier. One of those is Steele’s claim that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen visited Prague in August 2016 to meet with Kremlin insiders regarding hackers.

The general counsel for Brookings told The Times that Durham’s office issued its subpoena on Dec. 31, and that the think tank had turned over documents in February.

“Consistent with its practices in such matters, Brookings provided the responsive documents, none of which contained information associated with the reports known as the Steele dossier,” Michael Cavadel told The Times.

ZOA Slams ‘Deeply Troubling’ Tweets of House Committee, Ilhan Omar on Holocaust Remembrance Day

ZOA Slams ‘Deeply Troubling’ Tweets of House Committee, Ilhan Omar on Holocaust Remembrance Day

ZOA (Zionist Organization of America) is lashing out at Ilhan Omar for tweets they take as being anti-Semitic.  From Ilhan Omar? Say it ain’t so, Joe. She has a long history of anti-Semitism but this comes as the remembrance of the holocaust is going on. In addition of blasting Omar, ZOA head Morton Klein expressed his “deep concern” over an official HFA tweet that acknowledged that six million were killed but it did not mention they were Jews.

Klein, who was born in a displaced persons camp in Germany and is a child of holocaust survivors referred to the omission as both “incomprehensible and reprehensible.”  Klein went on to say that the Nazis killed six million Jews of which 2 million were children. The sting of Omar’s tweets is possibly hurting him much worse than the average Jew.

Klein also slammed Omar for a personal tweet of hers which he also deemed antisemitic.

In the tweet, Omar describes Israel as “a wealthy country that’s getting $3.8 billion a year from America. Yet their Ambassador has the audacity to complain about $150 million going to Palestinian refugees,” before adding, “Shameful.”

Klein wrote:

In her Yom HaShoa Day tweet, antisemitic BDS-promoter Omar wrongly referred to the Jewish State as “wealthy,” condemned the military assistance that enables Israel to defend herself from Arab/Muslim terrorists, and even condemned Israel for expressing concern that the Biden administration is renewing sending hundreds of millions of dollars to UNRWA (whom Omar misleadingly referred to as “Palestinian refugees”).

Israel-hater Omar ignored the fact that UNRWA, which will receive hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funds, teaches Arab children to hate and commit violence against Jews and Israel, in their textbooks and schools. UNRWA also has operations with the murderous terrorist group Hamas.  

UNRWA is the United Nations organization that runs schools in Palestinian territory that teaches young children jihad.

They teach us that Jews are bad people”; “I am ready to stab a Jew and drive a car over them”: “I will run a car into the Jews”; “We have to constantly stab [the Jews], drive over them and shoot them”; “Stabbing and running over Jews brings dignity to the Palestinian people”; “I’m going to run [the Jews] over and stab them with knives”; “I am prepared to be a suicide bomber”; and “With Allah’s help, I will fight for ISIS.”

 

Biden Sending Unaccompanied Illegal Alien Migrant Children To Former Japanese Internment Camp Location

Biden Sending Unaccompanied Illegal Alien Migrant Children To Former Japanese Internment Camp Location

Still believe that there is no crisis at our southern border? How long will this administration continue to deny that there is a massive crisis on our southern border before the problems there begin to move northern throughout the entire country? How bad are things getting?

One of the places where FDR forced Japanese Americans into detention centers for no other reason than his racism against “the Japanese mind” during World War II is the Los Angeles County Fairgrounds. They were called internment camps, and they were as unconstitutional as DACA or Joe Biden’s gun control executive orders. That administration stripped American citizens of all of their rights, their money, and their private property, including businesses because they couldn’t trust their loyalties to their own country.

This place that represents a serious lack of judgment on the part of the Roosevelt administration will now serve as an emergency shelter area for unaccompanied illegal alien children who illegally crossed our southern border into the United States.

One has to wonder how illegal their entry was when Joe Biden practically asked their parents to send them, but that’s a whole other story.

Who plotted these bad optics?

According to Hilda Solis, chairwoman of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, the decision was made after having “discussions” with the Biden White House.

The Biden administration has reached out to communities across the country to find spaces for illegal alien children, who were sent by their parents on the long and perilous journey alone, and whose numbers are overwhelming Border Patrol facilities, but there is no crisis. The administration even unsuccessfully tried to get NASA employees to travel to the border to volunteer in the overcrowded camps. What is it with Democrat administrations forcing NASA to do things that have nothing to do with the mission of NASA? Remember when Barack Obama used NASA as a Muslim outreach program?

One of the most disgusting aspects of the Biden administration and the Democratic Party is they are utilizing the human trafficking of unaccompanied illegal alien children for their own future power. They see them as nothing more than “unregistered Democrats,” and we hear not a peep from the mainstream news media. There is big money for cartels in trafficking these kids into the United States.

The Democrats in 1984 changed the name of the facility to the Pomona Fairplex to cover up their Japanese internment camp history. The large Pomona facility is the third one in Southern California to be used to house illegal alien unaccompanied children. That is an indictment of this president and his administration.

In 1942, months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D Roosevelt authorized the internment of Japanese Americans, fearing they would be loyal to the emperor of Japan because of the “Japanese mind.”

There is a California Historical Landmark plaque near the former internment camp where they will now intern illegal alien children.

The internment camp was opened in May 1942. It featured three-hundred and nine barracks, eight mess halls, and thirty-six shower and bathroom facilities. At its peak, the number of Japanese American citizens reached over 5,000 before it was shut down later that year when most of the Japanese American citizens were transferred to a different camp set in Wyoming.

Currently serving as the Fairplex parking lot, it was converted to one of LA County’s huge COVID-19 vaccination sites in recent months.

“Los Angeles County has a responsibility and an opportunity to care for unaccompanied minors coming to the United States,” Solis said Thursday.

Why is it our “responsibility” and how on Lucifer’s black beach is it an “opportunity” for the American taxpayers to have to take care of illegal alien children who were thought so little of that their parents sent them on a 1,000+-mile journey, alone, knowing they would probably be attacked, molested, or worse by coyote human trafficking cartel people along the way to our southern border? That responsibility was manufactured by a president who is power-hungry and a political party that is exploiting these kids to ensure that the Democratic Party will have majorities through future generations.

TRUTH SCORES: American Mainstream Media Do Know How To Validate A Story, When It’s Important To Them

TRUTH SCORES: American Mainstream Media Do Know How To Validate A Story, When It’s Important To Them

Instead of Social Scoring for American citizens, we should have “Truth-telling Scores” for our journalists and media. Here is how to start, see how they validate their stories.

After a full week of watching the most elite of the American media run with a baseless story about US House Rep. Matt Gaetz, the American Mainstream Media (MSM) proves that they actually do know how to validate a story when it comes to anything that goes against their personal narrative that Conservatives and Republicans are bad.

Notable is that yet they go hog wild on any tidbit of gossip that will destroy Americans who don’t vote as they do, as with the Gaetz or anything about “Russian disinformation.”

If we were serious about an authentic press in this country, people would notice two stories from this week, the death of Rapper “DMX” and the persecution of a Twitter User who criticized US House Rep. “AOC.”

CALLING BALLS AND STRIKES

The following statement is my opinion; citizens are free people; however, if a person wants to be called a journalist and chooses to go into that professional field, they should voluntarily submit to having their work scrutinized by a public panel of citizens with no participation in activism, for their work to be evaluated for evidence of the truth.

Consider the story of Rapper DMX, who passed away Friday after a week-long hospitalization. Immediately upon his death, SNOPES published their point of view:

Context: This rumor comes from an unnamed source quoted in a gossip magazine that has published inaccurate information on more than one occasion. As of this writing, there’s no evidence that COVID-19 or a COVID-19 vaccine played any part in DMX’s death,” Snopes reported within an hour of the announcement being made that DMX had died.

Good for them for jumping on. However, that is not always their pattern. They should be evaluated regularly to propagandize readers because of their clear desire to set a narrative.

The following is what we call “Click-bait.” The source of the story that DMX had to receive the vaccine shortly before his death appears to come from a publication called, Washington News Post, which claims to have interviewed a family member who is not named; the unnamed person claimed that the rapper had gotten the vaccine some short time before his death. Mentioning that they interviewed someone and not giving their name is a clear sign of gossip. This news organization should be given a strike for that, especially because this is a high-profile death, and people are very concerned about the vaccine.

Sadly, that is enough information for a  former NYT writer Alex Berenson, with a blue checkmark, to spout off.   Berenson is a social media influencer who ran with the story adding a comment, “I warned you,” seeing the story as an opportunity to promote their personal narrative. Both the New York Times and this poster should be given a strike for promoting Gossip, and this person should be evaluated for posting gossip while using that blue checkmark.

The New York Times should be evaluating people with blue checkmarks who use their names to promote gossip. Two strikes for them for their history of activist writers who put out false information.

This is called bias. Consider this story by a Democrat Socialist journalist with the intercept who snaps into action when a false story is attributed to favored US House Rep. Alexandria Cortez. To investigate whether she made a charge against a Twitter user who was visited by the police, Ryan Grim is immediately checking the story and use his position to clear the representative of any negative press.

He does a solid deep dive into the story to clear her name. However, his support of Anti-American causes and personalities is curious.

In the Constitutional Republic, a Democrat Socialist should be identified for his obvious bias and monitored for his bias against our legal system. Look at his timeline for his obvious anti-American perspective. He gets a strike.

As American citizens, we have the right to support people and issues that are of interest to us; however, if we seek to inform the American public of information and facts, we should be scrutinized much more than has been happening.  A free press is to serve free people, and currently, it is only independent media that is getting “fact-checked” by far-left activists and shut out of distribution. If America is going to be restored, we need to do much better than that.

The first step toward that end is the American people need to understand who they are giving clicks to and who they are reposting to get more clicks.  It all begins with the citizens.

 

 

Biden Signs Executive Order to Create a Commission As a Formality For Packing the US Supreme Court

Biden Signs Executive Order to Create a Commission As a Formality For Packing the US Supreme Court

On Friday, the White House made an announcement that President Joe Biden is going to sign an executive order creating a commission to study reform ideas for the US Supreme Court, including packing the Court, something he said he was “not a fan” of during the 2020 campaign. Everyone knew he was going to do it, so this should not come as a surprise.

The White House statement said, “The Commission’s purpose is to provide an analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals.” The White House added that the panel includes experts on Constitutional law, political science, and history. In other words, a bunch of leftists who hate the Constitution and our country.

Biden himself back in 1983 said during a Senate hearing that FDR’s move to pack the Court was a “bonehead idea,” and “a terrible, terrible mistake to make,” and “it put in question for an entire decade the independence of the most significant” body in government in this country.

WATCH:

So what’s changed? Biden is president now, that’s what’s changed.

The White House announcement somewhat addresses a presidential campaign promise from Biden as the radical Left repeatedly pressured him to say he would pack the court with additional leftist justices to dilute the Court’s growing conservative majority, including three justices nominated by former President Donald Trump and confirmed by the Senate. The number one thing for all Democrats is they always want a rigged system. They don’t like to lose, and they don’t like to have to work that hard to get what they want.

First off, Chief Justice Roberts is not a conservative, he’s a Hollywood guy. Kavanaugh is not an originalist either, his vote’s up for grabs. The jury is still out on Amy Coney Barrett. Gorsuch is close to being an originalist, but he votes with Kavanaugh sometimes I believe the only two originalists on the Court are Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Biden said in October that he would put together a “bipartisan commission” to address the High Court “because it’s getting out of whack.” See what I mean? Unless the Court is majority leftists on the bench, it will be considered out of whack. They want a rigged Supreme Court.

For Democrats, the term “bipartisan” means one of two things, either that Republicans cave and give them everything they want, or a panel of bipartisan members that means there are leftist Democrats and RINO Republicans who will cave and give them everything they want. Rigged.

Cased in point, Biden’s list for the panel features leftist Democrats and leftist legal scholars (whatever that means) and a few Republicans, most of them critical of President Donald Trump and the America First movement. There are no prominent conservatives or legal scholars. Rigged.

The only reason Biden is doing this is to pacify radical leftists who demand that he expand the Supreme Court for power. The court has had nine justices for over 150 years. That means nothing to radical leftists, as they want a rigged Supreme Court. And packing the court with more justices will do nothing more than what Joe Biden said. It will question the integrity of the court. The entire country will know that every ruling coming out of a

FDR’s attempt to pack the courts failed, because back then there were Democrats who joined Republicans to defeat his bonehead proposal.

In order for the Democrats to pack the Court, they have to do it through legislation. The White House also said that the panel will discuss term limits for Justices on the Court, but that will never happen because in order to do that they have to amend the Constitution.

The commission will be co-chaired by two former Obama officials (some bipartisanship) Bob Bauer, a former White House counsel for former President Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel in the United States Department of Justice.

The White House said the so-called bipartisan commission will address the Supreme Court’s role in the Constitutional system, which is ludicrous because it is a separate power created by the Constitution. The other two branches do not get to decide what the High Court’s role is in the Constitutional process, and if we had an honest press, the American people would learn about that. But we don’t have an honest press, we have a press that is champing at the bit to help the Democrats destroy our entire constitutional system.

Biden Trashes Power Of Constitutional Amendments On Anniversary of 13th Amendment, Media Silent

Biden Trashes Power Of Constitutional Amendments On Anniversary of 13th Amendment, Media Silent

On Thursday, Democrat Joe Biden took the opportunity to discredit the US Constitutional power by marginalizing amendments, and he did so on a historically important date; the anniversary of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, which banned slavery in America. The mainstream media said nothing at all about it. Black Lives Matter said nothing at all.

“[Constutitional amendments] are phony arguments, suggesting these are Second Amendment Rights or rights at stake for what we are talking about, but no amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute,” Democrat Joe Biden said at a press conference on Thursday in defense of his Exectuvite Orders on control of gun owners.

WATCH:

US House member from Colorado, Lauren Boebert, took notice of  Biden’s statements and emphasized Biden’s insensitivity, especially at a time when American media is in search of anything rooting out racism in America.

Biden, who claims to champion all Black Americans,  is aparently ignorant of the fact that he made his comments on the day of historical importance for Black Americans. Thursday is also the day that marks the anniversary of the 13 Amendment to the Constitution, which permanently banned slavery. And on this day in history, April 8, 2021, Joe Biden stated no amendment to the Constitution is absolute. Just imagine if Trump had said those words on this day,” Boebert wrote.

 

Boebert was reacting to a post made by Documentary Film Maker, Eroll Weber who posted, “On this day in history, April 8, 1864, the U.S. Senate passed the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which permanently bans slavery in America. The 13th Amendment was passed 38-6 with 100% support from Republicans-30 senators-along with 4 Democrats and 4 third-party.”

DOES THIS SOUND ABSOLUTE TO YOU?

13th Amendment Amendment XIII

Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.

Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

WHY DOESN’T BIDEN KNOW THAT?

Of course, America has grown accustomed to politicians like Biden who grab power for themselves while destroying citizens’ power.

Conservatives and populists did notice the power grab by Biden.

 

SO WHAT ARE AMENDMENTS? CAN BIDEN CHANGE THEM?

It is a leftist’s dream to change the US Constitution, yes. Can they change our rights? Yes. They can, they have, and they will again because there is no opposition to stop them that has been effective.

American voters are often confused about what their rights are. So- here is a primer.

U.S. Constitutional Amendments

The United States Constitution is often referred to as a “living document” that grows and changes as society moves forward. And no matter a person’s view on constitutional interpretation, there’s no doubt that amendments to the Constitution have changed the course of the American legal system. The first ten amendments became known as the Bill of Rights, which includes many of the freedoms we associate so closely with the United States – such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. These constitutional rights protect the lives of individuals from interference by the government. See below for the text of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, as well as annotations providing case law and historical context.

TO SEE YOUR RIGHTS AS OUTLINED BY THE US CONSTITUTION, GO HERE. IF YOU LIKE THEM-VOTE!

EXCLUSIVE: Source of Daily Mail Hunter Biden Article Exposes Who He Really Wants To Talk About

EXCLUSIVE: Source of Daily Mail Hunter Biden Article Exposes Who He Really Wants To Talk About

An explosive article about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop that has escaped scrutiny by the mainstream American media and law enforcement until recently appeared in UK media on Thursday, yet the source of information in that article says sex and drugs is not the story he wants people focused on.

“Let’s paint these guys individually as the ones who stole the election with their credentials and a compliant press,” Maxey said about John Brennan, James Clapper, and Mike Hyden, and others, pointing me to two posts in Politico that claim to expose Biden’s Laptop was Russian disinformation.

Recall the contents of the laptop have been verified by top forensics experts, according to the Daily Mail.

CONNECTING THE DOTS

The article’s source who provided the laptop to the Daily Mail is Naval Veteran Jack Maxey.  Maxey was first rebuked by Youtube, Twitter, and other platforms for talking about the laptop before the 2020 Presidential election,  and then outright banned from Twitter after posting some of the laptop contents on his own Twitter timeline.

“10/19/20, the War Room got taken down [From Twitter] along with the New York Post. My own Twitter account was dropped for some reason a month ago,” Maxey told me.

“Twitter sent me a first message telling me that someone had warned them that I was self-harming and that people cared about me. Then they sent me a message saying that I was using Twitter to create spam. Then they sent me a message asking me to remove 3-4 tweets referencing Bob Woodward and WaPo. I did it. Then they sent me an email saying upon further review they were suspending me permanently bc I promoted abuse,” Maxey said.

Maxey, a co-host of the show, had the laptop directly from the show owner of where the laptop had been abandoned, directly by Hunter Biden.  Maxey discussed the contents on Steve Bannon’s War Room Pandemic until the show was taken down off its platforms, left to scramble for new ways to distribute the popular podcast.

Bannon is also a Naval Veteran.

WHAT IS THE REAL STORY?

Maxey sees the contents of Biden’s laptop as more than just bombastic stuff about sex and drugs; Maxey told me he sees more to the important contents about what he calls “real election interference.”

“Let talk about how real election interference was perpetrated by Clapper, Brennan, Hayden, et al. THIS IS THE BIG STORY. Trust me,” Maxey told me and directed me to an article in Politico.

MAXEY SENT ME HERE

From her Politico article, Hunter Biden’s story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say, Natasha Bertrand reported, “More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president’s son.”

“More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to the letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

The letter, signed on Monday, centers around a batch of documents released by the New York Post last week that purport to tie the Democratic nominee to his son Hunter’s business dealings. Under the banner headline “Biden Secret E-mails,” the Post reported it was given a copy of Hunter Biden’s laptop hard drive by President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who said he got it from a Mac shop owner in Delaware who also alerted the FBI,” Bertrand wrote.

So, taxpayer-funded, career Intelligence servants called the exposure of Biden’s Laptop “Russian Disinformation,” which took down  Bannon and Maxey, two naval veterans who turned American media sources.

The letter the intelligence community wrote protecting the Biden family gave Big Tech cover to steal American civil liberties from Naval Veterans and other Americans. And it took Maxey to connect the dots.

Maxey directed me to the letter, which was also posted in Politico:

In the letter:

Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails
October 19, 2020

We are all individuals who devoted significant portions of our lives to national security. Some of us served in senior positions in policy departments and agencies, and some of us served in senior positions in the Intelligence Community. Some of us were political appointees, and some were career officials. Many of us worked for presidents of both political parties.

We are all also individuals who see Russia as one of our nation’s primary adversaries. All of us have an understanding of the wide range of Russian overt and covert activities that undermine The US national security, with some of us knowing Russian behavior intimately, as we worked to defend our nation against it for a career. A few of us worked against Russian information operations in the United States in the last several years.

Perhaps most important, each of us believes deeply that American citizens should determine the outcome of elections, not foreign governments. All of us agree with the founding fathers’ concern about the damage that foreign interference in our politics can do to our democracy.

It is for all these reasons that we write to say that the arrival on the US political scene of emails purportedly belonging to Vice President Biden’s son Hunter, much of it related to his serving on the Board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, has all the classic earmarks of Russian information,” the letter read.

THEY PUT THEIR NAME ON IT:

Signed, James Clapper, Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta, John Brennan, Thomas Finger, Rick Ledgett, John McLaughlin, Michael Morell, Mike Vickers, Doug Wise, Nick Rasmussen, Russ Travers, Andy Liepman, John Moseman, Larry Pfeiffer, Jeremy Bash, Rodney Snyder, Glenn Gerstell, David B. Buckley, Nada Bakos, James B. Bruce, David Cariens, Janice Cariens, Paul Kolbe, Peter Corsell, Brett Davis, Roger Zane George, Steven L. Hall, Kent Harrington, Don Hepburn, Timothy D. Kilbourn, Ron Marks, Jonna Hiestand Mendez, Emile Nakhleh, Gerald A. O’Shea, David Priess, Pam Purcilly, Marc Polymeropoulos, Chris Savos, Nick Shapiro, John Sipher, Stephen Slick, Cynthia Strand, Greg Tarbell, David Terry, Greg Treverton, John Tullius, David A. Varnell, Winston Wiley, Kris<n Wood- In addi<on, nine addi<onal former IC officers who cannot be named publicly also support the arguments in this letter.

About the people who signed the letter, Maxey said, “They also caused harm to NY Post me and others with their lies. They owe an apology to the American people and the world,” Maxey said.

You can find Jack Maxey on Gab.

 

When Marxism Meets Communism: Will George Floyd’s Trial Cause Social Upheaval For America?

When Marxism Meets Communism: Will George Floyd’s Trial Cause Social Upheaval For America?

<h4>When guerilla warfare tactics of leftist Marxist Community Organizers intersect with the powerful mind control tactics of the Chinese Communist Party and are applied, unopposed, in a free and open society, then citizens are in danger of finding themselves in the middle of a violent revolution.</h4>
Enter George Floyd trial.  Floyd is the latest unfortunate death by a police officer during an arrest to be exploited by a Marxist Defund the Police movement. Exploited is the correct term to use because a well-organized political movement has been on the lookout and ready to spring into action, over such a death, for a long time.

IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT ‘DEFUNDING THE POLICE’ WAS A PLAN, NOT A REACTION

Found, written by Maya Harris, the sister of Kamala Harris, is a wealth of Marxist tactics to use political theater, media, messaging, and branding to defund local police departments, by force to achieve certain goals that they can not bring about at the ballot box.

From page 8, the author describes the tactics she will teach activists and community organizers to take in order to bring about their desired collective changes to police departments:

“Fundamentally, police reform advocacy aims to redefine the relationship of police departments to
the communities they serve—a relationship defined over decades of interaction and laden with all the
complexities of race and class. This is no small feat. Advocates usually face a well-funded, politically
connected opposition.

Progress takes persistence, and change takes time. Advocacy efforts typically focus
on changing specific policies and practices that are incremental steps toward the much larger goal.
For all the challenges that exist, advocates in cities across the nation have achieved great successes in
securing improved police policies and practices and in moving their police departments closer to a vision
of community-centered policing. Some advocates have been doing this work for years; others have only
recently begun. All have relied on one or more of the advocacy strategies discussed in this manual as a
vehicle for change. Examples of their accomplishments and many lessons learned are described in this
manual,” Harris writes.

According to the defunding the policy manual:

Organized for Change is divided into five main sections:
Seizing the Moment: Urgent, Unified Community Response recognizes that police reform
advocacy often arises in the context of crisis—a high-profile instance of police misconduct that
focuses public attention for a moment in time on the need for positive change within the police
department. The chapter provides tips for resolving the circumstances at hand, while leveraging
the situation to advance a broader advocacy agenda.

Getting Specific: Know Your Police Department starts from the premise that an effective
strategy for change requires a firm understanding of what you currently have in place so that
you can develop a roadmap from where you are starting to where you want to go. The chapter
provides a range of topics and policies to consider.

Getting People Together and Making Your Case groups together four advocacy strategies:
organizing and coalition building; conducting research; working with the media; and harnessing
the power of the Internet. Each of these strategies is about building support for your advocacy
agenda. More often than not, one—if not all—of these strategies is invoked in any police
reform advocacy effort, regardless of the forum in which change is pursued.

Getting What You Want and Changing the Rules describes the four traditional forums in
which advocates pursue their agendas for change: the courts, the legislature, the ballot, and
administrative agencies. Sometimes these strategies are used in isolation; other times in
combination or succession. This section concludes with a reminder to think outside the box
and includes examples of tools and tactics that go beyond the traditional steps discussed
in the preceding chapters.

Getting Started: Tips to Consider in Moving an Agenda provides several nuts-and-bolts
issues to consider as you launch your advocacy effort—and get organized for change.

The manual is very specific in teaching activists how to train others for a full political movement. Along with Grassroots marketing platforms, and taxpayer-funded non-government organizations (NGO), activism like this has been a lucrative business for decades.

BRING IN NEW ALLIES AND NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR A POWERFUL CHANGE AGENT IN AMERICA

Along with a well-established path of distribution for the messaging about Floyd, and a built-in powerhouse PR movement, the left is able to use Floyd as an icon of dissent and organization with new technology.

According to CCP expert, Gordon Chang, there is a good reason to understand the influence of TikTok on American culture.

Enter Big Tech, Silicon Valley and Tik Toc

“Chairman Xi destroyed the lives of George Floyd and a further 1/4 million Americans with fentanyl. Intentionally. Then he used AI and social media to turn us against each other over it. And it worked. I testified before the senate to explain how he did it,” Paul Dabrowa posted.

In his paper, <em><a href=”https://t.co/HGNHHW5yxB?amp=1″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Cognitive Hacking as the New Disinformation Frontier</a>, </em>Dabrowa discussed how The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses “Artificial Intelligence Algorithms” which are designed to repress the Chinese population. The paper is based on his testimony that was presented before the Commonwealth of Australia Senate Select Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media on September 22, 2020.

“The risk in the new propaganda war The science and practice of persuasion has gotten drastically more sophisticated in recent years, thanks in large part to technology. Today, digitally-crafted propaganda can trigger wars, economic collapse, riots, and protests of all kinds. It can also destroy the credibility of
government institutions and turn a population against itself,” Dabrowa wrote.

In his testimony, at the link, Dabrowa lays out the numerous ways that TikTok uses to control and propagandize the population, and ends in concludes:

Conclusion
In recent times, the Australian public has started to realise that the Chinese Communist Party is systematically working to undermine Australian national security. One method is via social media applications such as TikTok; which currently remains a platform for censorship and propaganda while gathering an extraordinary amount of data on Australian users. The CCP uses similar platforms domestically to control and persecute its population.

The regime understands the enormous influence social media exerts in manipulating politics and national
elections. It seeks to exercise some of this same influence, and same power, more directly here in Australia, in an effort to control what Australians see, hear, and ultimately think.

TikTok poses a clear national security risk to the Australian population and should be banned.
I urge the Australian Government to take all measured actions necessary to protect Australians and our national interest: insisting on an outright sale of TikTok or, if necessary, ban the application to protect Australian national security.”

One has to wonder, if these dangers to national security are unfolding for Australia, are they unfolding here as well. Could this be what President Donald J. Trump had been warning us about?

0