The 2020 Presidential campaign will stand out in history for several reasons. Mostly restricted to online, TV & radio commercials, took place during a disputed national virus outbreak, during rioting by anarchist groups and included a Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, who is experiencing some form of mental decline. The person typically chosen to run as the VP nominee is important, but not as a real concern of them actually assuming the Presidency due to the death or inability of the President to fulfill the office moving forward.
With the mental lapses known to all, the integrity of the DNC for allowing the former VP to be the nominee is lacking. Unless in denial, most on their side are putting a lot of importance in the VP selection, as He/She could very likely need to run the country at some point during the 4 years. Either as the real decision-maker, allowing a President Biden to stay in office, so as to not affect his legacy, or to actually assume the Presidency in the event Joe can’t continue.
To the surprise of many, Mr. Biden announced over a month ago, that he was vetting VP candidates, and that it would be a woman of color. This immediately put the campaign in a box as the list of candidates shrunk considerably. One of the names circulating throughout the progressive media news network is California Senator Kamala Harris. A well known former California State Attorney General, with a questionable past, has the GOP preparing their political hit pieces to exposure her shortcomings. Recently there has been scrubbing of her history from the CA state website as well as Wikipedia.
From Fox News
Wikipedia page scrubbed of information amid veepstakes, igniting an online fight.
One person has made hundreds of edits in just a few months
An online battle has erupted over the Wikipedia page for Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., with a significant uptick in edits that reflects a pattern that’s been seen ahead of past vice-presidential announcements and led Wikipedia to put the page under “discretionary sanctions.”
The trend was first reported last week by The Intercept. According to the revision history of the Harris article on Wikipedia, there have been 500 revisions to the page since May 9, most of which have been made by one highly prolific editor.
That editor first started significantly changing the article in April, making additions that led another editor to say on the Kamala Harris “talk” page, “[y]ou seem to have gone through a database of press releases from Harris’s office, cataloging every single one and adding it to the article. That is not how we write encyclopedic articles.”
The user who made the contentious edits defended his actions, saying that he wanted to get rid of “misinformation” on the page.
Wikipedia notes in the “talk” page that the Harris article is now under “discretionary sanctions,” which it says is a “special system that creates an acceptable and collaborative editing environment for our most contentious and strife-torn articles.”
Let the scrubbing commence. With 7 in 10 Democrats, in a recent USA Today/Suffolk University poll, say it’s ‘important’ Biden name a woman of color as his running mate, we can expect a massive amount of cleaning up of all the woman under consideration for the VP spot. All negative information such as poor work performance, relationship issues, controversial social media posts, etc, must be removed, and if possible without the public knowing. Just like the cartoon figure Pepé Le Pew, the left is looking to pass off a skunk as a cat, hoping the voters will not smell the aroma of who they (she) actually is.
Hopefully like the cartoon, the VP nominee will never get the actual job just like Pepé never won over the girl cat. His real nature was exposed, the longer she was around him. Kamala Harris has been around a lot time, and if done correctly, the GOP will expose her fully to the voters.