A Biden Administration Would Ruin the Economic Success of the Trump Era

A Biden Administration Would Ruin the Economic Success of the Trump Era

Joe Biden tried to claim that President Donald Trump didn’t really build a strong economy, but instead he inherited it from the Obama administration.  I’ll wait until you’re done laughing.  Come on.  Get it out.  Ready?  Good.

It’s a great line for people who don’t know any better, but it completely ignores the successes of the Trump administration, before the Chinese virus pandemic struck our shores and allowed Democrat governors and mayors to shut down our economy.  Trump’s policies were so good that the economy is already coming back strong.  And we’re still experiencing the pandemic, at least that’s what the Fauci’s and Fredo Cuomos of CNN are telling us whether you believe them or not.

In fact, if God forbid Joe Biden wins the election, he would do himself and the county a real solid if he continued the economic policies of the Trump administration.  But we all know he won’t, because there are too many progressive hands in the pot that will block doing what works and what’s right for the country.  Instead, you can count on Biden going right back to the Obama policies that created a stagnant economy that created the longest recovery in our history.

Between December 2009 and December 2016, unemployment dropped 5.2 points, from 9.9 percent to 4.7 percent. It fell another 1.2 points by December 2019.  If you’re not educated in such things and use this kind of data to score political points, you would see those numbers to think the growth in the economy under Trump was nothing more than a continuation of Obama-era policies, and you would be wrong.

Democrats always take things out of context to either help their own arguments or trash their opponents, and this is no different.  You have to look at this in the proper context.  By 2016 the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve were saying that the economy was at full employment, and they believed any improvement at that point wasn’t possible.  Full employment doesn’t mean everyone who can work has a job.  It simply means that the percentage of people who fall in the category of unemployed are either between jobs, in college, on maternity leave, or don’t want to work.  There will never be zero unemployed.  Even the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) felt that if the unemployment numbers went any lower it would move into territory that is regarded as unsustainable capacity.

When Trump got elected he threw out that belief and implemented tax cuts, he cut job-crushing regulations, and pushed the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to zero.  The so called “experts” said Trump’s goal to get 3 percent growth was delusional, and Democrats, RINOs and the pundit brigade all called his policies irresponsible and dangerous.  They were all wrong.  Even the idiot Paul Krugman said that under Donald Trump the markets would never recover and that Trump’s economic policies would bring on a global recession.  Can you believe he won a Nobel Prize in economics?

The markets did exactly the opposite of what the experts predicted and the unemployment rate dropped drastically.  Americans between 25 and 54 who were employed or seeking a job for the first time since the 1980s (Reagan) saw a sustainable rise in jobs on the market.

By 2016 the median household income was $62,898, meaning it grew only $257 since 1999.  That’s 17 years of not much growth at all, thanks to the DC swamp.  However, over the next three years we saw median household income shoot up to nearly $6,000 at $68,703.  That explains why so many people last month polled that their families are better off today than they were four years ago under Obama-Biden.  And remember, we’re in a pandemic.

The reason for this expansion under Trump is because this president didn’t settle for what Republican presidents normally push, like doing tax cuts for businesses and individuals to incentivize growth in investment and wages.  On the other hand, Democrats push Keynesian policies of government spending increases hoping the extra spending will stimulate the economy enough to increase job growth.

Trump fought on three different fronts.  He fought to bring back manufacturing jobs and to boost our agricultural industry by starting trade wars where he fought to change our current trade policies to be more fair to America, which were designed by past presidents to help our foreign trade partners over the US.  That coupled with tax cuts and regulation cuts exploded the economy by causing many American companies to come back home and they brought the jobs with them.  Trump’s successes in the economy are so profound that it’s not even a question of should we continue with Trumpian economics or go back to the wimpy policies of past presidents.  We should stick with Trump’s policies and continue to grow.

A Biden Administration Could Raise Your Taxes Thanks to Senate RINOs

A Biden Administration Could Raise Your Taxes Thanks to Senate RINOs

Taxes are supposed to help the government function.  Our Constitution has what is referred to as the General Welfare clause, and if anyone knew the reasoning behind this mention in the Preamble, they would understand that taxation in our federal system is out of control and is not functioning the way our Founding Fathers intended.

At one point during the Constitutional Convention, the old statesman, Benjamin Franklin, proposed a tax for the general government (federal) for “a power to provide for cutting canals where deemed necessary.”  The reasoning for this was sound enough. Canals in those days were used to move merchandise off of ships that sailed to port and to distribute them throughout each city, town, or otherwise.

Luckily for us, Roger Sherman objected, saying, “The expence [sic] in such cases will fall on the U. States, and the benefit accrue to the places where the canals may be cut.”

In other words, Sherman argued that the entire people of the United States would have to pay a tax that only the people who benefitted from it would be those who used the canals.  This sparked a firestorm of debates in the Convention and later among the delegates of the States during the ratification.  The end result was to adopt the idea that any bill that comes to be Constitutionally voted upon that needed funding, the prerequisite would be that in order to create the tax to fund the program, everyone who has to pay the tax must also reap a benefit from the program they are paying taxes to fund.   Do you feel you’re getting your money’s worth today?  Do you think the DC swamp is adhering to the General Welfare principles?  Heck, most progressive politicians today believe the General Welfare clause give them license to tax the hell out of us to provide welfare benefits to those in need.

Wall Street has been jumping for joy over the election results, believing that the since the dreaded blue wave fizzled into a blue puddle, it meant that Democrats would not propose huge tax increases that the Biden campaign promised to bring them, with everything going back to the miserable days before Donald Trump.  While the GOP has so far retained control of the US Senate, the two runoff races in Georgia aside, most believe the GOP will retain control.

While control of the Senate will not be decided until the January 5 runoff elections in Georgia, most onlookers believe that it’s not likely that the two Democratic challengers will win and tip control of the Senate to the Democrats.  Well, maybe those folks have too much faith believing that Democrats haver a morality that will preclude them from cheating the way they did so massively in the general election.  We’ll see.

If the Republicans continue to control the Senate, the chances of tax increases by, God forbid, a Biden administration, would be very unlikely.

The problem we now face are even if the Republican maintain control of the Senate with just 2 votes to give them the majority, this would make some RINOs very important to the cause of freedom and liberty.  I’m talking about Mitt Romney and Susan Collins.  If just those two turncoats vote with Democrats to increase taxes on the proverbial rich, and we all know that really means everyone, then it goes to a 50-50 tie and ties under a Biden administration would go to a Vice President Kamala Harris whose senate voting record makes her the most radical progressive ever to hold a seat in that chamber, more so than even Bernie Sanders.

A Biden administration could be anticipated to move rapidly to suggest a major fiscal stimulus package deal and to use budget reconciliation to expedite its passage through the House and Senate.  Budget reconciliation is a budget process method that would enable the Biden plan to avoid a Republican filibuster, limit debate in the Senate to a mere twenty hours, and pass the Senate with only 51 votes.

Biden is a slime ball, and though he doesn’t have the cognitive ability to do much of anything complicated these days, as if he ever did, the people who would really be running things will be clever enough to reshape an ugly tax hike package to be acceptable enough for at least two Republican senators.  Think about it.  A stimulus package could ask for trillion of dollars to spend on coronavirus relief for small businesses and people who are unemployed.  They would bail out failing cities and states run into the ground by progressive policies and you, the taxpayer, would be on the hook to pay for it all.  Rather than take the Trump approach which is the strengthen the private sector by getting the government off the people’s backs and allowing ordinary people to do extraordinary things, a Biden administration would create policies to make as many Americans dependent on the federal government as possible.

They would add things like child tax credits and child and dependent care tax credits, and other various tax credits that may seem like a windfall for some people, but the strings attached to that spending would be enormous.

A Biden administration would crush the achievements of President Trump and America would quickly no longer be great.  A Biden tax plan could be pushed through with the age-old class warfare attack of only raising taxes on corporations and the rich, thus sending the message that you don’t want to start a business and/or get rich, because you’re evil and you shall be punished.  It’s maddening.  They could also raise the top rates for the corporate tax and go back to the days of Bill Clinton for individual taxes to say 39%.  Do you want to pay 39% of your hard-earned money to a Biden administration?

Wait until they start to mention a wealth tax where they will tax money you earned that has already been taxed and is sitting in an account somewhere accruing interest.  That’s outright theft, but a Romney and Collins could bring that to you.  It wouldn’t hurt them, because like the days of old Democrat politics, they would probably be exempt from the same laws that would harm everyone else.  That’s how the game used to be played before Trump came along and reset the playing field to be more fair.

Speaking of unfairness, a Biden administration would go back to allowing progressive states like California, Illinois and New York, with very high tax rates to pay for all the progressive government handout programs, to let their rich progressive friends write off their high state taxes on their federal returns, thus forcing the middle and lower classes in other states to subsidize them by paying their share of taxes for them, something the Trump administration did away with.  So much for the rich paying their fair share.

It could also include provisions Biden called for during the campaign, such as a new corporate minimum tax and the repeal of tax provisions used by real estate investors.

In short, the kinds of tax structure changes the Biden campaign talked about would again make it impossible for many corporations to function inside the United States and would have them leave the country and go to places like China, who have Joe Biden in their back pocket.  We are just coming out of the forced lockdowns and tax increases now would slow investment, killing job creation and we would experience another economic malaise like what we went through with 8 years of Obama-Biden.

Think about it.  If Republicans can hold onto the Senate majority, and curb the traitors to freedom and liberty within it, the economic catastrophe that awaits us could be avoided.  Donate whatever you can to the David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler campaigns to help them beat the cheat that we know the Democrats are right now preparing.  Donate like your future depends on it, because it really does.

Bill Barr Never Said Federal Investigation On Voter Fraud Allegations Was Over, It Was Fake News

Bill Barr Never Said Federal Investigation On Voter Fraud Allegations Was Over, It Was Fake News

The media lies so much they should lose their First Amendment protections.  The Freedom of the Press clause in the First Amendment was put there so that the press could keep the government honest.  But the majority of news outlets today lie so much they should not be allowed to hide behind the protections.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) hit back at media organizations who reported on Tuesday that the DOJ had concluded its investigation into allegations of voter fraud and had found no evidence, saying that claim was false.  In other words, the media outlets lied.

CBS’s Catherine Herridge, one of the few good journalists left, took to social media to spread the news that the press once again lied about the Trump administration, over an AP story that reported Attorney General William Barr said that the DOJ concluded its investigation into allegations of voter fraud and that they did not find enough evidence to overturn an election.  Well, Barr never said that.  It was Fake News, a lie.

#Election2020results From a DOJ spokesperson: “Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election. That is not what the Associated Press reported nor what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”

The Associated Press reported on Tuesday:

“Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but ‘to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.’

The comments, which drew immediate criticism from Trump attorneys, were especially notable coming from Barr, who has been one of the president’s most ardent allies. Before the election, he had repeatedly raised the notion that mail-in voting could be especially vulnerable to fraud during the coronavirus pandemic as Americans feared going to polls and instead chose to vote by mail.”

“There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results,” Barr added. “And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”

The article starts out:

“Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.”

The obnoxiousness of that statement, which is the first paragraph of the story, goes to show how biased the media is against Trump.  There have been hearings with state legislators in multiple states where whistleblowers are coming forward and testifying about rampant and massive voter fraud they witnessed on Election Day and after.  How can the Associated Press call Trump’s allegations “baseless claims” when the evidence is being presented all over the place?  Baseless means none.  There’s no base, which means nothing can grow from nothing.  It’s a lie!

That got my blood boiling so much I had to reach out to the AP.

The AP mentioned that Barr also said that some people were incorrectly looking to the federal criminal justice system for a fix-all solution over election issues, adding that the proper remedy for many of these issues is often found in civil lawsuits.  Those are the civil lawsuits we have seen that the AP has turned a blind eye on.

“Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. … And those have been run down; they are being run down,” Barr added. “Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on.”

The Trump legal team responded to Barr’s remarks by stating that “there hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation” and that the evidence they compiled has not been examined by the DOJ. The legal team added, “Again, with the greatest respect to the Attorney General, his opinion appears to be without any knowledge or investigation of the substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud.”

Witness Testimony: Trump Votes Allegedly Switched To Biden in Maricopa County, Arizona Dominion Machines

Witness Testimony: Trump Votes Allegedly Switched To Biden in Maricopa County, Arizona Dominion Machines

Arizona is another battleground state where election fraud was apparently rampant.

On November 30, the GOP chairwoman for Maricopa County, Linda Brickman, testified before the Arizona legislature testifying that she personally witnessed votes for President Donald Trump being counted as votes for his opponent, Democratic nominee Joe Biden when votes were input into Dominion Voting Systems machines.

Brickman, a veteran county elections worker, had already given her testimony in a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury.  In her testimony, she said that she and her partner worker, a Democrat, witnessed “more than once” Trump votes switch over to Biden votes when they were entering votes into the Dominion equipment from ballots that could not be read by machines.

She also testified that she was threatened by election supervisors at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center (MCTEC) for openly talking about what she saw.

“I observed, with my Democratic partner, the preparation of a new ballot, since the original one was soiled, or wouldn’t go through the tabulators. I read her a Trump Republican ballot, and as soon as she entered it into the system, the ballot defaulted on the screen to a Biden Democratic ballot,” Brickman testified GOP Arizona State legislators on Monday.

She said that when she reported the problem to election supervisors, there were others in the same room who also commented that they too had “witnessed the same manipulation.”

“We were never told what, if any corrective action was taken,” Brickman added. “All I know is the next day, I was called outside the room that I was working in for signature verification by a supervisor who said, ‘I understand you caused some problems this week and you thought our machines were not working correctly.’

“I was told at that point in time that I could not discuss anything or talk about what was going on,” Brickman said.

“Many people were threatened,” Brickman told the lawmakers. “They were told that their voices would be suppressed, they would have to leave the room and not work there again. I’m here because I think this is our duty to speak the truth.”  And God Bless her for having the courage to do speak out.

She testified that she was yelled at and even “reprimanded” by her own supervisor, who accused her of causing trouble and “bringing things up that I shouldn’t have.”  If you see election irregularities, I think it’s your civic duty to speak out.  The others must have been worried that their little voter fraud scheme would be exposed.

Brickman additionally mentioned that during testing and certification of the Dominion voting machines on Nov. 18, she refused to approve the certification of the Dominion system throughout a meeting with Secretary of State Katie Hobbs as a result of the machines had malfunctioned throughout the test, and were shut down and reset by Dominion staff instead of being corrected.

She added that no one was given any explanation concerning the errors.  “We could see the machines, but we could not see or observe the software behind the machine to confirm what had really gone on,” she added.

Members of the Trump legal team had already pointed to witness testimony alleging that election results from Dominion Voting Systems are vulnerable to being manipulated, an allegation that the company has repeatedly denied.  Does anyone believe that Dominion Voting Systems company would admit to any manipulation of voter data?

Brickman also testified that a number of voting machines displayed irregularities, including the intentional lowering of signature verification standards by the election supervisors who claimed it was done to make things “move more quickly” so that they could push through a higher amount of ballots.  I don’t think there is a “move more quickly” section in Arizona election laws.

“Standards were lowered from approximately 15 points of similarities … reduced to a minimum of three, and then lowered to one, and ultimately none,” Brickman said, recalling that she was told to “just pass each signature verification through.”

“We were told, ‘Too many rejections have already been turned in … we need to move more quickly.’ This is not the way an election should be run. Where’s the integrity?” Brickman said.  So, screw the republic, these election officials must have wanted to get to the bar quicker.

Brickman also testified that she saw signatures on ballot envelopes that were nothing like the name of the voter listed who was being let through by election supervisors.

“So the ones who signed the envelopes were not the actual voters, but these were allowed to go through with ‘Maricopa County verified’ stamped on the outside of each affidavit envelope,” she said.  She also observed batches of envelopes with different signatures coming from the same handwriting.

“There were at least 30 ballots that I saw at one time, that were signed by the same handwriting but on different voters’ names,” Brickman testified. “When I asked if the county attorney would be alerted for possible fraud, I was told ‘no,’ that supervisors would take care of it.”

One of the most “egregious” problems, Brickman said, was the tossing out Trump votes as duplicated votes or “overvotes” because the voter both checked the bubble for Trump on the ballot and also wrote in the president’s name under the write-in candidate.

“This would continue on as an overvote, which means no vote was counted at all despite the policy having been changed to allow these overvotes. Supervisors contradicted their own policies where the [voter’s] intent was clear,” she said.

It sounds like fraudsters wrote in Trump’s name just to invalidate the votes.  Democrats will stop at nothing to cheat.

“I am here today again not as an expert in the Dominion software but as a voter in Maricopa County who wants to hear and speak the truth even though myself and others have been suppressed to speak before you now,” Brickman told the hearing.

“There should be integrity,” she said.

Volunteer Groups In Georgia Claim They Have Discovered Enough Evidence of Election Fraud To Decertify Biden Victory. Have They?

Volunteer Groups In Georgia Claim They Have Discovered Enough Evidence of Election Fraud To Decertify Biden Victory. Have They?

When it comes to voter fraud that is being allegedly discovered in all the key battleground states, Georgia is one of the more difficult situations.  It’s one thing when you have discovered massive efforts by Democrats to commit election fraud in a multitude of ways, and that’s hard enough to fight, but when you have Republican public officials in the Executive branch who seem to be a part of the problem, it makes it necessary for private groups to form in order to help fight the effort against the illegal things that went on during the 2020 election.  Yes, I’m talking about Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Governor Brian Kemp among others.

Through a mostly volunteer, donation-funded effort, the nonprofit group “Nations In Action” has discovered the most compelling evidence of alleged voting irregularities of any other investigation currently underway in Georgia.

One of many volunteer groups, a Georgia-based voter data analytics firm says it has found that about 40,000 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 3 general election.  Mark Davis, President of Data Productions, Inc. and considered an expert in five court cases concerning election disputes found 40,239 people who moved from one county to another more than 30 days before the election and voted in their old county, which is illegal according to Georgia law.  Those 40,239 people who voted failed to register their new address in time to vote in their new county, and according to the law they cannot vote in either county until they do.

40,239 illegal votes are more than triple the size of the current margins in the Presidential race as Joe Biden is listed as being approximately 12,000 votes ahead of President Donald Trump.

Full disclosure: Mark Davis has been one of my best friends for about a dozen years.  He is like a brother to me.  I can say with confidence that he has been very concerned about voter residency issues in his state for decades.  He is the go-to guy in Georgia for voter data analysis.

Davis’ investigation say they found there were 312,971 people who moved within the state from one county to another and that out of that 122,231 people moved more than 30 days prior to the election and failed to notify the state in time to vote, which means they were ineligible to vote in the 2020 election.  That 40,239 number comes from that batch of people.

The analysis also found that 267,255 people notified the USPS that they moved outside the state of Georgia, which means they are no longer eligible to vote in the state, yet, 14,980 of those people allegedly voted in the 2020 election in Georgia, 100 percent of them illegally.

“When we ran the data on these changes of address, the numbers startled me,” said Davis.

In search of additional verification, a second Nations In Action volunteer, Derek Somerville, CEO of Sierra Partners LLC and former FBI Special Agent, started to analyze individual voters in Mr. Davis’ data.  “I worked in the US intelligence community. I’m a trained federal investigator who was assigned to Public Corruption cases” says Somerville. ”After investigating a random sample of these voters, it became abundantly clear that thousands, if not tens of thousands of voters in this election do not reside in the county in which they voted…or even in the state of Georgia.”

Maria Strollo Zack, founder and chairman of Nations In Action, acknowledged that what is allegedly occurring in Georgia ought to concern every voter no matter party, adding “The Georgia legislature has failed its citizens by refusing to focus on systemic widespread voter fraud for decades.”

Up to now, Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the final certified voter file from the Secretary of State Raffensperger have been ignored.  “What are they hiding over there,” Zack asked.

“Americans demand honest, free and fair elections and Georgia voters deserve better than this,” Zack said. “Georgia has clear statutory and case law when it comes to voters casting ballots where they live and the Election Lawyers, Attorney General, and Georgia Bureau of Investigation should get involved.”

Zack also called on the Georgia state legislature to immediately begin hearings over this information. “They may ultimately need to sue to get more time to recount without these illegal ballots, bad addresses, and unverified signatures.”

“Otherwise, if the election is de-certified, the General Assembly may need to step in and decide for itself whether to send electors and make that important decision on who will be the next President.”

Through a mostly volunteer, donation-funded effort, the nonprofit group “Nations In Action” has discovered the most compelling evidence of alleged voting irregularities of any other investigation currently underway in Georgia.

One of many volunteer groups, a Georgia-based voter data analytics firm says it has found that about 40,000 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 3 general election.  Mark Davis, President of Data Productions, Inc. and considered an expert in five court cases concerning election disputes found 40,239 people who moved from one county to another more than 30 days before the election and voted in their old county, which is illegal according to Georgia law.  Those 40,239 people who voted failed to register their new address in time to vote in their new county, and according to the law they cannot vote in either county until they do.

40,239 illegal votes are more than triple the size of the current margins in the Presidential race as Joe Biden is listed as being approximately 12,000 votes ahead of President Donald Trump.

Full disclosure: Mark Davis has been one of my best friends for about a dozen years.  He is like a brother to me.  I can say with confidence that he has been very concerned about voter residency issues in his state for decades.  He is the go-to guy in Georgia for voter data analysis.

Davis’ investigation say they found there were 312,971 people who moved within the state from one county to another and that out of that 122,231 people moved more than 30 days prior to the election and failed to notify the state in time to vote, which means they were ineligible to vote in the 2020 election.  That 40,239 number comes from that batch of people.

The analysis also found that 267,255 people notified the USPS that they moved outside the state of Georgia, which means they are no longer eligible to vote in the state, yet, 14,980 of those people allegedly voted in the 2020 election in Georgia, 100 percent of them illegally.

“When we ran the data on these changes of address, the numbers startled me,” said Davis.

In search of additional verification, a second Nations In Action volunteer, Derek Somerville, CEO of Sierra Partners LLC and former FBI Special Agent, started to analyze individual voters in Mr. Davis’ data.  “I worked in the US intelligence community. I’m a trained federal investigator who was assigned to Public Corruption cases” says Somerville. ”After investigating a random sample of these voters, it became abundantly clear that thousands, if not tens of thousands of voters in this election do not reside in the county in which they voted…or even in the state of Georgia.”

Maria Strollo Zack, founder and chairman of Nations In Action, acknowledged that what is allegedly occurring in Georgia ought to concern every voter no matter party, adding “The Georgia legislature has failed its citizens by refusing to focus on systemic widespread voter fraud for decades.”

Up to now, Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the final certified voter file from the Secretary of State Raffensperger have been ignored.  “What are they hiding over there,” Zack asked.

“Americans demand honest, free and fair elections and Georgia voters deserve better than this,” Zack said. “Georgia has clear statutory and case law when it comes to voters casting ballots where they live and the Election Lawyers, Attorney General, and Georgia Bureau of Investigation should get involved.”

Zack also called on the Georgia state legislature to immediately begin hearings over this information. “They may ultimately need to sue to get more time to recount without these illegal ballots, bad addresses, and unverified signatures.”

“Otherwise, if the election is de-certified, the General Assembly may need to step in and decide for itself whether to send electors and make that important decision on who will be the next President.”

Top Cybersecurity Expert NY Times Called ‘The Smartest Man in the Room’ Claims Trump Is Right, Election Rife With Fraud

Top Cybersecurity Expert NY Times Called ‘The Smartest Man in the Room’ Claims Trump Is Right, Election Rife With Fraud

Over the Thanksgiving holiday, Attorney Sidney Powell, who is working on her own to help prove election fraud against President Donald Trump in multiple states as an organized effort, released what she referred to as “the Kraken” which are two lawsuits that allege that massive voter fraud took place in the 2020 presidential election.

According to Conservative US, Powell released a “104-page document detailing allegations about Georgia and a 75-page document looking at Michigan on Wednesday night, calling for the election results to be decertified, Trump to be declared the winner and voting machines to be impounded.”

Powell released the document around midnight the night before Thanksgiving, and she gave a link to her website in the tweet, “The #Kraken was just released on #Georgia…Exhibits to follow. Also #ReleaseTheKraken in #Michigan.”

Sidney Powell said during a phone interview posted by Kyle Becker a freelance journalist, “we’ve got pictures of the check stubs paid to people to ballot harvest and do fraudulent voting.” When asked how many fraudulent votes she believes Joe Biden “had on his slate” Powell answered, “probably at least ten million.”

While Democrats have tried to label lawsuits and allegations of massive voter fraud as false and conspiracy theories, there’s one person involved who they can’t ignore, Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity and counterintelligence expert who has 30 years of experience in national security supporting Defense, US Intelligence Agency (USIA), and has given support to the CIA, NSA, DHS US-CERT, USCYBERCOM in the FBI.

Keshavarz-Nia has declared that there was massive voter fraud in the 2020 election via computers, saying, “all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden.”

Keshavarz-Nia concluded with “high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden.”  A couple months ago the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a huge, multi-million-dollar fraud that was run against the American intelligence and military communities.

“Navid Keshavarz-Nia, those who worked with him said, “was always the smartest person in the room.” In doing cybersecurity and technical counterintelligence work for the CIA, NSA and FBI, he had spent decades connecting top-secret dots. After several months of working with Mr. Courtney, he began connecting those dots too. He did not like where they led.”

Well, now “the smartest person in the room” joins with Trump and his legal team that the vote counts for Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia show “electronic manipulation.”

Kershavarz-Nia has worked as a cyber-security engineer.  “My experience,” he attests, “spans 35 years performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and security intelligence.”  The fact of the matter is Kershavarz-Nia is an expert who knows more about cybersecurity than most people in America.

Kershavarz-Nia, cybersecurity expert said that Hammer and Scorecard are real, they are not a hoax or a conspiracy theory as the Democrats and their boot-licking sycophants in the media are saying, and both of them are used to intentionally change votes and therefore election outcomes.

He also says that Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation, and that the media has done reporting on these vulnerabilities in the past, but that was when they thought Democrats would be the victims of such vulnerabilities.  Now, the very same news outlets are reporting that it’s impossible for the same vulnerabilities they reported on in the past.  Go figure.

Kershavarz-Nia also pointed out that Dominion has been used in other foreign election to “forge election results.”  The machines are able to be hacked very easily, and memory cards and cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.

He said that the company’s corporate structure is intentionally confusing to make it easier to hide corporate relationships with China, Cuba, and Venezuela, all countries known for fraudulent elections.

“The Kraken” is also a reference to the Military Intelligence 305th Battalion, according to Lt. Colonel Thomas McInerney.

Schumer Urges a Coup For Senate To Confirm Biden Cabinet Picks Before A Clear Winner Is Declared [VIDEO]

Schumer Urges a Coup For Senate To Confirm Biden Cabinet Picks Before A Clear Winner Is Declared [VIDEO]

On Monday, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) demanded that the Senate must begin confirmation hearings for Joe Biden’s cabinet before Inauguration Day.  Forget the fact that Biden has not even been legally confirmed as “President-Elect” yet, the Democrats want his cabinet picks ready to be confirmed on day one.

From the well of the Senate floor, the senate minority leader gave high praise for the people who have already been announced in the mainstream media’s hopes for a Biden administration and Schumer called on the Senate to begin confirmation hearings after the January 5 Georgia Senate runoff elections.  In the way he said it, it makes you wonder if he knows how the Democrats are going to cheat to win those two senate seats in Georgia.  I don’t trust the Democrats as far as I can throw them, and neither should you.

“As President-Elect Biden prepares to assume office on Jan. 20, he’s beginning to announce a slate of qualified, experienced public servants who he intends to nominate to his cabinet or other key administrative positions,” Schumer prefaced his public statement, naming Biden’s core economic team led by Treasury nominee Janet Yellen who will probably do the same things she did when she was the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.  Meaning, we would try to implement the same monetary policies of the miserable Obama years.

Schumer argued that the assembly “clearly has the experience, the knowledge, the prowess to meet the seriousness of this moment.”  But the Obama years are remembered for a miserable economy.

“More than that, they understand the needs of all Americans because they represent all given kinds of Americans. They’ll get to work not just on rebuilding our economy, but striving to provide greater and more equitable prosperity to future generations.”  What exactly are all the “given kinds of Americans” he’s talking about?  Aren’t we all Americans?  How does Treasury treat Americans differently?

Schumer continued, “In the midst of this once-in-a-century crisis, it’s imperative the next administration can count on the Senate to confirm its cabinet without delay.”  Doesn’t it sound like Schumer knows something we don’t?  Doesn’t it sound like he is completely confident that the Democrats are going to win the 2 Senate seats in Georgia, as if he has some sort of an insurance policy?

“Everyone knows that the Senate plays a pivotal role in confirming a new president’s cabinet in the midst of this crisis,” he asserted.  “It’s imperative that the next administration can count on the Senate to confirm its cabinet without delay.”  Why?  What’s the rush?  Is this just another ploy to set the perception that Joe Biden really won the election?  No matter what they do most Americans will never believe Biden beat Donald Trump.

Schumer went on to assert that the early days of the Trump presidency were defined by “high-level appointments of individuals who were manifestly unqualified, plagued by ethical complaints, or swimming in conflicts-of-interest—sometimes all three.”  I don’t remember the Senate working on confirmation hearings before Trump was ever officially declared president-elect, do you?

“Already Republicans are twisting themselves into pretzels to explain their opposition,” Schumer scoffed, saying the he fully expects to “see some crocodile tears spilled on the other side of the aisle over the president-elect’s cabinet nominees.”  What an arrogant man.

The minority leader ended with, “The American people cannot wait to have its government working at full-force to keep them safe, defeat the virus, and get our economy back on track.”  It sounds like the biggest snow job I’ve ever heard.  We have to defeat the virus because people are dropping off by the 0.000000009%!

OAN’s Jack Posobiec took to social media to refer to Schumer’s demands as an  “Unconstitutional coup.”

Liberals Whine About Trump’s 44 Uses of Clemency Powers Even Though Obama Granted 1,927!

Liberals Whine About Trump’s 44 Uses of Clemency Powers Even Though Obama Granted 1,927!

When President Donald Trump announced that he would be issuing a pardon for retired General Michael Flynn, his former National Security Adviser, the president’s opponents ripped the move as an alleged abuse of the president’s clemency powers.

Take the idiot Adam Schiff-For-Brains (D-CA) for instance:

“Donald Trump has repeatedly abused the pardon power to reward friends and protect those who covered up for him. This time he pardons Michael Flynn, who lied to hide his dealings with the Russians. It’s no surprise that Trump would go out as he came in — Crooked to the end.”

Of course, Schiff lies every time he opens his mouth.  He lied to the American people for over 2 years, constantly claiming on cable network news programs that he had in his possession definite evidence of Russian collusion, yet he never produced any of that evidence. He said this every single time he was given the chance. And even after the Mueller witch hunt ended with the special counsel having to admit there was zero evidence of collusion, Schiff still continued to claim there was evidence. This man is a pathological liar.

Not only did General Flynn not lie to the FBI about sanctions, which is what Schiff is referring to in his tweet lies, but according to the 302 documents of Flynn’s interview with the FBI, they never asked him a single question about his discussions of sanctions with the Russian ambassador.   How could the FBI charge Flynn with lying about sanctions when they never asked him about it?  If I know this, then Schiff, the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has to know as well. Therefore, he’s still lying.

Attacking President Trump’s use of the pardon power to help allies is nothing new.  A lot of people were upset when Trump pardoned former Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff Joe Arpaio in 2017 for targeting Hispanics while searching for illegal aliens.  You don’t look for little old ladies with blue hair and aluminum walkers when searching for illegal aliens in Arizona.

Liberals complained about Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza, a conservative icon, lecturer, author and filmmaker, who was singled out by President Barack Obama for making a movie “2016: Obama’s America” with some claiming D’Souza’s pardon was more about Trump’s ego and partisan politics than justice.  Can you believe that?  The man was targeted by the former president of the United States and the dingbats at NBC ignored that part of the story and reported it was about some sort of personal flaw in Trump’s character.

With such an outrageous amount of alleged abuse of the pardoning powers, normal people who watch the news would think that President Trump must have racked up an enormous number of pardons and commutations over the last 4 years.  And they could not be more wrong.  In fact, going all the way back to McKinley, President Donald Trump has the lowest number pardons and/or commutations than any other past president.

According to the non-partisan think tank Pew Research Center, who recently released a report, Trump had granted clemency only 44 times.  He granted only 28 pardons and 16 commutations, which means he granted only 0.5 percent of all the clemency requests he received.

The president’s haters may not like the people he granted clemency, but the Constitution gives him that power, and it is absolute.

Compared to the guy in the White House right before him, Trump would be considered an amateur.

President Barack Obama issued clemency 1,927 times.  He issued 212 pardons and 1,715 commutations.  And none of the same whiners against Trump issued as much as a peep.

A lot of Obama’s clemency decisions were considered highly controversial.  According to Pew:

“But Trump is far from the only president who has faced scrutiny over his use of clemency. Obama’s frequent use of commutations, particularly for prisoners convicted of drug-related crimes, prompted criticism from Republicans, who said it benefited ‘an entire class of offenders’ and infringed on the “lawmaking authority” of the legislative branch.”

Obama boot-lickers and other sycophants will defend the former president’s use of clemency by claiming he only came through for 5.3 percent of requests received.  But to leave it there would rob you of the whole story.  Yes, it was less than 6 percent of all requests, but during Obama’s eight years in the Oval Office, clemency requests jumped almost three times the previous record number, to 36,544, where you’d have to go all the way back to FDR.

And it was the Obama administration that was responsible for the spike in clemency requests during those 8 years as they actually created a program called “The Clemency Initiative,” where the administration called on prisoners to request clemency.  The sheer volume of petitions for clemency is what drove the percentage rate of granted requests down.

So, why all the hubbub over Trump’s use of the pardon power?  That’s being treated no differently from anything else this president has done.  His detractors hate his guts and will trash everything he’s done no matter how appropriate.  Given the facts about presidents invoking clemency, their complaints reflect more on their own character flaws than anything President Trump has done.

Georgia Secretary of State Orders Investigation Into Groups Trying to Register Out of State Voters For Senate Runnoff Elections

Georgia Secretary of State Orders Investigation Into Groups Trying to Register Out of State Voters For Senate Runnoff Elections

All eyes are on Georgia as the fate of the free world lies in the two senate runoff elections coming to Georgia in January.  I say this, because Democrats have already told us what they intend to do if they win the majority in the senate, and their plans would effectively end the republic as we know it.

If Republicans lose both senate runoff elections, that would make the senate split at 50-50.  That means the vice president would split every tie vote.   With that, the Democrats have threatened if, God forbid, Joe Biden gets in, they will get rid of the filibuster rule, so that Democrats could ram anything through that they want, making the minority party helpless to stop them.  They would also pack the US Supreme court and federal district courts with leftists who like the current leftists on the court do not usually rule based on the Constitution, but on whatever the leftist ideology of the day happens to be.  The Democrats have vowed to also bring Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. in as new states giving the Democrats four more senators so that they would always have a majority.  Folks, if they achieve these goals you can give your freedom good-bye.

Georgia’s top election official says that he is starting an investigation into whether third-party groups are trying to register people from other states to illegally vote in Georgia’s January 5 Senate runoff elections.  You know the Democrats are going to repeat the cheat that they did in the November 3rd general election, the evidence of which I will mention below.

An analysis was done of voter data for the 2020 election in Georgia by the President of Data Productions, Inc. Mark Davis, considered an expert witness in court for at least five cases concerning election disputes, where with the help of his testimony four of those cases resulted in new elections being ordered while they are still waiting for a ruling on the fifth case.  That fifth case is where Davis discovered double voting irregularities in the state’s primary election over the 2020 summer with his discovery resulting in an investigation by the Secretary of State’s office that revealed about 1,000 double votes in 120 counties.

Davis was asked to perform a National Change of Address (NCOA) study on the voter data from the November 3rd general election.  In Georgia, the law stipulates that if a person moves from one to county to another county, they have 30 days to notify the state or else they cannot vote in either county, and of course if you move out of the state you can no longer vote in Georgia.

His study shows 312,971 people moved within the state of Georgia, and out of that the data shows 122,231 voters who moved across county lines.  Of those, the data shows 40,279 people moved across county lines more than 30 days prior to the election and they voted in their old county of residence.  That’s illegal.  In all likelihood, the vast majority of those residency moves are not of a temporary nature.

Davis’ analysis of the data shows 267,255 people notified the USPS that they were moving to an address outside the state.  He warns that some of those people will be students living out of state while in school and military folks overseas, both parties who intend to move back to the state, so therefore, they have the right to vote.   Davis’ analysis discovered that 14,980 of those people, who moved out of the state, voted in the 2020 general election.  That alone, if they came from Biden districts, would overcome Joe Biden’s lead of 12,000+ votes.

Read Davis’ entire affidavit here.

Suffice it to say Georgia has some serious residency problems, which begs the question, is the state going to protect the runoff elections so that unlike the recent general election, they are fair and free?

On Monday, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced “we have opened an investigation into a group called America Votes, who is sending absentee ballot applications to people at addresses where they have not lived since 1994.”

Raffensperger, barely a Republican, also said his investigators are looking into “Vote Forward, who attempted to register a dead Alabama voter, a woman, to vote here in Georgia.” He also pointed to, “The New Georgia Project, who sent voter registration applications to New York City.”

Who is watching Stacey Abrams?

The secretary of state also pinpointed “Operation New Voter Registration Georgia, who is telling college students in Georgia that they can change their residency to Georgia and then change it back after the election.”

Raffensperger asserted that “voting in Georgia when you’re not a resident of Georgia is a felony. And encouraging college students to commit felonies without regard for what it might mean for them is despicable. These third-party groups have a responsibility not to encourage illegal voting. If they do so, they will be held responsible.”

Gabriel Sterling, the election official who manages Georgia’s voting system, told reporters that “this is new information, these outside groups attempting to register people illegally potentially, in other states.”

Sterling said that these third-party groups appear to be “literally saying ‘hey, it’s OK to commit a felony.’”

And Raffensperger emphasized that “this office will continue to take steps to protect the voting rights of the legally registered Georgians of this state, Republican, Democrat, independent, and whatever party you may be a member of.”

0