Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Congressman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) made some stunning allegations against the State Department and some sitting U.S. ambassadors during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night.

 

Congressman Mark Meadows went on Sean Hannity and made allegations that the some State Department and some sitting ambassadors have conspired with the DOJ to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump. He claims that soon to be released documents will show that Trump is completely innocent of collusion with Russia. But it will expose people in our government that were “actively” working to take Trump down.

Meadows boldly claims, “I think when the American people see what I’ve seen, they will judge for themselves and know that this has all been a hoax.”

This is coming out just a week after Lisa Page admitted there was a plan to create a false ‘Russain collusion” story to derail Trump.

UAF Admin

Source: Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Clinton Foundation whistleblowers have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence, Meadows says

Clinton Foundation whistleblowers have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence, Meadows says

Three people have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence of potential wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation, including misappropriation of funds and allegations of quid-pro-quo promises made to donors during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News.

Source: Clinton Foundation whistleblowers have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence, Meadows says

CNN: Biden Admin Considering Using Private Firms To Conduct Warrantless Surveillance Of U.S. Citizens

CNN: Biden Admin Considering Using Private Firms To Conduct Warrantless Surveillance Of U.S. Citizens

According to CNN, the Biden caliphate is looking into hiring private contractors to spy on Americans without a warrant because the federal government is not allowed to. And don’t you believe for one minute that they will only be investigating cr4iminals. If you are a vocal trump supporter, you will be fair game. If you don’t believe in vaccines, you will be a target. If you disagree with Democrats on anything, you will be a target.

CNN reported:

“The plan being discussed inside DHS, according to multiple sources, would, in effect, allow the department to circumvent” laws that limit what the federal government can do in surveilling U.S. citizens without a warrant. A source familiar with the effort said it is not about decrypting data but rather using outside entities who can legally access these private groups to gather large amounts of information that could help DHS identify key narratives as they emerge.”

“Gathering information on US citizens — no matter how abhorrent their beliefs — raises instant constitutional and legal challenges. Civil liberties advocates and privacy hawks have long criticized any efforts to collect even publicly available information on Americans in bulk as a violation of Americans’ First and Fourth Amendment rights.”

Former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows responded:

“They spied on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and skated by with no consequences… and now they want to spy on you too. This is a chilling, terrible idea that should be roundly rejected.”

From The Daily Wire

The report claimed that the private firms that the Biden administration is considering using would “act as middlemen” to obtain the information, which would consist of “broad summaries or analysis of narratives that are emerging on these sites” and would not “target specific individuals.” However, some of these firms use fake identities to access the private social media spaces that the government can’t access, which could cause potential legal headaches for the administration.

“The government outsourcing warrantless domestic spying of American citizens to outside corporations doesn’t make it any less dangerous, unconstitutional or illegal,” political strategist Andrew Surabian wrote. “Do any pols have the courage to stand up to an increasingly lawless & authoritarian national security state?”

 

GOAT: Rush Limbaugh Has Left For Heaven

GOAT: Rush Limbaugh Has Left For Heaven

Wednesday, February 17th, is a sad day in America over the loss of a beloved Conservative Talk show pioneer, who blazed a path behind him for many other conservative pundits, medical personalities, and politicians, and who leaves behind a legacy of encouragement for Conservatives that will not die.

“I know the media and liberalism like the back of my hand, and I want to convince people not to believe everything they hear right out of the shoot.  I have been studying them for 35 years.  They live and breathe with this unquenchable desire to destroy Donald Trump. They believe that they are going to destroy him because he represents America,” Rush Limbaugh said on one of his last shows. “America is not going to die.”

Rush went after the left’s “sacred cows” with great precision, to the point that he changed perspectives. I, myself, was a young leftist Community Organizer when I first heard Rush, and he changed me.

Rush had a way of cutting through the indoctrination and exposing the theft of leftism on the poorest Americans in a stinging rebuke to the mindset of the left, but he didn’t attack people.

However, that is not how the leftists interpreted his words over the years; the left is not as gracious.

The news hit the airwaves of Rush’s death quickly upon the announcement, even trending right away on social media, Rush had died. Numerous talking heads attempted to frame Rush as they frame all Conservatives who love America as something less than desirable.

“I am sad to tell you that our beloved Rush has passed away early this morning,” Catherine Limbaugh, Rush’s wife, announced at the beginning of Wednesday’s show, in a beautiful 15 min long Eulogy, where she did a magnificent job of softening a devastating blow to American talk show listeners.

“Rush Limbaugh has died at age 70. The conservative talk-radio icon announced in February 2020 that he had been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer,” CNN reported. 

“He loved you,” Catherine said. “Rush loved this country. He appreciated so much our prayers and support. You were there when he needed you.”

“RIP to a legend and a patriot, Rush Limbaugh. Not many people can say they revolutionized and stayed at the top of an industry the way he did. My condolences to his family,” Senator Rand Paul wrote. 

Rush Limbaugh was a constant source of comfort for Americans who were frustrated or angry at the loss of American values and traditions over the past three decades, leading people to hold onto a hopeful optimism that spreading Conservative values would fix the problems America faced.

Rush will always be the Greatest Of All Time.

Conservative Ron DeSantis released a statement:

Rush held the interest and passions of many Populist Americans, validating the working values and concepts that are held by the quiet majority of America. That is how we got President Donald J. Trump, and Trump acknowledged that when he awarded Rush the Presidential Medal of Freedom just one year ago.

“Rush is simply irreplaceable, and this loss to our country and the conservative cause cannot be overstated. God bless his family and his extraordinary legacy,” Rep. Mike Johnson wrote.

The left hated Rush for his powerfully large audience. And they hate him still for his undying love of American that will be his legacy, but that is not what is going to be the lasting legacy of Rush Limbaugh.

“Broadcast Legend Rush Limbaugh has died. His legions of fans will miss him, and his powerful and bright contribution to our national dialogue is a treasure that will endure for decades to come. Rush Limbaugh, a great American, dead at 70. God bless you Rush,” Lou Dobbs wrote. 

“For years Rush Limbaugh gave a voice to so many who felt forgotten by their government. We’ve lost a legend in talk radio, a faithful warrior for the conservative cause, and most importantly a great American. God bless his family.” Mark Meadows wrote. 

After Catherine spoke, the EIB played Ray Charles, America the Beautiful.  That will be Rush’s final say; he loved America to the very, very end.

So let that fuel you for the journey ahead, because while we will miss Rush, we have work to do, and we are going to remember his words; walking in his footsteps is something that will connect us to him forever.

“I always like to keep looking forward. We have to do that. If you aren’t going to do it, no one else will.  There is you, and without you there out there is there no me in here, without you out there.  I have been here for over 30 years and it is stunning that you are still there.  I want to express my gratitude, but the big news is that you all are still out there,” Rush said in 2018.  That is what I am going to remember.

The fight to keep American Great goes on.

Sean Hannity Blasts Mitch McConnell Over Trashing Donald Trump, Calls For New Leadership For Senate Republicans

Sean Hannity Blasts Mitch McConnell Over Trashing Donald Trump, Calls For New Leadership For Senate Republicans

On Monday night, Sean Hannity tore to shreds Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell on his show for the outrageous condemnation of former President Donald Trump after he was acquitted a second time during a rigged and highly unprofessional impeachment mess on Saturday.

McConnell voted to acquit Donald Trump and then proceeded to castigate him over the riot that happened at the Capitol on January 6.   A lot of people feel that McConnell was trying to play to both sides of the aisle.

During his speech, McConnell accused Trump of being morally responsible for the riot that broke out and said that the only reason he voted to acquit the president was that it is unconstitutional to try a president who has already left office.

McConnell then doubled down writing on Monday, “There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone.”

How can people like McConnell, who has to have access to a television, not realize that it has already come out that the FBI gave warnings to him and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi days before the January 6 event that they had credible intelligence that there was going to be an attack with violence at the Capitol?  How come neither Sgt at Arms for the House nor the Senate accepted help from the National Guard that was offered by President Trump says before January 6 and multiple times?  According to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, the president offered up to 10,000 National Guard troops to protect that Capitol and the entire DC area, and each time his offers were rebuked.

“His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended,” he claimed.

McConnell said he had no ill will against the seven turncoat Republican senators who voted to convict Trump, but 74 million Americans who voted for Trump do.

Can we get something straight?  Donald Trump did not incite the riot.  There’s just too much evidence showing the contrary, and it’s worthless idiots like McConnell who lend credence to the hateful Democrats who are exploiting what took place at the Capitol on January 6 in order to demoralize Trump supporters.  It’s not going to happen, because, despite the efforts of the Trump haters, they know what happened.  They know Trump was not the cause of the riot.  The FBI also arrested many leftists who were caught plotting and pre-planning the riot days before it happened.  How come the Mitch McConnells of the world keep ignoring that?

Hannity ripped on “Republicans who have turned their backs on the former president,” during his show.  He called on the carpet “sanctimonious” McConnell and the other seven Republican nitwits in the Senate who joined the Democrats in trying to convict Trump for allegedly inciting the riot on Capitol Hill.

“Where was John Thune (R-SD) and Mitch McConnell fighting against the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in our history with Operation Crossfire Hurricane?” Hannity asked.  And he’s right.  There were some Republican heroes who tried to stop the never-ending onslaught against Trump from the minute he became president, guys like Reps. Devin Nunes (R-CA), Jim Jordan (R-OH), Matt Gaetz (R-FL), and Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Ted Cruz (R-TX), but the majority of congressional Republicans let it happen.  They did next to nothing to stop the lawlessness of Democrats who went after Trump in the most despicable ways.

“They were missing in action. Where’s the sanctimonious Mitch McConnell, John Thune, demanding that Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters — when is he going to give a speech on the Senate floor and hold those Democrats accountable for their incitement of insurrection and their insurrection-like language? The time is now coming for new leadership in the U.S. Senate.”

The Senate Republicans who voted to convict Trump that Hannity was talking about are Sens. Richard Burr (NC), Lisa Murkowski (AK), Bill Cassidy (LA), Susan Collins (ME), Mitt Romney (UT), Ben Sasse (NE), and Pat Toomey (PA).  Tomey and Burr are retiring and Collins and Sasse just got reelected, but conservative Trump supporters have a long memory.  Most of the useful idiots in that group are catching flack back home from their angry constituents.

Three of the Republican senators who voted to convict Trump during the impeachment trial have already been censured by the Republican Party in their states including Richard Burr, Bill Cassidy, and Pat Toomey.

The Real Reason Democrat Managers Didn’t Call Witnesses During Senate Impeachment Trial

The Real Reason Democrat Managers Didn’t Call Witnesses During Senate Impeachment Trial

Remember when the House impeachment managers wanted to call witnesses, and then they changed their mind?  And then they changed their mind?  They wanted you to think it was over a phone conversation that some unknown Republican Congresswoman said she heard about that concerned Republican House minority leader Kevin McCarthy talking to then-President Trump during the riot on January 6.  That was a lie as is everything that comes from Democrats without fail.

The real problem for the Democrats came about when Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said the first witness he would call would be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and the first questions he would ask her would be what did she know and when did she know it?  The kinds of questions the senator from South Carolina would ask would have destroyed the Democrats’ impeachment case because thanks to the censorship of their friends in the mainstream news media and the tech tyrants in social media censoring any information that didn’t align with the lies and gaslighting that the Democrats were doing would come as a shock to millions of Americans.

AAt that point, the Senate Democrats held a lil chat with the House managers and told them to back down from the offer and agree to no witnesses to be able to get the hearsay statement they had from the Congresswoman into the record.

But in the end, they were afraid of something else coming out that they just couldn’t allow the American people to know about at that stage of the game.

Let me just start off by pointing out how despicable the Democrats are for what they did during the impeachment process.  They lied, they invented information, they altered documents, and they withheld exculpatory evidence.  Had they been in a real courtroom they not only would have been disbarred but they would have faced criminal charges and possibly sent to prison with large fines on top of it.   The Left and the Democrats are going around now with the talking point that it’s not a court of law and it’s different because it’s political.   Yes, it’s not an actual court of law, and yes, it is a political process, but the decorum of a court atmosphere is still expected.  The American people don’t expect their elected officials to fake a trial against an innocent man by doctoring information, manufacturing evidence, and withholding exculpatory information which is exactly what the Democrats House managers did.

The new Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer assured America that there would be a trial and that it would be “full and fair.”  The house managers provided nothing of the sort. It was reminiscent of an old Soviet Union rigged trial.

WATCH:

The House managers presented their case as if Trump was inciting people to riot and then he didn’t do anything to stop it, which is completely backward from what really happened.

The Democrats then impeached President Trump but it wasn’t really an impeachment in the sense that the Founding Fathers gave us in our Constitution.  The Democrats in the House didn’t hold a single hearing and they didn’t call a single witness.  What’s worse is they didn’t allow the President to defend himself.  They just talked about it for days then voted to impeach.  It was all a rush job.

The reason the House managers changed their mind on calling witnesses is that they didn’t want the truth to get out about why the entire impeachment process was a sham.  They didn’t want the American people watching the impeachment show to learn that there is far more evidence that shows Donald Trump did not incite the January 6 riot and that he most certainly did take action to stop it, but the Democrats thwarted his efforts.  You can throw in the mainstream news media and the social media tech tyrants as well because as it turns out they censored the president’s speech by deleting tweets and two videos he made asking for people to stop the violence, to go home, and to respect law enforcement.

The Democrats didn’t want the American people to know that for days before the January 6 riot President Trump offered up to 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol, and every offer was rebuked every time.  The House Sgt at Arms declined their help and he reports directly to the Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.  The Sgt at Arms needs to be asked if Pelosi gave him orders to not allow the National Guard to move in for protection and if not, then why did he turn them down?  We know the Capitol police chief said he asked for help and was turned down.

We reported last week that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said that Trump made sure the National Guard was waiting and ready to move in.

“We also know that in January, but also throughout the summer, that the president was very vocal in making sure that we had plenty of National Guard, plenty of additional support because he supports our rule of law and supports our law enforcement and offered additional help,” Meadows told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo.

“Even in January, that was a given, as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense,” Meadows said. “That was a direct order from President Trump and yet here is what we see … all kinds of blame going around but yet not a whole lot of accountability.”

“That accountability needs to rest where it ultimately should be and that’s on Capitol Hill” Meadows added.

Meadows noted that the Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller would back him up on the issue, and Miller did back him up, according to an interview in Vanity Fair.

The acting secretary of defense, Christopher Miller, was at the White House with his chief of staff, Kash Patel. They were meeting with President Trump on “an Iran issue,” Miller told me. But then the conversation switched gears. The president, Miller recalled, asked how many troops the Pentagon planned to turn out the following day. “We’re like, ‘We’re going to provide any National Guard support that the District requests,’” Miller responded. “And [Trump] goes, ‘You’re going to need 10,000 people.’ No, I’m not talking bullshit. He said that. And we’re like, ‘Maybe. But you know, someone’s going to have to ask for it.’” At that point Miller remembered the president telling him, “‘You do what you need to do. You do what you need to do.’ He said, ‘You’re going to need 10,000.’ That’s what he said. Swear to God.”

As it happened, Miller, on January 4 approved the authorization to give National Guard support if it was asked for January 5th and 6th.  But they had to ask for it because that’s the law.  In fact, when they didn’t ask for support, Trump went to great lengths to offer them support, and they turned him down.

That’s why what the Trump defense team along with Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham said was important to understand.  They let the cat out of the bag that neither Speaker Pelosi nor DC Mayor Muriel Bowser asked for the additional support beforehand, and you didn’t think the Democrats would admit that Trump offered the help, do you?  Had either one accepted Trump’s offer for 10,000 National Guard troops for support there wouldn’t have been a riot and more-than-likely nobody would have died.   I think a riot is exactly what the Democrats wanted so that they could attack Republicans as all being domestic terrorists the way they have been since January 6.

President Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops Multiple Times To DC BEFORE Jan 6 and Was Rejected Each Time

President Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops Multiple Times To DC BEFORE Jan 6 and Was Rejected Each Time

You’ve already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out at the Capitol that day.  The Democrats and their sycophants et. al. have used the riot, which consisted of no more than 10 percent of the people who were there to protest the stealing of an election, to go after Trump supporters and conservatives in general.  The progressives have been accusing Trump of inciting the riot, even though there isn’t an ounce of evidence that shows it’s true.  Now I think it’s time we hear some truth.

Questions were raised as to why was it so easy to breach the Capitol that day.  How come security around the building was so lax?  Many speculated that the Democrats wanted something to happen so that they could do exactly what they are doing now.  The Sgt at Arms for the House reports directly to the Speaker of the House or Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).  The Sgt at Arms for the Senate reported directly to the Senate Majority Leader, which at the time was Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY).  Where were they and how come they turned down National Guard troops when Trump deployed them after the riot started?  Who gave them the order to turn the Guard away?

We come to find out that former President Donald Trump had offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops in to the area of the Capitol in Washington DC before January 6, according to Mark Meadows the former White House chief of staff.

Meadows told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” host Maria Bartiromo that even though Trump was vocal about offering Capitol Police and National Guard presence at the Capitol on multiple occasions prior to January 6, his offers were rejected “every time.”

“We also know that in January, but also throughout the summer, that the president was very vocal in making sure that we had plenty of National Guard, plenty of additional support because he supports our rule of law and supports our law enforcement and offered additional help,” Meadows told Bartiromo.

“Even in January, that was a given, as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense,” Meadows said. “That was a direct order from President Trump and yet here is what we see … all kinds of blame going around but yet not a whole lot of accountability.”

“That accountability needs to rest where it ultimately should be and that’s on Capitol Hill” Meadows added.

Democrats have accused Trump of inciting the violence that took place in the Capitol that day during a speech he gave near the White House.  They said because he used the words “fight like hell” when referring to his legal team’s efforts for election integrity that he incited violence.  The Democrats think you’re all stupid.   I don’t think there is a prominent Democrat in DC who hasn’t used those exact words on many occasions.

House Democrats, joined by 10 cowardly Republicans, voted on January 13 to approve a single article of impeachment against the president for “incitement of insurrection,” making him the first president to be impeached twice.  I think that speaks more to what kind of people the Democrats have become than Trump.   And in an Orwellian atmosphere, thanks to Senate Democrats when the trial begins Trump will become the first former president to stand trial, which countless legal scholars have said it’s unconstitutional.

Meadows described the impeachment trial against a former president as “political theater.”  Chief Justice Roberts agrees because he wants nothing to do with it.

“It’s really about Democrats trying to once again make a political point,” he said. “This whole impeachment is designed to remove someone from office. President Trump is a private citizen at this point. And yet they can’t stand it. They have to continue to go ahead and try to put forth some kind of narrative that scores political points.”

He added, “But we have seen it before. The American people are not going to have it. We have already had 45 senators say that this is unconstitutional. But it’s more than that. It’s a violation of due process. It’s not what our founding fathers set up. And it sets a very bad precedent of future officeholders.”

Trump’s lawyers who will defend him on Monday set out their defense making the argument that the Senate has no jurisdiction to try a former president and that the House’s article charge against Trump is deficient because the president was never afforded due process and his right to free speech was violated by the article of impeachment itself.

Democrats on Monday made the argument that the Founding Fathers were all for going after a president politically after he left office based on the argument that they never put into the Constitution that it wasn’t allowed.  That’s what leftists do all the time.  “What do you mean the Congress can’t appropriate money to build swimming pools at members’ homes?  It doesn’t say in the Constitution that we can’t do it.”  My question to these idiot savants minus the savant part is if the Founding Fathers really believed that Congress can hold an impeachment trial on a man who is no longer the president then why did they write “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment” in the Impeachment Clause in Article I, Section 3?  If we were to use the logic of the idiots then we can say that the Impeachment clause does not say they can go after a former president.  My God, do we really have to deal with these nitwits to this level?

“The Article of Impeachment presented by the House is unconstitutional for a variety of reasons, any of which alone would be grounds for immediate dismissal. Taken together, they demonstrate conclusively that indulging House Democrats’ hunger for this political theater is a danger to our Republic democracy and the rights that we hold dear,” the trial memo, authored by Bruce Castor, David Schoen, and Michael van der Veen, states.

Transcript of Trump Call With Georgia Secretary of State was 100% Proper [TRANSCRIPT]

Transcript of Trump Call With Georgia Secretary of State was 100% Proper [TRANSCRIPT]

On Sunday, the Washington Post committed another act of Fake News when they released an audio of a Saturday phone call between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where the two men can be heard discussing the 2020 election results.

Originally, the Post released just snippets of the hour-long phone call where Trump can be heard talking about the election results with Raffensperger and his attorney Ryan Germany.

Listening in on the call was Trump campaign attorney Cleta Mitchell and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

The president spoke to details of numerous examples of dead people voting, double voting, and other ballot irregularities, all of which helped Joe Biden.  Though, the Democrats always did do well with the dead demographic.

The secretary of state and his lawyer counter Trump’s accusations mostly by giving simple responses saying that the problems Donald Trump raised have been investigated.  That’s their way of saying we don’t want to discuss it.

Trump then insists that he won Georgia’s presidential election on November 3 and argues that widespread election fraud took away his victory.

Where the Post lied was when they claimed that while talking to Raffensperger Trump “repeatedly urged him to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state.”

That is an outright bald-faced lie.

The transcript of the phone call shows Trump demanding an honest accounting of the ballots, which he says would give him far more than 11,000 votes.

Here are some points the president made.  H/T Newsmax

In laying out the irregularities like ballot fraud, Trump said: 

But we’ve had hundreds of thousands of ballots that we’re able to actually — we’ll get you a pretty accurate number. You don’t need much of a number because the number that in theory I lost by, the margin would be 11,779. But you also have a substantial numbers of people, thousands and thousands, who went to the voting place on November 3, were told they couldn’t vote, were told they couldn’t vote because a ballot had been put on their name. And you know that’s very, very, very, very sad. We had, I believe it’s about 4,502 voters who voted but who weren’t on the voter registration list, so it’s 4,502 who voted, but they weren’t on the voter registration roll, which they had to be. You had 18,325 vacant address voters. The address was vacant, and they’re not allowed to be counted. That’s 18,325. Smaller number — you had 904 who only voted where they had just a P.O. — a post office box number — and they had a post office box number, and that’s not allowed.

President Trump mentioned the Fulton County video tape that shows massive fraud, the one that everyone in the country by now saw:

We had at least 18,000 — that’s on tape, we had them counted very painstakingly — 18,000 voters having to do with [person’s name]. She’s a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler [person’s name]. That was the [Fulton County] tape that’s been shown all over the world that makes everybody look bad, you, me and everybody else. Where they got — number one they said very clearly and it’s been reported that they said there was a major water main break. Everybody fled the area. And then they came back, [name] and her daughter and a few people. There were no Republican poll watchers. Actually, there were no Democrat poll watchers, I guess they were them. But there were no Democrats, either, and there was no law enforcement. Late in the morning, early in the morning, they went to the table with the black robe and the black shield, and they pulled out the votes. Those votes were put there a number of hours before — the table was put there — I think it was, Brad, you would know, it was probably eight hours or seven hours before, and then it was stuffed with votes. They weren’t in an official voter box; they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases, but they weren’t in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it, and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it, but slow motion, and it was magnified many times over, and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.

Trump referred to even more examples of fraud:

You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia, but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that’s 2,326. And you had dropboxes, which is very bad. You had dropboxes that were picked up. We have photographs, and we have affidavits from many people. I don’t know if you saw the hearings, but you have dropboxes where the box was picked up but not delivered for three days. So all sorts of things could have happened to that box, including, you know, putting in the votes that you wanted. So there were many infractions, and the bottom line is, many, many times the 11,779 margin that they said we lost by — we had vast, I mean the state is in turmoil over this.

And then the president talked about that demographic the Democrats have always done well with, the dead vote:

The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters. The bottom line is, when you add it all up and then you start adding, you know, 300,000 fake ballots. Then the other thing they said is in Fulton County and other areas. And this may or may not be true .?.?. this just came up this morning, that they are burning their ballots, that they are shredding, shredding ballots and removing equipment. . . . And they supposedly shredded I think they said 300 pounds of, 3,000 pounds of ballots. And that just came to us as a report today. And it is a very sad situation. But Brad, if you took the minimum numbers where many, many times above the 11,779, and many of those numbers are certified, or they will be certified, but they are certified. And those are numbers that are there, that exist. And that beat the margin of loss, they beat it, I mean, by a lot, and people should be happy to have an accurate count instead of an election where there’s turmoil.

Raffensperger Claims Only 2 Dead People Voted:

Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is the data you have is wrong. We talked to the congressmen, and they were surprised.

But they — I guess there was a person named Mr. Braynard who came to these meetings and presented data, and he said that there was dead people, I believe it was upward of 5,000.

The actual number were two. Two. Two people that were dead that voted. So that’s wrong.

Raffensperger gives the Democrat lie about the video:

You’re talking about the State Farm video. And I think it’s extremely unfortunate that Rudy Giuliani or his people, they sliced and diced that video and took it out of context. The next day, we brought in WSB-TV, and we let them show, see the full run of tape, and what you’ll see, the events that transpired are nowhere near what was projected by, you know —

Trump refutes Raffensperger’s claims:

But where were the poll watchers, Brad? There were no poll watchers there. There were no Democrats or Republicans. There was no security there. It was late in the evening, late in the, early in the morning, and there was nobody else in the room. Where were the poll watchers, and why did they say a water main broke, which they did and which was reported in the newspapers? They said they left. They ran out because of a water main break, and there was no water main. There was nothing. There was no break. There was no water main break. But we’re, if you take out everything, where were the Republican poll watchers, even where were the Democrat poll watchers, because there were none. And then you say, well, they left their station, you know, if you look at the tape, and this was, this was reviewed by professional police and detectives and other people, when they left in a rush, everybody left in a rush because of the water main, but everybody left in a rush. These people left their station. When they came back, they didn’t go to their station. They went to the apron, wrapped around the table, under which were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box. And then they took those. They went back to a different station. So if they would have come back, they would have walked to their station, and they would have continued to work. But they couldn’t do even that because that’s illegal, because they had no Republican poll watchers. And remember, her reputation is — she’s known all over the Internet, Brad. She’s known all over. I’m telling you, “Where’s [name] ” was one of the hot items .?.?. [name] They knew her. “Where’s [name]?” So Brad, there can be no justification for that. And I, you know, I give everybody the benefit of the doubt. But that was — and Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put ’em in three times.

Raffensperger tries to BS the president:

Mr. President, they did not put that. We did an audit of that, and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times.

Trump pushes back because he wants to know:

Where was everybody else at that late time in the morning? Where was everybody? Where were the Republicans? Where were the security guards? Were the people that were there just a little while before when everyone ran out of the room. How come we had no security in the room. Why did they run to the bottom of the table? Why do they run there and just open the skirt and rip out the votes. I mean, Brad. And they were sitting there, I think for five hours or something like that, the votes.

Raffensperger tried to blow the question off:

Mr. President, we’ll send you the link from WSB.

Trump points out that there was no signature verification:

No, no you don’t [Brad]. No, no you don’t. You don’t have. Not even close. You’re off by hundreds of thousands of votes. And just on the small numbers, you’re off on these numbers, and these numbers can’t be just — well, why wont? — Okay. So you sent us into Cobb County for signature verification, right? You sent us into Cobb County, which we didn’t want to go into. And you said it would be open to the public. So we had our experts there, they weren’t allowed into the room. But we didn’t want Cobb County. We wanted Fulton County. And you wouldn’t give it to us. Now, why aren’t we doing signature — and why can’t it be open to the public? And why can’t we have professionals do it instead of rank amateurs who will never find anything and don’t want to find anything? They don’t want to find, you know they don’t want to find anything. Someday you’ll tell me the reason why, because I don’t understand your reasoning, but someday you’ll tell me the reason why. But why don’t you want to find?

Trump points out the incredulity of 100% of military ballots went for Biden, which is an impossibility:

And what about that batch of military ballots that came in. And even though I won the military by a lot, it was 100 percent Trump. I mean 100 percent Biden. Do you know about that? A large group of ballots came in, I think it was to Fulton County, and they just happened to be 100 percent for Trump — for Biden — even though Trump won the military by a lot, you know, a tremendous amount. But these ballots were 100 percent for Biden. And do you know about that? A very substantial number came in, all for Biden. Does anybody know about it? . . . Okay, Cleta, I’m not asking you, Cleta, honestly. I’m asking Brad. Do you know about the military ballots that we have confirmed now. Do you know about the military ballots that came in that were 100 percent, I mean 100 percent, for Biden. Do you know about that?

Raffensperger’s lawyer responds to the president:

I don’t know about that. I do know that we have, when military ballots come in, it’s not just military, it’s also military and overseas citizens. The military part of that does generally go Republican. The overseas citizen part of it generally goes very Democrat. This was a mix of ’em.

Trump doesn’t back down:

No, but this was. That’s okay. But I got like 78 percent of the military. These ballots were all for .?.?. They didn’t tell me overseas. Could be overseas, too, but I get votes overseas, too, Ryan, in all fairness. No they came in, a large batch came in, and it was, quote, 100 percent for Biden. And that is criminal. You know, that’s criminal. Okay. That’s another criminal, that’s another of the many criminal events, many criminal events here. I don’t know, look, Brad. I got to get .?.?. I have to find 12,000 votes, and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state. That’s before we go to the next step, which is in the process of right now. You know, and I watched you this morning, and you said, well, there was no criminality. But I mean all of this stuff is very dangerous stuff. When you talk about no criminality, I think it’s very dangerous for you to say that.

Folks, this is where the leftist kooks claim Trump ordered Raffensperger to cheat for him.

Trump: Fellas, I need 11,000 votes:

So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break. You know, we have that in spades already. Or we can keep it going, but that’s not fair to the voters of Georgia because they’re going to see what happened, and they’re going to see what happened. I mean, I’ll, I’ll take on anybody you want with regard to [name] and her lovely daughter, a very lovely young lady, I’m sure. But, but [name] .?.?. I will take on anybody you want. And the minimum, there were 18,000 ballots, but they used them three times. So that’s, you know, a lot of votes. And they were all to Biden, by the way, that’s the other thing we didn’t say. You know, [name] , the one thing I forgot to say, which was the most important. You know that every single ballot she did went to Biden. You know that, right? Do you know that, by the way, Brad? Every single ballot that she did through the machines at early, early in the morning went to Biden. Did you know that, Ryan?

Madison Cawthorn Wins North Carolina Congressional Seat

Madison Cawthorn Wins North Carolina Congressional Seat

The Associated Press announced that Cawthorn, a 25-year-old paraplegic after a near-fatal car accident has won a seat in the House of Representatives from North Carolina.

He is now the youngest member of congress. Cawthorn is paralyzed from the waist down. He outdueled Democratic nominee Moe Davis to win the seat.

Cawthorn said:

“I definitely am running against the Republican Party. They’re a party that doesn’t try to tackle real issues. They are a party that always says no to things.”

“He is a fresh new package, but the things that come out of his mouth sound like Strom Thurmond from the 1960s. There’s nothing original about his sexist, racist views.”

“I choose to fight for the future, to seize the high ground and retake the Shining City on a Hill. While the radical left wants to dismantle, defund, and destroy, Republicans, under President Trump’s leadership, want to rebuild, restore and renew.”

Cawthorn won the seat left vacant by Mark Meadows. But it appears that the Democrats will retain control of the House and the Republicans look like they will hold the Senate but by a smaller margin. President Trump is definitely in the hunt for reelection. But no final result will be known before Friday un less Trump runs the table with Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The President currently leads in all three.

From The Daily Caller

Several women have accused Cawthorn of aggressive sexual behavior before his political career, which Cawthorn has denied. He has also denied allegations that he is sympathetic to white nationalist politics and a fan of Adolf Hitler.

“There is a big difference between a failed advance and being forceful, to the extent that’s possible when you’re a paraplegic,” Cawthorn campaign spokesman John Hart told the DCNF Aug. 16. “If being guilty of an awkward, failed advance is a disqualifying event every male in public office should resign.”

Davis also has been criticized for vulgar tweets, including one about breaking the necks of North Carolina Republicans. He posted a tweet on Sept. 11, 2019, describing North Carolina Republicans as “extremists.”

0