Lisa Page Wants you to Know she is Lonely Because of Trump and she Wants you to Vote

Lisa Page Wants you to Know she is Lonely Because of Trump and she Wants you to Vote

Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer who is at the center of a historically corrupt spy scandal involving surveillance of a Republican President by an out of control allied government and media to overthrow a sitting US President, and who has had marital affairs with two of most high profile participants in the scandal, wants people to know she is sad.

She is lonely and feeling isolated, and if Trump gets elected again she is going to start a support group for the other public servants, like herself who don’t like who the public chooses to run to the county.

Here it is.  Here is the tweet:

She felt this was an important announcement.

Page is responsible for altering the report called the 302, which helped propel three-star general, Mike Flynn’s life into a deep state hell.  I bet he felt isolated while defending himself from a purely political witch hunt that drained his resources and threatened his family.

Page has a long history of passive-aggressively taunting the people she has victimized while claiming that she is the victim.  It appears from her company texts to one of her boyfriends, Peter Strzok a former FBI agent, that he entertained her fantasy of being a damsel in distress.

She apparently also had an affair with Andrew McCabe, another member of the FBI.  I wonder if these men’s wives and families felt isolated after they found out there were betrayed.

One of Page’s notorious texts was to Strozk about McCabe. In 2016 Page texted to Strozk,” I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way Trump gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40”

I wonder if either of them felt isolated when they found out she had played them both.

Page shares something in common with her swampy cohorts, they enjoyed texting to each other about their anti-Trump fantasies.

Page seems to lack all self-awareness of the damage she has done.  She has no remorse at all. She may need to build a special group of people who are as debased as she appears to be.

Who does stuff like this?

In a shocking post, as if she did nothing wrong to overthrow our duly elected President, Page wants to remind people to vote, as long as they vote the way she agrees with. Otherwise, she may need a new “insurance policy” or a support group.

We did vote Lisa!!  You refused to accept it.  Poor, poor Lisa. The world is just so unfair.

 Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer who is at the center of a historically corrupt spy scandal involving surveillance of a Republican President by an out of control allied government and media to overthrow a sitting US President, and who has had marital affairs with two of most high profile participants in the scandal, wants people to know she is sad.

She is lonely and feeling isolated, and if Trump gets elected again she is going to start a support group for the other public servants, like herself who don’t like who the public chooses to run to the county.

Here it is.  Here is the tweet:

She felt this was an important announcement.

Page is responsible for altering the report called the 302, which helped propel three-star general, Mike Flynn’s life into a deep state hell.  I bet he felt isolated while defending himself from a purely political witch hunt that drained his resources and threatened his family.

Page has a long history of passive-aggressively taunting the people she has victimized while claiming that she is the victim.  It appears from her company texts to one of her boyfriends, Peter Strzok a former FBI agent, that he entertained her fantasy of being a damsel in distress.

She apparently also had an affair with Andrew McCabe, another member of the FBI.  I wonder if these men’s wives and families felt isolated after they found out there were betrayed.

One of Page’s notorious texts was to Strozk about McCabe. In 2016 Page texted to Strozk,” I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way Trump gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40”

I wonder if either of them felt isolated when they found out she had played them both.

Page shares something in common with her swampy cohorts, they enjoyed texting to each other about their anti-Trump fantasies.

Page seems to lack all self-awareness of the damage she has done.  She has no remorse at all. She may need to build a special group of people who are as debased as she appears to be.

Who does stuff like this?

In a shocking post, as if she did nothing wrong to overthrow our duly elected President, Page wants to remind people to vote, as long as they vote the way she agrees with. Otherwise, she may need a new “insurance policy” or a support group.

We did vote Lisa!!  You refused to accept it.  Poor, poor Lisa. The world is just so unfair.

 

BREAKING NEWS! Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says

BREAKING NEWS! Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says

Breaking News! In a closed-door interview, Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted: ” the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information.” 

Page was fired when a series of anti-Trump texts surfaced between her and her FBI boyfriend, Special Agent Peter Strzok during the 2016 presidential election. Many conservatives have suspected there was bias in the DOJ under President Obama.
“So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory,” Ratcliffe (Texas Republican) began as he questioned Page under oath, according to a transcript excerpt he posted on Twitter. “But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —”
Page interrupted: “That is correct,” as Ratcliffe finished his sentence, ” — bring a case based on that.”

This is breaking news, stay tuned for more.

UAF Admin

Source: Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says

Carter Page Sues Deep State, Including the DOJ,  Demands a Jury Trial and 75 Million Dollars

Carter Page Sues Deep State, Including the DOJ, Demands a Jury Trial and 75 Million Dollars

Carter Page through his attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon, filed a $75 million lawsuit against James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page, the Department of Justice and others, on Friday.

“It is my privilege to represent Carter Page in his suit against the officials who violated his rights in an outrageous abuse of govt power. #Winterishere. We’re a team of lawyers working for justice for Carter,” Gordon wrote.

“The complaint leads with McCabe’s admission to the Senate Judiciary Committee that “We are all responsible for the work that went into that FISA” — brilliant, which is what you would expect from @McAdooGordon,” on court watcher posted on Twitter, in reaction.

In the 59 page document Page alleges his Civil Right were infringed upon by illegal spying upon him and ruining his life, which Andrew mcCabe already admitted to doing.

According to the lawsuit:

COMPLAINT

“Specifically, Dr. Page secks relief herein for Defendants’ multiple violations of his Constitutional and other legal rights in connection with unlawful surveillance and investigation of him by the United States Government. Dr. Page was targeted because of his lawful association with the 2016 Presidential campaign of Donald Trump. Dr. Page is entitled to relief for
Defendants’ unjustified and illegal actions (including violations of federal criminal law), which violated federal statutes enacted to prevent unlawful spying on United States persons, as well as the Constitution.”

Citizen Free Press reported on the lawsuit and said,”In an eight-count complaint filed Friday in the D.C. District Court, Carter Page seeks damages of no less than $75 million from the U.S. government, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and individuals responsible for obtaining four illegal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders against Page.”

Page’s 59-page complaint lists as defendants a veritable “Who’s Who” of the SpyGate scandal, including former FBI Director James Comey, Assistant Director Andrew McCabe, and the disgraced team of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Also singled out were Kevin Clinessmith, who earlier this year pleaded guilty to falsifying an email to hide Page’s past service as a source to the CIA, and FBI Agents Joe Pientka, Stephen Somma, and Brian Auten, with additional defendants identified merely as John Doe 1 – 10 and Jane Doe 1 – 10.

For further reading, Gordon recommends the Federalist:

According to the Federalist:

“The first four counts of his complaint allege claims under FISA, with one count seeking damages for each of the four FISA court orders the defendants obtained against Page. FISA provides a private right of action to allow “an aggrieved person. . . who has been subjected to an electronic surveillance or about whom information obtained by electronic surveillance of such person has been disclosed,” to sue those responsible.

In addition to stating a civil claim for damages under FISA, Page’s attorneys note in the complaint that FISA makes it a criminal offense to illegally “engage in electronic surveillance under color of law.”  While only the government can prosecute a criminal violation of FISA, the allegation is a stark reminder that other than Clinesmith, no criminal cases have resulted from the illegal targeting of Page and the Trump campaign—at least not yet.”

Full article at link:

And more is coming:

An Unusual Number of People Involved in Past Political Scandals Are Landing Jobs in the Biden Administration

An Unusual Number of People Involved in Past Political Scandals Are Landing Jobs in the Biden Administration

Now that the Democrats have total control of the White House and Congress they are much less inclined to give a damn about the appearance of impropriety.  A case in point is Jake Sullivan, who was an aggressive user of Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email server, has been chosen by President Joe Biden to be the White House National Security Adviser.  A man who frequently used an email server that was unsecured and vulnerable to foreign hacking, and in fact the fired and disgraced former FBI director James Comey said that it was “possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”  What exactly was the Biden team thinking when they made the decision to make Sullivan national security adviser?  These are White House people.  Are we to believe they do not have access to that kind of information, or do they just not care what it looks like to the American people?

Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland was known to have ties to Christopher Steele, the ex British spy who conjured up the phony dossier that was used against Donald Trump to create the Russia collusion hoax that was initiated by Hillary Clinton in an effort to get the new media to not focus on her illegal private email server.  At first, Nuland tried to downplay her role in spreading the fake dossier.  When Senate Intel Chairman Richard Burr asked Nuland if she had a role in an October 2016 briefing Steele gave to the State Department she responded, “I did not,” and followed up with “I actively chose not to be part of that briefing.”   But she later told a different tale when she mentioned to CBS’s “Face the Nation” that Steele “passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding and our immediate reaction to that was, this is not in our purview” and instead should be of interest to the FBI.  But then there was a 302 memo of an FBI interview with Bruce Ohr the at the time 4th highest-ranking person in the Department of Justice from Nov. 22, 2016, and the agents wrote down in the 302 document that “OHR knew Glen [sic] Simpson and others were talking to Victoria Nuland at the U.S. State Departmartment,” so she may not have been honest about her involvement in the first attempted government coup in our nation’s history.

White House domestic adviser Susan Rice, who is a known liar, once went on all the Sunday news programs and said that the Benghazi terror attacks on a US embassy that ended with the murder of four Americans, including the American Ambassador, happened in retaliation to an anti-Muslim YouTube video that apparently no one really saw or knew about.  It was later revealed through communications that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had with leaders in Libya and Egypt and email communication with her daughter, who used the pseudonym “Diane Reynolds,” that the attack came from an al Qaeda-like terrorist group.

She also wrote the 11th-hour email to herself reminding herself that President Obama did everything “by the book” over the Russian scandal.  Rice also lied when she said she had nothing to do with unmasking Trump campaign people for political purposes.  Rice told MSNBC in 2017 that “the allegation is that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes. That is absolutely false.”  Then how was Lt. General Mike Flynn unmasked for his phone call with the Russian ambassador about Barack Obama kicking Russian diplomats out of the country even though Flynn’s name does not appear on any government unmasking list?  Because President Obama did the unmasking request and by law unmasking requests made by the president do not get listed with other unmasking requests.  The entire thing was political.

Less than two weeks ago Melissa Hodgman was named Acting Director of the Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  She is married to Peter Strzok the fired and disgraced former FBI agent who was sleeping with former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, both of whom were involved in the active government coup attempt to frame Donald Trump for something they knew from the very beginning he didn’t do.  Strzok was the agent who ran the fraudulent operation Crossfire Hurricane against the Trump campaign for Russian collusion.

We’ve never seen a bigger amount of people who were involved in past scandals be chosen to run agencies and departments before.  Some Republicans are seeing a pattern.

“If you look at the larger picture, the Russia hoaxers, the people that were pushing this out from the very beginning and lying about it after the fact, they’re all at the top echelons of the Biden administration,” former House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA), the man who first exposed the Spygate conspiracy said on Sunday during an appearance on Fox’s “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo.

Nunes has a problem with Hodgman’s new appointment saying while she “could be a great public servant,” it created the appearance of a Democratic payback to her husband for pursuing Trump.

“Looks like Peter Strozk is actually going to get reimbursed for all of his troubles,” Nunes said. “The guy lost his job, but nothing’s happened to him at this point.”

PR Disaster: The People of Walmart Might be Dwindling in Numbers After Their Slap at Hawley

PR Disaster: The People of Walmart Might be Dwindling in Numbers After Their Slap at Hawley

Walmart, who took to Twitter to lash out at Senator Josh Hawley as he was going viral for committing to represent the concerns of the American people, is one of those brands that has survived numerous public relations hits by the elitist left and yet just damaged their own brand from the inside by trashing their own shoppers. It is doubtful they will be able to recover.

“Go ahead. Get your 2-hour debate. #soreloser,” Walmart posted (and took down).

Hawley tweeted: “Thanks, ⁦@Walmart⁩ , for your insulting condescension. Now that you’ve insulted 75 million Americans, will you at least apologize for using slave labor?”

He added: “Or maybe you’d like to apologize for the pathetic wages you pay your workers as you drive mom and pop stores out of business.”

TROUBLE IN CCP MERCHANDISE HEAVEN?

“Every time you have the urge to shop at Wal-Mart, remember this multinational corporation is the single greatest enabler of the theft of American jobs. It’s way past their corporate charter to go after Hawley and reveals their pro-CCP bent,” Peter Navarro posted on Twitter in reaction to the story.

The left collectively and publicly mock Walmart shoppers as low class, deplorable, and tacky. The left even has a popular meme series called “the people of Walmart,” which is nothing more than branding Walmart shoppers as tacky and low class.

So it made big news when tone-deaf Walmart struck out at Hawley as a “sore loser” on Tuesday after his announcement to champion the people’s interest in the 2020 Presidential election and then quickly pulled their tweet down.

But not before many people saw it.

Here is the timeline of what happened.

Hawley did something that was somewhat uncharacteristic of him and announced that he was planning on supporting President Donald J. Trump and the American people in their concerns over voter fraud.

“Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf,” Hawley posted.

So Walmart sided with the Democrats and Trump’s opposition,  and the very people who mocked their shoppers and posted that Hawley was a loser, and by proxy- rebuking the working-class Trump supporters who have been defending Walmart for years.

Within hours Hawley responded with the following statement:”Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Today U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced he would object during the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021. Senator Hawley will object to highlight the failure of some states, including notably Pennsylvania, to follow their own election laws and the unprecedented interference of Big Tech monopolies in the election. He will call for Congress to launch a full investigation of potential fraud and election irregularities and enact election integrity measures.

Democrats have previously objected during the certification process for the 2004 and 2016 Presidential elections.

Senator Hawley said, “Following both the 2004 and 2016 elections, Democrats in Congress objected during the certification of electoral votes to raise concerns about election integrity. They were praised by Democratic leadership and the media when they did. And they were entitled to do so. But now, those of us concerned about the integrity of this election are entitled to do the same.

“I cannot vote to certify the electoral college results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws. And I cannot vote to certify without pointing out the unprecedented effort of mega-corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, to interfere in this election, in support of Joe Biden. At the very least, Congress should investigate allegations of voter fraud and adopt measures to secure the integrity of our elections. But Congress has so far failed to act.

“For these reasons, I will follow the same practice Democrat members of Congress have in years past and object during the certification process on January 6 to raise these critical issues.”

Background On Previous Objections to Electoral College Vote Certification

In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones Objected to the Electoral College Votes from Ohio.

Stephanie Tubs-Jones Said, “I Raise This Objection Because I Am Convinced That We As A Body Must Conduct A Formal And Legitimate Debate About Election Irregularities.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 3:10-3:20)

Boxer views her 2005 objection as “her proudest moment on the Senate floor,” according to CNN. (CNN, 12/27/2020)

In January 2005, 31 Congressional Democrats Voted To Reject Ohio’s Electoral Votes. (CNN, 1/6/05)

Nancy Pelosi Praised The 2005 Objections, Saying Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents” During “Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening”

Nancy Pelosi Said, “We Are Witnessing Democracy At Work,” And “This Debate Is Fundamental To Our Democracy.” “[T]oday we are witnessing democracy at work. This is not, as some of our Republican colleagues have referred to it, sadly, frivolous. This debate is fundamental to our democracy.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 32:49-33:08)

Pelosi Said Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents, Many Of Whom May Have Been Disenfranchised In This Process.” “The Members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. This is their only opportunity to have this debate while the country is listening, and it is appropriate to do so. If there were other venues of this caliber, we would have taken that opportunity. But this is the opportunity. We have a responsibility to take advantage of it.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)

  • Pelosi Said, “This Is Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening” And “We Have A Responsibility To Take Advantage Of It.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)

Pelosi Said, “Do Not Talk About This As A ‘Conspiracy Theory.'” “[P]lease do not talk about this as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ It is not about that. It is not about the conspiracy; it is about the Constitution of the United States.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 39:50-40:03)

In 2017, At Least Seven House Democrats Sought To Object To Electoral Votes In Favor Of President Trump:

  • Jim McGovern Said, “The Electors Were Not Lawfully Certified, Especially Given The Confirmed And Illegal Activities Engaged By The Government Of Russia.” (CNN, 1/6/17)
  • Raul Grijalva Objected After North Carolina’s Tally. (CNN, 1/6/17)
  • Pramila Jayapal Objected To Georgia’s Vote Certificate. (CNN, 1/6/17)
  • Jamie Raskin Objected To 10 Of Florida’s 29 Electoral Votes, Saying “They Violated Florida’s Prohibition Against Dual Office Holders.” (CNN, 1/6/17)
  • Maxine Waters Objected. (CNN, 1/6/17)”

Remember Walmart shoppers are trashed constantly by the elite left, to the point where the political class refers to Trump supporters as “smelly Walmart people,” which started with Lisa Page texting her lover, corrupted FBI agent Peter Strok, that she could smell the hated Trump supporters in a Walmart.

And the left wants to dictate to Walmart what they call sell:

And makes fun of their shoppers:

The Washington Examiner reported on Hawley’s move:

“Hawley became the first senator to confirm his intention to object despite Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s insistence that his caucus not support the challenge. Several House Republicans have said they plan to challenge it. Biden is set to be inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2021.

Congress members objecting during this certification step is not unprecedented. Democrats have attempted this maneuver twice since the turn of the century, but neither was successful because a member of the Senate did not sign on to either.”

Walmart later in the day issued an apology, claiming that the post was a mistake.

“The tweet was mistakenly posted by a member of our social media team who intended to publish this comment to their personal account,” Casey Staheli, Walmart’s senior manager of national media relations, told Newsweek.

“We have removed the post and have no intention of commenting on the subject of certifying the Electoral College,” Staheli added. “We apologize to Senator Hawley for this error and any confusion about our position.”

US Attorney Recommends Criminal Charges for Andrew McCabe

US Attorney Recommends Criminal Charges for Andrew McCabe

UAF Contributor Jane Darcy

Criminal charges against former FBI Director Andrew McCabe have been recommended from US Attorney Jessie Liu. The potential charges relate to false statements made by Mr. McCabe to the FBI regarding the investigation into Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

McCabe appealed the decision of the US attorney Washington all the way up to Jeffrey Rosen, the deputy Attorney General. His request was rejected in an email from the Department of Justice.

McCabe’s case was referred to the US Attorney’s office in Spring of 2018 following an investigation by the Inspector General’s office. They have just referred the case for prosecution.

In 2016, just prior to the election, the FBI was involved in two investigations that potentially implicated Hillary Clinton. One, Operation Midyear Exam, involved her infamous private email server. The other involved an alleged pay- to-play scandal involving the Clinton Foundation. McCabe played an important role in both investigations.

While this was occurring, then Virginia governor, Terry McAullife headed a political action committee that donated $675,000 to McCabe’s wife’s failed senate campaign. Mr. McAullife was a close confidant of the Clintons. The Wall Street Journal was preparing two stories regarding these facts, and Mr. McCabe directed the Office of Public Affairs and FBI Special Counsel Lisa Page to call and collect as much information as she could regarding these stories. What followed was a series of alleged leaks to the Wall Street Journal regarding the Clinton investigations. McCabe had authorized the leaks made by Lisa Page then denied doing so.

These are the same players that feature prominently in the investigation of the improper use of the FISA court against President Trump. If there is, indeed, an indictment of Mr. McCabe, it will be interesting to see what other information will be made public.

Sources: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/breaking-us-attorney-recommends-charging-mccabe-doj-rejects-last-minute-appeal/

https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/what-indictment-andrew-mccabe-would-mean

Source: BREAKING…….. US Attorney Recommends CRIMINAL CHARGES Against Andrew McCabe – DOJ Rejects His Last Minute Appeal

Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Congressman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) made some stunning allegations against the State Department and some sitting U.S. ambassadors during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night.

 

Congressman Mark Meadows went on Sean Hannity and made allegations that the some State Department and some sitting ambassadors have conspired with the DOJ to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump. He claims that soon to be released documents will show that Trump is completely innocent of collusion with Russia. But it will expose people in our government that were “actively” working to take Trump down.

Meadows boldly claims, “I think when the American people see what I’ve seen, they will judge for themselves and know that this has all been a hoax.”

This is coming out just a week after Lisa Page admitted there was a plan to create a false ‘Russain collusion” story to derail Trump.

UAF Admin

Source: Meadows Claims Ambassadors Worked With DOJ Against Trump

Trump Spills What He Wrote In the Letter To Biden

Trump Spills What He Wrote In the Letter To Biden

Former President Donald Trump spoke about what he wrote in the letter he left to President Joe Biden when he left office in January. The Democrats and Fake News media, but I repeat myself, derogatorily said Trump wouldn’t write a letter which has been a tradition when transferring power, but like just about everything else they ever said about the 45th president it was a lie. They had absolutely no evidence to enable them to make such a statement.

“Basically, I wished him luck and, you know, it was a couple of pages long and it was from the heart because I want to see him do well,” Trump said to Lisa Boothe during an interview on a podcast on Monday when he described the letter he left for the man that 74 million American voters believe stole the election from him.

The former president continued saying, “I want him to do well, but that doesn’t include closing up the Keystone Pipeline, which by the way environmentally is much better than having [crude oil] on trains. But [Biden’s] friend and supporter Warren Buffett has trains. Nobody ever talks about that.”

What the former president was saying was that Joe Biden in order to appease the environmentalist wacko anti-oil Woke Supremacy shut down the Keystone Pipeline via executive order and they believe that it’s an enormous victory. They were dancing in the streets. But the truth of the matter is that the oil is coming anyway and now instead of efficiently and safely being delivered through a pipeline that oil will now being transported through Mac trucks and trains and that puts the environment at more of a risk of danger than coming in through a pipeline. It will also raise the cost of the oil to pay for the transportation when delivery via pipeline would have been practically free in comparison.  And that translates to among other things higher gasoline prices at the pump. Way to go, Wokers!

Biden never said what was written by the former president in the letter that the Fake News said he would never write, only that it was “very generous.” In my opinion, anything other than “you stole the election from me, you thief,” is a win for Biden.

Outgoing presidents in a recent tradition have left a letter for the incoming president. That was started by President Ronald Reagan when he left a letter for incoming president George H W Bush on the Resolute Desk.

Outgoing President Barack Obama left a letter for incoming President Donald Trump, part of which said:

“This is a unique office, without a clear blueprint for success, so I don’t know that any advice from me will be particularly helpful … American leadership in this world really is indispensable. It’s up to us, through action and example, to sustain the international order that’s expanded steadily since the end of the Cold War, and upon which our own wealth and safety depend.”

Outgoing President George W Bush left a letter for incoming President Barack Obama:

“Very few have had the honor of knowing the responsibility you now feel. Very few know the excitement of the moment and the challenges you will face … There will be trying moments. The critics will rage. Your ‘friends’ will disappoint you. But, you will have an Almighty God to comfort you, a family who loves you, and a country that is pulling for you, including me. No matter what comes, you will be inspired by the character and compassion of the people you now lead.”

After the tech tyrants at Twitter did the unimaginable and treated President Trump like a dog while he was still in office by censoring him with false labels of “misinformation” and then removing tweets and videos he posted to eventually kicking him off the platform, the former president told Boothe during the interview that he really doesn’t miss the platform at all. He used it to get his message out, at first bypassing the Fake News media’s filtering of everything Republicans say to speak directly to the people. Now out of office, he doesn’t need it.  No other president was treated so disrespectfully.

“I put out a statement, it’s much more elegant than a tweet and I think it’s picked up better. I would almost say better than Twitter,” referring to the 280 character limit of Twitter per tweet. Now, the former president can send out messages to his own liking without worrying about having his message twisted.

BREAKING: Mother Of Tamir Rice Calls Out Black Lives Matter And Ben Crump In Shocking Smack Down

BREAKING: Mother Of Tamir Rice Calls Out Black Lives Matter And Ben Crump In Shocking Smack Down

The Mother of Tamir Rice, Samaria Rice, is leading a group of concerned citizens to absolutely defang a radical far-leftist movement of social justice warriors, who appear to be seeking fame and money rather than helping communities heal from devastating losses. She called out the “ambulance chasers” out by name and demanded they stop exploiting people’s deaths and injustices for profit.

“Step down from the spotlight of our fights. Do not do any more interviews, make any more t-shirts, or hold press conferences or events in the name of our loved ones anymore. Do not use our loved ones to market any events,” Samaria Rice said in a released statement, directed to Ben Crump and other high-profile celebrity personalities and actors.

Benjamin Crump, a prominent Civil Rights attorney, who has gotten major settlements for his clients in some overly aggressive ways,  is being dragged around social media and highlighted as a corrupt figure, by members of the Black Community, who he claims to champion. It is noteworthy due to his connections to Democrat Kamala Harris, who has encouraged his lawless tactics have to shape powerful social justice movements that taunt and harass Americans and prevent an entire nation from healing.

RECALL THE MOTHER OF TAMIR RICE WAS AWARDED 6 MILLION DOLLARS BY THE CITY OF CLEVELAND IN 2016

Although the city did not admit wrongdoing, they settled out of court. From a Guardian article in 2016: “The city of Cleveland, Ohio, has agreed to pay $6m to the family of Tamir Rice to settle a lawsuit over the 12-year-old’s fatal shooting by a police officer.

The payment will avert a federal civil rights case brought against city authorities by Tamir’s relatives over the death of “a young boy with his entire life ahead of him, full of potential and promise”, their attorneys said on Monday.

“Although historic in financial terms, no amount of money can adequately compensate for the loss of a life,” said a statement issued by the firm of Jonathan Abady, Earl Ward and Zoe Salzman, their lead counsel. “Nothing will bring Tamir back. His unnecessary and premature death leaves a gaping hole for those who knew and loved him that can never be filled.”

The details of the settlement were contained in a filing by judge Solomon Oliver to federal court in Cleveland on Monday morning. The city will pay Tamir’s family $3m this year and $3m next year. Tamir’s estate will receive $5.5m, while his mother, Samaria Rice, and his sister, Tajai Rice, will receive $250,000 each directly,” they reported.

Angela Stanton King, who has been a guest of David Harris Jr, posted on March 15 about a post from the Mother of Tamir Rice, showing her concerns and frustration over the involvement of the Black Lives Matter movement and Crump’s actions as well as others.

Samaria Rice was banned from Facebook after the post:

Rice’s further statement appeared on Twitter the next day placed by an associate. In the statement, a group of concerned people called out high profile activists in the Black Lives Matter and complained about being mistreated and having the death of her child exploited by them.

“OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM SAMARIA RICE, MOTHER OF TAMIR RICE AND LISA SIMPSON, MOTHER OF RICHARD RISHER. Myself, @DaShaunLH, and @likefannielouhad a conference call with Samaria and Lisa, and below is their full statement regarding Tamika Mallory, Shaun King, Benjamin Crump etc,” the statement reads:

Rice claims that while Black Lives Matter and their numerous Global Grassroots marketing Platforms made massive amounts of money on exploring her story, she has received nothing and is living in poverty with other children.

She makes demands:

“Financial assistance for the Tamir Rice Foundation from all who have exploited Tamir Rice: Tamika Mallory, Shaun King, Benjamin Crump, and Black Lives Matter Global Network. I, Samaria Rice, purchased the building in 2018 and it needs remodeling, operational funds, etc.”

and

“Housing funds for Lisa Simpson, as I am battling homelessness with my current children. My son, Richard Risher, was killed by LAPD and I was offered no assistance from BLM. I am currently living in a motel with my children and need funds for housing.”

According to the Wikipedia page on the tragic incident, “On November 22, 2014, Tamir Rice, a 12-year old African-American boy, was killed in Cleveland, Ohio, by Timothy Loehmann, a 26-year-old white police officer. Rice was carrying a replica toy gun; Loehmann shot him almost immediately after arriving on the scene. Two officers, Loehmann and 46-year-old Frank Garmback, were responding to a police dispatch call regarding a male who had a gun.”

Samaria Rice has set up a foundation and purchased a building with a mission, according to her website:

“The Tamir Rice Foundation invests in the growth and enrichment of all children through after-school programs in arts and culture by allowing them to express their truth to improve their lives as they grow into young adults.

The Tamir Rice Foundation also seeks to advocate for police reform by advocating to change laws and implement new policies for the system with community oversight for police accountability and community reform dialogue.”

So the question is, why are people out making massive amounts of money for activism on the death of her child and not supporting her foundation, in her son’s honor?  And why is she being banned from social media for addressing this highly important matter? Where is Kamala Harris? Because she is also associated with Ben Crump, who has led this movement with the Trayvon Martin case.

For more reading on Ben Crump and his schemes:

0