A group of Democrats have filed an ethics complaint against Sen Josh Hawley and Sen Ted Cruz. Those Democratic Senators include Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Tina Smith (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH). These same Democrats never considered filing ethics complaints against any Democrat who did exactly the same in 2001, 2005 and 2017.
In 2001, Maxine Waters objected to the election of George W Bush. In 2005 Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, and then-Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif objected and in 2017 it was radical Rep Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash. None of them were charged with ethics complaints. And for good reason. The law gives members of congress the right to object to the electoral vote.
Objecting to the Counting of One or More Electoral Votes Provisions in 3 U.S.C. §15 include a procedure for making and acting on objections to the counting of one or more of the electoral votes from a state or the District of Columbia. When the certificate or equivalent paper from each state (or the District of Columbia) is read, “the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.”
Any such objection must be presented in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. The objection “shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof. ” During the joint session of January 6, 2001, the presiding officer intervened on several occasions to halt attempts to make speeches under the guise of offering an objection.
Hawley then decided that he had a complaint against the Democrats who failed to recognize his right of free speech or the law allowing members of congress to object to electoral results.
Hawley wrote in his ethics complaint:
In light of the shameful abuse of the ethics process you have deliberately engaged in, I have considered whether I should call for you to resign or be expelled from the Senate. But I continue to believe in the First Amendment, which the US Supreme Court has repeatedly said protects even “offensive” and malicious speech, such as yours.
The First Amendment does not, however, give you carte blanche to abuse the Senate ethics process. I have today filed a complaint with the ethics committee that details your deliberate and partisan abuse of this process, including your apparent coordination with various dark money groups, and requests that you be appropriately disciplined.
Hawley asked the ethics committee if:
Coordinated with the Never Trump organization the Lincoln Project, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), MoveOn, Voto Latino, the Sierra Club, and other outside organizations.
Coordinated with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the Joe Biden administration, and other members of Democrat leadership.
Coordinated with lobbyists for corporations urging the suspension of those corporations’ political contributions.
Hawley asks that the Democratic Senators be punished for using the ethics process to be weaponized against anyone that disagrees with them and to assure they refrain from doing so in the future.
Homeland Security Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) wants Sen Ted Cruz and Sen Josh Hawley placed on the no-fly list as terrorists. Thompson who has an IQ that is underwater, made the suggestion on Monday after his keepers turned their backs for just a minute. Be honest, could the Democrats be any more mental? Oops. And womental too.
Thompson called them terrorists.
Because they questioned the voting irregularities that were a large part of the vote in swing states. He also accuses them of incitement to riot. He claims they are domestic terrorists but that BLM who caused more than $2 billion in damages during their riots are not.
I defy Thompson to produce even a shred of evidence that either one of the Senators suggested that the protesters riot and lay siege on the Capitol. You can however find examples of that from Ilhan Omar, AOC, Maxine Waters, Kamala Harris and a whole host of Democrats.
I notice he did not suggest that they be put on the no fly list. That’s understandable since scientific research has found that people with a weakened mental (and womental) capacity are usually hypocrites as well.
The rioting was set off after Mike Pence, whose political career is now over announced that he would accept the electoral votes for Joe Biden. He might want to explore a future in over the road trucking. Perhaps soldering wires would be more to his liking.
“There’s no question about it,” Thompson said when asked if protesters who entered the US Capitol last week should be placed on the federal no-fly list. “First of all, these folks, in my opinion, can be classified as domestic terrorists because of the actions they participated in on Wednesday. Now under normal circumstances international terrorists are out on no-fly lists. These are domestic terrorists–same thing. A terrorist is a terrorist, no matter who you are.”
The radio host then asked Rep. Thompson if Hawley and Cruz should be placed on the no-fly list because they objected to Joe Biden’s electors.
“There’s talk about liability for inciting this insurrection falling, maybe, in the laps of Senator Hawley and Senator Cruz and a member of Congress who may have Facetimed or led people to Pelosi’s office. If these folks are found liable, should they be on the no-fly list?” the radio host asked Rep. Thompson.
Thompson replied, “Well, there’s no question about it. There’s no exemption for being put on the no-fly list.”
Steve Bannon announced on his Podcast, Bannon’s War Room Pandemic, Saturday, that he had confirmed statements that there are up to a “dozen Republican Senators who are in talks to join Senator Josh Hawley and contest election results”.
Bannon also predicted that up to 200 US House Reps would also contest the results.
Reports of Senators went viral quickly:
Conformed: “JUST IN: Roughly a dozen Republican senators are in talks to join Senator Josh Hawley in objecting to the electoral college results when Congress meets Wednesday, per multiple Republican sources (CBS News).”
Sen. Josh Hawley was the first Senator to make news with his plans to contest the election results:
“Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf,” Hawley posted on Twitter.
Hawley’s office released the following statement about his plans:
Sen. Hawley Will Object During Electoral College Certification Process On Jan 6
Wednesday, December 30, 2020
Today U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced he will object during the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021. Senator Hawley will object to highlight the failure of some states, including notably Pennsylvania, to follow their own election laws as well as the unprecedented interference of Big Tech monopolies in the election. He will call for Congress to launch a full investigation of potential fraud and election irregularities and enact election integrity measures.
Democrats have previously objected during the certification process for the 2004 and 2016 Presidential elections.
Senator Hawley said, “Following both the 2004 and 2016 elections, Democrats in Congress objected during the certification of electoral votes in order to raise concerns about election integrity. They were praised by Democratic leadership and the media when they did. And they were entitled to do so. But now those of us concerned about the integrity of this election are entitled to do the same.
“I cannot vote to certify the electoral college results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws. And I cannot vote to certify without pointing out the unprecedented effort of mega corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, to interfere in this election, in support of Joe Biden. At the very least, Congress should investigate allegations of voter fraud and adopt measures to secure the integrity of our elections. But Congress has so far failed to act.
“For these reasons, I will follow the same practice Democrat members of Congress have in years past and object during the certification process on January 6 to raise these critical issues.”
Sen Josh Hawley (R) Missouri says he has a witness who he says is able and willing to testify that Facebook, Twitter, and Google colluded with each other to censor Conservatives and to hide Joe Biden’s scandals.
Gee, you could have knocked me down with a Sherman tank. Who would have ever thought that was possible. (Removing tongue from cheek)
Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg will be testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee about censorship.
Expect them both to lie through their teeth once again. But if Hawley has a whistleblower and can hit them up with questions derived by the whistleblower, things could get very uncomfortable, very fast.
Hawley is a huge critic of Big Tech and is bound to hit both men with questions they will avoid answering at all costs. If Biden wins the election, he will kill any meaningful investigations into the three companies he owes so much to. When you buy a Biden, they stay bought. Joe’s parents did not raise any welchers.
“I’ve heard from [A Facebook] whistleblower who revealed Facebook and Google and Twitter coordinate to censor. Facebook has an internal platform to manage it. I’ll be asking Mark Zuckerberg and [Jack Dorsey] about this at tomorrow’s hearing.”
As Breitbart News’ Lucas Nolan reported earlier today, Big Tech censorship against President Trump continues to escalate:
Breitbart News has reported extensively on social media websites increasing their censorship leading up to the 2020 Presidential election. Twitter stated last week that it put labels on 300,000 user posts from October 27 to November 11 for violating rules related to election misinformation. Twitter also implemented a retweet feature that required users to add their own comments before retweeting a post on the platform.
Between election day and Friday of last week, Twitter labeled around 34 percent of President Trump’s tweets and retweets as “disputed.” Breitbart News has reported extensively on this, noting recently that 25 of President Trump’s posts across Twitter and Facebook were labeled or disputed within 24 hours.
The Masters of the Universe has been able to whirl, spin, and dance to avoid answering questions honestly. It will be interesting to see how they handle questions gleaned from inside information. If proven all three Big Tech companies could actually be charged with making billions in illegal campaign contributions that could cost them a fortune and lead to sanctions against all three.
Walmart, who took to Twitter to lash out at Senator Josh Hawley as he was going viral for committing to represent the concerns of the American people, is one of those brands that has survived numerous public relations hits by the elitist left and yet just damaged their own brand from the inside by trashing their own shoppers. It is doubtful they will be able to recover.
“Go ahead. Get your 2-hour debate. #soreloser,” Walmart posted (and took down).
Hawley tweeted: “Thanks, @Walmart , for your insulting condescension. Now that you’ve insulted 75 million Americans, will you at least apologize for using slave labor?”
He added: “Or maybe you’d like to apologize for the pathetic wages you pay your workers as you drive mom and pop stores out of business.”
TROUBLE IN CCP MERCHANDISE HEAVEN?
“Every time you have the urge to shop at Wal-Mart, remember this multinational corporation is the single greatest enabler of the theft of American jobs. It’s way past their corporate charter to go after Hawley and reveals their pro-CCP bent,” Peter Navarro posted on Twitter in reaction to the story.
The left collectively and publicly mock Walmart shoppers as low class, deplorable, and tacky. The left even has a popular meme series called “the people of Walmart,” which is nothing more than branding Walmart shoppers as tacky and low class.
So it made big news when tone-deaf Walmart struck out at Hawley as a “sore loser” on Tuesday after his announcement to champion the people’s interest in the 2020 Presidential election and then quickly pulled their tweet down.
But not before many people saw it.
Here is the timeline of what happened.
Hawley did something that was somewhat uncharacteristic of him and announced that he was planning on supporting President Donald J. Trump and the American people in their concerns over voter fraud.
“Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf,” Hawley posted.
So Walmart sided with the Democrats and Trump’s opposition, and the very people who mocked their shoppers and posted that Hawley was a loser, and by proxy- rebuking the working-class Trump supporters who have been defending Walmart for years.
Today U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced he would object during the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021. Senator Hawley will object to highlight the failure of some states, including notably Pennsylvania, to follow their own election laws and the unprecedented interference of Big Tech monopolies in the election. He will call for Congress to launch a full investigation of potential fraud and election irregularities and enact election integrity measures.
Democrats have previously objected during the certification process for the 2004 and 2016 Presidential elections.
Senator Hawley said, “Following both the 2004 and 2016 elections, Democrats in Congress objected during the certification of electoral votes to raise concerns about election integrity. They were praised by Democratic leadership and the media when they did. And they were entitled to do so. But now, those of us concerned about the integrity of this election are entitled to do the same.
“I cannot vote to certify the electoral college results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws. And I cannot vote to certify without pointing out the unprecedented effort of mega-corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, to interfere in this election, in support of Joe Biden. At the very least, Congress should investigate allegations of voter fraud and adopt measures to secure the integrity of our elections. But Congress has so far failed to act.
“For these reasons, I will follow the same practice Democrat members of Congress have in years past and object during the certification process on January 6 to raise these critical issues.”
Background On Previous Objections to Electoral College Vote Certification
In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones Objected to the Electoral College Votes from Ohio.
Stephanie Tubs-Jones Said, “I Raise This Objection Because I Am Convinced That We As A Body Must Conduct A Formal And Legitimate Debate About Election Irregularities.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 3:10-3:20)
Boxer views her 2005 objection as “her proudest moment on the Senate floor,” according to CNN. (CNN, 12/27/2020)
In January 2005, 31 Congressional Democrats Voted To Reject Ohio’s Electoral Votes. (CNN, 1/6/05)
Nancy Pelosi Praised The 2005 Objections, Saying Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents” During “Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening”
Nancy Pelosi Said, “We Are Witnessing Democracy At Work,” And “This Debate Is Fundamental To Our Democracy.” “[T]oday we are witnessing democracy at work. This is not, as some of our Republican colleagues have referred to it, sadly, frivolous. This debate is fundamental to our democracy.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 32:49-33:08)
Pelosi Said Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents, Many Of Whom May Have Been Disenfranchised In This Process.” “The Members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. This is their only opportunity to have this debate while the country is listening, and it is appropriate to do so. If there were other venues of this caliber, we would have taken that opportunity. But this is the opportunity. We have a responsibility to take advantage of it.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)
Pelosi Said, “This Is Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening” And “We Have A Responsibility To Take Advantage Of It.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)
Pelosi Said, “Do Not Talk About This As A ‘Conspiracy Theory.'” “[P]lease do not talk about this as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ It is not about that. It is not about the conspiracy; it is about the Constitution of the United States.” (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 39:50-40:03)
In 2017, At Least Seven House Democrats Sought To Object To Electoral Votes In Favor Of President Trump:
Jim McGovern Said, “The Electors Were Not Lawfully Certified, Especially Given The Confirmed And Illegal Activities Engaged By The Government Of Russia.” (CNN, 1/6/17)
Raul Grijalva Objected After North Carolina’s Tally. (CNN, 1/6/17)
Pramila Jayapal Objected To Georgia’s Vote Certificate. (CNN, 1/6/17)
Jamie Raskin Objected To 10 Of Florida’s 29 Electoral Votes, Saying “They Violated Florida’s Prohibition Against Dual Office Holders.” (CNN, 1/6/17)
Remember Walmart shoppers are trashed constantly by the elite left, to the point where the political class refers to Trump supporters as “smelly Walmart people,” which started with Lisa Page texting her lover, corrupted FBI agent Peter Strok, that she could smell the hated Trump supporters in a Walmart.
And the left wants to dictate to Walmart what they call sell:
And makes fun of their shoppers:
The Washington Examiner reported on Hawley’s move:
“Hawley became the first senator to confirm his intention to object despite Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s insistence that his caucus not support the challenge. Several House Republicans have said they plan to challenge it. Biden is set to be inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2021.
Congress members objecting during this certification step is not unprecedented. Democrats have attempted this maneuver twice since the turn of the century, but neither was successful because a member of the Senate did not sign on to either.”
Walmart later in the day issued an apology, claiming that the post was a mistake.
“The tweet was mistakenly posted by a member of our social media team who intended to publish this comment to their personal account,” Casey Staheli, Walmart’s senior manager of national media relations, told Newsweek.
“We have removed the post and have no intention of commenting on the subject of certifying the Electoral College,” Staheli added. “We apologize to Senator Hawley for this error and any confusion about our position.”
Mo. Sen Josh Hawley has asked the DOJ to investigate Soros funded St Louis DA for violating the civil rights of the McCloskey family.
The McCloskeys defended their home with legal firearms after hundreds of BLM members broke down the gate to their community, threatened residents and painted graffiti along the way.
ST Louis DA Kim Gardner has sent the police with search warrants to their house twice now and during one visit, they confiscated a legally owned firearm.
If Gardner won’t enforce the law and continually refuse to accept felony cases including child sex and drug dealers and who dropped all charges against the rioters, then citizens must have the right to defend themselves.
Gardner is just one of several radicalized DAs who were able to get elected with a large transfusion of cash from George Soros, known to finance riots as well. So, first, he finances the riots and then his bought and paid for DAs drop all charges brought against them. Great deal if you are a rioter, but not so good if you are a victim.
This morning I have asked the Department of Justice to open a civil rights investigation into the St Louis Circuit Attorneys Office. Targeting law abiding citizens who exercise constitutionally protected rights for investigation & prosecution is an abuse of power https://t.co/lg9GbisWgd
Senator Josh Hawley is calling for a federal civil rights investigation into St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner after claiming she is “targeting the McCloskey family for using firearms to defend themselves and their property against a mob of protesters”.
Hawley sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr Thursday morning accusing Gardner of abusing her power in handling the investigation.
“This is an unacceptable abuse of power and threat to the Second Amendment, and I urge you to consider a federal civil rights investigation into the St. Louis Circuit Attorney’s Office to determine whether this investigation and impending prosecution violates this family’s constitutional rights,” Hawley wrote.
Sen Hawley sent his letter to AG Bill Barr and accused Gardner of targeting the couple and violating their constitutional rights. Barr has not yet said if he plans to investigate, but he should.
Senator Josh Hawley, R-Missouri engaged with ESPN and the NBA over inquiries about the Basketball League’s support of the Chinese Communist Party’s agenda by refusing to equally support different points of view about the Government in China, specifically those among the people in Hong Kong.
“Today Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is sending a letter to NBA Commissioner Adam Silver blasting the league’s apparent decision to strictly limit messages players can wear on their jerseys to a few pre-approved, social justice slogans while censoring support for law enforcement officers or the military and any criticism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Senator Hawley writes that, as the NBA is now sanctioning political messages, they must stand up for American values and make clear where they stand on China’s human rights abuses,” Hawley’s office said.
According to a press release, Hawley wrote in the letter to Silver, ” “The truth is that your decisions about which messages to allow and which to censor – much like the censorship decisions of the CCP – are themselves statements about your association’s values. If I am right – if the NBA is more committed to promoting the CCP’s interests than to celebrating its home nation – your fans deserve to know that is your view.”
Hawley has been stirring up the pot over his concerns, and Friday got an “FU” from ESPN reporter, Adrian Wojnarowski, in response to Hawley’s press release.
Wojnarowski apologized for being “disrespectful”, but did not address any of the concerns Hawley’s or the people Hawley represents, nor did he touch upon the disastrous optics and terrible PR of players and owners supporting brutal and violent Communism.
LeBron James, who posted a rebuke to supporters of Hong Kong liberty fighters in 2019, is one representative of the NBA who has been very vocal about his support of the Chinese Communist Party, which is greatly disturbing to many sports fans who prefer to keep politics out of the sport.
I'd like to ask for LeBron James, the same thing, and the Solomon or Spinx asking, why don't @ESPNNBA
Maybe it's not surprising that The King and The Emperor share similar views. It's just sad to think of how many basketball players are tortured in Xinjiang concentration camps or facing bullets in the frontline of Hong Kong. Authoritarianism is our common enemy.#LeBronJamespic.twitter.com/KPfmCjKvbU
However, having the sports league tied together with Communists has not escaped the scrutiny of many fans.
Meanwhile, in Hong Kong Now that Hunter Biden client's Communist China has now officially crushed Democracy and human freedom. *I'm sure that @KingJames, @NBA and @Nike will smear them as Racist, in the same way they smear all Americans. https://t.co/hJTiccjMvM
In the letter, Hawley wrote, “The league’s new policy suggests a newfound commitment to enhanced employee
expression. But that free expression appears to stop at the edge of your corporate sponsors’ sensibilities. And for woke capital today, profits from the Chinese market are more popular than patriotism.
The truth is that your decisions about which messages to allow and which to censor – much like the censorship decisions of the CCP – are themselves statements about your association’s values.”
The NBA has been pushing a leftist Social Justice message for some time, influencing common culture with Cultural Marxism.
In this article from 5 years ago, a player is shown introducing his anti-police statements to the game and influencing other players.
A little more than five years ago, our @busyxb wrote about sports figures speaking out on social justice, focusing the "I can't breathe" gear worn by NBA players. It's as relevant now as it ever was. https://t.co/Ra5MErt14f
We may just be beginning to see what Communism and Social Justice have in common and how the NBA and other American institutions have been using their resources to influence the media to indoctrinate America.
Fahrenheit 451 was the first full book I ever read. I’ll be honest. I only read it because of a computer game of the same title. As a young kid, the game was pretty cool, and when I heard it was named after a book that everyone else in the world knew about, I decided to see what the hubbub was all about. It bears a clever title in that 451 degrees Fahrenheit is the temperature that paper starts to burn. The book is about a dystopian future where the government bans all books so that the great unwashed won’t be able to read them. And they didn’t just ban books, they burned them so they no longer existed.
Amazon, arguably the world’s largest bookseller, has decided that it will no longer allow the sale of books that teach that transgenderism and other sexual identities or orientations make any claims that they are conditions caused by mental illness. Yet, they still allow for sale a book titled The GayBC’s listed as “A joyful celebration of LGBTQ+ vocabulary for kids of all ages!“
The bookseller announced the policy after Republican lawmakers asked the company why they pulled the sale of Ryan T. Anderson’s 2018 book, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.”
That book, which sat on Amazon’s bestsellers list, is no longer available for purchase at Amazon at all, period, full stop.
But you can still buy a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Main Kampf where the socialist dictator plotted and planned to take over the world on Amazon either through the company or through third-party sellers.
In a letter sent to Republican Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Mike Braun (R-IN), Amazon responded by saying, “As a bookseller, we provide our customers with access to a variety of viewpoints, including books that some customers may find objectionable.”
“Amazon works hard to ensure customers have a great shopping experience, and access to the widest and most diverse cross-section of written and spoken word in retail today,” the letter continued. “We reserve the right not to sell certain content. All retailers make decisions about what selection they choose to offer, as do we.”
The letter added, “As to your specific question about ‘When Harry Became Sally,’ we have chosen not to sell books that frame LGBTQ+ identity as a mental illness.” This even though homosexuality was listed by the American Psychiatric Association, the largest psychiatric organization in the world, as a mental disorder up until the politicians got involved, the same type of politicians who today demand that we trust the science, and without any “science” involved they just reversed their stance on the issue back in 2012. It’s when you read their statement saying “We will no longer insist on a label of sickness for individuals who insist that they are well and demonstrate no generalized impairment in social effectiveness,” followed by claiming the APA supports “civil rights legislation at local, state, and federal levels that would ensure homosexual citizens the same protections now guaranteed to others,” that you realize it was a purely political reason for the 180-degree turn. If Schizophrenia suddenly because very popular in pop culture these clowns would more-than-likely do a 180 on that too.
The author took to social media to discuss Amazon’s crazy move [pun intended].
“Amazon has finally responded. Everyone agrees that gender dysphoria is a serious condition that causes great suffering. There is a debate, however, which Amazon is seeking to shut down, about how best to treat patients who experience gender dysphoria.”
Don’t forget folks, gender dysphoria is listed in the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), a manual published by the American Psychiatric Association to diagnose mental conditions.
He followed up with another tweet.
“Gender dysphoria,” Anderson explained, “is listed in the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which Amazon sells. So the real deciding factor seems to be whether you endorse hormones and surgery as the proper treatment or counseling.”
“Amazon appears to have never read my book, but relied on hit pieces. As I pointed out before: ‘Please quote the passage where I ‘call them mentally ill.’ You can’t quote that passage because it doesn’t exist.”
Jeffrey Trachtenberg, of the Wall Street Journal, said the bookseller’s decision comes as “the nation’s largest tech platforms are under increased scrutiny regarding the decisions they make over which content is acceptable.”
It sounds like the insane asylum patients are complaining so much to politicians and corporations that the corporate board rooms fear political influence that could harm their bottom line so they take the easy way out and say “screw you” to the 60% of the people who buy their stuff because the Democrats are running the show now. That, and because the leftist tech tyrants agree to be the de facto government dishing out punishments to those who dare go up against the Woke Supremacy.
“The senators, in their letter dated February 24, characterized Amazon’s decision to remove the book as a signal ‘to conservative Americans that their views are not welcome on its platforms,'” Trachtenberg wrote.
The Democrats are out for blood. They have always been conniving but this time they are doing it right out in the open. They are in a panic. President Trump’s approval rating has soared to 59%, much higher than Biden’s.
They failed with impeachment and so they decided to put together a commission to write a report on the January 6th riot in Washington D.C.. But it is the leader of the commission that is drawing the most criticism. Retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré is an unabashed conservative hater and it is reflective of his view of conservatives. He called Sen Josh Hawley a rolled-up ball of s*^t. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg.
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson alerted his viewers Wednesday night of tweets from Honore:
“This little piece of s**t with his @Yale law degree should be run out of DC and Disbarred ASAP. These @Yale and @Harvard law grads is high order white privilege.”
YouTube has pulled the video and it can no longer be shown. But one of Josh Hawley commenting on Honore’s selection and here it is:
“He understands how to use force to achieve political objectives,” Carlson said. “And it seems like he’s being set up to use his military training against anyone who sees the world differently than he does. They’ll be reclassified as domestic terrorists. Who are these people and what threat do they pose?
Well, according to General Honoré, those threats include the Constitution and our Second Amendment. For real, he believes your right to defend yourself is dangerous. He said that, and we’re quoting here, quote, ‘We can’t permit Second Amendment rights at First Amendment protests.’ Really constitutional scholar are you? Imagine a public figure with a general in front of his name making that statement.
This is the guy Nancy Pelosi wants in charge of security. Honoré is not a fan of the First Amendment, either, by the way. On Twitter, he attacked this network, even told people to stop buying the we can’t use it profanity, the ‘crappy’ stocks of any company that advertises on Fox News talking to the stock price of advertisers. He retweeted posts accusing the social media site Parler of being, and I’m quoting now, 100% complicit in the Jan. 6 riot.”
What are the odds that Honore will write an unbiased honest report? About the same as whether Rosie O’Donnell can fit through the eye of a needle. Is this what we can expect for the next two years? If it is the Democrats better start manufacturing votes now for the 2022 midterm elections or they could see a red wave. What the Democrats have done so far and the promises of what they will do is probably behind the 18 point jump in Trump’s favorability rating.