There are many reasons why I love to watch the “Tucker Carlson Tonight” show on Fox. One of the biggest of many reasons is because Tucker is not afraid to expose people on either side of the aisle when it comes to doing something wrong. He’s the opinion guy on TV that will explain to you why he thinks something is wrong and why what politicians say is usually loaded with a bunch of bullschtein.
The contrast between when President Trump picked his cabinet members and made appoints to how President Biden was treated over his nominees and appointments is nothing short of astonishing and inconceivable just to use a couple of words to describe it. Nearly every nominee made by Trump brought anger and hatred from the Woke Supremamcists on the Left, in news media, academia, and of course in the Democratic Party. By contrast, there was no pushback whatsoever on appoints of people who were involved in major scandals, people like Jake Sullivan who was an aggressive user of Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email server which the FBI said was more-than-likely hacked by foreign governments was White House National Security Adviser or White House domestic adviser Susan Rice, who is a known liar, who once went on all the Sunday news programs and said that the Benghazi terror attacks on a US embassy that ended with the murder of four Americans, including the American Ambassador, happened in retaliation to an anti-Muslim YouTube video that apparently no one really saw or knew about. And there are more. No blowback by any Fake News outlets.
On Wednesday night, Tucker gave a virtual bitchslap to Biden’s new climate czar John Kerry a.k.a. Lurch explaining how the failed presidential candidate is such a hypocrite to fly in a private jet to climate conferences all over the world. This is something that progressives never understood how regular people, you know, us the great unwashed, could make such argument and point out their hypocrisy when flying around in pollution generating jets to go preach their watermelon antics. I say watermelon because these people are green on the outside and socialist red on the inside. While they virtue signal to the bourgeois of the world about climate change, global warming and all the other government gravy train nonsense that man has no impact on while they themselves violate their own virtue signaling. They must sit around scratching their heads wondering why the beknighted get upset when they violate their own virtue signalling thinking they do so to spread more virtue signalling. Can you follow all of that?
“The climate czar fights climate change. And if facts or common sense get in the way of that, the climate czar will fight those, too. It’s the perfect role for John Kerry,” Carlson sniped. “John Kerry has devoted his entire life taking on the global warming by contributing as much to global warming as he possibly can.”
Carlson went into details about how Kerry spent over 20 hours in 2020 fling around in his private jet “emitting in the process more than 100 metric tons of carbon emissions.” Carlson went on to categorize Kerry as “the kind of leader who leads by negative examples,” because his flying around that private jet produces more carbon than any American could possibly produce in their entire life.
A couple years ago Kerry flew all the way to Iceland to accept an award and to be honored for fighting climate change when he could have done a Zoom meeting online and had the award mailed to him:
“Well, in 2019 the world finally recognized John Kerry’s sacrifice, his enduring commitment to doing precisely what he wants while preventing you from doing the same. John Kerry was given in recognition of this something called the Arctic Circle Award. That Award recognizes his effort to, quote, ‘Tackle environmental matters.’
Naturally, John Kerry flew all the way to Iceland – that’s 3,000 miles away – on his private jet to accept this honor. In his acceptance speech, John Kerry made it very clear people like John Kerry make him angry. In order to fight climate change, John Kerry said, we need to do exactly the opposite of what John Kerry himself is doing at the moment.”
And after chiding the American press for not asking Kerry any questions about his hypocrisy, Carson touted an Icelandic journalist for putting him on the spot for the private jet. Kerry said, “It’s the only choice for somebody like me who is traveling the world to win this battle. I believe the time it takes me to get somewhere. I can’t sail across the ocean. I have to fly to meet with people and get things done.”
“It’s the only choice for someone like me,” Carlson declared, as if he was Kerry. “It’s the only choice for someone like me. Why do you have a 12,000 square foot house on the water in Nantucket? It’s the only choice for someone like me. Not a choice you are allowed to have.”
Former Secretary of State John Kerry is being slammed for conducting shadow diplomacy with Iran after admitting to multiple meetings with Iranian officials behind the backs of the Trump administration — including over the scrapped nuclear deal.
Republican Senator Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Oversight Committee, was on Maria Bartiromo, Sunday Morning Futures, and said that the FBI had Hunter Biden’s Laptop for a year, and the public has the right to know why they sat on it, because the information on the laptop included information about potential illegal business dealings by Joe Biden, the Democrat candidate for US President.
“What we are finding is that somewhere around 2014, or 2015 is that Hunter Biden really figured out how to vacuum up these dollars from around the world, ” Johnson said about the Senate Oversight Committee Investigation into the Biden’s business dealings.
The media is resisting his authority and his committee’s authority, and siding with Joe Biden, by refusing to inform the public.
“We have jurisdiction over conflicts of interest, and Biden’s dealings are sleazy, if not illegal. We have to investigate more, but this is who the American people are going to vote for, so they need to know,” Johnson said.
Johnson reacted to a video clip of Democrat candidate Joe Biden saying none of it was true at the debate last week.
“The only guy who made money from China is this guy, (pointing to Trump),” Biden said at the debate.
Johnson responded to Bartiromo and said about the video clip, “the Vice President is lying, again. Check out page 78 of our report where we show a company, a Chinese company, CESE, transferred about 5 Million dollars to businesses controlled by Hunter Biden. He, [Joe Biden] is lying when he said he never spoke to Hunter Biden about business deals and overseas business connections, who flew over to China and had a handshake with Johnathon Lee who ended up being a business partner in an investment firm, Biden is lying about Biden and Biden Inc,” Johnson said.
Bartiromo talked about newly uncovered emails that would show that there was discussion about “The Biden Lift, where people talked about doing business with the Biden’s would give their companies a lift,” she said.
“Chris Coons lied about what we are spending on this investigation, I have not spent a dime other than my regular staff salary. This is what we do. We investigate these issues and there is a blaring case of conflict of interest here that the media is ignoring,” Johnson said.
One view wrote in response to the show:
@senronjohnson did a phenomenal job laying out the corruption of Biden, Inc. this morning on Sunday Morning Futures. He needs to subpoena Hunter Biden! Anyone that blocks him from doing so is also on the take. Stop the DC corruption!”
THE FINAL REPORT IS WORTH A READ: Here is the Executive Conclusion:
As the Chairmen’s report details, Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board negatively impacted the efforts of dedicated career-service individuals who were fighting to push for anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Because the vice president’s son had a direct link to a corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials were required to maintain situational awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of continuing to push an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt owner. As George Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board of Zlochevsky’s company.”
Yet, even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board cast a shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the Committees are only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite the efforts of these individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears. Former Secretary Kerry’s December 2019 denial of having any knowledge about Hunter Biden or Burisma is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by the Committees. Kerry was briefed about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Christopher Heinz the day after Burisma announced Hunter Biden joined its board. Additionally, Secretary Kerry’s senior advisor sent him press clips and articles relating to Hunter Biden’s board membership. This appears to be yet another example of high-ranking Obama administration officials blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Several witnesses highlighted efforts to enable a successful investigation of Zlochevsky,
and also noted that the U.S. decision to condition a $1 billion loan guarantee was made in part because of the then-Ukrainian prosecutor general’s failure to pursue a case against Zlochevsky. But at the end of the day, between 2014 through 2017, despite the concerted effort of many U.S. officials, not one of the three different Ukrainian prosecutor generals held Zlochevsky accountable.
The Obama administration and the Democrat lobby shop Blue Star Strategies had consistent and extensive contact with Andrii Telizhenko over a period of years. Yet despite these well-documented contacts with Democratic officials, Democrats have attempted to impugn this investigation for having received some Blue Star-related records from Telizhenko. Some Democrats have even (incorrectly) identified Telizhenko as the Committees’ “star witness.”430
Although he produced a small number of Blue Star-related records to the Committees, the Committees never interviewed him as part of this investigation.
I was born and raised a Catholic. My parents even sentenced me to 12 years of Catholic school. I have a pretty good knowledge of the church’s teachings and dogma. And I can say openly that I believe the current Pope is a Marxist who is working to liberal up the Roman Catholic Church. Things that Pope Francis has done and said have affected me so much that I no longer go to Catholic mass. I now go to a Charismatic Church that has nothing to do with the Catholic Church. Way to go, Supreme Pontiff.
On Monday, the Vatican declared that it is “morally acceptable” for Roman Catholics to get vaccinated for COVID-19 based on research that used cells derived from aborted fetuses to make the vaccine. This guidance came after some clergy in the United States argued that such products were immoral.
Anything that has to do with the murder of unborn children has always been an abomination to the Roman Catholic Church. Until now, I suppose.
The Vatican’s watchdog for doctrinal orthodoxy is called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and they said it has received several requests for “guidance” during the recent months of the pandemic. The Congregation revealed that bishops, Catholic groups, and experts have offered “diverse and sometimes conflicting pronouncements” on the issue at hand.
The Catholic Church’s teaching says abortion is a mortal sin. The Catholic Church has always asserted that every abortion is evil, teaching that the Catechism of the Catholic Church declares “has not changed and remains unchangeable.” Until now, I suppose.
Folks, this isn’t just a Democrat politician who claims to be a Catholic, like Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Joe Biden who support abortion, this is the Pope!
So, the Vatican has deemed that “it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses” in production process when “ethically irreproachable” vaccines aren’t available to the public. However, the Vatican stressed that the “licit” uses of said vaccines “does not and should not in any way imply that there is a moral endorsement of the use of cell lines proceeding from aborted fetuses.”
That’s the first step to changing the Church’s stance on abortion, mark my words.
The Vatican explained in a statement that obtaining vaccines that do not pose an ethical dilemma is not always possible. That’s a Marxist argument for the “greater good.” The Holy See pointed to circumstances in countries “where vaccines without ethical problems are not made available to physicians and patients.” There is also the situation where special storage expectations and/or transport conditions make distribution all the more demanding.
There were echoes of the the pronouncement in a statement from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops that said that “in view of the gravity of the current pandemic and the lack of availability of alternative vaccines,” receiving the vaccines being distributed in the United States is justified “despite their remote connection to morally compromised cell lines.”
We’re talking about a virus that has a 99.9xxx percent survival rate.
The US Bishops conference officials said that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 “ought to be understood as an act of charity toward the other members of our community.”
A few weeks earlier, two US Bishops in California and Texas respectively, condemned vaccines using cell lines from aborted fetuses as immorally manufactured. One of them said he refused to get vaccinated for COVID-19 and encouraged his Catholic flock to do the same.
To reassure Catholics that getting the vaccine wouldn’t violate the church’s moral teachings the Vatican cited that “health authorities do not allow citizens to choose the vaccine with which to be inoculated.” Well, maybe they should. Is this a First Amendment issue? The Vatican went even further to declare that it is morally acceptable to get vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses.
And how much are we to take seriously the politicians who are saying that even after vaccinated you must still wear masks and adhere to local social distancing policies? So, that means that even if you get the vaccine you still cannot have more than 10-50 people, depending on secular laws in each jurisdiction, congregate in church? What kind of virus is this that still poses a threat even after being vaccinated? A political one is the only appropriate response.
On Thursday, President-Elect Joe Biden appointed Susan Rice as the head of the White House Domestic Policy Council, drawing mixed reactions from the public.
Rice served in multiple roles during both terms of the Obama administration; she was ambassador to the U.N in his first term and national security advisor in the second. In her new role for Biden, Rice will head the committee that will oversee the implementation of his domestic policy agendas.
Former senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett tweeted her support for Rice and described her as “a brilliant and dedicated leader committed to public service with a wealth of experience.”
Samantha Power, who succeeded Rice as ambassador to the U.N., and John Kerry, former secretary of state, both lauded Rice for her determination and experience that qualifies her for the job.
Despite this praise, a closer look at Rice’s past political experience will show some deeply troubling events.
Rice had a sketchy involvement in the terrorist attacks on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. For several days after the al-Qaeda attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, Rice continued to spread the lie that the attacks were a “’spontaneous reaction’ to an obscure anti-Islam video,” in Egypt, not the result of a failure from the Obama administration to protect our own.
“… What happened this week in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result – a direct result of a heinous and offensive video that was widely disseminated, that the U.S. government had nothing to do with, which we have made clear is reprehensible and disgusting,” Rice said on ABC’s This Week on September 16, 2012.
Rice lied to the American families of the victims in the attack and deceived Americans on what actually happened. Everyone in the Obama administration who engaged in that cover up made a litany excuses for their inadequate response to a skirmish that resulted in the first violent death of a U.S. ambassador since 1988. All of those involved in that process (including Kerry) showed that the safety of Americans was their least concern, and should therefore never be in charge of guaranteeing American safety again.
That is why Rice is not a qualified candidate for this job. She is a pathological liar, and if she could not advocate for American lives abroad, there is no reason to believe that she will be qualified to implement policies within our borders.
On November 27, 2020, four Iranian terrorist operatives go on trial in Antwerp, Belgium. Among them is Iran’s regime diplomat-terrorist Assdollah Assadi for planning to bomb a 2018 meeting in France of an exiled opposition group, the first time an E.U. country has put an Iranian official on trial for terrorism.
“Two years ago, European security authorities prevented a terrorist attack in Paris. An Iranian diplomat and several agents were arrested. It is the first time in Europe that a foreign state has been held responsible for a planned terrorist attack on an enormous scale and brought to justice. The trial is scheduled to begin on November 27th,” according the Teller Report.
Recall, Democrat John Kerry, Secretary of State under former President Barack Obama, accepted that he was using US tax monies to fund Iran’s terrorism. So what part does America play in the assistance of growing worldwide terrorism, which is now on trial?
The following is the bold statement of Mr. Antonio Tasso, a Member of the Italian Parliament that lays a foundation for what could become a much wider trial to come, and is published on National Council of Resistance of Iran, who describe themselves as “The Viable Democratic Alternative”.
“The question is, how did the regime in power in Iran have this inhuman courage?They committed the most massive political genocide since World War II,” Tasso said.
I, undersigned Antonio Tasso, a Member of the Italian Parliament, participated in the Grand Gathering of the National Council of Resistance of Iran on June 30, 2018, at the Villepinte Hall in Paris with a large delegation of Italian political figures. I want to ask to be registered as a civil party against Assadollah Asadi and his accomplices, currently pending in the Belgian Antwerp Criminal Court. I knew that the dictatorial religious regime in power in Iran is the leading country in the world by the number of executions. I knew that this regime had executed tens of thousands of freedom activists in Iran over the past forty years, most of whom were members and supporters of the People’s Mojahedin of Iran (MEK).
I knew that in 1988, immediately after the end of the Iran-Iraq war, Khomeini issued a fatwa that executed most of the Mojahedin in prisons. Most of those who carried out that sentence currently occupy the highest political and judicial positions in the country. In less than three months, more than 30,000 political prisoners, more than 90% of whom were MEK members, were executed. Therefore, they committed the most massive political genocide since World War II. Ten months ago, in November last year, following a peaceful national uprising of the Iranian people, 1,500 defenseless demonstrators were killed within three days on the direct order of the supreme leader Ali Khamenei, 12,000 others were arrested, undergoing torture. We know that this regime has so far been condemned 65 times by United Nations bodies for its crimes.
But what I didn’t know is that the top officials of the Iranian regime had decided to attack the demonstration in which tens of thousands of women, men, elderly, young people, and children participated—a peaceful gathering in Paris to express their own idea. Besides, hundreds of political figures and elected representatives of different countries, including myself, were present to support a free Iran. Whenever I think about such an attack, if it hadn’t been foiled, a great tragedy would have happened. I tremble because the victims would not have been hundreds but thousands.
The question is, how did the regime in power in Iran have this inhuman courage? All but, in particular, the European states must think twice about this question. Undoubtedly, the criminal advance of the regime, even in Europe, derives above all from the ferocious dictatorship’s brutal nature. But that’s not all the reason. One part goes back to the destructive policy we Europeans have been pursuing for years in favor of the regime, and in the face of its crimes in Iran and outside the country, we have adopted a policy of appeasement.
Let me give an example from my country. Besides mass killings of freedom activists in Iran, the regime has committed a wave of large-scale terrorism around the world, especially against its opponents in various countries, including Europe (Germany, France, Great Britain, Switzerland, Italy, Austria, the Netherlands), United States of America and Iran’s neighboring countries in the Middle East (Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan, UAE, etc.).
I would like to remember Hossein Naghdi, killed on March 16, 1993, in Rome by the terrorists of the Iranian regime. Hossein Naghdi was a young diplomat who, after the fall of the Shah, worked as the charge d’affaires in the embassy of his country in Rome. He resigned in 1982 when the regime’s wave of mass executions of young Iranians began, and he joined the National Council of Resistance of Iran and represented it up to death.
Regarding his very significant role in Italy, let me tell you a part of the ruling of the criminal tribune of Italy: “Naghdi’s murder should be considered as a political murder, which has been decided in the Iranian government’s circles in the framework of a larger project aimed at destroying resistance centers abroad. Due to his political activity in Italy, due to his ability to establish a relationship with the highest levels of the political circle in Italy, due to the undeniable human abilities, and for the … unceasing struggle with a clear and obvious face against the regime which he initially had embraced. The decision to kill [Naghdi] was taken by a group of Tehran’s political and religious leaders and assigned to the group that entered Italy specifically for this purpose…
In light of these indisputable facts, confirmed not only by many documents of the international press presented by the civil party but it is cited by “extensive” sources (available to all) as cited by Messina [Chief investigative officer of the Carabinieri] in his statements, it can be understood that the assassination of Naghdi was a goal to extinguish a prominent resistance member. A man able to centralize a network of international relations in support of his struggle, a proud opponent who did not forgive the errors of the Tehran regime and enjoyed the unequivocal admiration and appreciation of the members of the Italian political world … ” (Extract from the ruling of the Italian Criminal Court issued on December 13, 2006, about the assassination of Mohammad Hossein Naghdi, representative of the National Council of Resistance of Iran in Italy).
But how did the Iranian regime commit such crimes and then escape punishment and responsibility? By using government facilities and especially under diplomatic cover. The commander of the Naghdi assassination commando, based on the latest investigations by the Italian police and information from within the Iranian regime, was a person nicknamed Amir Mansour Bozorgian. The latter entered Italy with the same name and a diplomatic passport.
After committing this crime, he managed to flee our country. Investigations by the Iranian Resistance showed that the man was a Revolutionary Guards general named Ghafoor Darjazi who had managed to hide. Two years ago, it was discovered that this person changed his name to “Engineer Mostafa Modabber” and is now the manager of the company “Saipa”, which also has a football team responsible for constructing Iranian sports stadiums!
My expectation from the court is that they will show no mercy to these conspirators, so such crimes are not repeated. The court must tell the truth as it was.
It must be said that these crimes have been committed in recent years, and the reason was that the Iranian people and their representatives in the National Council of Resistance want to end the dictatorship. It must be said that the highest level of leadership of the Iranian regime has decided, organized, and commanded this crime.
The Sunda morning talk shows and the New York Post reported on the National Security risk that Hunter Biden causes his Father, Joe Biden, the Democrat candidate for President of the United States, on Sunday.
The MacBook Pro’s hard drive — the subject of a series of New York Post stories and under investigation by the FBI — had the lax and lazy password despite containing a trove of e-mails and other data relating to his father, Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden, the Daily Mail on Sunday reported,”The New York Post reported, Sunday.
The contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop that were “protected” by the very easy to figure out password Hunter 02, include:
ts existence was revealed by the New York Post last month, but the staggering scale and sensitivity of its contents – easily accessible to a hacker with a modicum of skill – is only revealed for the first time today.
The material, none of which was encrypted or protected by anything as basic as two-factor authentication, includes:
Joe Biden’s personal mobile number and three private email addresses as well as the names of his Secret Service agents;
Mobile numbers for former President Bill Clinton, his wife Hillary and almost every member of former President Barack Obama’s cabinet;
A contact database of 1,500 people including actress Gwyneth Paltrow, Coldplay singer Chris Martin, former Presidential candidate John Kerry and ex-FBI boss Louis Freeh;
Personal documents including Hunter’s passport, driver’s licence, social security card, credit cards and bank statements;
Details of Hunter’s drug and sex problems, including $21,000 spent on one ‘live cam’ porn website and ‘selfies’ of him engaging in sex acts and smoking crack cocaine;
While Hunter has been accused of using his family name to help with deals with Ukrainian and Chinese firms, there is nothing on the laptop to implicate Joe Biden in any wrongdoing.
One email relating to a failed Chinese deal refers to a payment of ten per cent to ‘the Big Guy’, which some have suggested is the presidential hopeful.
However, Mr Biden has insisted: ‘I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life,” according to Daily Mail, UK who examined a hard drive from the computer.
Bernard Kerik, a former Police commissioner of New York City chimed in, in agreement and posted on Twitter, “@JoeBiden allowed his son to become one of our nation’s greatest security risks“
A reporter from The Real Daily Wire, Ryan Saavarda asked a great question to remind the left and their media allies of their hypocrisy and worte, “Remember when the media treated the completely unverified and now debunked Steele dossier as credible and then claimed that Trump put U.S. national security at risk because the prostitute pee-pee tape left him susceptible to blackmail?”
President Donald J. Trump, who was spied upon and hounded over a make-believe story of national security risks, posted on Friday:
“After the #Bobulinski interview, #JoeBiden is a National SecurityRisk and his Security Clearance should be immediately Revoked. Joe is comprised and should be removed as the Presidential Nominee immediately! #BidenCrimeFamiily“
A Fox News contributor reported on Twitter,”
Anyone in the U.S. military or intelligence community will tell you that it would be impossible for .@joeBiden to get a security clearance. To quote #TonyBobulinski, Joe Biden has been “compromised”. This scandal makes him a national securityrisk. Period. @TuckerCarlson“
The Conservative Treehouse reported on discussion of the National Security risk of Hunter Biden and his laptop, on the Sunday morning shows and wrote,” Representative Jim Jordan and Representative Doug Collins appear on Sunday morning to discuss the stunning evidence within the Hunter Biden laptop that shows a massive insider payoff and Biden family scheme to enrich themselves through bribes.
The Chinese communist government knew exactly what they were doing by paying Hunter Biden for Joe Biden’s influence. The Chinese Communist Party motive was transparently to have control over the Biden family; that is a national security risk.”
The Obama-Biden administration back in 2015 approved the sale of a strategically sensitive manufacturer in Michigan, a company called Henniges Automotive, to a company linked to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, along with a Chinese military contractor on an American watch list over its close ties to the People’s Liberation Army. That would be the communist Chinese army for you liberals.
Hunter Biden’s equity fund, which was backed by both the communist Chinese government, and Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC), the Chinese contractor, wanted special approval for the deal from the Committee of Foreign Investment in the United States (CIFIUS) (the same Obama-created board that approved the Uranium One sale to the Russians who then took ownership of 20 percent of US uranium) because Henniges produced technology with potential military use. So, Hunter Biden allegedly helped the communist Chinese government to buy a manufacturing company that could help them militarily.
AVIC entities have been sanctioned by the US 5 separate times since 1993 and the addition to the watch list, a major red flag, happened less than a year-and-a-half before they co-purchased Henniges with Hunter Biden’s BHR. It’s like all built-in government fail safes were ignored by the Obama-Biden administration.
The fact that CFIUS approved the deal is alarming provided that Henniges owns numerous plants in the US that are now controlled by a Chinese military front company. Thanks in part to the Biden crime family.
Internal BHR documents reveal exactly how the Chinese military contractor was able to disguise its ownership through shell corporations and created a joint-venture with the son of the former vice president to expedite the Chinese takeover of an American dual-use technology manufacturer. Other documents suggest that Hunter Biden’s Chinese-backed venture siphoned money to an entity controlled by the daughter of then-Secretary of State John Kerry, Vanessa Kerry, a month before the CFIUS board approved the takeover. During that time, Secretary of State John Kerry played a leading role on the Obama-Biden CFIUS committee, just as Hillary Clinton did when she was secretary of state and convinced the other CFIUS board members to approve the sale of Uranium One.
Do you see how incestuous the Democrats under Obama were?
When the news broke of the AVIC takeover of Michigan-based manufacturer Henniges Automotive, Biden’s associates cheered and celebrated, labeling the transaction a “proof of concept” for future Chinese acquisitions. Holy cow. Devon Archer sent out an email on September 15, 2015 with the Subject line reading: “Congratulations!!!! Proof of concept again.” In the email it said, “This is great. Let’s get a letter out to Ambassador Baucus ASAP Archie (an apparent Archer nickname),” Bevan Cooney replied. Cooney’s a former Biden associate who is now sitting in prison on another charge that involved Biden’s business partners. He must be looking at Hunter and Archer and thinking he got the shaft out of the group, because he’s in prison and they’re not.
It turns out that “Archie” is Devon Archer. Cooney gave New York Times bestselling author and investigative journalist Peter Schweizer and investigative journalist Matthew Tyrmand open access to his emails with written authorization.
Not long after the deal closed, Archer began drafting a letter to US Ambassador to China Max Baucus (who happened to be a longtime friend of the Biden crime family). Archer’s letter was an invitation to Ambassador Baucus to attend a banquet celebration for the deal with esteemed guest including BHR’s communist state-owned “strategic partners” and investors.
“I am writing to invite you to a cross-border banquet to celebrate our acquisition of Henniges Automotive. We consummated the transaction earlier this month, in conjunction with our strategic partner, AVIC, for $600 million. I have also attached a news article about the transaction. This milestone marks our first U.S.-based acquisition. Our strategic partners, including AVIC and Sinopec, will be in attendance, as will our investors, including the Bank of China and China Development Bank. We hope to discuss the opportunities and challenges of cross-border investments for Chinese companies in today’s macro environment. A member of our team has also extended an invitation to your economics advisor – Jonathan Fritz – to speak at the seminar.”
The strategic partners and investors that Archer listed, notably Sinopec, the Bank of China, and the China Development Bank, are all state-owned entities and subsequently arms of the Chinese Communist Party whose executives/officials, together with BHR, clearly wanted to rejoice the Henniges coup.
Hunter Biden’s Chinese business partners were happy. One internal BHR document reads in both English and Mandarin Chinese: “We are incredibly proud of the perseverance, dedication and ingenuity of the Project Hanson team who collectively brought to life the first-born of BHR’s cross-border investment platform, the first of many to come.”
The former senior director for international affairs working in President Ronald Reagan’s National Security Council, Roger Robinson, said that “the US government has known for years that AVIC has been helping China’s military and aiding US enemies and as such was sanctioned in the past.” The fact that AVIC has very well-known ties to the Chinese government makes the Obama-Biden administration’s approval all the more curious. “This is anything but a benign Chinese enterprise,” said Robinson.
A picture of Joe Biden with Kenes Rakishev of Kazakhstan, who once pursued business opportunities with Hunter Biden. None of them apparently was successful but Rakishev did invest one million dollars with Alexandra Forbes Kerry, the film-maker daughter of John Kerry.
This is one more example of Biden greasing the wheel of riches for his son despite his statement that he had no clue what his son was up to. It is another case where a foreigner is able to buy access to the rich and powerful Democratic party.
Kenes Rakishev, is described as “a relative and junior partner of [oligarch] Timur Kulibayev.” He is on the far left in the picture. His website describes him as an “international businessman, investor and entrepreneur.”
The Mail can reveal that between 2012 and 2014, Hunter worked as a sort of go-between for Kenes Rakishev, a self-styled ‘international businessman, investor and entrepreneur’ with close family connections to the kleptocratic regime of his homeland’s despotic former president Nursultan Nazarbayev
Emails passed to this newspaper via anti-corruption campaigners from the Central Asian country reveal that Biden Jr held extensive meetings with Rakishev, who was looking to invest a portion of his personal fortune in New York and Washington DC. He also travelled to the Kazakh capital of Astana to hold business discussions.
Hunter Biden then attempted to persuade Rakishev to buy into a Nevadan mining company, brokering a series of meetings with the firm, before convincing him to invest a cool million dollars with Alexandra Forbes Kerry, the film-maker daughter of Democrat Senator and former Presidential candidate John Kerry.
Archer received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, to buy a car on the same day that Joe Biden met with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk .
The money came from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma; from the Chinese company Bohai Harvest RST (BHR); and from a company controlled by Rakishev, Novatus Holdings.
Investigative journalist Matthew Tyrmand who received the emails of turncoat Bevan Clooney, provided Breitbart News with an email from Devon Archer from 2014 saying he would be hosting Kazakhstan’s “Secretary of State” in the nation’s capital.
President Trump has been slamming Joe over Twitter. Here is a post from this morning: