GOP Rep Introduces Measure to Remove Jerry Nadler as Judiciary Chairman Over Impeachment Probe

GOP Rep Introduces Measure to Remove Jerry Nadler as Judiciary Chairman Over Impeachment Probe

A Republican congressman on Sept. 24 introduced a resolution to strip House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.

Republican congressman has introduced a resolution to strip House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) of his panel post in a bid to put an end to his “rogue witch-hunt” to impeach President Donald Trump.

Lance Gooden (R-Texas) made the move on Sept. 24 after impeachment proceedings against Trump were formally backed Tuesday by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

Gooden said in a release: “In recent days, Democrats have sanctimoniously declared their allegiance to the rule of law. I encourage them to follow those rules and hold Chairman Nadler accountable for breaking them.”

He added that Nadler’s actions went against the will of the House of Representatives, as it didn’t explicitly authorize his committee to begin impeachment proceedings. “This attempted coup against a duly elected, sitting president is unprecedented and must be stopped,” Gooden continued.

“I urge the majority to move immediately to have him stripped of his chairmanship and that any accomplices on the Judiciary Committee not be considered as a replacement.”

It comes as Pelosi on Sept. 24 announced that an inquiry into impeaching Trump is underway.

She alleged that Trump “seriously violated the Constitution,” saying that the House is “moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry.”

She met on Sept. 24 with her caucus of House Democrats before the planned statement.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces Trump impeachment inquiry at the U.S. Capitol in Washington
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announces the House of Representatives will launch a formal inquiry to investigate whether to impeach U.S. President Donald Trump following a closed House Democratic caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Sept. 24, 2019. (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

Pelosi, until recently, had publicly resisted the move despite other top Democrats pushing for it in legal filings and in the media. The move by some Democrats to impeach the president was stalled after former special counsel Robert Mueller was unable to back up claims of collusion between Trump and Russia or obstruction of justice.

But recent claims published in The Wall Street Journal that Trump allegedly pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a July phone call to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, have emboldened them to continue.

On Sept. 24, Trump said he would release the transcript of his call with Zelensky. “I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

“You will see it was a very friendly and totally appropriate call. No pressure and, unlike Joe Biden and his son, NO quid pro quo! This is nothing more than a continuation of the Greatest and most Destructive Witch Hunt of all time!”

Trump also said that the push for impeachment is part of the “greatest and most destructive witch hunt of all time.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said that he will back Pelosi’s decision.

“I speak regularly with Leader Pelosi. I spoke to her last night and again twice this morning. As I’ve said before, I believe she is handling this appropriately and she has my support,” Schumer told reporters, according to The Hill.

Congressional Democrats, including (L-R) House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.), Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Senate Finance Committee ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), walk out of the White House before talking with reporters following a meeting with President Donald Trump in Washington on April 30, 2019. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Read full article here: GOP Rep Introduces Measure to Remove Jerry Nadler as Judiciary Chairman Over Impeachment Probe

BLM Announced Demands Including Convict Trump, Investigate White Supremacy Cops, And Stop Comparing Summer Riots To Jan 6

BLM Announced Demands Including Convict Trump, Investigate White Supremacy Cops, And Stop Comparing Summer Riots To Jan 6

The Marxist group Black Lives Matter (BLM) has made public a new list of shameful and impossible demands concerning former President Donald Trump and the “mostly peaceful” riots all throughout the summer of 2020.

There are seven items on their list of demands that they expect to be done immediately. In fact, we’re already late!

The list is as follows:

  1. Convict and ban Trump from future political office
  2. Expel Republican members of Congress who attempted to overturn the election and incited a white supremacist attack
  3. Launch a full investigation into the ties between white supremacy and the Capitol Police, law enforcement, and the military
  4. Permanently ban Trump from all digital media platforms
  5. Defund the police
  6. Don’t let the coup be used as an excuse to crack down on our movement
  7. Pass the BREATHE Act

I honestly believe that the leaders of Black Lives Matter sat around a giant pool at one of Patrisse Khan-Cullors’ multi-million dollar mansions to come up with a list of things that will take the media’s focus off of the Marxist leader’s real estate spending spree because she caught a lot of flack.

The Marxist group is now referring to the January 6 Capitol riot as the “Coup.” If anything, it would be an attempted coup, because what happened on January 6 was not a coup. The thieving Democrats got away with what they did in the 2020 election, and for it to be considered a coup would mean that those who walked into the Capitol that day seized power, which they did not.

Under the banner of their first demand they wrote, “We are joining Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep. Ayanna Pressley, Rep. Cori Bush, Rep. Jamaal Bowman, and others who are demanding Trump be immediately convicted in the United States Senate. Trump must also be banned from holding elected office in the future.”

Sounds like they’re still afraid of Trump. They had their chance during the phony Senate impeachment trial, and it failed because there aren’t enough Senators stupid enough to vote to convict Trump who did nothing wrong on January 6. That Trump did anything wrong is the Big Lie.

Spouting more nonsense about so-called “white supremacists,” which seems to be the answer to every problem BLM makes up, they wrote, “More than half the Republican representatives and multiple senators stoked Trump’s conspiracy theories and encouraged the white supremacists to take action to overturn the election. We are supporting Rep. Cori Bush’s resolution to expel them from Congress for their dangerous and traitorous actions. We also support steps to bar them from seeking another office.”

There was no visible army of white supremacists at the January 6 riot. If there were images of white supremacists at the January 6 riot, we would have seen them all, ad nauseam and nonstop, plastered all over the screens of CNN and MSNBC and on the pages of the Washington Post and the New York Times. It didn’t happen because they weren’t there. That story is a lie.

BLM tried to create a conspiracy between the police and white supremacists, which is insulting just on the face of it.

“The Capitol was able to be breached and overrun by white supremacists attempting to disrupt a political process that is fundamental to our democracy. We know that police departments have been a safe haven for white supremacists to hide malintent [technically not a real word] behind a badge because the badge was created for that purpose. We also know off-duty cops and military were among the mob at the Capitol on January 6th. Guilty parties need to be held accountable and fired. We are supporting Rep. Jamaal Bowman’s COUP Act to investigate these connections.”

What I would like someone from BLM to explain to me is how was what happened on January 6 racial at all? You can argue all you want about it being the coup or about it being a riot that was pre-planned, and that trump was behind in all the other nonsense lies that the Left has told about January 6, but you can’t bring race into it.

Referring to the toppling of public statues, the looting, and burning of businesses, the setting fire to a federal building, taking over police precincts, attacking and murdering innocent victims every night and all summer long as their “Freedom Summer,” BLM wrote, “In response to the coup, Politicians have already introduced the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021. We’ve seen this playbook before. These laws are used to target Black and brown communities for heightened surveillance. Republicans are already busy trying to create an equivalence between the mob on January 6th and our Freedom Summer. We don’t need new domestic terror laws, facial recognition, or any other new police power for the state. Our government should protect righteous protest and stay focused on the real issue: rooting out white supremacy. There are enough laws, resources, and intelligence, but they were not used to stop the coup. Our elected officials must uncover why.”

Sticking with the “blame everything on white supremacy” theme, BLM calls for community investment by writing, “The police were born out of slave patrols. We cannot reform an institution built upon white supremacy. We need a new, radical approach to public safety and community investment. President Biden has already drawn on the BREATHE Act in his executive actions, calling for racial equity screens in federal programs, investing in environmental justice at historic levels, and engaging with system-impacted communities. The BREATHE Act paints a vision of a world where Black lives matter through investments in housing, education, health, and environmental justice”

Just as an FYI, in researching this list my antivirus caught a trojan virus by visiting BLM’s website so you may want to stay clear of it. Thanks for that!

It’s going to be a long year as BLM is going to milk the white supremacist angle for all that it’s worth. They will blame everything, including humidity, on white supremacy. When ANTIFA and BLM hit the streets to cause mayhem, we can actually see them on video. They wear black clothing, black helmets, and carry weapons like concrete milkshakes to throw at cops and anyone else in their way. We watch them set fires and beat people up. Just go to YouTube and search and you will find it. But we never see the white supremacists doing what BLM and other mental patients claim they do that is so dangerous that we need the federal Congress to get involved. Where are they? Show them to us. Are they going into neighborhoods and setting fires? Are they killing innocent people? Do they even exist? Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY) Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said that ANTIFA is a myth. Joe Biden said ANTIFA is just an idea. Yet those two pinheads support BLM’s idea that there is this army of white supremacists keeping them down. This is why it’s going to be a long year.

‘A Gift From God’: Trey Gowdy Says Republicans Will Use Court-Packing Bill To ‘Bludgeon Democrat Candidates in 2022’

‘A Gift From God’: Trey Gowdy Says Republicans Will Use Court-Packing Bill To ‘Bludgeon Democrat Candidates in 2022’

Former Rep Trey Gowdy is ecstatic that the Democrats are trying to pack the Supreme Court. He has to know it will never pass in the Senate.

It should pass in the House because three Democrats would have to cross party lines and I don’t believe Pelosi would allow that. She wants to wait until Schumer has the votes to get it through the Senate, so it is very possible that there will never be a vote.

Bret Baier commented that Pelosi has said she does not support the bill. That may be true of this bill but she also said she supported the commission Joe Biden set up to explore the possibility. She would bring it to a voter today if she thought it would pass.

This is not a bill they want to vote on and lose because all the members in the House and the Senate would be on the record, which is exactly what Gowdy thinks would be a killer in the 2022 midterms and possibly even in 2024.

Gowdy replied to Baier:

“Bret, this is a gift from God. That is the only way to describe it. It has no chance ever of becoming law with the current Congress but it will be used to bludgeon Democrat candidates in 2022 which is why you saw that motley group of only four that can’t even wait for Biden’s commission.”

“So Republicans rejoice that Jerry Nadler is handling strategy for 2022. You are guaranteed to retake the House and the Senate.” 

Bret Baier pointed out that in order to pass the bill in the Senate they would first have to kill the filibuster rule and Joe Manchin has insisted that he opposes ending the filibuster.

They will also have to deal with Kyrsten Sinema who also opposed doing away with the filibuster. That too is unpopular with the voters.

Axios’ Jonathan Swan said:

“But it all comes as you said it comes down to Joe Manchin. It’s not just Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema opposes eliminating the filibuster, but Manchin is dug in on this issue. He’s put out an op-ed. He said it a million times on the record I don’t see any sign that he is softening on this issue whatsoever.”

Insufferable Democrats Condemn Capitol Riot This Week After Downplaying Daily Riots All Summer Long

Insufferable Democrats Condemn Capitol Riot This Week After Downplaying Daily Riots All Summer Long

Playing the very definition of hypocrisy, many of the same Democratic leaders who spent the entire summer rationalizing and downplaying the violence in Democrat-run cities across our country have come out to condemn the violence in the riot that took place outside the Capitol building on Wednesday.

The riot that took place this week at the US Capitol, which happened during a pro-Trump rally that turned into a march down the street to the Capitol building, saw numerous protesters storm the legislature building causing Democrat lawmakers to run like frightened children, and delayed the certification of the 2020 election fraud.

Protesters went into lawmakers’ offices and trashed them, moving into the Senate chamber, and then clashing with police.  At one point, an unarmed 34-year-old female 14-year Air Force veteran was shot and killed by a police officer for crouching in a window frame after the glass had been smashed out of it.  The woman was not a threat and there were a number of uniformed police officers standing right behind her.  Ashli Babbit was shot in the neck and was pronounced dead sometime later.

The mayhem that ensued was characterized by the mainstream media as a coup or an insurrection and was universally denounced by lawmakers from both parties.  No one said any of it was mostly peaceful the way they did throughout the summer as we all watched American cities burn, businesses looted and people murdered in the streets.

Many of the same Democrat hypocrites who condemned the violence this week downplayed the summer-long daily riots that destroyed people’s lives and burned down their businesses and they didn’t care at all, because they wanted to blame it all on President Donald Trump.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said that ANTIFA was just a myth on right-wing TV.

Joe Biden, who just stole the presidential election said that ANTIFA was not a real group, but just an idea.

That “idea” harmed a hell of a lot of people over the summer and since.

Democrats supported the violent group Black Lives Matter and did everything they could to make it appear that the ugliness that the two groups and other leftists did to destroy a nation was fully justified.

Kamala Harris, who is set to be sworn in as our next vice president supported an organization that bailed out rioters so that they could get back on the streets to continue their destruction.

Harris said during an interview that the protests (read riots) are a movement and they’re not going to stop.  And they shouldn’t.

It was insufferable to listen to Democrats downplay the riots and the violence by continually calling them peaceful.  This woman is going to be dangerous for the next four years because she has a mean streak in her and a get-even attitude about radical ideas that America is systemically racist.

A prominent voice among the band of hypocrites is Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) (AOC), a woman who is known for her inflexible socialist beliefs and nonstop criticism of the Republican Party.  She is also known to run her mouth about things she knows nothing about and usually gets it wrong, but her stupidity and ignorance in such things is not really the topic here.

Since the incident on Wednesday, AOC has been hard pushing for President Trump’s removal from office, blaming him for the mayhem that took place at the Capitol.  Of course, there is no evidence whatsoever that Trump told anyone to start rioting, but that never stops a good lie by a Democrat.

On Thursday, AOC took to social media and tweeted, “Our republic is in great danger,” and then called for Trump to be removed either via the 25th Amendment or by way of a second impeachment.

“Our republic is in great danger, and it is imperiled further without swift action to protect it.

The President incited an attack on Congress. He is deeply unstable. The Cabinet must invoke the 25th amendment.

Congress must also pursue impeachment and removal of the President.”

It seems that AOC approves of political violence when it serves her purposes politically.  She is on record for making ambiguous and vague opinions about the violence that took place all summer long after the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police.

AOC did a video where she accused people of being hypocritical if they called for the violence to end without giving in to the rioter’s demands.

“If you are calling for an end to this unrest, and if you are a calling for an end to all of this, but you are not calling for the end of the conditions that created the unrest, you are a hypocrite,” she said in the video.

“So if you’re out here calling for the end of unrest,” she continued, “then you better be calling for health care as a human right, you better be calling for accountability in our policing, you better be supporting community review boards, you better be supporting the end of housing discrimination … Because if you don’t call for those things and you’re asking for the end of unrest, all you’re asking for is the continuation of quiet oppression.”


A post shared by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@aoc)

When she made the video multiple people had already been killed because of the riots, and more came afterward.

And that was the most docile response to the violence that the Congresswoman has given.

At the end of summer in 2019, AOC said that marginalized groups “have no choice but to riot” when their living conditions are bad.

“Once you have a group that is marginalized,” she said while discussing conflicts happening in Israel.  “Once someone doesn’t have access to clean water, they have no choice but to riot.”

“I’m not even talking about Palestinians,” she added. “I’m talking about communities in poverty in the United States, I’m talking about Latin America, I’m talking about all over the world.”

She went on to say, “Social destabilization is what happens when people do not have a plan or feel like there’s no vision for their future.”

She justified political violence.

The Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said of public statues being toppled, “People will do what they do.”  She also said that “from a safety standpoint, it would be a good idea to have it taken down if the community doesn’t want it.”  This was from the Speaker of the House of Representatives!

Pelosi downplayed much of the violence over the summer while giving well-rehearsed lines about how violence is never a good thing and at the same time she condemned President Trump in solidarity-like speeches to support radical Democrat mayors who refused to stop riots in their cities and told the president to pound sand when he offered to send federal agents in to help quell the mayhem and burning of cities.

The dopey Democrat Senator from New Jersey Cory Booker also condemned Wednesday’s violence referring to it as a “nadir of shame.”

“It’s disgraceful that Trump and his allies have enabled this violence and attacks on our democracy,” Booker tweeted.

I guess he thought we would forget that on June 4 of last year he was far more careful in his wording over the deadly violence that took place for a week that went through multiple American cities netting over a dozen people murdered, rioters setting fire to a police station, looting, assaults, and arson all over the place.

“I think that there’s an overemphasis, for one, on rioters and looters,” the smiling jackass from New Jersey said, referring to the animals as “such a small fraction relative to peaceful protesters and activists.”

Roger Stone’s Full Statement on Pardon, Pleas for Pardons for Assange and Snowden

Roger Stone’s Full Statement on Pardon, Pleas for Pardons for Assange and Snowden

President Donald J. Trump issued a full Presidential pardon to Roger Stone on Wednesday and Stone took the opportunity to deliver a statement full of gratitude as well as pleas to Trump to issue pardons to others.

The following is the full and unedited statement of Roger Stone, from December 23, 2020.

On behalf of my family and myself, I wish to praise God and give my deepest thanks to President Donald J. Trump for his extraordinary act of justice in issuing me a presidential pardon, completely erasing the criminal conviction to which I was subjected in a Soviet-style show trial on politically-motivated charges, further corrupted by egregious, illegal misconduct by the Jury Forewoman in the case.

Just weeks ago, when the US Department of Justice released the last remaining redacted sections of the ‘Mueller Report’ that pertained to my case, the Special Counsel admitted that there was no “factual” evidence whatsoever of coordination, collaboration, or collusion between me, any  Russians, WikiLeaks or publisher Julian Assange. Additionally, they found no “factual” evidence that I had advanced knowledge of the precise timing, source, or content of any of WikiLeaks’ 2016 disclosures, including the release of John Podesta’s apparently purloined emails. Even more incredibly, the ‘Mueller Report’ concludes that even if they had found evidence that I had received data from WikiLeaks and disseminated it to anyone, these were perfectly legal, constitutionally-protected actions under the First Amendment. In short: Mueller’s intrusive, lawless, malicious multimillion-dollar witch hunt could find no prosecutable crime against me,
other than what they managed to fabricate.

Why am I not shocked that only BuzzFeed, whose lawsuit won the release of this material, the Washington Examiner, and ZeroHedge reported this shocking news? Perhaps it’s because the Justice Department released it at midnight of election day – the busiest news day of the year – in other words, they wanted it buried deep. Or perhaps media outlets like the Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, the Business Insider, Politico, and others who gleefully reported lie after lie about me, my case, and the purported “evidence” against me. In fact, the media jackals reported
nothing. I have no doubt that the unhinged radical left, who despise both President Trump and me, will now recycle the entirely-false and now thoroughly-
the debunked narrative that I “maintained my silence” regarding misconduct by the President in return for the commutation of my sentence and a pardon.
Hillary Clinton has said it, Jerry Nadler has said it, Adam Schiff and Hakeem Jeffries have said it, and Eric Swalwell, the communist Chinese-compromised
Congressman, echoed it. It’s a lie.

This canard is based on a conversation I had with Howard Fineman that he later misreported on MSNBC. Fortunately, I have Fineman’s text message
reaffirming that I never said I ‘knew of criminal misconduct’ by the President or ever said that I maintained my silence to protect him, but rather that I merely repeated what I had said on multiple occasions after the commutation of my sentence, namely that I refused to bear false testimony against the
President when the Mueller prosecutors approached by my attorneys seeking my “cooperation” in return for a recommendation for leniency in my sentencing.

Claims falsely made by Michael Cohen and Rick Gates that they overheard conversations between candidate Trump and myself discussing WikiLeaks are not only totally-uncorroborated but also materialized only after the Special Counsel’s legal operators’ induced the two with favorable plea
bargains for their other crimes. These manufactured claims are unsupported by any phone records or witnesses, and their sworn testimony is contradicted
by their FBI 302 documents released by the Justice Department.

I was charged with “lying to Congress,” even though any misstatements I made to partisan Democrat inquisitors on the House Intelligence Committee
concealed nothing material either to their investigation or regarding any underlying crime because there was none. Rod Rosenstein testified to the
Senate Judiciary Committee that he did not approve the investigation into my affairs. His statement is belied by his own signed scope-memo
authorizing the Special Counsel’s expansion. In other words, Rosenstein lied to Congress under oath.
More recently, the Washington Post reported that three top senior nonpolitical career prosecutors denied claims made by Assistant US

Attorney Aaron Zelinsky in sworn testimony to the House Judiciary Committee that they told him they were being pressured by the White House
and top administration officials regarding my sentencing, specifically to “go easy on Stone in their sentencing recommendation.” In other words, both
Rosenstein and Zelinsky lied to Congress. When will they be prosecuted? Lastly, I want to particularly thank Rev. Franklin Graham for his spiritual
guidance, as well as Rev. Randy Coggins, Pastor Mark Burns, Pastor Darrel Scott, Pastor Rod Parsley, Reverend Rodney Howard-Browne, David
Clement, Eric Metaxas, Father Michael J. Grady of St. Anthony’s Parrish in Fort Lauderdale, and other men of God who convinced me that reaffirming
my faith in Jesus Christ and confessing my sins would bring God’s grace in delivering me from my persecutors. How right they were.
The injustice done to me does not stand alone. Other good Americans have been victims of a corrupt system made to serve venal power-seekers,
rewarding deceit and manipulation, rather than reason and justice. President Trump can be the purveyor of justice over the vile machinations of wicked
pretenders to the mantle of public service.

I hope the president will consider granting full and unconditional pardons to Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Marcus Garvey, and Former Secret Service Agent Abraham W. Bolden, Sr.

We Predicted Sexual Harassment Accusations Against Andrew Cuomo Would Be Ignored, and We Were Right

We Predicted Sexual Harassment Accusations Against Andrew Cuomo Would Be Ignored, and We Were Right

We recently reported when New York City political appointee Lindsey Boylan took to social media on Sunday to claim that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo “sexually harassed me for years,” and I warned that the mainstream news media would Tara Reade her, and completely ignore the story.  And they did.  Tara Reade came out and accused Joe Biden of sexual assault and the media didn’t cover that story either.

So, if you get your “news,” for lack of a better word, from ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC or NBC you’re probably ignorant of her tweet, because they failed to cover it.  Cuomo is their boy, because even though he completely botched the handling of coronavirus in his state, he brazenly accused President Donald Trump for his own mistakes and failures, and since these network hate Donald Trump, Cuomo is their hero.

Had Cuomo been a Republican you would still be hearing about it.  It’s just the messed up world we live in now.

Boylan, who describes herself as a progressive (which is really the American version of a Marxist), according to her LinkedIn profile, worked for the Cuomo administration from 2015 to 2018.

“Yes, @NYGovCuomo sexually harassed me for years. Many saw it, and watched. I could never anticipate what to expect: would I be grilled on my work (which was very good) or harassed about my looks. Or would it be both in the same conversation? This was the way for years.”

“Not knowing what to expect what’s the most upsetting part aside from knowing that no one would do a damn thing even when they saw it.

No one.

And I *know* I am not the only woman.”

The Media Research Center reported that ABC, NBC and CBS ignored Boylan’s claims in the first 24 hours after her allegations became public.  That’s nothing.  It’s been over a month and they’re still ignoring all the evidence that confirms massive voter fraud took place in the 2020 election.  You can’t trust that alphabet soup.

“The network newscasts on Sunday night and Monday morning were predictably silent on the shocking sexual harassment claims against Governor Andrew Cuomo, a hero among liberals,” NewsBusters associate editor Scott Whitlock wrote.

“On Sunday night there was silence from the networks. On Monday morning, NBC’s ‘Today,’ ‘CBS This Morning’ and ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ all avoided the accusations against the governor, despite a combined six hours of available air time,” Whitlock added.

Networks weren’t the only ones who decided to completely ignore the story, because liberal cable news outlets also completely ignored accusations made by Boylan.

I wonder how that makes progressive women feel to know that left wing news outlets will completely ignore their allegations of sexual harassment to favor a man who is a liberal Democrat politician?  Doesn’t that mean that all of media’s hype and rhetoric about women needing to be believed was just a bunch of bullschtein political rhetoric?

Neither CNN nor MSNBC mentioned Boylan’s allegations during the 24 hour timeline follower her tweets, according to the transcripts.

Though Boylan described the governor’s office as being a “toxic work environment” earlier in December, she has yet to give up and details of alleged incidents, and she has named no witnesses.

On a side note, whenever people here about charges of sexual harassment they immediately begin to think of a boss, usually a man, telling a female subordinate that if she doesn’t have sex with him she’s fired or she won’t get promotions or she will be demoted, etc.  That’s horrible and there should be something done about bosses who do that.  But that’s not how the liberals have morphed this area of the law.  Sexual harassment could have absolutely nothing to do with an action being sexual in nature. It could have to do with harassment in the workplace like having your work ridiculed constantly or being cursed at by the boss.  In the old days we used to call that life on the job.  Us older folks understand that many people had bad bosses at one time or another who took things out on you that you didn’t deserve.

Of course, the governor’s office said there was no truth to the claims as if anyone expected him to admit to it.

There’s a lot of speculation going around that Boylan came out with these accusations because she’s running for Manhattan Borough President in 2021 and she thinks she’ll get media attention and the attentions of some feminist groups who will come out and support her.  But it looks like she’s learning that feminists are only against politicians who won’t do their bidding.  For goodness’ sake they championed Bill Clinton a serial sexual predator.  Boylan also ran against Jerry Nadler for his seat in Congress this year, and she lost by 40 points, according to Ballotpedia!

Rep. Swalwell (D-CA) Refuses To Talk About Honeypot Relationship With Chinese Spy, Blames It All On Trump

Rep. Swalwell (D-CA) Refuses To Talk About Honeypot Relationship With Chinese Spy, Blames It All On Trump

Two days ago, on December 8, Axios broke a bombshell story that California Democrat Representative Eric Swalwell was closely involved with a spy, Fang Fang, or Christine Fang, from China who fundraised for his campaign and planted an intern inside his office.  What a dope!

The next day we reported that House minority leader Kevin McCarthy said that “Not only should he [Swalwell] be removed from the Intel [Committee]. He should be removed from Congress, as well.”

On the same day the story broke, during an interview on Politico, rather than respond to questions about how much he was involved with the suspected honeypot spy, Swalwell did what he is known to do; he blamed his own culpability on President Donald Trump.  What an irresponsible schmuck.  I hope the people in his district are paying attention.

For the last four years the most dangerous place to be was between Eric Swalwell and a news camera.   This pathetic loser spent all of that time trashing our president every chance he got by continuing the spread the lie about the Russian collusion hoax.

And after the Mueller witch hunt ended with a conclusion of no evidence whatsoever that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia we never got that apology from this reprobate.  And now, he’s blaming Trump for his relationship with a probably Chinese spy.

I’m not kidding. Here’s what this clown said.

“I’ve been a critic of the president. I’ve spoken out against him. I was on both committees that worked to impeach him,” Swalwell said in an interview on Tuesday. “The timing feels like that should be looked at.”

Yeah, the Trump administration was so worried, so deranged over the lunatic rantings of Eric Swalwell that they bypassed anybody like the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and they went straight for the tough guy, the badass, the Howdy Doody lookalike, Eric the porcelain doll of the Communist Chinese Party Swalwell.

Swalwell added: “What it appears though that this person — as the story reports — was unsuccessful in whatever they were trying to do. But if intelligence officials are trying to weaponize someone’s cooperation, they are essentially seeking to do what this person was not able to do, which is to try and discredit someone.”

Swalwell doesn’t need a bombshell story of how he served as an Asian useful idiot for a country that is trying to take our place in the world to be discredited.  He has been doing that on his own for quite some time.

According to the yóunì, gangà Congressman from California, the real story here is not that he was duped by a female Chinese spy who may have gotten government intelligence from him, after all, he does sit on the House Intelligence Committee, but rather, that the media is reporting on this story at all and not on the fact that it was all Trump’s fault.  This is the same Chinese spy who gave sexual favors to a couple of mayors

Swalwell wants to change the narrative that it’s not a story about him and a female Chinese spy, but about the reporting on him and a female Chinese spy.  He wants you to believe that Axios, which is not a conservative, pro-Trump outlet in the slightest, did a hit piece on him to help the Trump administration undermine Swalwell’s integrity, even though we already know all about the congressman’s lack of integrity when Sir Fartsalot tries to obstruct and shift the blame for his actions elsewhere.

In fact, the Trump administration was so evil they got Axios to publish the story after the election to ensure maximum damage. #EyeRoll

Remember when he farted like a pack mule eating fried eggrolls on live TV?  He denied what everyone saw and heard during his live interview as he was – you guessed it – attacking Trump with more lies.

And he found liberal vindication for lying about farting like Tasmanian Devil eating a box of burritos filled with raspberries on live TV when Hardball threw him a towel claiming the noise was really a coffee mug being slid across the anchor desk.  I’ve tried sliding about a half dozen different types of coffee mugs over my kitchen table and none of them sounded like a whoopee cushion  gone nuclear.

And then there’s this. According to Politico, Sir Fartsalot refused to talk about his relationship with the Fang.  After being asked about a possible romantic relationship with the Chinese spy, Fartman won’t talk about it.  I honestly believe the American people have a right to know, because of his position in Congress being on the Intel Committee.  If the Chi-Coms sent in a honeypot to get American intelligence then we have a right to know.  I don’t want the gruesome details because I don’t like throwing up in my own mouth, but I would like to know if they had a romantic relationship.

And don’t even think House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will do anything about it.  She’s already defended him staying on the Intelligence Committee.  Swalwell allegedly said that Pelosi knew about the situation before he was put on the committee, yet no Republican was made aware according to the New York Post. In that past, before the Democratic Party went nuts and began politicizing e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g, Swalwell would have been off that committee very quickly. But the Democrats now care less about our national security than one of their own who trashes Donald Trump regularly. It’s a total disgrace.

MASK WARS: Dem Gov. Cuomo Reports he is “Appalled” by Large Group Enjoying a Concert, Silent About Riots

MASK WARS: Dem Gov. Cuomo Reports he is “Appalled” by Large Group Enjoying a Concert, Silent About Riots

Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo posted on Twitter that he was upset about a large group who had gathered in Southhampton for a concert, ending hi silence over large gatherings, seeming to favor violent uprisings and criminal acts to dancing to music played by a DJ.

In the post, which went viral with over 8 Million views, a large group of people are seen dancing. Cuomo has called for a Department of Health investigation into infractions on Mask usage and Social Distancing.

Cuomo takes the opportunity to shame the crowd over their rebellion, and calls the dancing “Reckless endangerment of public health”:

He also went on a tirade on Twitter about people using masks:

“No one has the right to endanger the health of store employees or other customers,”, Cuomo.

Apparently looting, shooting, and arson are not health concerns for Cuomo.

No response from Cuomo about this:

No response or Health Department Investigation about this:

Nothing from the Gov about this:

Cuomo is a radical left member of the Democrat party who, along with their allies in the Media,  are claiming that peaceful Americans without masks are “intolerable”, “reckless” and “harming people with their lack of caring”, while also claiming that the violent and criminal uprisings are “peaceful”.

The Democrats are very, very serious about Masks and Social Distancing and not “holding yourself out as not caring”, about masks, as seen in this video of US House member Jerry Nadler at a House hearing Tuesday.

You will care, or be made to care about masks and other stuff too…



Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals

Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals

This is another example of the Democratic party pushing more big government. Even though they have no authority over local governments they are passing laws to assume an Authoritarian position in government.

This is some of the most dangerous legislation Democrats can pass. Taking away the protections of police officers will only encourage officers to leave the force and discourage others from choosing it as a career.

From Washington Examiner

It may not be a plank in the official Democratic Party platform, but it’s clear that Democrats and their supporters want to eliminate state and local police. The radical left, which now controls the Democratic Party, is making a frontal assault on the police with their calls to defund and dismantle police departments. Democratic members of Congress are fighting a rearguard action through their dangerous Jerry Nadler-Nancy Pelosi anti-policing bill.

During the hearing on the Nadler-Pelosi monstrosity, Democrats rejected every amendment offered by Republicans, even when Democrats agreed with the substance of the amendment.

Included in the Nadler-Pelosi bill was a provision that limited the sentence of a person convicted of lynching to 10 years. The Democrats doggedly fought to defeat an amendment offered by Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas that would have made lynching punishable by life imprisonment or death-penalty eligible. Nadler argued that the death penalty was barbarous. But then, so is lynching.

In an effort to ameliorate Nadler’s concerns, Gohmert proposed a change that would maximize the penalty for lynching to life in prison. Nadler and the Democrats rejected this, apparently content with the bill’s maximum of 10 years punishment for lynching.

The heart of the anti-police bill is an effort to eliminate all legal protections police officers have. Since Democrats are also attempting to bring all police power to the national government, their bill is also chock full of tactical mandates on local police departments.


A court-made rule gives police officers limited, qualified immunity for their acts. Because of language in a Supreme Court ruling, there is a need to reform immunity provisions, while protecting police. Many Democrats seemed to acknowledge the need to give some protection for officers who do not intentionally or recklessly harm a citizen but were unwilling to accept any Republican attempts to reform the immunity laws. Democrats preferred a total elimination of all legal protection to our police officers.

If the Democrat bill becomes law, here is what will happen.

All police officers will be personally liable for any decision they make and for any accident they cause. Currently, officers receive internal discipline, and in cases where an officer is alleged to have committed a crime, such as the George Floyd case, the officer is subject to the civil authorities. Victims have a claim on the department in all cases.

Because an officer has virtually unlimited exposure under the Democrats’ proposal, an officer will not only put his life on the line every time he is working a shift, but he will put his home, his possessions, and the sanctity of his family on the line.

That means the risk of being a career cop will immeasurably outweigh the rewards.

It also means that it will be even harder to recruit and retain officers. Departments that are already depleted by vacancies will find it harder to fill those vacancies.

Officers who have been on the force will leave to find a job that does not impose the risks Democrats insist are necessary.

For those officers who are serving and believe they cannot change careers, the choice will be whether to get involved in a volatile situation and risk losing not just their lives, but everything they have worked for, or to wait until the volatility ends and the officers can enter the scene without those risks.

In other words, enforcement will be spotty, and many officers will leave the force to find other work.

The ultimate result of the bill will be an emasculation of local law enforcement and higher crime rates.

Democrats want to reduce or eliminate transfers of certain military surplus equipment to state and local police forces. Democrats fail to remember history. Before police forces received military surplus, they were hopelessly outgunned by street gangs and violent thugs. Further, some of the equipment involves machinery necessary to conduct rescue operations.

Ultimately, neither party has fully acknowledged that there is no authority for the federal government to control local law enforcement except in cases where federal civil rights are being violated. An example of this would be in the “autonomous” area in Seattle where constitutionally recognized rights are being trampled on, and the state and local officials are failing to protect those rights. The U.S. representative from that area, a Democrat, touted the peaceful nature of the people who have forcefully taken over the area, and described a portion of this unlawful takeover as a “community garden.”

When it was pointed out that antifa was fomenting violence, Democrats asserted that antifa is merely a fiction, a fantasy. Not even reading to them the reporting from leftists at CNN would penetrate the fog of their belief.

Were the Democratic bill to become law, the best police officers will leave, the best recruits will find something better to do, and local police agencies will die on the vine. That is the Democrat design. Let the crazy, violent, “fictional” groups such as antifa or Black Lives Matter agitate to eliminate state and local police departments, while Democrats in Congress squeeze the life out of local police agencies.

Look for higher crime rates across the nation and police power centralized in Washington, D.C.

Source: Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals