Dems Move To Oust Rep. Miller Meeks As She Introduces REACT Act House Bill

Dems Move To Oust Rep. Miller Meeks As She Introduces REACT Act House Bill

Americans see something very strange is unfolding in Washington DC while the Government is in a unique “trifecta” of power owning all three branches of government and apparently being assisted by Wall Street, the Media; that absolute power corrupts, absolutely.

“Speaker Pelosi says she’s open to unseating Republican Congresswoman Miller-Meeks. Translation: You’re only allowed to object to an election if you’re a Democrat,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) posted on Twitter. 

UPDATE

“A key House committee voted Wednesday to consider a challenge from the Democratic candidate in a contested race for a House seat in Iowa.

The House Administration Committee voted by a 6-3 margin to table Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks’s (R-Iowa) motion to dismiss an effort by Democrat Rita Hart to press the panel to consider the results in the 2020 race in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District.

The panel will begin examining the merits of Hart’s argument that she should be placed in the House seat,” The Hill reported Thursday.

MEEKS JUST INTRODUCED BILL TO FORCE BIDEN TO EXAMINE MIGRANTS FOR COVID

The Democrats are moving to overthrow a seated member of the US House of Representatives who has already introduced her first piece of legislation, according to a press release from her congressional office:

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, March 16th, 2021, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (IA-02) introduced H.R. 1897, the Requiring Every Alien Receive a COVID-19 Test (REACT) Act. This legislation would require the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to test all migrants illegally crossing our border for COVID-19 who DHS plans to release into our communities. According to recent reports, as of March 8th, 185 migrants released into Brownsville, Texas have tested positive for COVID-19.

Under current law, there is no requirement for individuals released from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody to test negative for COVID-19. The REACT Act would require CBP and ICE to administer a diagnostic test and receive a negative result for COVID-19 to an inadmissible alien who has entered the United States and is released from CBP or ICE custody within 30 days of entry to the U.S. or is placed is an alternative detention program within 30 days of entry into the United States.

“This week, I traveled to El Paso, Texas, to meet with CBP agents and officers. I saw firsthand the crisis they are facing, and I believe it is our job in Congress to address it and assist them. Approximately 50% of agents have tested positive for COVID-19, and very few migrants are being tested,” said Miller-Meeks. “My REACT Act would require that every migrant released from CBP or ICE custody is tested and receives a negative test. Border security and immigration are not an issue that only affects border states; they affect every community across the country. By ensuring that individuals entering the country are negative for COVID-19, we can help keep our communities safe and healthy.”

Watch Meeks in the following video state her case:

The Hill reported:

“Rita Hart should immediately cease her undemocratic efforts to usurp the will of Iowa voters and election officials. Iowa voters should decide Iowa elections, not [Speaker] Nancy Pelosi and her socialist colleagues,” said Mike Berg, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Wednesday’s vote sets up a partisan battle over the seat in a chamber that Democrats only control by five representatives, the narrowest majority in modern history.”

This story is developing…

Biden Celebrates House Passing Bill HR 1 Which is an Existential Threat To Our Republic

Biden Celebrates House Passing Bill HR 1 Which is an Existential Threat To Our Republic

Will Johnson was right. He said on his show. He said that the Democrats were going to pass legislation that will ensure they never lose another election again before the 2022 midterms and here it is.

On  Thursday, President Joe Biden celebrated the Democrat-controlled House passing a huge bill they claim is election reform, while smart people point out it’s anything but, admitting he will sign it if it is passed by the Senate.

Biden said of the bill it is “urgently needed” to protect the right to vote and to “strengthen” democracy, and he said he will work with Congress to “refine and advance” the legislation.  If it’s so urgently needed then why does it have to be refined?

This is a man who is in office because his party stole the election from the Republicans.  I know we’re not supposed to say that, but folks, how much more gaslighting can we put up with.

The bill called For the People Act of 2021, known as H.R. 1, passed on Wednesday by a vote of 220 to 210.   It is a ten-vote difference which is an indicator that at least half the country does not want this.  No Republicans voted for the bill, because they understand how dangerous it is for our republic.

“In the wake of an unprecedented assault on our democracy; a coordinated attempt to ignore, undermine, and undo the will of the American people never before seen in our history; and a new wave of aggressive attacks on voting rights taking place in states across the country, I applaud Speaker Pelosi and the House of Representatives for passing H.R. 1, the For the People Act of 2021,” Biden said in a statement Thursday.

My blood is boiling as I write this.

Biden, the Thief-in-Chief, said that the right to vote “sacred and fundamental.”  Then why has he undermined that right for decades?  He added that it is “the right from which all of our other rights as Americans spring.”  And his party took away my right in the state of Pennsylvania when they refused to allow poll watchers into the vote-counting centers when that truck delivered thousands of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania all for Joe Biden.  We all know the theft that occurred and we know we get punished for talking about it, but how can these Democrats give lip service to our rights when they are tearing them apart?

“It will rein in the outrageous gerrymandering that distorts our democracy,” Biden said. Gerrymandering that both parties do when they are in control, but Democrats can’t stand when Republicans do it.

“It will empower the Justice Department to crack down on laws that curtail voting rights along racial lines. It will reform our campaign finance system to amplify the voices of the people — not the powerful. And it will modernize and secure our future elections against all manner of threats.”

It will do none of those things.  What it will do is rig the system so that Republicans never win another election.

This very bill speaks volumes for just how radical the Democrats have become.  The US constitution gives sole power over election laws and rules to state legislatures.   This bill is trampling on that authority by taking that power away from the states and giving it to the federal government.  This bill should be proposed as an Amendment because Amendments were made when the federal government wants to take a power that belongs to the states.  Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 states, “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;”  Folks, this bill is unconstitutional.

The Democrats give platitudes over Constitutional principles and the right to vote and whatnot but they really don’t give a damn.  All they really want is power and that’s what this bill is about.  This bill will not do anything they tell you it’s about.  It is about the Democrats grabbing power that will seize our republic.  They are an existential threat to our country.

“I look forward to working with Congress to refine and advance this important bill,” Biden said. “And I look forward to signing it into law after it has passed through the legislative process so that together we can strengthen and restore American democracy for the next election and all those to come.”

His idea of the legislative process has nothing to do with the legislative process.  If Biden was really concerned about the legislative process he would have very openly and very loudly condemned the Democrats for even proposing such a bill.

Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stopped drinking long enough to say that the legislation is needed to fight voter suppression in states.  The Democrats lie when they say there is no widespread voter fraud and I am telling the truth when I say there is no widespread voter suppression.  Voter suppression to Democrats is an excuse they use when they lose elections.   It’s insufferable to have to listen to Democrats explain bills they push that are designed to rig the system in their favor.

The bill will create automatic voter registration throughout the country which is a violation of Article I, Section 4, Clause 1.  It will allow felons to vote, which would override state laws that do not allow felons to vote.  The Democrats are counting on winning the felon vote.

The worst part of the bill is it will enhance voting by mail, which is how they cheated in many states in the 2020 election.  If you don’t agree with this, that’s your prerogative but the evidence is on my side.

HR1 also forces organizations that get involved in political activity to disclose large donors.  Does anything think the Democrat organizations will abide by this 100%?

Everything in this bill is aimed at making sure Democrats never lose another election.  If they somehow get this passed and the Supreme Court does not strike the bill down in its entirety as the most unconstitutional power grab attempt by a major political party then it’s over, the republic is gone.

Republicans Want to Give Babies a “Second Chance at Life” Bill Introduced in US House

Republicans Want to Give Babies a “Second Chance at Life” Bill Introduced in US House

A powerhouse of fundraising for the left, with brilliant messaging, branding and PR, aimed at shaping public opinion, registering voters for ballot harvesting schemes, and getting voters out to the voting booths, is Planned Parenthood (PP).

PP makes massive wealth off of a co-mingling of federal taxpayer funds, and radical leftist utopian Community Organizing drives, which is filtered to the Democrat Party.   The abortion provider thrives on the left’s obsessions with eradicating babies and they are surely not going to like the government passing a law that gives preborn people a second chance at life.

Life is not a choice that the left or their paymasters are going to like very much, and they are in charge of all three branches of Government at this time, but here it goes.  Republicans introduce a bill to save human lives.  People should contact their lawmakers if they agree.

John Paluska, in an article for the  Daily Fodder, reported on the bill:

“Republicans in the house have introduced a new bill that would require Planned Parenthood and all other abortion clinics to tell women that the abortion pill is reversible, and HOW to reverse it. The bill, titled the “Second Chance At Life Act,” was introduced by more than 50 Representatives and would be a death blow to Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics that do not want to tell women there’s a way to reverse the procedure and often leave that information out if they are not required to disclose it.”

The bill states:

SEC. 3402. ABORTION PILL REVERSAL INFORMED CONSENT.

“(a) Requirement Of Compliance By Providers.—Effective 30 days after the date of enactment of the Second Chance at Life Act of 2021, any abortion provider in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, who knowingly performs any chemical abortion, shall comply with the requirements of this title.

“(b) Informed Consent.—Except in the case of a medical emergency described in section 3403, a chemical abortion involving the two drug process of dispensing mifepristone first and then misoprostol shall not be performed or induced or attempted to be performed or induced without the following:

“(1) The woman is informed, by telephone or in person, by the physician who is to perform the chemical abortion, by a referring physician, or by an agent of either physician at least 24 hours before the chemical abortion, that—

“(A) it may be possible to reverse the intended effects of a mifepristone-induced chemical abortion if the woman changes her mind but that time is of the essence; and

“(B) information on and assistance with reversing the effects of a mifepristone-induced chemical abortion is available on the website of the Department of Health and Human Services required by section 3405(b).

“(2) After the first drug involved in the two drug process is dispensed in a mifepristone-induced chemical abortion, the physician shall provide written medical discharge instructions to the pregnant woman which must include the statement:

‘Recent developing research has indicated that mifepristone alone is not always effective in ending a pregnancy. It may be possible to avoid, cease, or even to reverse the intended effects of a mifepristone-induced chemical abortion if the second pill has not been taken. Please consult with a health care professional immediately.’ .

DEFENDING AMERICA: Indiana House Passes Constitutional Carry, Braver Than the US Supremes

DEFENDING AMERICA: Indiana House Passes Constitutional Carry, Braver Than the US Supremes

The reason that America is confusing to many people, including some Americans is that we are a Constitutional Republic.  We elect , or in theory, elect the people who want to represent us in the Government, and they are supposed to listen to us and represent our voices and abide by the US Constitution.   As archaic as that may sound to the left, the process still, surprisingly, works in some places where there are brave Americans remain in office.

So check out Indiana, home of the greatest spectacle in racing the Indy 500, who are now passing gun laws that respect Americans, and joining other states who are doing the same.

“House Bill 1369 passed the House by a 65-31 vote and now heads to the Senate, where its already picked up key endorsements. Under the legislation, sometimes called “constitutional carry,” certain offenders still could be prohibited from carrying handguns.

The bill would eliminate the license in March 2022. The licenses raise $5.3 million per year to train law enforcement officers, a tab that taxpayers would at least partially have to pick up.

Opponents worry the bill would make police officers and the general public less safe, but advocates say law-abiding citizens should not have to pay for a right guaranteed to them by the Constitution,” reported The Indy Star on Tuesday.

Fox News reported in an article, Indiana House votes to eliminate license to carry a handgun in state, that the bill specified that certain offenders still could be prohibited from carrying handguns.

This seems like news from an America long ago and far away from where a country where the highest court in the land from behind massive military protection can’t muster the bravery to protect the livelihood and future of 360 Million Americans, but it is real.  It is happening back home in Indiana.

As the federal government is getting more oppressive with gun laws, the State Legislatures, who are closer to the people are turning to more liberty for gun owners.

Grover Norquist noted in a Twitter post that Indiana could be the 20th state to enact Constitutional carry for firearms.

DIGEST OF BILL

Firearms matters. Effective March 30, 2022: (1) Repeals the law that requires a person to obtain a license to carry a handgun in Indiana; (2) Specifies that certain persons who are not otherwise prohibited from carrying or possessing a handgun are not required to obtain or possess a license or permit from the state to carry a handgun in Indiana; (3) Prohibits certain individuals from knowingly or intentionally carrying a handgun; (4) Creates the crime of “unlawful carrying of a handgun”; (5) Provides that a prohibited person who knowingly or intentionally carries a handgun commits a Class A misdemeanor; (6) Specifies that the unlawful carrying of a handgun is a Level 5 felony if a person: (A) is less than 23 years of age; and (B) has an adjudication as a delinquent child for an act described by IC 35-47-4-5 (unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon); (7) Allows a resident of Indiana who wishes to carry a firearm in another state under a reciprocity agreement entered into by Indiana and the other state to obtain from the superintendent of the state police department a reciprocity license; (8) Requires law enforcement agencies to make use of certain data bases when issuing reciprocity licenses; (9) Specifies the following fees for reciprocity licenses: (A) $0 for five year reciprocity licenses, and (B) $75 for lifetime reciprocity licenses; (10) Provides that a person who knowingly or intentionally exerts unauthorized control over a firearm of another person with the intent to deprive the person of any part of its value or use commits theft, a Level 5 felony; and (11) Allows for the imposition of an additional fixed term of imprisonment when a person knowingly or intentionally: (A) points; or (B) discharges; a firearm at someone the person knew, or reasonably should have known, was a first responder. Effective July 1, 2021: (1) Provides that the following must develop a process that allows law enforcement officers the ability to quickly access information about whether a person is a prohibited person who may not knowingly or intentionally carry a handgun: (A) The state police department; (B) The bureau of motor vehicles; (C) Local law enforcement agencies; and (D) Any other state entity with access to information related to persons who may not knowingly or intentionally carry a handgun; (2) Provides that the information made available to law enforcement officers must meet all state and federal statutory, constitutional, and regulatory requirements; and (3) Allows state entities to enter into a memorandum of understanding to ensure that all legal requirements are met. Defines certain terms. Makes conforming amendments.

Remember elections have consequences. Knowing your state representatives and letting them hear your voice is a great way to keep a Republic.

House Republicans Say Pelosi Broke Her Own Rules And Bypassed Metal Detectors, Demand She Be Fined

House Republicans Say Pelosi Broke Her Own Rules And Bypassed Metal Detectors, Demand She Be Fined

In keeping with their long time tradition, the Democrats have proven themselves to be the world champion hypocrites.

The House installed metal detectors so that Democrats can claim they did it to keep Republicans from harming them. They established a fine of $5,000 for walking around them.

They have already fined Republican Reps. Louie Gohmert and Andrew Clyde for avoiding the detectors.

On Friday, Nancy Pelosi was caught by three Republicans walking around the metal detectors and now they insist that she be fined as well.

Republican Reps. Rodney Davis, Barry Loudermilk, and Bryan Steil sent the letter to Timothy P. Blodgett, demanding that Pelosi pay the same fine as Republicans. Fat chance.

I’m sure she will find a way around it but if she does that rule has to be abandoned.

In their letter, they wrote:

“House Resolution 73 directs you in your capacity as Sergeant at Arms to impose fines against members of the House who fail to complete security screening prior to entering the House Chamber. The resolution, which went into effect upon passage of the House on February 2nd, imposes a fine for $5,000 for the first offense.”

“It also directs you to promptly notify in writing of fines being imposed for violations of House Resolution 73. Yesterday, at approximately 9:59 am, multiple members observed the Speaker of the House entering the House Chamber without completing security screening. What was observed was a clear violation of House Resolution 73 and you are required by House Rules to impose this fine. Please inform us once the fine has been assessed.” 

From The Daily Caller

A group of Republicans sent a letter Friday night to the Sergeant at Arms which claims Speaker Nancy Pelosi broke rules House rules by walking around the metal detectors before walking on the floor.

The House installed the new magnetometers in early January and requires all members of Congress to walk through them before entering the House of Representatives chamber after rioters supporting Trump stormed the U.S. capitol Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and violence. As a result of the riot, the electoral college certification process was postponed and members of Congress were forced to evacuate the building.

Tulsi Gabbard Challenges Nancy Pelosi for ‘Enemy is Within the House’ Rhetoric: ‘Like Throwing a Match Into a Tinderbox’

Tulsi Gabbard Challenges Nancy Pelosi for ‘Enemy is Within the House’ Rhetoric: ‘Like Throwing a Match Into a Tinderbox’

For a while now, I have wondered if Tulsi Gabbard would soon jump parties and become a Republican. She really does not believe what the party insists you say you believe and she is often a critic of those in the same party as she belongs to.

Her latest target is Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi said:

“I do believe, and I have said this all along, that we will probably need a supplemental for more security for members when the enemy is within the House of Representatives, a threat that members are concerned about in addition to what is happening outside.”

She doubled down:

“It means that we have members of Congress who want to bring guns on the floor and have threatened violence on other members of Congress.”

Pelosi did not point out any Republican who allegedly threatened any Democrat. She never provided any proof of any kind and let’s be honest her credibility passed by the wayside long, long ago. If she did have proof of such threats, why did she not report it to the Capitol Police? This would be a criminal investigation. Yet, she hasn’t done a thing about her accusations. To me, this is very suspicious.

Gabbard said:

“What Speaker Pelosi is talking about is a very serious thing. If there is evidence to back what she is saying … is true, this is a legal issue for law enforcement. Because members of Congress are not above the law either.”

“Isn’t this also inciting? If you think there is someone among the Republican caucus who’s actively plotting the murder of Nancy Pelosi or other members of Congress, that could then bring violence upon those individuals.”

“That’s really the issue here. If this is a criminal threat, let law enforcement deal with it’ If there is no evidence of what she is talking about, and if it is not true, it is inciting further division and further harm potentially and further destroying the possibility of our country coming together.”

Gabbard went on to say that the country needs to unite and for Pelosi to make such charges without any proof is just further alienating the two parties. Pelosi wants the parties to be at war because she thinks the voters favor the Democrats, but she is wrong. Many who voted for Biden are now having buyer’s remorse such as trade unions. Biden has pushed a lot of issues that have one thing in common. None have benefitted the American people but China did really well as did Russia.

US HOUSE: Incoming Rep. Lauren Boebert Defends Herself Against Dems Who Want Her Defenseless, Gun Struggle

US HOUSE: Incoming Rep. Lauren Boebert Defends Herself Against Dems Who Want Her Defenseless, Gun Struggle

Incoming Freshman Republican representative Lauren Boebert wants to exercise her rights as an American citizen and carry her weapon when she is on Capitol Hill, and Democrats have already run to Speaker of the House, Democrat Nancy Pelosi to demand that Boebert be barred from carrying her weapon when in the Nations capitol.

Boebert posted on Twitter:

Boebert’s office released the following letter saying she refuses to give up her rights.

 RIFLE, Colo.—Today, U.S. Congresswoman-Elect Lauren Boebert (CO-03) released the following statement after leading 83 Members and Member-Elects of Congress in an effort to block a gun grab recently proposed by House Democrats: “I refuse to give up my Second Amendment rights. I’m a 5-foot tall, 100-pound mom with four children and will be walking to work and serving in one of the most dangerous cities in the U.S. I choose to defend my family and my life with all of the force the Constitution provides. I will not let a bunch of gun-grabbing House Democrats take away my Constitutional right to protect myself.” Gun Owners of America Senior Vice President Erich Pratt stated, “Millions of Americans go to work every day while carrying firearms for self-defense. So why shouldn’t Members of Congress or their staff be able to do the same? Criminals won’t follow the laws, and they will always manage to get their hands on weapons, regardless of the restrictions in place.” In their letter, the 83 Members and Member-Elects stated: “If Members can’t carry on Capitol grounds, they can’t protect themselves in D.C. while making their way to and from their offices to perform their official duties. The ‘last-mile’ transition of self-protection is critical. The current regulations provide transitional coverage once the Member is physically on campus. Changing the current regulations could create new problems and uncertainty for lawful carrying Members in terms of what to do with a firearm once the Member arrives at the Congressional Complex. “Moreover, and most importantly, Members need to be able to protect themselves once the Member is in the public space/street and out of the protective care of the Capitol Police. If the current regulations are changed, the Member will be at risk of physical assault and real danger, especially after voicing views of his or her constituents that may not be held by others physically present in Washington D.C.” Background: Congresswoman-Elect Lauren Boebert (CO-03) is a tireless defender of the Second Amendment. In the 117th Congress, the Congresswoman-Elect will Co-Chair the Congressional Second Amendment Caucus with U.S. Congressman Thomas Massie. Currently, Members of Congress are allowed to carry firearms within the U.S. Capitol Complex as a result of U.S. Capitol Police Board’s regulations and 40 U.S.C. § 5104. The current regulations allowing Members of Congress to carry have helped protect these Members and their Second Amendment rights since 1967. Recently, 21 Democratic Members of Congress sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy asking them to include “a provision in the Rules package directing the Capitol Police Board to ensure that Member of Congress may not possess firearms on Capitol grounds.” The House of Representatives is expected to take up the House Rules Package during the week of January 4, 2021. In response to the House Democrats proposed gun grab, Congresswoman-Elect Lauren Boebert wrote and led a letter signed by 83 current Members and Member-Elects of Congress slamming this dangerous and short-sighted proposal and advocating for the current regulations that allow Members of Congress to carry in the Capitol Complex and protect themselves to remain in place. The 83 Members and Member-Elects of Congress that signed Congresswoman-Elect Boebert’s letter include: Ralph Abraham, M.D., Kelly Armstrong, Brian Babin, James R. Baird, Jim Banks, Cliff Bentz, Jack Bergman, Andy Biggs, Dan Bishop, Lauren Boebert, Mo Brooks, Ken Buck, Tedd Budd, Tim Burchett, Michael C. Burgess, M.D., Kat Cammack, Earl L. “Buddy” Carter, Madison Cawthorn, Ben Cline, Michael Cloud, Andrew S. Clyde, James Comer, Dan Crenshaw, Scott DesJarlais, Byron Donalds, Jeff Duncan, Neal Dunn, Pat Fallon, Randy Feenstra, Michelle Fischbach, Scott Franklin, Matt Gaetz, Louie Gohmert, Bob Good, Lance Gooden, Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S., Marjorie Greene, Mark E. Green, M.D., H. Morgan Griffith, Andy Harris, M.D., Diana Harshbarger, Yvette Herrell, Jody Hice, Richard Hudson, Ronny Jackson, Bill Johnson, Dusty Johnson, Jim Jordan, Fred Keller, Steve King, Doug LaMalfa, Doug Lamborn, Robert E. Latta, Billy Long, Nancy Mace, Thomas Massie, Brian Mast, Lisa C. McClain, Mary Miller, Alex Mooney, Barry Moore, Markwayne Mullin, Gregory F. Murphy, M.D., Dan Newhouse, Ralph Norman, Jay Obernolte, Burgess Owens, August Pfluger, Scott Perry, Bill Posey, Guy Reschenthaler, Matt Rosendale, Chip Roy, John H. Rutherford, Austin Scott, Adrian Smith, Jason Smith, Victoria Spartz, W. Gregory Steube, Thomas P. Tiffany, Tim Walberg, Randy Weber, Don Young. Gun Owners of America, the National Rifle Association and the Conservative Partnership Institute all support Congresswoman-Elect Boebert’s letter. On July 24, 1998, a gunman entered through a Member and employee entrance on the Eastside of the Capitol with a six-shot revolver. When the metal detector alarm went off, the gunman shot a Capitol Police Officer in the back of the head and then fled to a corridor filled with several House leadership offices while engaging in a shootout. The gunman was shot and apprehended after entering the office of then-Majority Whip Tom DeLay. Tragically, two Capitol Police Officers died during the 1998 shooting. On June 14, 2017, at a practice session attended by 24 Members of Congress at Eugene Simpson Stadium Park in Alexandria, Virginia, for the annual Congressional Baseball Game for Charity, a gunman opened fire on the Members and engaged in a ten-minute shootout with officers from the Capitol Police. Thanks to the quick actions of the officers that day the only causality was the gunman. However, then U.S. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise was critically injured and nearly lost his life. The three Capitol Police officers present at the practice were assigned to protect Whip Scalise who, due to his House leadership position, had a full-time security detail. Had these heroes not been there, the 24 Members of Congress present at the practice would have been unguarded and it’s likely several more would have been critically injured or even killed. Members of Congress are public figures often in the national spotlight. Accordingly, they can fall target to random and senseless act of violence. Given the current political environment and previous attacks on Members of Congress, now is not the time to disarm them and make changes to existing regulations that have helped protect them for more than 50 years. 
PA House and Senate Want to Halt Election Results for Biden, Important News Being Ignored by the Media

PA House and Senate Want to Halt Election Results for Biden, Important News Being Ignored by the Media

Evidence of major election fraud has become so well known that politicians are starting to feel the pressure and are reacting, such as the House and Senate case in the state of Pennsylvania. Even though many average Americans understand some of the most complex details, President Donald J. Trump’s opponents have been sheltered from the truth. They don’t seem to understand even the basics of the allegations.

There is a conflict in American society, and much of it has been created by the established media ignoring major news items.

The group of networks known as the Mainstream Media (MSM) in America has refused to cover some of the most established facts from official sources. That fact should be alarming to people. Consider this set of tweets from a State Senator, reporting on facts from the PA House and Senate, who are collectively disputing their state’s election results, which should be headline news because of the historical impact it will have on a Presidential election:

“Today, members of the PA House and Senate request that Sen Mitch McConnell and Rep Kevin McCarthy dispute the PA election results until an investigation is conducted into the numerous claims of fraud. Until this is completed, the hastily certified results can’t be trusted,” Senator Doug Mastriano posted, along with screenshots of the letter.

This isn’t a surprise or a “one-off” letter, so where is the media? 

On the 28th of December, another PA representative released the following letter, detailing many of the findings of the group and their justification for calling for an investigation: 

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

DEC. 28, 2020 

HARRISBURG – A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf. These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election.

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020, as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.

The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States. On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.

The lawmakers issued the following statement in response to their findings:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level, which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in this analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).

Rep. Frank Ryan

101st Legislative District

Pennsylvania House of Representatives

PA House Republicans Uncover Error of Over 200,000 More Votes Counted Than People Who Voted

PA House Republicans Uncover Error of Over 200,000 More Votes Counted Than People Who Voted

The state of Pennsylvania, after close to two months, has been found to have certified votes that are in error.

The Pennsylvania House has just revealed that the results that were certified in Pennsylvania for President are in error by over 200,000 votes.  This is more than double the amount of difference between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

This is unbelievable.  Russ Diamond, a Republican State Representative discovered and then reported Monday that the results for the Presidential race are off in Pennsylvania.  How bad was it that he discovered?  Well, there were more ballots that were cast than there were people who voted by more than 200,000 votes.

The group of Republican Representatives released this message:

“HARRISBURG – A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf. These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election.

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.

The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States. On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.”

In addition the representatives released the below message:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials certain counties contravening and undermining Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop box questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of pole watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

” However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns.  These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

” These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

Democrats and liberals keep saying that evidence was presented by Republicans to courts and they were not successful.  That is a complete lie, because in all the courts that rejected the cases, the Republican never got to present any evidence in the first place.  The cases were rejected before they were able to present evidence.  But that doesn’t stop the Left from lying about it.

State Representative Frank Ryan indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in this analysis work himself, Representatives Russ Diamond, Dave Zimmerman, Barb Gleim, Stephanie Borowicz, Dan Moul, Paul Schemel, Dawn Keefer, Eric Nelson, Mike Jones, Rob Kauffman, David Maloney, David Rowe, Kathy Rapp, Daryl Metcalfe, Jim Cox and Brett Miller.

0