Marc Elias. longtime Hillary lawyer and DNC liar for hire who has fought voter ID laws all across the country and the man who commissioned the fake Steele dossier and his law firm has been sanctioned by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for ethical violations.
Elias was sanctioned by Texas federal appeals judges for a “redundant and misleading submission” and for violating his ethical “duty of candor” to the court.
Elias filed an addendum to a court case involving straight-ticket voting that Democrats opposed before the 2020 election. But, he hid one important fact from the court.
The addendum was exactly the same as he had filed earlier that was rejected but that he did not inform the court about.
For their criminal behavior, Elias and his law firm Perkins Coie were hit with having to pay for attorney fees and double the court costs and requires them to take a course in legal ethics.
A top Democratic election lawyer was smacked with sanctions by Texas federal appeals judges for a “redundant and misleading submission” and for violating his ethical “duty of candor” to the court in a case in which the Democratic Party was fighting against a state law that banned straight-ticket voting.
Marc Elias, a lawyer for Perkins Coie who is well known for his election fights during the 2020 contest and for hiring the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele in 2016, was criticized and punished by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on Thursday, along with a number of his colleagues.
Judge Edith Clement, nominated by former President George W. Bush in 2001, and Judge Jennifer Elrod, nominated by Bush in 2007, both ordered Elias and his associates to be sanctioned, while Judge Catharina Haynes, another 2007 Bush nominee, did not.
“Appellees did not notify the court that their latest motion to supplement the record filed on February 10, 2021 was nearly identical to the motion to supplement the record filed several months ago by the same attorneys, on September 29, 2020. Critically, Appellees likewise failed to notify the court that their previous and nearly identical motion was denied,” the judges ruled. “This inexplicable failure to disclose the earlier denial of their motion violated their duty of candor to the court.”
It’s a real shame that 97.6% of Democratic lawyers give the rest a bad name.
They have the ethics of an alley cat.
They are the ones who make sure there is a two-tier justice system.
Elias is the one who hired Fusion GPS and subsequently Christopher Steele and his phony dossier.
Judicial Watch (JW) is heading to the Supreme Court over Hilary Clinton testifying under oath over her illegal server and the Benghazi attacks.
A federal judge ordered Clinton to do the deposition but D.C. Appeals Court set aside the decision.
JW is not discouraged, they are taking the case to the Supreme Court. They want them to set aside the ruling of the D.C. court. Clinton is fighting them tooth and nail.
Judicial Watch has been able to get more information from the government that even Congress couldn’t get.
Their persistence pays off and the documents that they have uncovered have been considerable. But perhaps a release of information in about 80 days could be the topper.
That’s when the FBI must turn over all of their documents on Seth Rich.
For the longest time, the FBI claimed they never investigated the death of Rich or examined his computer.
Judicial Watch refuses to back down and is now taking the fight to the US Supreme Court:
Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a petition for writ ofcertiorari (“cert petition”) with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to take up its challenge to an appeals court order exempting Hillary Clinton from testifying under oath about her emails.
Judicial Watch argues the court should hear its case because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in giving Clinton unwarranted special treatment that conflicts both with Supreme Court precedent and the precedents of other courts of appeal, including its own.
In effect, it eliminates any discovery into the actions of agency officials or employees other than FOIA officers – walling off from any inquiry officials or employees who may be less than honest with FOIA officers or who might seek to conceal agency records from FOIA officers to prevent disclosure to the public, among other matters plainly relevant to an agency’s good faith in responding to FOIA requests.
Judicial Watch is making the case that no judge or court has the jurisdiction to undermine the Freedom of Information Act and that Hillary is not above the law.
But they are wrong. The Clintons have been above the law their entire political lives.
President Barack Obama’s intelligence department heads never thought Donald Trump was a Russian spy. The idea of that was so absurd on the face of it, yet the country spent four years hitting Trump with that accusation. There are still some mental midgets out there who still spout that accusation on Twitter. I just had a run-in with one of them yesterday.
We reported a few days ago that according to handwritten notes by Obama’s former CIA director John Brennan the whole Trump-Russia collusion delusion narrative was created by Hillary Clinton as a diversionary tactic to get her private email server off the focus of the mainstream news media.
We now know that the entire Obama intelligence apparatus and the FBI knew from day one that the whole thing was bogus and yet they attached a team of FBI agents to devote manpower and costly resources to investigate the first candidate, then President-elect and finally President Trump. And it went on for years with them all knowing there was nothing to it. But why, you may ask?
Because they feared that Russia, along with other foreign intelligence services, had Hillary’s emails, and in those emails were things that could have destroyed many people besides Clinton, including Barack Obama.
The Clinton campaign was fearful that her emails would go public, and the decision to have the administration protect her was made by senior US officials.
A former senior intelligence official from the Obama administration confirmed to veteran journalist Lee Smith, former editor-in-chief for the Village Voice has had his work published in Real Clear Investigations, the Federalist, and Tablet, that leading into the 2016 election, that US intelligence officials told the FBI that the 2016 Democratic nominee’s emails were compromised.
“They concluded that there were approximately 30,000 emails in the possession of foreign entities,” the former Obama official said. “The FBI was provided with digital copies of some of the emails and then evaluated them, determining their veracity and identifying what sensitive issues were being addressed. The FBI had been informed of this prior to James Comey’s press conference exonerating Clinton.”
And yet we had the now-fired and disgraced former FBI director James Comey go out and give a public speech exonerating Clinton after spending ten minutes listing criminals items that Clinton did that would have landed anyone else in prison.
The FBI then began a massive cover-up for Clinton. It ran in two parts. The first being the year-long investigation of her illegal private email server, where the FBI never once questioned Hillary under oath. That bogus investigation was called “Midyear Exam,” and was launched July 10, 2015. It was the thing that Comey would use to absolve her.
So, every time you see a Hillary Clinton tweet against Donald Trump, a video clip of her trashing him, you now know that she is a sociopath who knew from the start that she was guilty of Espionage Act crimes, and more, and has no problem whatsoever lying about it and attempting to still place blame on Trump who did absolutely nothing wrong, and she knew that the Obama DOJ was never ever going to indict her, a Democrat successor to the man who spied on the Trump campaign.
The second part of the FBI’s cover up for Clinton was called “Crossfire Hurricane,” a counterintelligence operation designed to intentionally steer the focus from the contents of Clinton’s emails just in case they were leaked, which they believed contained US secrets and/or corrupt, illegal deals the Clinton Foundation was involved in, like the Uranium One deal, which involved others in the administration, including the Biden crime family which was involved with a uranium mine in Kazakhstan linked to the Clinton bribe. There is proof that Joe Biden met with Kenes Rakishev, a Kazakh oligarch who worked with Biden’s corrupt and troubled son Hunter, who had an interest in the uranium mines in Kazakhstan, which contains some of the richest deposits of uranium.
The FBI operation was to manufacture the lie that Trump was involved with the Russians, and that they leaked her emails to the public to help him get elected. Some bozos still believe that even in the face of evidence that the whole thing was created by Hillary Clinton. That’s how embedded the crooked Obama administration and the boot-licking sycophants in the mainstream news media made the hoax in the minds of millions of gullible Americans. After Trump’s victory, this nonsense narrative became a cudgel against the president for his entire first term in office. The source believes that the FBI still has Clinton’s emails unless they got rid of them.
And now you know the truth of what these despicable people put the country through, and especially what they put Donald Trump and his poor family through, for four years was all to protect Hillary Clinton, the woman that Trump decided to not prosecute after he became president, one of the biggest mistakes he ever made.
In light of all of this information, it makes you wonder if there are still FBI and intelligence officials loyal to Clinton and Obama who made sure to delay the Durham investigation into Crossfire Hurricane’s beginnings and the news of Hunter Biden’s many questionable discretions. It is believed that Hillary Clinton sent an email to President Obama while she was overseas on an unsecure device, and that Obama responded to her illegal private email server email account. So they would be protecting him as much as Clinton herself.
Another takeaway from this is to consider that not one of them, not one single, solitary member of the Obama administration, not one news journalist who pushed the Russian collusion story, who hyperbolically exaggerated the Mueller investigation, who called Donald Trump, and his children, traitors to the United States, not one of these degrading, disgraceful, contemptible, loathsome and reprehensible vermin has ever once apologized for the what they did. And folks, that includes an apology to all of you.
Some high-ranking US Intelligence officials were very concerned heading into the 2016 election about the fact that the Russians were fully aware that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was planning to smear Donald Trump with lies of being a Russian agent. They were so concerned that they personally briefed then President Barack Obama about it, according to freshly declassified CIA documents. Apparently, CIA officials asked the FBI to look into Russian knowledge of the Clinton campaign’s slimy smear operation. Remember, other recent declassified documents showed that it was Clinton who started the whole Russian collusion delusion in an effort to get the news focus off of her illegal private email server.
Handwritten notes from former Obama CIA Director John Brennan were just declassified, showing that the Intelligence community knew back in 2016 that Russian intelligence was monitoring, and possibly pushing disinformation into Clinton’s anti-Trump Russian collusion lies. The amount of intelligence over Russia’s familiarity of Clinton’s plans were so troubling to Brennan and other national security people that they informed Obama about it in the summer of 2016 inside the Oval Office.
The handwritten notes by Brennan were declassified by John Ratcliffe, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and he presented them to Congress on Tuesday.
The notes reveal that Brennan and US intelligence people knew months before the 2016 election that the collusion nonsense was the result of a campaign operation Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. They knew it, they reported it, and then did exactly what Barack Obama told them to do, which allegedly was to help her cover it up.
“We’re getting additional insight into Russian activities from [REDACTED],” Brennan’s handwritten notes state. “Cite alleged approval by Hillary Clinton–on 26 July–of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to villify [sic] Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security services.”
John Brennan knew the entire time, from 2016 onward, that it was Hillary Clinton who made it up and he never said a word to the press. Brennan continued to act like Donald Trump colluded with the Russians. What a piece of s***.
Brennan, at the time probably thinking Clinton was going to win, wrote the news to memorialize a meeting held at the White House with Obama and his top national security advisers. He was probably attempting to prove to Clinton that he should be kept on as CIA director. “Look what I did for you.”
The jackass Included in his notes responses from other participants in the meeting, including former White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, and former DNI James Clapper, but those responses are redacted for obvious reasons. This means they all knew from the very beginning.
Naturally they redacted a response to a question by Obama on whether or not they had any actual evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. I suspect they were covering their butts. I would love to read those notes unredacted.
Some officials at CIA and other intel agencies suspected from the very beginning that many of the claiming made for the Trump collusion bullschtein story was nothing but Russian infiltrated disinformation. Ratcliffe just last week declassified a memo based on Brennan’s notes citing that Russian intelligence was aware of Clinton’s plans, and that alone increased the likelihood that there was a bunch of Russian disinformation involved.
In November 2020, Attorney General Bill Barr informed Congress that the FBI was so worried about a Russian spy named Igor Danchenko they listed him as the “Primary Sub-Source” used by Christopher Steele, the former British spy who was bought and paid for by a Russian oligarch, who was hired by Hillary Clinton to write the Steele dossier, which has since been thoroughly debunked. Danchenko is the one who provided the most outrageous, salacious, crazy town allegations against Trump. In fact, the FBI listed him as a national security threat and investigated him to find out if he was in fact a Russian spy, but when he left the country they dropped the case.
Even though slime ball Democrats like Adam Schiff (D-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Eric the Chines puppet Swalwell (D-CA) ran around claiming, without providing a single piece of evidence, that the latest declassifications are also Russian disinformation, numerous intel people said that the CIA is still convinced that Russian intelligence genuinely believes that Hillary Clinton launched the smear campaign against Donald Trump and his campaign, citing Russian collusion, just to distract from her illegal private email server. People forget that in October of 2017, the top lawyer for the Clinton campaign and the DNC admitted publicly that he himself hired the Democrat opposition research company Fusion GPS.
James O’Keefe released audio footage of Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, talking to Cliff Johnson, an attorney from the US State Department, about what appears to be a discussion over a “dangerous leak.”
“We have been calling the US State Department for a day to explain the urgency and they have not called back,” Assange said in 2011 when the State Department was under the leadership of Hillary R. Clinton.
O’Keefe posted on Twitter:
“Julian Assange to Hillary Clinton’s State Department following the theft of 250,000 diplomatic cables from @Wikileaks: “In case there are any individuals who haven’t been warned…they should be warned.”
The footage, O’Keefe described as from August 26, 2011 and said the two were discussion State Department documents.
The video starts with the introduction of Cliff Johnson, an attorney for the US State Department, and Assange is heard saying, ” Thank you for calling back. Have you been briefed? Yes, so the situation is that we have intelligence that the State Department Database Archive of 250,000 diplomatic cables, including declassified cables, is being spread around and is to the degree that we believe that it is in the next few days will become public. We are not sure but the timing could be imminently or within the next few days to a week and there may be some possibility to stop it,” Assange said.
Veritas adds, “The Documents originally obtained by Assange and Wikileaks were to be redacted by Wikileaks before any release, but were stolen.”
The video goes on, Cliff Johnson asks, ” And who would be releasing these cables? Is this Wikileaks?”
“No. We would not be releasing them,” Assange responds. “This is Daniel Domscheit-Borg, a previous employee that we suspended last August,” Assange said.
Johnsons asks,” So e apparently has access to the materials that Wikleaks also has?”
Assange answers,”yes that is correct.”
Johnson: “And he has access to everything you have, is that correct?”
Assange: “That is correct.”
Johnson: “Ok. And that includes classified as well as unclassified cables?”
Assange: “That is correct.”
Johnson: “I see, and in terms of what they took does that mean that they now have the ability themselves without your control or authorization to make this as available as they want?”
Assange: “That is correct. There is no attempt at redaction program and no attempt at harm minimization.”
Project Veritas added: “Assange believed there was great danger to US Agents and interests with the publication of the unredacted documents.”
Assange: “In case there are any individuals who haven’t been warned that they should be warned.”
The video shows that Assange was acting in assistance to the US Government. ANd that the information was out there and not under his control. Veritas said that Assange also thought the US may have blocked or slowed the publication by eliminating some of the files covertly.
Assange offered advice on how to slow or stop the breech.
This release of footage comes on the same day that Assange has requested a Presidential pardon from President Donald J. Trump.
Former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has announced that she is not your average voter in this year’s presidential election.
Clinton will be casting a vote this year as one of the 538 members of the Electoral College.
On Tuesday, Clinton appeared on SiriusXM’s “Signal Boost”. She discussed her plans for election day, what it might look like to stand in a long line, and then she told her interviewers that she has joined the Electoral College:
“I’m an elector in New York,” she said. “I’m sure I’ll get to vote for Joe and Kamala in New York. So, that’s pretty exciting.”
Clinton also explained to her interviewers that she’s not even letting herself think about the possibility of another Trump victory:
“I’m not gonna think about it. I cannot imagine that he would be re-elected after the damage that he’s caused and I can’t imagine four more years of this abuse and destruction. So, no, I don’t think about it. I refuse to.”
In 2016, Clinton won the popular vote by 2.9 million votes, but she lost the election because she didn’t secure enough votes in the Electoral College.
There has been a growing movement among Democrats since the 2016 election calling for the abolition of the Electoral College, arguing in favor of a more direct democratic process than the republican one handed to us by the Founders.
Clinton has been among those voices calling for the college’s abolition.
“I think it needs to be eliminated,” she told CNN in 2017. “I’d like to see us move beyond it, yes.”
New York has 29 electoral votes of the Electoral College’s total 538. The Electoral College is made to reflect our representative bodies in number – 435 for the House, 100 for the Senate, and 3 for the District of Columbia.
According to both CNN and RealClear Politics, Biden has the lead in New York’s polls days ahead of the election.
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is apparently still not over her epic loss to President Donald Trump in the 2016 election, and she’s still bitter about it.
During a recent appearance on Kara Swisher’s New York Times Opinion podcast, “Sway,” the former secretary of state said that she was “born” to be president and that it makes her “sick” to her stomach to think Trump could win reelection. That’s interesting, because it made me sick to think that she could have won in 2016 and we would be living in a nightmare right now.
At one point Swisher asked Clinton if she thought a woman president would handle the coronavirus pandemic more ably.
Clinton responded by championing herself, saying, “I have no doubt, especially if it were me.”
“I was born for that. I mean, that’s why I knew I’d be a good president. I was ready for crises and emergencies, and I would have done what you see these women leaders doing. You listen to the science. You bring in people in an open, inclusive way. You communicate constantly, you make the case by explaining why what you’re doing is in the long-term interests, not only of health, but also, of the economy. Yeah, I have no doubt in my mind at all that I would have stepped up to that crisis.”
Thank God the American people disagreed. Does anyone believe Hillary Clinton would have handled the COVID-19 pandemic better than Trump did? I’m talking about in reality and not the made up world of the Left. She would have done a lousy job and the press would have praised her anyway.
I believe Clinton would have been a control freak president where she not only would control businesses and industries, but she would try to get a government grasp on everyone’s individual lives as well.
When the interview moved on to Trump’s re-election possibilities, Clinton chimed in, saying, “I can’t entertain the idea of him winning.”
“It would cause cognitive dissonance of a grave degree,” she said, which is ironic, because I believe most people who voted for her in 2016 did so holding their noses, because they knew she was not a great candidate.
Clinton then went on saying that just thinking about another Trump win would also make her physically ill.
“It makes me literally sick to my stomach to think that we’d have four more years of this abuse and destruction of our institutions, and damaging of our norms and our values, and lessening of our leadership, and the list goes on. But there’s no doubt that he would do everything he could to attack and punish anyone who was, in his view, an adversary …
… I don’t think he has any boundaries at all, Kara. I don’t think he has any conscience. He’s obviously not a moral, truthful man. So he will do whatever he can to lift himself up. And remember, as I said, he lives with this specter of illegitimacy. He knows more about how he got really elected than we still do. Hopefully, we’ll learn more in the years ahead.”
Apparently, Hillary suffers from the same Trump Derangement Syndrome that afflicts most Fake News reporters, where she believes Donald Trump abuses institutions and our values while the exact opposite is true. The President Trump I see has always gone out of his way to remain within the limited powers of Article II, something most presidents have not done in my lifetime. The problem for Clinton and all of her sycophants is that they don’t understand what America truly means. They don’t understand the promise of America and how to take advantage of it. They see American society broken down into different constituent groups, all to be manipulated differently for the “greater good” whatever their definition. Trump gets America. He understands that powerful people were selling out American workers to globalist intentions, and he has reined that in.
Clinton, who has endorsed Democratic nominee Joe Biden, last year reportedly considered running for president again in 2020. She has had a difficult time getting over her 2016 loss, allegedly thinking about a rematch with Trump “all the time.” She’s bitter, because she thinks she deserves the presidency, that it is owed to her. According to political consultant Dick Morris who helped Bill Clinton get reelected, she told Morris once that God put her on earth so that she could help people. And that takes us right back to Clinton not understanding what government is supposed to be in America. Government is not supposed to help people, rather, government is supposed to protect the freedoms and liberties given to us by God and held within our Constitution. Once government protects our rights, we’ll do the rest. She doesn’t get it, and Trump does, and that’s why he won, and it’s why he will win again.
Yet despite radiating enough bitterness about the result of the election four years ago that makes people not want to be near her, Clinton wanted listeners to know that it’s Trump, not her, who remains plagued by the outcome.
“Well, I think I live rent-free in his head,” she said. “He does not live rent-free in my head, because I have very little regard for him.”
Recently released documents show that it was Hillary Clinton who started the whole Russian collusion lie, and that she did it to get her illegal private email server off the front pages and top stories of news rooms everywhere. Clinton effectively took away the peaceful transition of power for President Trump, sinking the country into a Constitutional crisis of never-ending investigations all hinged on her lies.
The failed candidate said that she is sure Biden will now do what she couldn’t and beat Trump. She probably knows the level of cheating the Democrats are planning. She said, “most Republicans are going to want to close the page” on the Trump era.
“They have been cowards, spineless enablers of him,” she added. There’s that wonderful Clinton charm. “They want to see him gone as much as we do, but they can’t say it publicly.”
It is a real shame for Hillary and those Never Trump RINOs that the overwhelming majority of the people love and support this president in ways Hillary Clinton could never understand.
The Democrats made a circus out of #MeToo allegations of Sexual Abuse, in numerous campaigns against Republicans and institutionalized Democrat Activist/Media allies into punishing their opponents. Yet if their friends are well connected they know they won’t have to face the consequences of their abuses, especially if they were cooperating with Hillary Clinton.
Here is the story that exposes how the Democrats abuse their power and ignore abuse when it is convenient for them.
This is the story about how Hillary Clinton ignored Human Rights abuses with the Chinese Community Party with man accused of sexual harassment, all because she deeply wanted to be involved with China’s massive economic growth at the time.
In 2018 when it didn’t matter, the New York Times posted a story about Burns Strider, a now- former aide to Clinton:
A senior adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign who was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young subordinate was kept on the campaign at Mrs. Clinton’s request, according to four people familiar with what took place.
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager at the time recommended that she fire the adviser, Burns Strider. But Mrs. Clinton did not. Instead, Mr. Strider was docked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling, and the young woman was moved to a new job.
Mr. Strider, who was Mrs. Clinton’s faith adviser, was a founder of the American Values Network and sent the candidate scripture readings every morning for months during the campaign, was hired five years later to lead an independent group that supported Mrs. Clinton’s 2016 candidacy, Correct the Record, which was created by a close Clinton ally, David Brock.
He was fired after several months for workplace issues, including allegations that he harassed a young female aide, according to three people close to Correct the Record’s management.
CONSIDER WHY SHE PROTECTED HIM:
From the recently opened “Vault” of Clinton’s email it is clear why she protected him, he encouraged her to cover up for China’s human rights abuses“
This email is from 9-18-2011. He copies an article by the AP and then in caps adds his commentary.
Subject:Hey Boss… China
I’m not pretending to be shaping policy… just my thoughts to my boss… it’s an interesting area:
This is an interesting AP article… “Analysis: Clinton pushes for stronger China role”
I’ve copied the entire piece below… but first here are some excerpts with reaction (in all caps):Hillary Rodham Clinton has moved aggressively and quickly to secure a stronger role in what she has called the world’s most important relationship: U.S. dealings with China.
THIS IS TRUE IN TERMS OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP SIZE OF POPULATION, ECONOMY AND POETICAL WILLIN CHINA MAKES IT SO.
Clinton is pushing, however, to ensure that her diplomatic corps is not marginalized as the United States engages a country theObama administration needs as a partner in efforts to solve the world’s major problems.
MY GUESS IS THAT CHINA WILL HAVE SOME SAY IN WHO THEY WANT TO ENGAGE. THERE IS A STRONG HISTORY OF THERECONSIDERING CHOICE OF ARRIVING EMMISSARY NOT A DEFACTO CHOICE, THEY WILL ENGAGE WHO THEY RESPECT, CHINA HAS ALREADY INDICATED AS MUCH LATE LAST YEAR WHEN THEY SAID THEY WERE TIRED OF MULTIPLE FACES AND PREFERRED A CENTRALIZED POINT OF DIPLOMATIC ACTIVITY (AFTER ALL, CENTRALIZATION MAKES SENSE TO THEM)
Clinton then pleasantly surprised China by saying the Obama administration would not let its human rights concerns interfere with cooperation with Beijing.
THIS STATEMENT OF YOURS RAISED MY EYEBROWS A GOOD BIT AT FIRST BUT I THOUGHT THROUGH. I CONSIDERED CHINA’S APPROACH TO MOVING FORWARD… NOT EVERYTHING HAS TO BE ON PUBLIC DISPLAY… YOU SHOWED RESPECT AND, MAINLY, YOU SHOWED DIPLOMATIC INTELLIGENCE WHICH THEY WOULD ADMIRE.
Despite all the talking, Bonnie Glaser, a China specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, said there remains a “profound level of distrust between the sides.”
I MUST HAVE HEARD “SAVING FACE” A THOUSAND TIMES WHILE LIVING THERE BOTH IN CANTONESE AND ENGLISH, THERE’S PUBLIC WAY AND A PRIVATE WAY THAT MOVE ALONG PARALLEL LINES BUT TOWARD A COMMON GOAL. WITHOUT SOUNDING TOO CLICHE THE PUBLIC WAY IS A DANCE FOR FOLKS TO WATCH WHILE THE RELATIONSHIPS, DECISIONS AND PLANS HAPPEN PRIVATELY. UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE PUBLIC WAY SHOULD BE WAS ALWAYS WHAT I HAD TO THINK THROUGH… I KNEW HOW TO MANAGE THE PRIVATE WAY.
Economy said China would be happiest with a long-running dialogue that does not require major policy changes. “The United States usually comes to China with a pretty long list of what we want China to do, and, for the most part, what China wants is to be left alone,” Economy said.
REALLY? CHINA MOST WANTS “TO BE LEFT ALONE.” I THINK WHAT CHINA WANTS IS GROWTH, RESPECT AND ADEQUATE PLACEMENT ON THE WORLD STAGE,
Mar 27, 3:36 AM (ET)By FOSTER KLUGWASHINGTON (AP) – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has moved aggressively and quickly to secure a stronger role in what she has called the world’s most important relationship: U.S. dealings with China. But military and economic tensions between the two powers keep getting in her way.
As the international financial crisis worsens, the two colossal economies have bickered over their intertwined interests. China is nervous about its position as Washington’s biggest foreign creditor, holding an estimated $1 trillion in U.S. government debt.
Beijing and Washington also have sparred over military matters, including a confrontation between American and Chinese vessels in the South China Sea and harsh words over Pentagon claims that China’s rapidly growing military strength could allow it to win short, intense conflicts against high-tech adversaries. These issues will demand high-level attention from the Treasury and Defense departments. Clinton is pushing, however, to ensure that her diplomatic corps is not marginalized as the United States engages a country the Obama administration needs as a partner in efforts to solve the world’s major problems.
Clinton began staking out her claim on China early. A week after President Barack Obama’s Jan. 20 inauguration she signaled [ Sentence in email cut off].
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT
If you want to know why America is in trouble, consider how our civil servants have handled power and access to money. Consider how China got so much power over America in the years Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and which people in the government covered up for HER, and for what she did.
Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz from Florida was the subject of a nasty-gram “article” in Yahoo News by a far-left journalist, and it was picked up and promoted by none other than former First Lady, Former New York Senator, Former Secretary of State and two times failed Presidential candidate, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Ever since Clinton lost to President Donald J. Trump in a historic landslide, Clinton has refused to accept the humiliating defeat and she has joined the “Resistance” to Trump’s administration.
Friday Clinton reacted to a Yahoo article, and then Gaetz, the subject of the article hit back – hard and reacted to Clinton. The whole thing made an interesting comical thread of tweets.
What started it?
“For once, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) probably doesn’t want anyone paying attention to him. Gaetz, a vocal conservative and supporter of President Trump, appears to have violated House ethics rules with spending throughout his four years in office, aPolitico investigation has found,” Kathryn Krawczyk wrote for Yahoo News.
In the Politico hit piece that Yahoo picked up, the reporter wrote,”Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz has privately engaged in several spending practices in his nearly four years in office that appear to be in conflict with the House’s ethics rules, a POLITICO investigation has found.”
So Gaetz has a media studio and speechwriter. OK. Most candidates do.
Clinton, unwilling to wait for any old fashioned “due process”, herself the participant of many corrupt exploitations of taxpayer funds over the past 25 years wrote: