Now that Georgia is enacting new laws that will prevent many ways in which an election could be stolen, Joe Biden and the Democrats are in a panic. The new law requires that people voting by mail must provide legal IDs.
The Democrats claim that the poor do not have a way of getting IDs and therefore cannot vote. But the poor get federal benefits such as food stamps, healthcare, HUD, HEAP, and other benefits that require you to produce an ID.
Now, Biden is using the full force of the federal government in an effort to try to either have the law thrown out or reversed by Georgia itself.
Many people are threatening a boycott of the state. But, it’s really not a boycott because although they boycott by not filming or doing business with Georgia companies, they still want to make money from people living in the state. What if the state were to ban any company boycotting the state such as video streaming companies?
Biden says the Department of Justice is now looking into Georgia and deciding how best to harass them and trying to force them to change course. Not just because of Georgia but in all the states trying to root out the possibility of fraud.
Now, Democrats are stating that Stacey Abrams was cheated out of her election that she lost by 55,000 votes. But minorities voted in record numbers and Abrams has failed to produce even one person who was denied the chance to vote.
Currently, Democrats are trying to nationalize the vote, cutting states out of the loop and forcing them to adopt policies that make it easier to cheat.
This must not stand and it may not. Sen Joe Manchin is signaling that he opposes the bill because Republicans were denied the opportunity to have input in writing the election laws.
They can’t really do anything to him as opposition from the far left will help him when he is up for reelection.
President Joe Biden told reporters on Friday that the Justice Department and his administration are “taking a look” at the legislation, which he claims is an “attack on the right to vote” in the Peach State.
“We’re working on that right now. We don’t know quite exactly what we can do at this point. The Justice Department’s taking a look as well,” Biden said.
In a separate statement on Friday, Biden characterized the state’s move to protect the sanctity of the ballot box as “a blatant attack on the Constitution and good conscience.” He also labeled the law as the “Jim Crow in the 21st Century,” referring to Jim Crow laws that enforced racial segregation in the south.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) caved to the Woke Supremacy and withdrew its support of a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn an insane state policy in Connecticut that allows transgender athletes to race in women’s track competitions.
The lawsuit was filed by some female runners who argued that they had been deprived of wins, athletic opportunities, and even state titles due to the fact that they were unfairly forced to compete against transgender runners who are biologically male.
Under the Trump administration, the DOJ had filed a statement of interest in the lawsuit back in March in support of the suit that seeks to change the policies of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr argued that the unfair competition violated Title X, which among other things protects equal opportunities for females.
But now the lunatics are running the asylum in Washington, DC. You know the type, people who always inexplicably find the need to tell conservatives that they believe in “science” – as if conservatives don’t – but then go on to explain to us that if a biological man puts on a dress and says out loud that he is a woman then he is, in fact, a real woman.
The DOJ statement was withdrawn on Tuesday.
Connecticut US Attorney John Durham and other officials said in a statement that the “government has reconsidered the matter.” Translation: the crazies are now in charge and it’s going to be hell for the next four years.
The CIAC argued that it’s following guidance from state law that stipulates students should be accommodated according to their preferred gender identity. But Title X is federal law and the Democrats who have always wrongly argued that federal law, outside of the original 18 enumerated powers found inside the Constitution along with any powers that came with amendments, supersedes any powers of the states. Now that it’s working against them they changed their tune. Suddenly they believe in states’ rights. But how much do you want to bet something else will come along next week say in Texas or Florida where the same crazies will argue that states’ rights don’t really exist because they block whatever nonsense they’re dealing with at that time?
The Alliance Defending Freedom, who filed the federal complaint, made the argument that the CIAC is violating the equal rights of female athletes.
“Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field. Forcing female athletes to compete against boys is grossly unfair and destroys their athletic opportunities,” said ADF legal counsel Christiana Holcomb. She will be flogged, FLOGGED I tell you, by the Woke Supremamcy once they wind of her attempts to argue that there are only two genders, something that mankind has understood since the days man climbed down from the trees.
“Now when we line up in front of our blocks, and the starter calls us to get into position, we all know how the race will end. We can’t win,” said Selena Soule, a female athlete who is arguing discrimination.
“What they are proposing is legally sanctioned discrimination under this lawsuit,” said McHealen. It’s only discrimination because the state of Connecticut went nuts and demanded men in dresses get special rights.
I don’t know Ms. McHealen, and I’m sure zee is a nice person, but how on Lucifer’s black beach can zee not figure out that forcing biological females to compete against biological males is not discrimination at the federal level?
I think the answer to this is to create a new category of transgender sports, but the Woke will never go for it because it makes just too much sense.
Wednesday night, the GOP lawmakers sent a letter asking Durbin to schedule hearings into the conduct of the Cuomo administration since it has been reported that it intentionally withheld the COVID-19 death numbers from nursing homes after Cuomo forced COVID-19 positive patients into nursing homes with the most vulnerable of our society for this pandemic virus, the elderly.
“The American people deserve to know the extent to which Governor Cuomo and his senior staff violated the civil rights of New York seniors, lied to the Department of Justice about their actions, and violated federal civil and criminal laws in the process,” the lawmakers wrote.
“That so many people needlessly lost their lives because of the failed policies of Governor Cuomo’s administration — an administration that many have lauded over the past year — is tragic and deserves a full investigation and accounting.”
Of course, you just know that Durbin and his cohorts in the party are going to use the Cuomo administration’s lie that they did it because President Donald Trump was pressuring them on Twitter.
In the letter sent to Durbin, the senators said they expect Merrick Garland, President Joe Biden’s attorney general nominee, to commit to investigating this growing scandal.
“When Judge Garland testifies before this Committee, we expect him to commit the Department of Justice to fully investigating this cover-up to determine whether any criminal laws were violated and to prosecute any violations,” they wrote. Not that it will ever happen, because while Democrats make things up against Republicans out of thin air, they rarely ever go after one of their own, and the tyrant governor of New York is most definitely one of their own.
Richard Azzopardi, a spokesman for the governor, slimed on about Cruz’s request, “Every death in this pandemic is a tragedy and shame on the Treason Caucus for exploiting them to distract from fermenting the Capitol insurrection that resulted in the death of a police officer.”
Can you believe that? This putz (a little cultural appropriation) tried to dilute the scandal by referring to a fake scandal against Senator Cruz where in the wake of the Capitol riot on January 6, the Democrats have tried to accuse Cruz of helping to incite the riot while he was inside the Capitol building doing exactly what the Democrats did for the last three Republican White House victories. Azzopardi accused Cruz and the other Republicans of doing exactly what he did in the context of his accusation. The Democrats are sick people.
Last week we reported that a Cuomo top aide, Melissa DeRosa, admitted to a bunch of state Democrats lawmakers that they withheld the COVID-19 nursing home death count over the fear that the numbers would be “used against us” by federal authorities. Isn’t that called obstruction? I thought the Democrats really hated obstruction.
This scandal was made public after New York Attorney General Letitia James reported that she discovered that COVID-19 nursing home deaths were 50 percent higher than Cuomo and the administration claimed.
Also on Wednesday Assemblyman Ron Kim (D-Queens) said he received a threatening phone call from Cuomo last week telling the assemblyman that he’d be “destroyed” if he didn’t help contain the situation. Can you imagine?
Kim said he was “in the middle of bathing my kids,” when Cuomo asked him to write up a statement that would say that DeRosa told state lawmakers that they would comply with federal prosecutors.
Folks, that’s manufacturing false evidence, something the Democrats accused Trump of doing, except unlike the former president, Cuomo allegedly actually did if Kim is telling the truth.
Kim said that during the call Cuomo threatened him saying, “You have not seen my wrath. I have been biting my tongue for months.” The assemblyman said Cuomo then told him, “I can tell the whole world what a bad person you are and you will be finished.” Kim said, and concluded that the governor told him, “You will be destroyed.”
This is worse than any of the lies the Democrats made up about Republicans and apparently it’s a real scandal.
Last month, Cruz introduced an amendment to the COVID-19 relief package that called for a Department Of Justice investigation to determine if officials like Cuomo could be criminally or civilly liable for forcing COVID-19 patients into nursing homes. The senator from Texas shouldn’t hold his breath because there is no way, no how that the Biden DOJ will ever hold Democrats accountable for what they did that ended up killing thousands of seniors.
Cuomo made good on his threats. During a press conference on Wednesday, the governor attacked both Assemblyman Kim and the New York Post for having the gall to expose the nursing home scandal.
It now appears that fellow Democrats, who put up with Cuomo’s arrogance for way too long during the COVID-19 crisis, are now turning on him. On Tuesday, nine state Assembly Democrats accused the governor of federal obstruction of justice in a letter that asks that Cuomo’s COVID-19 emergency powers be stripped. Multiple state Senators asked for the same.
I am admittedly a partisan conservative, but I don’t take too much pleasure watching someone have the world come down on them, but in this case, I think it’s completely justified. Andrew Cuomo has been an obnoxious and arrogant tyrant who not only botched his handling of the pandemic for New Yorkers and not only tried to blame everyone else for his and his administration’s negligence over the nursing home debacle, but he actually wrote a book about what an awesome job he did as governor handling the COVID-19 pandemic.
But, absolutely nothing will happen on the federal level as we now know that President Biden chose not to discuss the scandal during his White House meeting with the governor on Friday, saying “it was not a focus of their conversation or a topic.”
For those of you reading this who are admitted leftists I want you to do something for me. I want you to close your eyes, take some deep, slow breaths, and once your mind has been cleared of everything, think to yourself, what if it was Donald Trump.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo had better watch his step should she decide to make Melissa DeRosa the scapegoat in his Covid-19 to the nursing home scandal.
She is not someone to be messed with. Or at least her mother-in-law is no one to be messed with.
Audrey Strauss runs the DOJ office in the Southern District of New York.
As such, she could be the one to prosecute Cuomo over his mishandling of the pandemic in New York.
Cuomo released fake numbers where it comes to deaths by Covid-19, he is likely guilty of obstruction charges.
There could be other charges as well as possible but improbable impeachment since Democrats greatly outnumber Republicans which means Cuomo will get away with murder.
I don’t know any other way to describe what Cuomo did to the nursing home patients, do you?
His assistant Melissa DeRosa already admitted to obstruction in her phone call with top Democratic lawmakers. At least 15,000 seniors living in nursing homes died as a result of his orders to sent Covid positive patients into nursing homes where the most vulnerable Americans live. This led to their deaths. Cuomo blamed the deaths on President Trump, knowing all the time that it was his own idiotic decision that led to mass graves in New York.
Melissa DeRosa, Cuomo’s Assistant, stated to the Democrats on a recent conference call:
“And basically, we froze,” she reportedly said. “Because then we were in a position where we weren’t sure if what we were going to give to the Department of Justice, or what we give to you guys, what we start saying, was going to be used against us while we weren’t sure if there was going to be an investigation.”
She reportedly added: “That played a very large role into this”
“But instead of a mea culpa to the grieving family members of more than 13,000 dead seniors or the critics who say the Health Department spread COVID-19 in the care facilities with a March 25 state Health Department directive that nursing homes admit infected patients, DeRosa tried to make amends with the fellow Democrats for the political inconvenience it caused them.
“So we do apologize,” she said. “I do understand the position that you were put in. I know that it is not fair. It was not our intention to put you in that political position with the Republicans.”It was the NY Post’s Bernadette Hogan, Carl Campanile and Bruce Golding broke this story on February 11.”
“Hogan has been on top of this story since the beginning and has attended most of Cuomo’s press conferences in person. her coverage at the New York Post has kept the nation updated as to the horrific crimes that were being committed by the Cuomo administration in New York’s nursing homes and hospitals by virtue of NYS Department of Health Commissioner Howard Zucker’s Covid-19 public policies”
“The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating SpaceX over whether the company discriminates against non-U.S. citizens in its hiring practices and said Elon Musk’s company is stonewalling a subpoena for information, court documents revealed Thursday.”
“The DOJ’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section received a complaint of employment discrimination from a non-U.S. citizen claiming that the company discriminated against him based on his citizenship status.”
(i)to hire for employment in the United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (b) or (ii) if the person or entity is an agricultural association, agricultural employer, or farm labor contractor (as defined in section 1802 of title 29), to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (b).
Okay. With that in mind, exactly why is Musk being investigated? For obeying the law? Or is it because he is feared because his beliefs sometimes mirror that of conservatives, such as his statements on social media banning and its effect on the First Amendment.
John Lott, who was hired by the Justice Department in October as senior adviser for Research and Statistics at the Office of Justice Programs just published a story in which he claims that as many as 368,000 excess votes tipped the scale in at least two states according to a study he made.
Those states are Pennsylvania and Georgia.
The study’s summary reads:
“Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 ‘excess’ votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania.”
The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.
The goal of the study was to determine the number of votes affected and what the implications were for the election.
He also says that the same conditions existed in other states too but he did not give a solid opinion since he has basically just studied the two states.
“In layman’s terms, in precincts with alleged fraud, Trump’s proportion of absentee votes was depressed – even when such precincts had similar in-person Trump vote shares to their surrounding counties. The fact that the shift happens only in absentee ballots, and when a country line is crossed, is suspicious.”
“The precinct level estimates for Georgia and Pennsylvania indicate that vote fraud may account for Biden’s win in both states.”
Lott also looked at voter turnout rates in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, comparing counties where there was alleged fraud and counties where there wasn’t.
Lott estimates that at least 289,000 fraudulent votes were counted. Of course, his study has no legal effect on the fight going on right now but it does tend to agree with other information we have.
Former Venezuelan National Treasurer who was a temporary medical aide to Hugo Chavez and her spouse who was a one-time security guard to Hugo Chavez has been charged in connection with international bribery and money laundering scheme.
HOW RICH PEOPLE HIDE MONEY
According to Taiwan News.com, who posted an AP article, the two were first exposed in the “Panama Papers” which according to Wikipedia is described as:
A former Venezuelan National Treasurer and her spouse were charged in a superseding indictment filed Tuesday for their alleged participation in a previously indicted billion-dollar currency exchange and money laundering scheme. An alleged co-conspirator was previously charged in the original indictment.
Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian C. Rabbitt of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan of the Southern District of Florida, Special Agent in Charge Anthony Salisbury of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Miami Field Office, Special Agent in Charge Mark B. Dawson of HSI Houston Field Office, Acting Special Agent in Charge David Magdvcz of HSI Boston Field Office, Special Agent in Charge George L. Piro of the FBI Miami Field Office, and Inspector General Jay N. Lerner of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Office of Inspector General (OIG) made the announcement.
Claudia Patricia Diaz Guillen (Diaz), 47, and her spouse, Adrian Jose Velasquez Figueroa (Velasquez), 41, Venezuelan citizens who reside in Madrid, Spain, were charged in a superseding indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering and two counts of money laundering.
Raul Gorrin Belisario (Gorrin), 52, a Venezuelan billionaire businessman who owns Globovision news network, was charged by indictment in August 2018 and remains charged in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator in the same money laundering conspiracy and money laundering counts. He is currently a fugitive residing in Venezuela.
The superseding indictment alleges that Gorrin paid millions of dollars in bribes to two former Venezuelan national treasurers, Alejandro Andrade Cedeno (Andrade) and Diaz, and to Velasquez, for the benefit of Diaz, to corruptly secure the rights to conduct foreign currency exchange transactions for the Venezuelan government at favorable rates. Gorrin wired money to and for the benefit of Andrade and Diaz, including money for private jets, yachts, homes, champion horses, high-end watches, and a fashion line.
Andrade, 56, a Venezuelan citizen, was previously sentenced to 10 years in prison in November 2018 for his role in the conspiracy to commit money laundering. As part of his guilty plea, Andrade admitted that he received over $1 billion in bribes from co-conspirator Gorrin and other co-conspirators in exchange for using his position as Venezuelan national treasurer to select them to conduct currency exchange transactions at favorable rates for the Venezuelan government.
An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
HSI Miami, HSI Houston, HSI Boston, FBI Miami, and the FDIC OIG are investigating this case. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Chief Vanessa Sisti and Trial Attorney Paul A. Hayden of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kurt Lunkenheimer and Nalina Sombuntham of the Southern District of Florida. The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided significant assistance in this matter. The Policía Nacional (Spanish National Police) also provided significant assistance.
The Department of Justice on Thursday, published their final rule for the department’s procedures on Aliens claiming asylum which has the left upset because they seeing a tightening of the immigration process under President Donald J. Trump that is now apparently limiting the claims people can make for why they are afraid for their lives and need to move to America.
The DOJ is removing the power of fear claims, under their newest procedures and sending people in front of judges to prove they are in fear, to be given asylum. Those are two of the major contested changes to the new procedures, including removing Obama era procedures dealing with NATO military members, or who aliens have a “disability that renders it impractical to proceed with the examination under the Act”, and more legal loopholes that made immigration wide open for people.
The new rules go into effect Friday, Dec. 11, and according to Human Rights Watch, partners with the radical far-far left Ford Foundation, the announcement specifically changes definitions of what they call “social groups,” and the left, whose response to the Friday changes follows, is not happy.
§ 208.1(c) – The proposed rule would radically change the definition of a “particular social group,” making it virtually impossible for a person who is a member of a social group other than the four specified in the refugee definition (race, religion, nationality, and political opinion) from ever qualifying for asylum.
One of the nine excluded social groups are people involved in “interpersonal disputes of which governmental authorities were unaware or uninvolved.”Another of the nine excluded social groups are people who have past associations or activities with criminal or terrorist groups. People who are targeted for criminal activity because of their perceived wealth or affluence (208.1(f)(v)) would not be recognized as a social group.
§ 208.1(d) – The proposed rule defines “political opinion” in a way that appears designed to exclude refugees who fear persecution based on their political opinion
§ 208.1(e) – The proposed rule redefines “persecution” so that it is limited to exigent situations.
The exclusion of evidence in support of an asylum claim because it might “promote cultural stereotypes” would threaten the ability of LGBT and women asylum seekers, in particular, from presenting evidence to support their claims.
§ 208.18 – The proposed rule imposes a nearly impossible evidentiary burden on those seeking Convention against Torture protection.
An asylum seeker seeking protection under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment would have to prove that a government official who has inflicted or acquiesced to torture has done so “under color of law” and is not a “rogue official.”
From the federal register on the topic,” The decision to adopt such a regulatory scheme was made on the assumption that it would not “disrupt the streamlined process established by Congress to circumvent meritless claims.” Regulations Concerning the Convention Against Torture, 64 FR at 8485.”
From the “Public Comments” section of the federal register, the reaction from the far left leading group Human Right Watch gives us some indication of the focus of the proposed changes:
“Human Rights Watch urges DHS to withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety.
The proposed rule appears designed to create insurmountable procedural barriers, evidentiary burdens, and qualification standards to prevent three groups, especially, from being able to exercise their right to seek and enjoy asylum in the United States: Central Americans fleeing gang violence; women fleeing domestic abuse; and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. That said, this regulation would set bars that would make it exceedingly difficult for all categories of people who qualify for and deserve asylum to be recognized as refugees and protected.
The HRW reaction possibly explains the increase in Immigration Judges under Trump, to keep the process streamlined under his administration, unlike under Obama’s, and further explains in why in Section Three how the DOJ remade the Obama Era Immigration laws: “REMOVE AND RESERVE DHS-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES FROM DOJ REGULATIONS”.
The full Press Statement from the Department of Justice from Thursday follows:
The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security Publish Final Rule on Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removalhttps://t.co/wlAyrzIVWk
The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security Publish Final Rule on Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal Today, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security (collectively, the Departments) announced the forthcoming publication of a Final Rule that will streamline and enhance procedures for the adjudication of claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) regulations.
The Final Rule, consistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), will enable the Departments to more effectively separate baseless claims from meritorious ones. This will better ensure groundless claims do not delay or divert resources from deserving claims, and in particular, will better ensure the security of our nation’s borders by facilitating the efficient review of claims in a manner consistent with the law and the integrity of our immigration system.
The Final Rule addresses public comment received following publication of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and codifies amendments to multiple provisions of the Departments’ regulations. The rule takes effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, which is scheduled to occur on Friday, Dec. 11, 2020.
The Final Rule makes the following changes to the Departments’ regulations:
Amend the regulations governing credible fear determinations so that individuals found to have such fear will have their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the CAT adjudicated by an immigration judge in streamlined proceedings, rather than in immigration court proceedings conducted under section 240 of the INA; Permit immigration judges to pretermit asylum applications without a hearing if the application does not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief; Clarify when an application is “frivolous”; Clarify standards for the adjudication of asylum and withholding claims including amendments to the definitions of the terms “particular social group,” “political opinion,” “persecution,” and “firm resettlement”; Outline factors, including an exemption for children under 18 for the factor regarding unlawful entry or attempted unlawful entry, for adjudicators to consider when making discretionary determinations; Clarify the standard for determining the acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity under the CAT regulations; Raise the burden of proof for the threshold screening of withholding and CAT protection claims from “significant possibility” to a “reasonable possibility” standard; Apply bars to asylum and withholding when making credible fear determinations; and Clarify the requirement to protect certain information contained in asylum applications, applications for withholding of removal under the INA, applications for protection under the regulations implementing the CAT, and applications for refugee admissions.
As Donald J. Trump was preparing to be sworn in as President Of The Unite State on January 20, 2017, members of the FBI, CIA, and the White House were in the process of setting up an, per Peter Strzok, an “insurance policy”.
Following the swearing-in, FBI Director James Comey met with President Trump to tell of accusations he should know about, and the existence of a dossier which would show that his campaign had colluded with Russians to help him get elected.
After meeting with President Trump, Comey contacted the United States Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who initiated the fake news networks to start the attack on Trump knowing bout the dossier.
Regardless of no evidence, United States Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller, to in effect find a crime. After 40 million dollars, and over 2 years of investigations, the final Mueller report concluded no evidence of collusion was discovered.
Shortly after the conclusion of the investigations and after the Democratic party re-took the US House in 2018, the democrats, using one phone between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, voted for impeachment sending the case to the US Senate for trial.
The Senate quickly voted NO, rejecting the bogus charges, ending shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic kicked in.
So here we are, right before the end of year 4 for President Trump’s term, and the DOJ is the next government agency to look into an alleged crime, this time a bribery charge against President Trump.
The Department of Justice is investigating a potential crime, a bribery scheme that allegedly sought to funnel money in the form of a “political contribution” in exchange for a “presidential pardon or reprieve of a sentence.”
The revelation, which was made in court documents that were unsealed on Tuesday in federal court, does not disclose “a timeline of the alleged scheme, or any names of people potentially involved, except that communications between people including at least one lawyer were seized from an office that was raided sometime before the end of this summer,” CNN reported. “No one appears to have been publicly charged with a related crime to date.”
The court documents state that “over fifty digital media devices, including iPhones, iPads, laptops, thumb drives, and computer and external hard drives” were seized that allegedly contained evidence of “criminal activity,” specifically a “secret lobbying scheme” in which unnamed individuals acted as lobbyists to senior White House officials without registering as lobbyists, in accordance with U.S. law, to secure “a pardon or reprieve of sentence.”
“The heavily redacted documents revealed Tuesday do not name the individuals involved or President Donald Trump,” NBC News reported. “They also do not indicate if any White House officials had knowledge of the scheme.”
Trump responded to the report late on Tuesday evening, writing on Twitter: “Pardon investigation is Fake News!”
The Trump haters have been trying to line up charges against, who the left thinks will be, Donald J. Trump, former President, if he has left office on January 20th, 21.
Why many might ask, to me it is simple. To publicly display what actions the establishment will take against those who try to come in and drain the swamp. There are a lot of “Deep Staters” who want to get a pound of Trump’s flesh for his efforts to expose their dirty deeds.