NBC political director and MSNBC host Chuck Todd was ripped down by many leftists on social media for asking if then President-elect Joe Biden would be able to keep his promise on the coronavirus pandemic. The answer is of course not.
Recently on “Meet the Press” Todd mentioned polls results that revealed that many Americans believe the country is very divided and will stay that way for many years to come. That’s what happens when the socialists assume power and try to force people to do things that go against human nature.
“Let’s be realistic, Biden’s first and most crucial task is to vaccinate America, to fulfill that promise of 100 million vaccinations in his first 100 days,” Todd said. That’s not going to happen and useful idiots like Chuck Todd will blame the Trump administration for Biden’s failures. The Woke Supremacists are angry because they don’t want it exposed that Joe Biden is going to be an unmitigated disaster of a president.
“The ultimate success or failure of his presidency may hinge simply on that one promise that he made and it might be his only way to begin immediately cauterizing America’s social, economic, and political wounds,” he continued. Joe Biden created many of America’s social, economic, and political wounds. He launched his 2020 campaign on the Charlottesville lie. What makes anyone think he’s going to try to unify the country? For Woke Supremacists, you unify a country by forcing people to agree with you or silence them. They offer no alternative.
“Let’s put it this way if Biden wants to succeed he has to fulfill that first vaccination promise,” he concluded. “If Biden doesn’t get it right, he will have failed on the job he was elected to do.”
The reaction was swift and ugly.
Many leftists spit fire-and-brimstone of fury on social media at Todd for the audacity of saying such a thing, and also at MSNBC for allowing Todd to remain employed by MSNBC, which really stands for More Silly Nonsense By Communists.
“For years I’ve been on this platform telling you about the lack of professionalism and lack of journalistic ethics in @chucktodd’s daily broadcasts. A lot of you saw it today. But it’s been happening for years and it is past time for @MSNBC to do something about it,” said novelist Don Winslow.
Think about that. The Left is complaining about Chuck Todd the leftist cheerleader having a lack of journalistic ethics. The campaign to begin eating their own has begun. It’s still hilarious though that the Left believes Todd has a lack of journalistic ethics for the complete opposite reasons that the benighted Deplorable’s believe that Todd has a lack of journalistic ethics.
I even said so.
I think it's hilarious that the Woke Supremacists think Chuck Todd has a lack of journalistic ethics for completely opposite reasons the benighted deplorables believe Chuck Todd has a lack of journalistic ethics. đđ đđ€Ł
“Chuck todd, before Biden is even sworn in⊠talking about his push for vaccines: ‘if Biden doesn’t get it right, he will have failed in the job he was elected to do’ i repeat: Biden is not even sworn in yet,” said liberal activist Oliver Willis.
chuck todd, before biden is even sworn in… talking about his push for vaccines: "if biden doesn't get it right, he will have failed in the job he was elected to do"
“I’ve been trying to hold my tongue. But I’m done. F@chucktodd. That’s what I said. F. #ChuckTodd. Once more for the kids in the back: #F***CHUCKTODD!!!!” ranted leftist actor Matt Walton.
Liberals are so nuts about conformity to the Woke Supremacy that they actually went off on Todd back in August for having a Republican on the “Meet the Press” panel with a bunch of leftist journalists.
Chuck Todd is always in the running for Dumbest Anchor on Cable News, battling it out each month with Brian Stelter from CNN’s “Reliable Sources.” Stelter usually holds the title month after month but sometimes Chuck Todd eats his Wheaties and comes out punching for the title.
Chuck Todd from NBC deceptively edits Barr’s words.
When asked by CBS News’ Catherine Herridge how history would judge the DOJ’s decision to move to dismiss the Flynn case, Barr initially responded, laughing: “Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”
After the brief clip aired, Todd remarked that he was “struck by the cynicism of the answer — it’s a correct answer, but he’s the attorney general. He didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this was a political job.”
He deceptively left out Barr saying, “I think a fair history would say it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law,” Barr said. “It upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was an injustice.”
NBC News tweeted that that part of the interview was “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short.” But Todd responded to the “cut short” clip as if that was all Barr said.
Unfortunately, this is was the liberal news does. They don’t get clips or soundbites they want so they alter things to fit their agenda. They are nothing more than deep state operatives deceiving the easily deceived people.
Today on Meet The Press, @chucktodd wildly took context out of an answer AG Bill Barr gave about his decision to drop the case into Gen. Michael Flynn.
I cut Todd’s segment along with Barr’s full answer together. Look at how blatantly dishonest this is. pic.twitter.com/tODOEwL48V
Asked by CBS News’ Catherine Herridge how history would judge the DOJ’s decision to move to dismiss the Flynn case, Barr initially responded, laughing: “Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”
After the brief clip aired, Todd remarked that he was “struck by the cynicism of the answer — it’s a correct answer, but he’s the attorney general. He didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this was a political job.”
In the full clip, which the NBC show did not air, Barr immediately went on to state explicitly that, in fact, he felt the Flynn decision upheld the rule of law.
“I think a fair history would say it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law,” Barr said. “It upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was an injustice.”
The Daily Caller’s Greg Price had called out the edit earlier Sunday
Â
Â
“Very disappointed by the deceptive editing/commentary by @ChuckTodd on @MeetThePress on AG Barrâs CBS interview,” DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec wrote. “Compare the two transcripts below. Not only did the AG make the case in the VERY answer Chuck says he didnât, he also did so multiple times throughout the interview.”
In response, the “Meet the Press” Twitter account posted: “Youâre correct. Earlier today, we inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip of an interview with AG Barr before offering commentary and analysis. The remaining clip included important remarks from the attorney general that we missed, and we regret the error.”
“‘Inadvertently strikes again!'” tweeted independent journalist Mike Cernovich.
But, the show did not say it would apologize on-air. NBC News did not respond to Fox News’ request for information about an on-air apology, either.
“A tweet in no way covers the error,” wrote The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway. “A lot of people are rightly angry at @chucktodd for willfully lying about AG Barrâs comments on rule of law â but @JoeNBC also did it days ago. These intentional lies in service of false narratives have gone on for years. Infuriating.” (That was a reference, in part, to NBC’s Joe Scarborough sharing a debunked, deceptively edited clip of Vice President Mike Pence handling boxes of PPE.)
Blogger Jim Treacher and journalist Tim Pool were among many other influential commentators explicitly seeking an on-air apology.
Late Sunday, President Trump tweeted that “Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd” should be fired, saying he “knew exactly what he was doing.”
On the recommendation of U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen, who served as an FBI agent for more than a decade, the Justice Department on Thursday moved to drop its case against Flynn. The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynnâs late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.
One of the documents was a top official’s handwritten memo debating whether the FBI’s “goal” was “to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired”; other materials showed efforts by anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok to pursue Flynn on increasingly flimsy legal grounds.
The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn’s December 2016 conversations with Russia’s ambassador, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing. The FBI’s leak to The Washington Post that claimed the FBI cleared Flynn — which was published just a day before the Flynn White House interview — may have been an effort to lower his guard.
NBC host Chuck Todd, who is always in the running to overtake CNN’s Brian Stelter as the dumbest newsman in the news media, had it out with Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) over a number of Republican members of Congress who are planning to dispute the certification of Joe Biden winning the 2020 election due to questions of massive election fraud.
After being accused of trying to thwart the democratic process, Johnson hit back by telling sleepy eyes Todd that they are trying to protect it.
âWe are not acting to thwart the democratic process, we are acting to protect it,” Johnson said to Todd.
âThe fact of the matter is we have an unsustainable state of affairs in this country where we have tens of millions of people who do not view this election result as legitimate,â Johnson added.
The senator from Wisconsin added, âAs long as somebody is going to be objecting to this and weâre going to take a vote, letâs propose a solution in terms of transparency, investigation, with a commission.â
Todd, like all mainstream news media activists, saw his job as trashing Johnson and continuing to spread the lie that there is no evidence of election fraud based on the courts dismissing multiple cases brought on by Republicans. What Todd and every other left-wing activist with a news program forgets to mention is that none of the cases were tossed by judges based on bad evidence. They were never allowed to even present their evidence before the judges threw out the cases. Don’t you think that’s a pretty important fact that Todd should have acknowledged?
âYou made an allegation there was widespread fraud, you have failed to offer specific evidence of that widespread fraud, but youâre demanding an investigation on the grounds that there are allegations of widespread fraud. So essentially youâre the arsonist here. President Trump is the arsonist here,â Todd spit out at Johnson.
Here’s the most frustrating thing about all of this. There is massive amounts of evidence showing election fraud, but losers like Chuck Todd refused to air it. There were legislature hearings in all of the key battleground states where whistleblowers and witnesses filed over a thousand affidavits signed upon penalty of perjury who testified to reveal election fraud they witnessed first hand.
The hearings were all aired on YouTube, because cretins like Chuck Todd refused to air them. None of the mainstream news media outlets aired a single hearing, and I believe they stayed away from them so that they could continue to lie to their viewers about there being no evidence.
Here is just one example of an expert witness who testified as to the results of a 2020 voter data analysis he did for the Georgia election, where he discovered there were tens of thousands of fraudulent votes in numerous categories.
WATCH:
âBecause you didnât have the guts to tell the truth that this election was fair!â Todd continued.
Johnson fired back at the lamebrain pointing to him as being the arsonist because media types like Todd “dropped any pretense of being unbiased and actually chose sides during the election.”
Todd and others in the Fake News media are acting like the Republicans contesting the election results is an unprecedented affair.
Let me remind them that the last three times a Republican won a presidential election the Democrats in the House brought objections to the Electoral votes the Republican won.
Lest they forget that the House Democrats contested both elections of former President George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 and President Trump’s win in 2016.
WATCH:
Senator Josh Hawley (R- MO) announced last week that he will object to Electoral College certification, and that brought a large amount of condemnation from Democrats who praised their own partyâs objections to GOP victories in 2000, 2004 and 2016. Democrats always accuse Republicans of doing things that they actually did.
Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf pic.twitter.com/kTaaPPJGHE
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called the Republicanâs objections to the 2020 election “conspiracy and fantasy.” I’d love to know how much Schumer is involved in the attempts to steal the Georgia senate runoff elections being held today.
Schumer said, “The effort by the sitting president of the United States to overturn the results is patently undemocratic. The effort by others to amplify and burnish his ludicrous claims of fraud is equally revolting.”
So, then what would he call when the Democrats did it three times? The clowns literally claimed Donald Trump was a Russian asset after his 2016 victory.
“This is America. We have elections. We have results. We make arguments based on the fact and reasonânot conspiracy and fantasy,” he added. He said this even though he know that Democrats have been challenging the electoral vote for every Republican victory for decades.
In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), along with Representative Stephanie Tubbs (D-OH), objected to Bush’s 2004 electoral votes in Ohio.
Democrats championed Boxer’s actions at the time, including Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL). Yet last week, Durbin described Republican objections as “the political equivalent of barking at the moon.” Speaking of barking at the moon, Durbin is a known liar who throws out lies to push conspiracy theories.
The fact of the matter is the Constitution provides lots of remedies for situations we are in right now. Donald Trump won the 2020 election by a landslide, and the Democrats stole it from him. You have to be dumb as a box of hair or a CNN viewer to not understand that after the evidence has been presented from all battleground states. It’s overwhelming, despite the fact that the Democrats and their boot-licking sycophants in the mainstream news media ignore or lie about it. The Republicans have every right to object.
If you’ve been paying attention to Joe Biden’s choices for Cabinet positions, it looks like his Climate Change ideology is a litmus test for getting on the team. The Cheater-in-Chief has raised Climate Change to the level of a cult.
He named John “Lurch” Kerry a climate czar. If Representative Deb Haaland (D-NM) who was named to head up the Department of the Interior, gets confirmed, she will be the first Native American Cabinet member in history. Remember, qualifications don’t matter as much to liberals in power as do getting a “first.” That’s what liberal diversity gets us, people who are diverse in race, but not in thinking because they’re all leftists who have drank the Kool-Aid, or should I call it the Kook-Aid?
Another first for Biden would be if Michael Regan gets confirmed as the first black head of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Joe Biden has made it abundantly apparent that he is all in on using the federal government to shove whacko environmental policies down American throats, and after what the country was just put through via COVID, you can believe he will do it whether it is needed or not. I say that because many environmentalists believe our environment is already doing well thanks to technology brought on by capitalism, something the current crop of election thieves disdain.
Biden will rule as a dictator right up until the time he declares he has to leave and lets the true progressive nightmare, Kamala Harris, take over.
Here’s some questions for all the climate tyrants out there who believe that government has the power to actually change the climate, which even a first grader understands it doesn’t, why hasn’t the government been able to stop natural disasters like hurricanes, tsunamis and rains that cause flooding? How come if the television news meteorologists can’t accurately predict the weather 72 hours out, we are supposed to believe that the “science” is there to predict we are all going to die in less than twelve years if we don’t allow the politicians to spend more of our money on ridiculous climate policies?
State governments (and federal CDC and some other departments) have already tried to condition Americans into believing they have the power to lock them down, to shut down their businesses, and force people out of work. Again, they do not, but we no longer live in a society where law and order applies to elected leaders who are Democrats as we have seen where Democrat governors and mayors have disregarded their own lockdown orders, leading to the people they are supposed to represent to believe the leaders themselves do not believe in the policies they are employing on them.
Democrats at every level have shown they have zero regard for the working class families and the small businesses they have destroyed by using COVID-19 to justify a dictatorship mentality. Democrats have eroded our freedoms and liberties long enough, and the people are starting to revolt. You can’t lock people down for a year and then tell them the lockdown policies have to continue even longer before people start to take matters into their own hands.
So, after experiencing the lockdowns and forcing people to wear masks, even though the top epidemiologists in the world have said that lockdowns and masks do not work to stop the spread of the COVID-19 virus, does anyone really believe that the American people will stand for a Biden administration forcing all kinds of stupid Climate Change regulations onto them in the name of saving our planet?
I have always referred to the global warming nuts as watermelons, because they are green on the outside and socialist red on the inside. They have always used the platform of saving the planet to justify spending more and more of our tax dollars, which is what it’s really all about: power and control.
And during 2020, the armpit of calendar years, we have learned that everyone in the Left’s camp has worked in unison to deprive the rest of us of our Constitutional rights. We have Democrat politicians enforcing rules they make up out of thin air with no resemblance of how a republic works. Most of the COVID mitigation rules across the country have not come from the due diligence of state legislatures, but out of unconstitutional mandates made by governors and mayors who claim they care about your health enough to force you into compliance with their orders.
We’ve also learned of the limits the mainstream now mostly Fake News industry will go to promote the lies of the Left and to censor truth. CNN and MSNBC tell whoppers day in an day out, and the New York Times and Washington Post are best suited at the bottom of a dirty birdcage. Meet the Press’s Chuck Todd said he would not allow any guests on his show who did not drink the Climate Change Kook-Aid. That’s total censorship by a major news network. The press has a Constitutional protection from government censoring the news that is an important part of keeping our country free, and yet we watch them spit on their role and obligation to allow news from all sides to be heard.
We watched as elected Democrat whose main priority is to protect the people they serve allow riots and looting to happen all across the country causing mayhem, destruction, and even death. Not only did we see Democrat leaders allow the riots to continue, but they actively and very publicly told the Trump administration to not step in to help shut them down.
We saw that the tech giants were willing to actively censor free speech in order to protect Democrats and leftist ideological causes, even though they know full well that everyone knows they were doing it. Everyone knew the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop yet Twitter continued to censor the story, knowing that everyone already knew about it. The tech giants censored any speech their leftist cohorts disagreed with, and they’re still thriving.
We saw public schools care more about the employment of adults than the education of our children. The Democrats didn’t care one iota about the psychological problems lockdowns and virtual learning would cause to our kids. Instead, we saw teachers unions demand more pay for not working.
We’ve also seen that the Courts are thoroughly corrupted. It has become wholly apparent that Democrat judges no long believe in the Constitution as they continually rule against the rule of law. We saw judges at the beginning of the Trump administration make rulings just to screw over the Trump agenda, ruling that were not based on Constitutional principles at all. For example, a federal judge shot down Trump’s travel ban claiming it targeted Muslims when it did not. And even if it did, the United States in the past has done travel bans specifically on Muslims. Barack Obama specifically did a travel ban against Iran and the word Muslim was in the order. In fact, Trump’s travel ban was based on the six countries that the Obama administration declared had the highest propensity for ISIS operatives to infiltrate refugee groups to get into the US and cause damage.
Here’s the problem with rogue judges. The judges realize they don’t have to face any accountability. Leftist judges understand that their rulings will be held until an appeal overturns it, which usually takes upwards to 18 months to hit the Supreme Court. and then, after their ruling is overturned, there is no blowback on the judge who knowingly ruled against the rule of law for ideological purposes. And we just witnessed the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court refuse to hear a case on election fraud because he feared riots.
That’s the world in which we now live. Do the powers of darkness really expect us to believe that America just voted for even more of this? Does anyone believe the Democrats, after living through 2020, will be less likely to attempt to get away with murder?
Libtards on the left, and let’s be clear, that’s what they are, have been griping and moaning that the litigation by the Trump campaign over voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election is an attack “on our democracy” – though we live in a republic – even though everything they have done so far is provided for in the Constitution, says Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND).
On NBCâs âMeet the Press,â Cramer said, “These are processes that are in our Constitution, in our laws, and theyâre not just appropriate, but theyâre really an obligation, frankly, to the millions of Americans that President Trump is a reflection of. I know, you know, a lot of people like to think that weâre the reflection of him. Heâs the reflection of millions of people that want to see him fight this to the end.â
âI think everyone ought to calm down a little bit. I donât see this as an attack on our democracy. I mean, we spent four years listening to news shows and liberals discrediting, trying to discredit the Trump administration to the point of spying on him by the last administration. Forty million dollars spent on an independent counsel that started with no evidence and ended proving that there was no evidence. And then, of course, this crazy impeachment. So, I think what weâre experiencing now, everyone ought to just relax and let it play out in the legal way. Weâll be just fine,â he said.
Lawmakers and their boot-licking sycophants in the Fake News media have been trying to pressure Donald Trump into conceding the race to former vice president Joe Biden, who thinks he’s already won the race and is able to create a new department, “The Office of the President Elect” which is just stupid. President Trump is asserting that he won the election, and his legal team believe they already have enough evidence of widespread massive voter fraud on the part of Democrats in the key battleground states.
We are certainly not declaring a winner until the litigation is over, and who cares anyway, because we don’t determine who the winner is. I wish the media cretins would understand that.
Trumpâs legal team has alleged election massive fraud. Rudy Giuliani has stated that they already have over 1,000 affidavits, signed upon penalty of perjury, from poll workers and vote count observers who say that they witnessed multiple types of fraud,
âWhat theyâre claiming is that thereâs a lot of evidence, and theyâre presenting that evidence in cases. Now itâs up to them to present that evidence ⊠And weâve yet to see a real hearing where evidence was presented. And theyâre not obligated to present it, you know, yesterday or tomorrow, although the sooner the better from my perspective,â Cramer told the sleepy-eyed host Chuck Todd.
âI think that to have this process is just fine. And who knows? Remember, weâve also never in historyâin this century or any other centuryâhad a massive vote by mail, you know, balloting where there was things like ballot harvesting and ballot curing, things that weâve never even heard of before that were taking place,â he continued.
âAnd frankly, a much, much lower rejection rate of mail-in ballots than just four years ago when there were many fewer of them. So itâs okay to go through this process, make sure itâs being done right, make sure that it never happens again if there are irregularities. We canât ignore hundreds of signed affidavits. Thatâs evidence. Thatâs way more evidence than Robert Mueller had.â
The rates of rejected ballots were normal to slightly higher in most states except for the key battleground states in the 2020 election. For example, in 2018 mail-in ballots had a rejection rate average of 1 or 2%. That’s a lot of ballots. And that’s coming from people who have experience voting by mail. Many states had very little experience with mail-in voting this year. There are a lot of ways you could screw up your vote with mail-in voting. You could forget the security sleeve, you could forget to sign the envelope, forget to fill in one of the circles, etc. They would be thrown out for a whole host of violations.
So we’re supposed to believe that in 2020, a year with massive mail-in voting for the very first time in our history, with most people voting that have never voted by mail before, and they all nailed it? Nonsense!
From Just the News: “Historically, mail-in ballots are rejected at around the rate of 1%. For first-time absentee voters, the rate can go as high as 3%, the higher number reflecting the unfamiliarity first-time voters have with the mail-in process.” Yet, rejection rates for 2020 were just a tiny fraction of normal rejection rates. Really?
That’s called circumstantial evidence that needs to be investigated. In other words, it’s impossible to believe that rejection rates this year, which according to normal history, should have been even higher than 3% with all the new first-time mail-in ballot voters, but they were reported as a fraction of that. Horse hockey!
In Georgia, for example, the rejection rate in 2016 was an incredible 6.4%, according to US Data. In 2020 they reported a 0.2% rejection rate, more than 30 times lower than the last election, according to US Elections Project. Are you kidding me?
Similar trends happened in Pennsylvania, where the rejection rate was 0.03% this year compared to 1% in 2016.
In Nevada, the rejection rate more than halved from 1.6% in 2016 to around 0.75% in 2020.
North Carolina went from 2.7% in 2016 to 0.8% this year, when mail-in voting was huge with majorities of first-time mail-in voters.
While Cramer argued Trumpâs legal battles are fine, Bidenâs chief of staff Ronald Klain charged on ABCâs âThis Weekâ that the president is ârejecting democracy.â Well, of course he would say that, because his party is being accused of a massive voter fraud effort that stole the election.
âHe has been, as you said at the outset, launching baseless claims of voter fraud, baseless litigation. Heâs been rejected by 34 courts, and now these efforts to try to get election officials to overturn the will of the voters,â Klain told host George Stephanopoulos. What he failed to say is that the Trump legal team has only filed three cases, not 34, as those were rulings based on legal pleadings like asking to stop state certifications while investigation voter fraud. Of course, no Democrat-appointed judge worth his activist card would allow Trump to get past their court. The Trump legal team is probably considering these hearings as the necessary steps to get to the US Supreme Court.
âItâs corrosive. Itâs harmful. But as Mitt Romney said, itâs not going to change the outcome of what happens here. At 12 noon on Jan. 20, Joe Biden will become the next president of the United States. Everything Donald Trumpâs doing now is bad for our democracy. Itâs bad for our position, our image in the world, but itâs not going to change what happens here when we get a new president next year.â
In other words, the Democrats are terrified that they got caught cheating, because the revelations that are allegedly coming will not only expose them for voter fraud in this election, but it will possibly go back decades and we might find out who shouldn’t even be in office but for cheating in their elections.
Biden spokesperson Kate Bedingfield spoke with Chuck Todd about the distrust that progressives have for Joe Biden.
Bedingfield claimed that AOC will be very happy with Biden’s agenda. But, will she? I would highly doubt it. I don’t believe she will be happy with anything short of socialism and the kind of extreme agenda that would make Stalin blush.
Bedingfield insists that Biden will be a progressive president. How will he do that? He would need a progressive cabinet, and unless Mitch McConnell wilts, Biden won’t get that.
Any legislation must also be approved by the Senate and the House is no longer a sure thing since the margin between parties will be so small.
AOC unveiled a $93 trillion dollar Green New Deal but Biden only wants to spend between 3 and 5 trillion over ten years. How happy will that make her? He will make her happy on illegal immigration with his open borders policy. And free medical coverage for illegals. Now that the election is over he can go back to banning fracking.
Todd said:
âSome people hear the word consensus on the Left and they think it means youâre gonna sell the Left out. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said this in an interview about her expectations on how the Biden administration will be to the Left of the party, and she says, âThe history of the party tends to be that we get really excited about the grassroots to get elected, and then those communities are promptly abandoned right after an election.’â
âLet me ask you this: do you believe that sheâs going to be disappointed or not when she sees the agenda of the Biden administration in the first six months?â
Bedingfield replied:
âNo, I think that Vice President Biden campaigned on an incredibly progressive and aggressive agenda. Take a look, for example, at his climate plan. Itâs the boldest, biggest climate plan thatâs ever been put forward by, you know, by a nominee running for president, and now a president-elect.â
âHeâs gonna make good on those commitments. I mean we, you know, he spent time during this campaign bringing people together around this climate plan. He was able to get the endorsement of groups like the Sunrise Movement and the endorsement of Labor for this plan. Itâs a big, aggressive plan. Itâs a perfect example of the kind of, you know, big effort that he is going to make to meet this moment and to meet these crises that weâre in.â
Time will tell but I think you will see a fight between the progressives and everyone else for the next two years if Biden is elected.
President Trump lashed out at Fox News on Sunday, targeting several figures at the network in a series of tweets claiming that the network was “being fed Democrat talking points.”
President Trump is on fire this Sunday and who can blame him? After another week of fighting the fake news every single day, he wants an alternative news outlet. Trump even blasted Fox News for being driven by some of the liberal talking points and lead by RINOs. He called out some of the people too, like Chris Wallace and Donna Brazile. Conservatives have supported Fox News for a long time but have been driven to other media outlets as Fox has shown signs of being infiltrated by the Democrat machine. I hope some money machine out there can answer Trump’s call for a new mega conservative news outlet.
President Trump lashed out at Fox News on Sunday, targeting several figures at the network in a series of tweets claiming that the network was “being fed Democrat talking points.”
In three tweets Sunday afternoon, the president called for an “alternative” to the right-leaning news network.
Trump attacked numerous figures in the tweets, including former Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who joined the board of Fox News in March of last year, and former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile, who was accused of leaking CNN town hall questions to then-candidate Hillary Clinton during the Democratic primary in 2016.
His criticism also targeted “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace, who he said was “nastier to Republicans than even Deface the Nation or Sleepy Eyes,” referring to CBS’s “Face the Nation” and NBC’s Chuck Todd, host of “Meet the Press” and “Meet the Press Daily.”
Fox News representatives did not return a request for comment on the president’s tweets. His remarks come as right-wing cable news outlet One America News Network has pushed in recent weeks for the president’s public support, tweeting in March that it called “bullshit” after Trump failed to mention the network by name at a campaign rally.
“Anyone who knows @OANN, knows we’ve reported REAL news since DAY ONE. Our young people work very hard to do that, so to be mentioned by the President means a lot more to them than to the established media elites,” added the network’s CEO, Robert Herring, in a tweet.
 
