Majority of House Democrats Vote to Lower Voting Age to 16

Majority of House Democrats Vote to Lower Voting Age to 16

Radical Woke Supremacist progressive House Democrats unsuccessfully pushed an amendment lowering the federal voting age to 16 as part of the HR 1 voting rights package on Wednesday.

According to C-SPAN, the amendment failed by a vote of 125-302, thank God, after a majority of Democrats voted for it at 125-93.

“A sixteen-year-old in 2021 possesses a wisdom and a maturity that comes from 2021 challenges, 2021 hardships, and 2021 threats,” Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), a member of the progressive “Squad,” who was behind the amendment, said in a statement on Monday. “Now is the time for us to demonstrate the courage that matches the challenges of the modern-day sixteen- and seventeen-year-old.”

Listen to this lunatic go on about how wonderful her amendment is.  Completely out of touch.

Is it just me or have the Democrats so far proposed nothing but power grab moves for their party?  They have not proposed a single bill that will make one American life better.

Along with Pressley, Representative Grace Meng (D-NY), and Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-Il), reintroduced the amendment on Monday.  All three would be primaried and thrown out of office if Democrat voters cared about the future of our country.

Back in February, Pressley said that she was “shocked” that lowering the legal voting age to 16 was such a “polarizing” subject.  That’s a clear signal that the Congresswoman from Massachusetts is out of touch with the American people.  She made the comment during a Facebook Live discussion with Representative Barbara Lee (D-CA), and author Ibram X. Kendi.

“Dr. Kendi, I was shocked by how polarizing an issue this was, and listen when I would tell people John Lewis is an original co-sponsor of this, you know, our young people deserve to have a stakeholder in our democracy,” Pressley said responding to Kendi, who claimed that lowering the voting age is an example of an anti-racist policy.  How?  How is lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 an anti-racist policy?  What does race have to do with lowering the voting age?  How could these Woke Supremacists find a racial issue in that? If they really want to set an anti-racist policy why not lower the voting age to 7?  That will really send a message.  #SMH

It’s not a new thing either.  This amendment to lower the voting age was originally added to HR 1 back in March 2019.  The amendment failed then too receiving only 126 votes.  You would think these progressives would learn by now that the American people do not want the voting age lowered.  But progressives never operate that way.  They truly are Woke Supremacists in that they believe that their ideas will fix everything just so long as the smartest people in the world are implementing them.   They ignore the fact that they are elected to “represent” the people who elect them to office, that’s why they’re called Representative so and so in the House.   But progressive Democrats do not represent anyone but their own self, their own party, for their own power.

“Beginning at the age of 16, young people are contributing to both the labor force and their local economies by paying income taxes, and yet they are deprived of the opportunity to exercise their right to vote,” Pressley said on the House floor in 2019.  Then raise the age of being able to work.

“In this country, we affirm that when a person walks into the voting booth and pulls that lever, there is no meritocracy or hierarchy. The booth is the equalizer.”  Unless they use voting machines to alter the votes and rig an election.  Now we know that their vote may not count the way the voters wanted them to count.

Democrats will do anything to rig an election.  HR 1 is exactly that, with provisions that will make the federal government completely take over election laws and rules in states, even though the Constitution gives sole authority for election laws to state legislatures.  Don’t take my word for it.  Read it yourself here.

Democrats Objected to the Last 3 Republican Presidential Victories But Media Thinks 2020 GOP Objections Are Unprecedented

Democrats Objected to the Last 3 Republican Presidential Victories But Media Thinks 2020 GOP Objections Are Unprecedented

NBC host Chuck Todd, who is always in the running to overtake CNN’s Brian Stelter as the dumbest newsman in the news media, had it out with Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) over a number of Republican members of Congress who are planning to dispute the certification of Joe Biden winning the 2020 election due to questions of massive election fraud.

After being accused of trying to thwart the democratic process, Johnson hit back by telling sleepy eyes Todd that they are trying to protect it.

“We are not acting to thwart the democratic process, we are acting to protect it,” Johnson said to Todd.

“The fact of the matter is we have an unsustainable state of affairs in this country where we have tens of millions of people who do not view this election result as legitimate,” Johnson added.

The senator from Wisconsin added, “As long as somebody is going to be objecting to this and we’re going to take a vote, let’s propose a solution in terms of transparency, investigation, with a commission.”

Todd, like all mainstream news media activists, saw his job as trashing Johnson and continuing to spread the lie that there is no evidence of election fraud based on the courts dismissing multiple cases brought on by Republicans.  What Todd and every other left-wing activist with a news program forgets to mention is that none of the cases were tossed by judges based on bad evidence.  They were never allowed to even present their evidence before the judges threw out the cases.  Don’t you think that’s a pretty important fact that Todd should have acknowledged?

“You made an allegation there was widespread fraud, you have failed to offer specific evidence of that widespread fraud, but you’re demanding an investigation on the grounds that there are allegations of widespread fraud. So essentially you’re the arsonist here. President Trump is the arsonist here,” Todd spit out at Johnson.

Here’s the most frustrating thing about all of this.  There is massive amounts of evidence showing election fraud, but losers like Chuck Todd refused to air it.  There were legislature hearings in all of the key battleground states where whistleblowers and witnesses filed over a thousand affidavits signed upon penalty of perjury who testified to reveal election fraud they witnessed first hand.

The hearings were all aired on YouTube, because cretins like Chuck Todd refused to air them.  None of the mainstream news media outlets aired a single hearing, and I believe they stayed away from them so that they could continue to lie to their viewers about there being no evidence.

Here is just one example of an expert witness who testified as to the results of a 2020 voter data analysis he did for the Georgia election, where he discovered there were tens of thousands of fraudulent votes in numerous categories.


“Because you didn’t have the guts to tell the truth that this election was fair!” Todd continued.

Johnson fired back at the lamebrain pointing to him as being the arsonist because media types like Todd “dropped any pretense of being unbiased and actually chose sides during the election.”

Todd and others in the Fake News media are acting like the Republicans contesting the election results is an unprecedented affair.

Let me remind them that the last three times a Republican won a presidential election the Democrats in the House brought objections to the Electoral votes the Republican won.

Lest they forget that the House Democrats contested both elections of former President George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 and President Trump’s win in 2016.


Senator Josh Hawley (R- MO) announced last week that he will object to Electoral College certification, and that brought a large amount of condemnation from Democrats who praised their own party’s objections to GOP victories in 2000, 2004 and 2016.  Democrats always accuse Republicans of doing things that they actually did.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called the Republican’s objections to the 2020 election “conspiracy and fantasy.”  I’d love to know how much Schumer is involved in the attempts to steal the Georgia senate runoff elections being held today.

Schumer said, “The effort by the sitting president of the United States to overturn the results is patently undemocratic. The effort by others to amplify and burnish his ludicrous claims of fraud is equally revolting.”

So, then what would he call when the Democrats did it three times?  The clowns literally claimed Donald Trump was a Russian asset after his 2016 victory.

“This is America. We have elections. We have results. We make arguments based on the fact and reason—not conspiracy and fantasy,” he added. He said this even though he know that Democrats have been challenging the electoral vote for every Republican victory for decades.

In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), along with Representative Stephanie Tubbs (D-OH), objected to Bush’s 2004 electoral votes in Ohio.

Democrats championed Boxer’s actions at the time, including Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL).  Yet last week, Durbin described Republican objections as “the political equivalent of barking at the moon.”  Speaking of barking at the moon, Durbin is a known liar who throws out lies to push conspiracy theories.

The fact of the matter is the Constitution provides lots of remedies for situations we are in right now.  Donald Trump won the 2020 election by a landslide, and the Democrats stole it from him.  You have to be dumb as a box of hair or a CNN viewer to not understand that after the evidence has been presented from all battleground states.  It’s overwhelming, despite the fact that the Democrats and their boot-licking sycophants in the mainstream news media ignore or lie about it.  The Republicans have every right to object.

Kamala Harris Was Sworn in As a US Senator on Sunday

Kamala Harris Was Sworn in As a US Senator on Sunday

Democrats know that it looks awful that Kamala Harris has not vacated her Senate seat, no matter how they try to redirect questions about it, or how they to gaslight Americans and make us feel crazy for asking about it, it is extraordinary that she has not stepped aside.

The man designated to replace Harris even posted about it on Sunday:

The Democrat “Inaugural” Committee posted today, signaling to Democrats the chosen narrative is that she was”sworn in” 4 years ago”:

Just in case anyone searched “Kamala sworn in”.

Community Organizers, like Amy Siskind, joined in on the propaganda:

We do not understand why she is clinging to her Senate seat, but the fact is that she is, a recently sworn-in Senator for the 117th Congress.

Harris’s term is over in two years, and she claims that she is the Vice President-elect, but she is, in fact, a US Senator, who was sworn in with the collective office holders on Sunday.

Padilla was designated to take over for Harris by embattled Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom, who is facing a state recall.  Harris’ will step down sometime in January.

And Democrats are not happy, according to The Western Journal who reported:

“California Gov. Gavin Newsom picked a prominent minority state official to replace presumptive Vice President-elect Kamala Harris in the Senate. This would, ordinarily, be a moment of celebration for the kind of people who use the word “intersectionality” and don’t have to stifle a smile.

But, it turns out that California Secretary of State Alex Padilla is the wrong kind of minority.

According to The Associated Press, Newsom picked Padilla — a personal friend and the son of Mexican immigrants — to fill Harris’ spot until 2022, when the presumptive vice president-elect would have been up for re-election normally.”

“The sad reality is [Harris] was the only African-American woman in the Senate at this time, and when you think about the history of this country and the challenges that exist for African-Americans especially … this is a real blow to the African-American community, to African-American women, to women in general,” she added, SFGate reported. “I think it’s really challenging to put it in words.”

This would have been a slam-dunk pick in any other year, but Padilla is a Latino man, and Kamala Harris is a black woman. If you haven’t updated your grievance org chart recently, Harris is the only black woman in the Senate, and not replacing her with the next black woman in line was seen as a slap in the face — particularly to San Francisco Democratic Mayor London Breed.

In case the name sounds familiar, Breed is the politician who attended a dubious party at The French Laundry — an expensive Michelin-starred eatery in the Napa Valley — one day after Gavin Newsom did. Both were raked over the coals, particularly given their dining restrictions and tough talk regarding socializing among those outside your immediate family without wearing masks.

“It was definitely a surprise, and it’s an unfortunate situation as we are trying to move this country forward in making sure that black lives truly matter and that African-Americans have a seat at the table, especially African-American women,” Breed said during a virtual news conference Tuesday, according to Fox News. “After what was done in this race on a national level, it definitely is unfortunate.”

VIDEO: Trump Supporters Apprehend Man Who Caused 3-Vehicle Crash, Threw Bottle at Trump Supporters

VIDEO: Trump Supporters Apprehend Man Who Caused 3-Vehicle Crash, Threw Bottle at Trump Supporters

A 20–year-old was cited with a misdemeanor on Sunday after reportedly throwing a water bottle at participants in a Trump rally before causing a 3-vehicle crash.

The Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office is currently investigating the incident.

According to Santa Maria Police Sgt. Nate Totorica, 20-year-old Jacob Garza passed a convoy of trucks participating in a “Stop the Steal” Trump parade just after 2 PM on Sunday afternoon in his black BMW.

Garza drove around the block, then sped back down the street, blowing past a stop sign. He allegedly threw a water bottle at rally participants on the side of the rode before speeding into an intersection and crashing into one vehicle, which then crashed into another vehicle. One vehicle was turned over onto its side.

Two people were injured in the collision. One suffered a broken arm, and another swelling. Both were transported to Marian Regional Medical Center to be treated.

In video circulating social media, the 20-year-old is seen being apprehended by Trump supporters. According to some witness reports, the suspect attempted to run away from the scene of the crash.

In the video, a man is seen holding Garza in a chokehold. A woman off camera is screaming at Garza, evidently for the danger his reckless driving caused, telling him, “I live here! I live here!”

Another man says, “You’re going to jail dude, for a long f***ing time.” And the man holding Garza in the chokehold says, “Welcome to MAGA country, mother f***er”.

“It’s hard to tell what happened first,” said Sgt. Totorica. “Some witnesses suggest he tried to run and some people grabbed a hold of him. It’s hard to tell what’s self defense.”

When police arrived, they closed down a portion of the road for half an hour and interviewed over a dozen witnesses.

“The stories we heard were definitely varied,” Totorica said, “and we saw a lot of video, but we didn’t get one full video.”

“We don’t know if he tried to flee, we don’t know if he got pulled out of the car, we don’t know how it began other than there was an altercation that occurred.”

Garza has been cited with reckless driving causing injury, and he has started a GoFundMe account, alleging that he was attacked due to his sexual orientation.

“I was targeted and attacked in the midst of a Trump rally for simply being gay,” he wrote. “I was followed and harassed which ultimately led to a multi-car accident while trying to escape. I was dragged, degraded, and assaulted until police arrived on scene. Any form of donations would be greatly appreciated for legal fees and medical expenses. Thank you for your support and understanding.”

Gen. Mike Flynn said, ” I ask that you stand with me today in renouncing this betrayal of trust” in Op Ed

Gen. Mike Flynn said, ” I ask that you stand with me today in renouncing this betrayal of trust” in Op Ed

The Western Journal published an exclusive op-ed by General Mike Flynn, who is the persecuted former member of both the Barack Obama administration and the Donald J. Trump administration, and who has been a target of the radical left since he boldly defended Americans and America’s interests, disagreeing with Obama about the intentions of foreign terrorists, specifically ISIS.

Barbara Flynn Redgate is the administrator of the Mike Flynn Defense Fund, and an expert on the Government’s corrupt pursuit of her brother, posted Friday:

Flynn, is somewhat under a self imposed “gag” order, due to an activist judge on a personal vendetta, while his case winds it’s way through federal court still, even months after the Government dropped the case, yet Flynn does not allow the 2020 Presidential election go by without making a statement about what is at stake.

From the article, Flynn writes:

“We are a nation founded by leaders who fought tyranny and oppression to ensure that all American citizens be treated fairly and equally across this land.

These constitutional and God-given rights should never be denied, stolen or silenced by false prosecutions or political persecutions driven by fear, hatred or animosity. Those who scowl at the very core of our republic and act from vengeance or revenge against one of us threaten the safety and security of all of us.

Never should our nation, our president or any family or individual be so viciously targeted, maligned, smeared and threatened as we have all felt for the past four years and counting. This unconscionable and seditious direct attack by ideologically driven elitists strikes at the will of the American people who ensure our very freedoms through their vote and daily selfless actions.

We cannot allow the opposing leftist agenda to continue enabling the fleecing of America, peddling connected-influence for cash, exploiting American innovation for an elitist self-serving purpose, wielding official power and influence as a means to ensure personal gain while exercising mass control and selling out our American ideals for ideologies to pursue what the leftists would like as “common and normal.”

These all diminish the power and purpose inherent in “we the people” who constitute our republic.

I ask that you stand with me today in renouncing this betrayal of trust that has burdened our nation and breached the foundation of our American ideals.

Let us proclaim with one united voice across this land that we will hold the line and never allow the rightful power of the citizens of the United States of America to be uprooted, undercut, usurped or held hostage by a coup against our nation, a duly elected president, or any future president of these United States.

Please Visit Western Journal for the rest of the article.