Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore & AOC Endorse Biden

Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore & AOC Endorse Biden

Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore & AOC Endorse Biden Regardless of Assault Allegations & Silence on CCP Virus

Nancy Pelosi has officially endorsed Biden for president. Even though he has been criticized for being strangely quiet during the CCP Virus pandemic Nancy praised him.
“As we face coronavirus, Joe has been a voice of reason and resilience, with a clear path to lead us out of this crisis.”
Many have also called for Biden to drop out of the race due to the lingering sexual assault allegations, but the Democrats are rallying behind him.
AOC endorsed Biden this week. Although it wasn’t very enthusiastically:
“In November, I’m going to be voting for Joe Biden,” she responded. “But that’s what I’m going to be doing.”
“So, is this the first time you said you voting for Biden?” Fat Joe asked.
“I mean, I’ve been saying this whole time that we got to support the Democratic nominee,” she said, but she added: “This is the time where I’m saying it declaratively like this.”
Al Gore endorsed Biden too, saying, “I am so proud to endorse your candidacy, Joe,” Gore said. “Your election is absolutely crucial, Joe, and I want to do everything I can to convince everybody that cares about the climate crisis, particularly those people, that this is a no-brainer.”
Biden once considered himself a moderate Democrat now he is giving concessions to progressives in order to win their vote. He has embraced their agendas on healthcare, climate change, LGBT, and criminal justice. A vote for Joe is a vote for the liberal agenda.

Epoch Times | April 27, 2020 

U.S. House Of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has endorsed Joe Biden for president, joining a list of top Democrats who have recently thrown their support behind the former vice president.

Pelosi’s endorsement of the Democratic presidential candidate follows that of U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Al Gore, who all threw their weight behind Biden earlier this month.

In a video statement released on April 27, Pelosi cited Biden’s experience in government, including his role in passing the Affordable Care Act, as an evidence of his leadership qualities. She said Biden is well-positioned to lead the country amid the ongoing CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus outbreak.

“As we face coronavirus, Joe has been a voice of reason and resilience, with a clear path to lead us out of this crisis,” Pelosi said in her endorsement.

Sources: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Endorses Joe Biden for

https://www.theepochtimes.com/al-gore-endorses-biden-presidency-on-earth-day-but-is-criticized-by-michael-moore_3328157.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/494275-ocasio-cortez-says-she-will-vote-for-biden-in-november



Tax Cuts – Tax Increases 101 Or How Liberals Lie About Soaking the Rich

Tax Cuts – Tax Increases 101 Or How Liberals Lie About Soaking the Rich

A favorite mantra (or is it a chant?) of liberals is that tax cuts cause deficits and are evil and tax increases are noble, virtuous, and pure.  Both notions are a bunch of gobbledygook hogwash.

The Biden administration fresh off the $1.9 trillion non-relief COVID relief package is about to hike taxes to pay for a round of infrastructure and wasteful climate change spending.

Biden’s White House has said tax increases are definitely on the table and they claim they are targeting wealthy individuals and corporations to pay more.

“His priority and focus has always been on people paying their fair share and also focusing on corporations that may not be paying their fair share, either,” White House press secretary “One time, at band camp girl,” Jen Psaki said. “So that remains his overarching approach, but there isn’t a package yet where we’re talking about pay-fors yet.”

Biden and his people are as annoyingly obtuse.  Did they not see the numbers under Trump?

Here’s the thing.  Numbers do not lie unless manipulated by liars.  It can be proven by real numbers that tax increases always lower government revenues while tax cuts always increase government revenues.  It’s counterintuitive, but it is true. The Democrats know this, but they hike taxes anyway because it allows them to virtue signal to the great unwashed that they are sticking it to the rich and they use the tax code to control people’s behaviors as good little dictators tend to do.

First off, this notion that the rich need to “pay their fair share” I consider an evil manipulation because according to IRS data the wealthiest wage earners already pay their fair share and then some.  The latest numbers provided by the IRS show the top 1 percent of wage earners paid 37.2 percent of the entire federal income tax burden.  The top 5 percent of wage earners paid 58.23 percent, over half of the entire federal income tax burden.  The top 10 percent of wage earners paid 69.47 percent and the top 50 percent of wage earners paid 96.96 percent of the federal income tax burden. That leaves the bottom 50 percent of wage earners paying only 3.04 percent, and they are the ones who use most of the government services paid for by the rest of us.  So now you know that the next time a Democrat says they want the rich to pay their fair share you know they are lying to you because when 5 percent of any group pays almost 70 percent of the costs they are absolutely paying their fair share.

Joe Biden is saying that he wants to raise taxes only on people earning $400,000 a year or more, those evil rich, greedy ba$tard$, right?

Looking at it another way, people who earn $400,000 a year are mostly small business owners who were hit very hard economically in 2020 with lockdowns as designed by Democrats to take away a major funding source for Republican candidates.  It’s known that Republicans dominate in campaign donations from small businesses because they support small businesses while Democrats attack them with taxes and regulations out the wazoo.  I have no idea where the wazoo is, but I hear that taxes and regulations pour from it like an out-of-control fire hydrant as far as small businesses are concerned.

Biden campaigned on increasing the corporate tax from 21 percent to 28 percent and the individual rate from 37 percent to 39.6 percent.  On top of that, he wants to raise the capital gains tax rate on people who earn more than a million dollars a year.  And trust me, eventually, those tax increases will hit you, the great unwashed as the virtue signaling done now is just to get you used to tax rates being increased.

Here’s the thing.  Biden and the Democrats in Congress are trying to convince you that raising taxes will help them generate more revenue to pay for all of the things that you are probably never going to benefit from anyway, but it’s a total lie.  If the government needs to raise its revenue the best way to do that is by cutting taxes.  Cutting taxes has worked every single time it has been tried.  Okay, so when was it tried you ask?

Calvin Coolidge in his inaugural address said the following:

“The collection of any taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to the public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. The only constitutional tax is the tax which ministers to public necessity. The property of the country belongs to the people of the country. Their title is absolute.”

Sounds a lot like Trump doesn’t it?

Anyway, Coolidge got tax rates lowered from 77 percent eventually to 25 percent lower than Reagan’s 28 percent.  Lowering tax rates started under his boss President William Harding until his death when Coolidge became president.

The net effect of lower taxes created an economic boom the likes of which hadn’t been seen before.  In fact, our economy became so strong they nicknamed the time period “The Roaring Twenties.”  Along with the roaring economy, government revenues increased every year.

By the time Coolidge left office, the national debt was lowered to $16.9 billion in 1929 from $22.3 billion in 1923, and the Federal Budget was reduced to $3.3 billion in 1929 from $5.1 billion in 1921.

Okay, but that was just an outlier, right?  Wrong.

The next President to lower taxes to great results was JFK.  And he was a Democrat.

In January 1963, President Kennedy presented Congress with a tax proposal to reduce the top marginal tax rate from 91 percent to 65 percent and to cut the corporate tax rate from 52 percent to 47 percent.  Kennedy was assassinated before Congress voted on his budget.  Out of respect for his death, Congress voted nearly unanimously for the bill.  Even Soviet-loving Marxists like Ted Kennedy, Howard Metzenbaum and Al Gore voted for it.  And the result was the economic boom that followed and government revenues increased.

President Ronald Reagan lowered tax rates from 70 percent to 28 percent.  Federal revenues under the new rates sadly went down.  No, I’m just kidding.  Government revenues more than doubled going from $500 billion in 1980 to $1.2 trillion by 1990, about 50 percent higher when you account for inflation.

The examples don’t stop there.

When President George W Bush cut taxes it created the largest economic expansion ever.  Sadly, his economy went south after the 30+ year Democrat-created Housing Market scam finally crashed the economy, but the tax cuts increased government revenues.

The same happened under President Donald Trump when he cut tax rates giving us the largest economic expansion and the greatest economy we ever saw.  Government revenues again went up.

How is this so?  To the average dopey liberal this doesn’t make sense.  You lower the tax rates and the government gets more money?

It’s very easy to understand and it all goes back to screwing the rich.  When the government raises taxes rich people who understand money will find other ways of either investing to earn money or hiding it until better times.  For example, when taxes are at 70 percent while Democrats are salivating at the screw job they’re doing to America, a wealthy person sees it as he has to give the government 70 cents on every dollar he earns and only gets to keep 30 cents.  To the wealthy guy that’s not worth the efforts of starting and running a business.  Why go to the trouble of starting a business when the government is going to steal well over half of what you make?  Instead, he’ll invest his money into something like tax-free municipal bonds like the Kennedys do until better tax rates come along.  When the rich guy isn’t investing his money into a business that means there are no new jobs for employees who would be hired to help run the business.  No job means no income tax revenue for the government.

But, if the rates were reversed and the wealthy guy gets to keep 70 cents for every dollar he earns and only has to pay 30 cents to the government he’s going to see that as an opportunity to invest his money to start a new business.  His business may be such a big idea that he can’t run it all by himself, so he hires employees to work there.  Every new employee earning a paycheck will now pay income taxes on his earnings and government revenues go up because of it.

“BUT THE DEFICITS!” scream the liberals.  Tax cuts do not cause deficits.  In fact, tax cuts have nothing to do with deficits.  Websters defines a deficit as spending more than you earn.  We’ve already seen that tax cuts counterintuitively increase government revenues, so when deficits arise during times of private sector economic prosperity by cutting taxes it’s because the swamp rats in DC outspent even the rising revenues.  Think about it this way.  If you have a box and you place a dollar inside that box, that’s called saving.  If someone comes along who sells candy bars and you ask the guy how much for one and he says $1.  You open up your box and take out the dollar that you put in there and you give it to the guy who then hands you the candy bar.  That’s called spending.  But what if you didn’t put the dollar in the box?  When the guy comes by with candy bars you have nothing in the box to buy any candy.  Did not having the dollar in the box affect spending in any way?  Of course not, because you didn’t spend anything.  The problem is we have the most thieving people in the world running the country now and what they would do is buy a thousand candy bars with only $1 in the box and tell the guy they pay for the other candy bars later.  That created a deficit of $999.00 because they spent more than what they had in the box.  Democrats and liberals do not understand this very simple example.

That phenomenon of tax cuts causing government revenues to go up also has the added benefit of the private sector growing and expanding and that causes the unemployment rate to drop and pretty much everything gets better for the American worker and the American family.  Conservatives like Trump understand this and they make it a priority to help the American working class.  Democrats on the other hand either do not understand this common-sense thinking of the economy or they do but would much rather prioritize government control over the people instead of helping the American working class do better for themselves.  Joe Biden has chosen government control over helping the American working class.

Former Trump Adviser Predicts At Least 3 Indictments Coming From Special Counsel John Durham’s Investigation

Former Trump Adviser Predicts At Least 3 Indictments Coming From Special Counsel John Durham’s Investigation

Peter Navarro, a former Trump Administration Trade Official made a prediction on Maria Bartiromo’s Fox News show “Morning Futures” on Monday predicting that there will be at least three indictments coming from the investigation being run by Special Counsel John Durham concerning the Trump-Russia hoax perpetrated by Obama Administration officials at the request of Hillary Clinton to get her illegal private email server out of the news back at the beginning of the summer of 2016 in an effort to help Clinton get elected in spite of her atrocious mishandling of classified information that would have landed anyone else in prison as a clear violation of the Espionage Act.

Navarro was a trade and economics guy brought into the Trump administration who helped the president turn our economy around and send the Obama/Biden years of economic misery to the ash heap of history, so how would he be privy to such inside information of a special counsel investigation?

Don’t forget that Donald Trump was a businessman and he kept Navarro inside his inner circle  Navarro built relationships with the other insiders who would know about such things as how the Durham investigation is going.

Navarro said he has been a registered Democrat who supported the Clinton/Gore administration and he supported Hillary Clinton’s first failed presidential campaign back in 2008.  The former Trump adviser also ran for office as a Democrat in California several times and the Hildebeast even endorsed him.  Believe it or not, Navarro asserts that he holds progressive views on many social issues, but I think he confuses progressivism with liberalism because he doesn’t seem at all like an evil person.

He joined the Trump campaign as an economic adviser because of Trump’s nationalist economic policies and he too opposes trade deficits and trade deals termed as multilateral.  Trump himself preferred to have separate trade deals with individual countries rather than one-size-fits-all because you can negotiate individual trade deals easier than having multiple countries team up on you which gives you less strong of a position.  This is why he is anti-China on trade and other foreign policy matters which are important for the United States, something Trump understood from the beginning.

After the election, Trump appointed Navarro to be the Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy within the White House.

Navarro’s influence in the White House grew as other advisers dropped off because they forgot that the president is the one who makes policy and not them.  He used his influence to move his China foreign policy ideas to be a centerpiece of Trump’s renegotiating trade deal moves with the Chinese communists.

When Bartiromo asked him about his prediction of three indictments, his response was less than exciting.  Navarro told the host that he is making the prediction based on reports by John Solomon last week where it was reported that additional FBI internal documents surrounding the FBI’s spy Stefan Halper and what he did during the summer of 2016 leading up to the election when he targeted Trump campaign members to either find out if any of them knew anything about working with the Russians to dig up opposition research political dirt on Hillary Clinton.

Halper was sent in by the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign.  This is not up for dispute.  Two months prior to the election George Papadopoulos got a meeting request from Halper, who at the time was a University of Cambridge professor, who asked Papadopoulos to fly to London to discuss international relations and the possibility of Papadopoulos writing a paper on the gas field in the Mediterranean and be paid the sum of $3,000.  Halper paid for his flight, which could be construed as entrapment.  Papadopoulos flew to England and met with Halper.  While discussing the reason he traveled to London, suddenly Hapler switched the subject to Russia, asking Papadopoulos, “You know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?”  It was so out of the blue that Papadopoulos saw it as a red flag that something was up.  He offered Halper no information and later said it was an absurd question in the first place.  George said that Halper was not the only suspicious person to reach out to him, claiming there were two others.  According to Papadopoulos’s wife, one of those contacted offered to pay George $30,000 a month during his time with the Trump team, the wife recognizing the offer as something nefarious saying, “It looks to be one among a series of attempts to entrap George. The question today to me is whether these people are simply shady businessmen or are they part of a greater attempt to entrap George in illegal activity.”

And the Halper scenario is just the tip of the iceberg for what the Obama DOJ and intelligence community did to stop Trump, and we know who did what and when they did it, enough to bring dozens of indictments.

Fact Check: Trump’s PA SCOTUS Case Has Not Been Assigned a Date, How to Know for Sure- Citizen Journalism 101

Fact Check: Trump’s PA SCOTUS Case Has Not Been Assigned a Date, How to Know for Sure- Citizen Journalism 101

One of the ways opponents of President Donald J. Trump are winning the information war is by flooding social media with false information meant to dispirit people, confuse people, and discredit people. Propaganda is a highly specialized art form and the left are experts at disinformation. They also have the means to distribute disinformation to groups of 10’s and groups of millions. At some point, everyone will get caught up in one of their traps. Our mission as truth seekers is not to get caught up in too many and to keep real information flowing to the right places.

There was a rumor circulating the last few days that Trump’s latest filing at the SCOTUS had been accepted and assigned a date that would happen “before the 6th”. Many people were re-tweeting the information with the headline; Breaking! And the news was excitedly picked up and moved around.

“Before the 6th” should have been your signal to dive deeper and inspect that post for the truth.

The was a mistake or a lie. Some well-meaning people got caught up and retweeted it. We all need to “level up” and learn how to identify news items better, so we can beat this disinformation war against our Republic.

Citizen Journalism is a powerful weapon to do that, and that is why the left wants to discredit the concept so much. Getting people to repost misinformation is one of their tactics. Let’s not let them win lie that- let’s learn to do better- me included.

Look for posts that give you links to actual documents like this one and dive into the link because we don’t know that it isn’t a fake link. Step two: follow the link and look around for a few mins, then verify that the information you found is accurate:

COMPARE AND CONTRAST

If you see something online and you think it is interesting, go to “first-hand sources” and research. Go directly to the source. Do not repost anything without looking at the first-hand source. A good place to start is with press releases from the official sources.

So-let’s do that. This is the latest press release from the campaign of Donald J. Trump. You can sign up for alerts there. Start making a mental “map” of the press releases you have read.

Here is the Trump case that was filed, lets jump in and look for something to grab on to:

President Trump’s campaign today issued the following statement.

“Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s campaign committee, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore.   This represents the Campaign’s first independent U.S. Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.

“This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘the constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots  from 8 pm  on election day to 5 pm three days later] … has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.’

“The Campaign’s petition seeks to reverse three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud, including (a) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day, (b) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities, (c) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘in the room’ – in this case, the Philadelphia Convention Center – the size of several football fields, and (d) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign, address, and date mail ballots.

“The petition seeks all appropriate remedies, including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements. The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by  December 23  and a reply by  December 24  to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets  on January 6  to consider the votes of the electoral college.”

– Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump

Click here to read the Campaign’s Petition.
Click here to read the Campaign’s Motion.

Ok. They are working on their general strategy of allowing state legislators to vacate electors based on unverified ballots. Noted.

Then go to the US Supreme Court Website and enter the search information from Trump’s links and be prepared to accept the truth of what we find.

It has not been accepted or assigned.

This one was easy and took about three minutes to verify. As much as we want to defend President Trump and the country, we have to be careful about listening to and promoting rumors and gossip.

But the good news is that if you were excited to inform people of the developments, that means you might well be a great citizen journalist. I encourage people to get involved with the news cycle, to use every method you have to promote a real news story, journalism, podcasting, and public speaking, and to keep at it. We all fall for the disinformation at some point. Do not let it set you back when it happens to you; just do better next time.

If that was you and you fell for it: Get back in there, Citizen Journos. The fight for our minds and the soul of our country is only just beginning. We really do need “all hands on deck.”

Trump Legal Team Files Lawsuit With US Supreme Court Against Pennsylvania Election Results Charging Constitutional Violations

Trump Legal Team Files Lawsuit With US Supreme Court Against Pennsylvania Election Results Charging Constitutional Violations

President Donald Trump’s legal team filed an appeal to the US Supreme Court to reverse cases by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that changed mail-in ballot laws.

According to the US Constitution’s Article I, Section 4, the State Legislature has the power to create or change election laws.  Neither the Executive branch nor the Judicial branch has that power, and yet both of the branches went rogue in Pennsylvania and changed election laws, and both branches did it to help Democrats.

The legal case is asking the US Supreme Court to reverse three cases decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that “illegally changed” mail-in ballot laws “immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election.”  They rigged it for Democrats.  The lawyers argued that the Supreme Court’s decisions are in violation of Article II of the Constitution and the 2000 Bush v. Gore ruling.  The argument being the state’s Supreme Court violated the US Constitution’s Article II, Section 1 that says that the State Legislature chooses the Electors who will vote for president based on the election laws created by the Legislature.  By changing election laws they violated the State Legislature’s prescribed method of selecting Electors.  Also, in Bush v Gore the US Supreme Court ruled that the way ballots were handled in Florida violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by counting votes in one county one way and differently in another county.  That also happened in Pennsylvania counties during and after the 2020 election.

The lawsuit is asking for “all appropriate remedies,” which includes the vacating of Electors that were committed to Joe Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania Legislature to call up their own electors.  If the US Supreme Court has a problem with this then they have a problem with our Constitution.

When on December 14, 2020, the Electoral College voted, the Republican Party in Pennsylvania had its own Electors cast votes for Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, in a bid to preserve legal challenges in the state.

“The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the US Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider the votes of the electoral college,” according to a statement, authored by former New York City Mayor and Trump legal team attorney Rudy Giuliani.

“This represents the Campaign’s first independent US Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.”

Word has gone out that the Texas case against four of the key battleground states was rejected because Chief Justice John Roberts was afraid of riots that most certainly would occur if the High Court had done their duty and served the American people by following the Constitution.  But Roberts is a weak man who would rather allow 75 million American voters to be disenfranchised by cowering away from Biden supporters who would act like animals on our streets than to do the right thing.

WATCH:

On top of that, the lawsuit will seek to reverse several decisions that “eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud.”

In the lawsuit it reads that these laws barred election officials from being able to check whether or not mail-in ballot signatures were legitimate during Election Day canvassing, they removed the right of certain campaigns to challenge ballots when they were canvassed for signatures that were forged, along with other issues.  The laws blocked campaign poll watchers/observers from being able to stand close enough so that they could see the ballots they were appointed to observe, and in counties like Philadelphia they removed the statutory requirement that voters had to correctly sign, address, and date mailed ballots.

“Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature,” Trump lawyer John Eastman wrote, adding that “more than enough” ballots are involved to affect the election outcome.

If the Supreme Court denies to even hear this case it should be pitchforks and torches by 75 million angry American voters, because the one thing Americans do not like is when someone gets away with cheating.

The Trump lawyer also asked the Supreme Court to require Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, who clearly broke the law when she herself changed election laws, to respond to the filing by noon on December 23rd.

Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) filed a lawsuit against officials in Pennsylvania’s Executive branch charging that the state unconstitutionally changed its mail-in ballot laws.  This is a black letter law filing because the letter of the law says that only State Legislatures can change election laws, and members of the Pennsylvania Executive branch are certainly not from the Legislative branch of government.

Trump  will Pursue Civil Rights Claims at SCOTUS Over Changed Mail-in Ballot Laws

Trump will Pursue Civil Rights Claims at SCOTUS Over Changed Mail-in Ballot Laws

On Sunday the legal team for President Donald J. Trump filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore

“The campaign pursues historic civil rights claims on Pennsylvania’s failed presidential election with the Supreme Court,” wrote Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch.

Fox News reported, “President Trump’s campaign team on Sunday filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to reverse several cases by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to change the state’s mail ballot law before and after the 2020 presidential election.”

FROM THE TRUMP LEGAL TEAM:

President Trump’s campaign today issued the following statement:

“Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s campaign committee, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore.   This represents the Campaign’s first independent U.S. Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.

“This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘the constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots  from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later] … has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.’

“The Campaign’s petition seeks to reverse three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud, including (a) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day, (b) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities, (c) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘in the room’ – in this case, the Philadelphia Convention Center – the size of several football fields, and (d) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign, address, and date mail ballots.

“The petition seeks all appropriate remedies, including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements. The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by  December 23  and a reply by  December 24  to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets  on January 6  to consider the votes of the electoral college.”

– Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump

Click here to read the Campaign’s Petition.
Click here to read the Campaign’s Motion.

I have been writing about the expectation that the legal challenge would come down to Civil Rights:

SCOTUS HELL: Screaming Heard Through the Walls, Powell Posts About Chaos, Kraken on Docket

SCOTUS HELL: Screaming Heard Through the Walls, Powell Posts About Chaos, Kraken on Docket

The last week has been a hectic time for Americans to learn about the powers of the United States Supreme Court, with Trump supporters’ focus upon the actions of the high court as time moves the country closer to the fate of the US Presidency. The news was going viral on social media of footage about the battle between at least two Supreme Court Justices and new development that attorney Sidney Powell was approved to have a case of numerous disenfranchised voters on the docket.

According to Powell’s Twitter timeline, she has been on the receiving end of unprofessional behavior at the hands of the US Supreme Court. After hearing of battles there over similar cases, voters were following all of the details.

SCREAMING WAS HEARD THOUGH THE WALLS

In a video showing a man testifying about something he read in a report:

SCOTUS Justice Roberts was reportedly scared to take up the Texas case according to a staffer testimony. “I don’t give a ***** about ‘Bush vs Gore’… at that time we didn’t have riots!”

WATCH:

CHAOS

The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14! Today it FINALLY submitted our #Arizona & #Wisconsin EMERGENCY petitions filed Friday INEXPLICABLY rejected them They were submitted electronically Saturday morning and all copies hand-delivered and fees paid. #SupremeCourt clerk refused to give reason and will not return phone calls!! What is going on?? Unprecedented lack of professionalism,” Powell posted on Twitter.

BUT SHE MADE IT ON THE DOCKET! 

In an article by John Paluska, for The Daily Fodder:

Sidney Powell’s “Kraken” has finally made it to the Supreme Court’s docket. The suit is perhaps the strongest collective argument yet against voter fraud.

It contains the forensic audit done in Michigan that proves systemic voter fraud occurred through the Dominion Voting System tabulation. It also has proof of at least 200,000 FRAUDULENT VOTES cast in the election.

Further, it contains official Georgia elections records that prove the Dominion Voting Systems program’s “inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.” In other words, official Georgia election canvassers could not rely on Dominion Voting Systems’ software to count the vote because it didn’t repeat the same vote totals twice.

According to the lawsuit:

15. The Interim Report shows multiple grave problems with the accuracy and vulnerability to hacking and evidence destruction of the Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion”) machines used in Antrim County, Michigan. The report is relevant to each of the Related Cases because each of the states in question uses Dominion equipment. The Interim Report vindicates the lengthy opinion and order of Judge Amy Totenberg in Curling v. Raffensperger, 2020 WL 5994029 (N.D. Ga. 10/11/20), which found “extreme” and unacceptable security risks in the Dominion system. Compelling evidence and expert analyses show convincingly that the results of the Dominion system cannot be trusted and should not have been certified.

16. The findings in the Interim Report are consistent with the expert testimony provided by Mr. Ramsland regarding Dominion’s vote manipulation in the Petitioners’ November 25, 2020 complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the “District Court”) (R 450; 2438), and with his testimony in the Related Cases. Mr. Ramsland concluded in the Georgia case that, for the State of Georgia, “at least 96,000 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,” and “136,098 ballots were illegally counted as result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,” id., each of which is several times larger than former VicePresident [sic] Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia (10,457 votes). Similar anomalies exist in the Related Cases. Among other things, the Complaints in the trial courts and the Petitions to this Court in each of the Related Cases all seek prospective injunctive relief requiring a similar forensic audit of Dominion voting machines.

17. The Coffee County, Georgia Board of Registration and Elections refused to certify the ma,chine recount election returns on their Dominion systems “given its inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”6 The results of the machine recount report were internally inconsistent and could not be reconciled and were inconsistent with both the election night count and the hand audit.7 The Coffee County BRE analysis confirms the Interim Report’s findings, cited above, that ballots going to adjudication can be changed on a wholesale basis by the operator with no oversight, controls, or accountability, an extremely serious vulnerability.

The Kraken has been released, and it’s time to audit the vote and cancel out the widespread fraud that tipped the election for Biden.

Joint Congressional Inauguration Committee Does NOT Vote to Acknowledge Joe Biden as ‘President-Elect’

Joint Congressional Inauguration Committee Does NOT Vote to Acknowledge Joe Biden as ‘President-Elect’

At least we now know that there are some people in Washington, DC who haven’t lost their minds of the liberal pathogen.

The Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies did not pass a resolution to acknowledge former Vice President Joe Biden as the president-elect as President Donald Trump and other Republicans continue lawsuits challenging the results of the November 3 presidential election, as told by several members of the panel.

First of all, not a single Elector has cast a vote, so there is no declared winner.  The Left, which includes the Democratic Party, the mainstream media, Fake News media, and Fox News’ Chris Wallace, have been trying to push the perception that Joe Biden is the winner of the 2020 Election.  In fact, they have gone so far as to declare that there has been no evidence found of voter fraud that would overturn the election when the exact opposite has been true this whole time.

There are 3Republicans and 3 Democrats on the panel from both the House and Senate, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), Senators Roy Blunt (R-MO) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN).

Republicans on the committee argued that they made the decision because there are election-related processes that need to play out first before a president-elect can be decided.  Yes, like finding out who really won would be a good start.

“It is not the job of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies to get ahead of the electoral process and decide who we are inaugurating,” Blunt said in a statement. “The JCCIC [Inaugural Committee] is facing the challenge of planning safe Inaugural Ceremonies during a global pandemic. I would hope that, going forward, the members of the JCCIC would adhere to the committee’s long-standing tradition of bipartisan cooperation and focus on the task at hand.”

Senate Majority Leader McConnell reminded reporters that the Electoral College meets to elect the president on Dec. 14.

“This has become a weekly ritual. The Electoral College is going to meet on the 14th and cast a vote, and we’re going to have a swearing-in of the next president on the 20th of January,” McConnell said.

Hoyer issued a statement after the resolution was rejected, criticizing the Republican position.  Of course he did.

Hoyer confirmed to the media that the vote didn’t pass saying, “The extent to which Republicans are refusing to accept the outcome of the election and recognize Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as our next President and Vice President is astounding.”

That is an incredible statement from the House Majority Leader, especially when we all know that the Democrats to this very day still have not accepted the outcome of the 2016 election when Donald Trump defeated Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.  In fact, the Democrats have spent every wakeful our since Trump’s first inauguration trying to have him removed from office.  They first threw a phony Russian collusion hoax at the president, and then they impeached him for something that Joe Biden actually did when he served as President Obama’s vice president!

Hoyer told The Hill that GOP lawmakers have a “deference to President Trump’s post-election temper tantrums.”

So now we call investigating evidence of massive voter fraud a temper tantrum?  Hoyer is a disgrace.

But he said the Inauguration Committee agreed on limiting public participation during the January 20 inauguration event due to Communist Chines Party virus, so there is that.

Hoyer told reporters, “I think there was a consensus that we’re going to limit far beyond what we’d like to do.”

Biden has declared victory, even though he told Biden sycophant Chris Wallace during a debate he moderated to protect the former vice president that he would wait to declare victory, and that was the first promise he broke as soon as his handlers told him he won.  Trump and other Republicans are contesting the election results in court, because the Trump legal team has taken thousands of affidavits filled out, under penalty of perjury, by whistleblowers who worked the election who testified that they witnessed a lot of fraud in favor of the Democratic candidate.

According to the text of the resolution that was shot down, it had proposed that the public be notified “in coordination with the Biden Presidential Inaugural Committee and public health experts” as “we observe this transition of power.”  Gee, that’s great, even though President Trump never got a peaceful transition of power from the Democrats.  They attacked him from even before he was inaugurated.  In fact, threats of impeachment came before Trump even won the nomination.

The vote came on the same day the Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit that sought to decertify election results in Pennsylvania, and while the Fake News media jumped for gleeful joy at that news, they are were too ignorant to realize that the Pennsylvania case was rejected because the High Court agreed to hear the case that the state of Texas file directly to the Court against four states, and Pennsylvania is included.  The states being sued are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over those states violating the Electors Clause of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause where Executive and/or Judicial branches changed election law and rules when the Constitution gives sole power to the legislatures that resulted in the Democrats having the ability to cheat.

Remember that in Bush v. Gore in 2000 the High Court ruled that by Florida treating ballots in one county differently than they treated ballots in other counties violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection clause and the election went to Bush.

Trump Legal Team Statement On “Safe Harbor Deadline”, Citing Left’s Hero RBG

Trump Legal Team Statement On “Safe Harbor Deadline”, Citing Left’s Hero RBG

The Trump Legal Team released a press statement on Tuesday “safe Harbor Deadline” that is being discussed in the media and online, defining the term and dispelling the left’s claims to legal power and authority of the American media to determine laws and victors in American elections.

The full press release follows:

The ‘Safe Harbor Deadline’ is a statutory timeline that generally denotes the last day for states to certify election results. However, it is not unprecedented for election contests to last well beyond December 8.

“Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College. The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the President on January 20 at noon.

“Despite the media trying desperately to proclaim that the fight is over, we will continue to champion election integrity until the legal vote is counted fairly and accurately.”

– Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump, and Jenna Ellis, Trump Campaign Senior Legal Adviser and Attorney for President Trump

IN AGREEMENT

Attorney Phillip Kline echoed the sentiment and said,” These “Safe Harbor” dates are not required by the constitution. We need more time to investigate this election. The ONLY Electoral College deadline specifically required by the Constitution is noon on January 20, at which point Trump’s first term officially ends.”

“The “Safe Harbor” dates of December 8th and 14th are not constitutionally required. These dates can easily be moved without harm to our country. The left is unable to verify that these elections were lawfully done and the right has evidence of fraud that’s starting to flow,” Kline said.

The State Legislatures have authority, many are saying leading in to what appears to be the makings of a US Supreme Court case showdown.

0